Police: Gunman shoved gun in waistband, shot himself in testicles

[Jeff]

This is funny it would be nice to see all thugs have the same fate . I can see it now as he enters jail and is tested to see how much balls he has I think this guy may find trouble in jail

PORTLAND, OR (KPTV) -
A man police said is responsible for a shooting in a downtown parking lot ran from the scene, but shot himself in the testicles as he shoved the gun into his waistband Tuesday night.

http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/24591...ampaign=buffer

[aboutime]

This is funny it would be nice to see all thugs have the same fate . I can see it now as he enters jail and is tested to see how much balls he has I think this guy may find trouble in jail





http://www.msnewsnow.com/story/24591...ampaign=buffer

Funny story Jeff.

By the way.

How does a Blonde learn if her date is TICKLISH?


ANSWER: "She gives him a TEST TICKLE!"

[jafar00]

This is why you need tougher gun laws.

[aboutime]

This is why you need tougher gun laws.

jafar. Please check off WHICH America politician YOU are related to as a descriptive manner to explain your endless BS concerning YOUR interpretation of gun laws???

1. Obama
2. Nancy Pelosi
3. Harry Reid
4. Barbra Boxer
5. Sen. Feinstein (a known Jewish favorite of yours)
6. Humpty Dumpty
7. Spongebob Squarepants

Just give us a number.

[cadet]

This is why you need tougher gun laws.

Gun laws don't mean less gun. Gun laws mean more unarmed law abiding citizens.
Which means easier targets.

[jafar00]

Gun laws don't mean less gun. Gun laws mean more unarmed law abiding citizens.
Which means easier targets.

If it was harder for Mr Nonutsanymore to get a gun in the first place, it is more than likely he wouldn't have shot up the carpark in the first place. It is also likely that he would still have functioning gonads with which to reproduce which is a bad thing. Now I don't know which is worse?

[Jeff]

If it was harder for Mr Nonutsanymore to get a gun in the first place, it is more than likely he wouldn't have shot up the carpark in the first place. It is also likely that he would still have functioning gonads with which to reproduce which is a bad thing. Now I don't know which is worse?

So if all the law abiding citizens turn there guns in you are under the impression so will the criminals ?

jafar you might check into the laws we have pertaining owning a gun and if our Gov. was to enforce even half the laws on the books there would be less criminals with guns but we have a president that is more interested in taking law abiding citizens guns away but then on the same note he wants to release criminals from jail so they can go back to there neighborhoods


Looks a bit fishy to me, UN arm law abiding citizens and allow criminals to walk free and lets not forget we shouldn't discipline black students to hardly and we should allow them to score less than other students but get the same grade, almost seems like he wants his followers to be there with him but those that disagree with him should have no way to protect themselves

[aboutime]

So if all the law abiding citizens turn there guns in you are under the impression so will the criminals ?

jafar you might check into the laws we have pertaining owning a gun and if our Gov. was to enforce even half the laws on the books there would be less criminals with guns but we have a president that is more interested in taking law abiding citizens guns away but then on the same note he wants to release criminals from jail so they can go back to there neighborhoods


Looks a bit fishy to me, UN arm law abiding citizens and allow criminals to walk free and lets not forget we shouldn't discipline black students to hardly and we should allow them to score less than other students but get the same grade, almost seems like he wants his followers to be there with him but those that disagree with him should have no way to protect themselves

Jeff. There's an unidentified ULTERIOR motive behind such statements made by jafar.
Knowing his respect, and admiration for known Terror Groups like Hamas, and Hezbollah. jafar is merely voicing the unspoken intentions of such groups...in that they would prefer an UNARMED America when they finally arrive to destroy anyone of us who doesn't obey, or follow their Religious demands, and the phony Book of Peace.

[jafar00]

So if all the law abiding citizens turn there guns in you are under the impression so will the criminals ?

There are so many guns on your streets, there would be a bloodbath so you are right to be concerned. This should have been dealt with when the constitution was written. A "well regulated militia" should have been clarified a bit more. Allowing every Tom, Dick and Harry to carry a gun around without oversight is not a militia. It's not even regulated.

[logroller]

This is why you need tougher gun laws.

...like what-- single-shot only?

[logroller]

There are so many guns on your streets, there would be a bloodbath so you are right to be concerned. This should have been dealt with when the constitution was written. A "well regulated militia" should have been clarified a bit more. Allowing every Tom, Dick and Harry to carry a gun around without oversight is not a militia. It's not even regulated.

Didn't they though-- they empowered Congress
“to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, RESERVING TO THE STATES RESPECTIVELY THE APPOINTMENT OF THE OFFICERS, AND THE AUTHORITY OF TRAINING THE MILITIA ACCORDING TO THE DISCIPLINE PRESCRIBED BY CONGRESS.”

Besides that, you're misguided to say such about Tom, Dick and Harry. Its an omission of convenience to fail to mention the latter portion of Amendment II, ", the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Should they have clarified what 'the people' means?

[jafar00]

Didn't they though-- they empowered Congress
“to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, RESERVING TO THE STATES RESPECTIVELY THE APPOINTMENT OF THE OFFICERS, AND THE AUTHORITY OF TRAINING THE MILITIA ACCORDING TO THE DISCIPLINE PRESCRIBED BY CONGRESS.”

Besides that, you're misguided to say such about Tom, Dick and Harry. Its an omission of convenience to fail to mention the latter portion of Amendment II, ", the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Should they have clarified what 'the people' means?

If I was an American and I went out and bought a gun tomorrow, would I also be enrolled in this "well regulated militia"? Or can I just walk around with it and have nobody making sure I use it correctly?

[logroller]

If I was an American and I went out and bought a gun tomorrow, would I also be enrolled in this "well regulated militia"? Or can I just walk around with it and have nobody making sure I use it correctly?

I must have missed where 'people' is defined as militiamen. If I said, 'dog owners being wonderful citizens, as necessary to a healthy community, the right of the people to have pets shall not be infringed.' -- does that mean that only dogs are pets?

[fj1200]

There are so many guns on your streets, there would be a bloodbath so you are right to be concerned.

Could you point out the causation please?


*note, the rate was 3.6 in 2010

Or how the US has more violent crime?

[jafar00]

Could you point out the causation please?


*note, the rate was 3.6 in 2010

Or how the US has more violent crime?

Interesting graphs. Are they from gun fanatics perchance?

I have some statistics to counter with from Nationmaster.
http://www.nationmaster.com/compare/...d-States/Crime

Gun violence > Homicides > % homicides with firearms

Aus #21, USA #7 in the world with USA having 142% more Homicides using firearms than Australia

Gunviolence > Homicides > Overall homicide rate > per 100,000 pop.

Aus #27 (1.8802), USA #14 (9.1) in the world. Quite a lot more!

Or how about simply Murders with firearms

Aus #25, USA #4. USA has 158 times the murders with firearms when compared to Australia.

Australia has murders and crimes sure, but I'm quite certain that it is easier to get away from a perp if he isn't pointing a gun at you. Our biggest problem is alcohol related violence and our govt is doing little to combat it. If you added guns to the alcohol mix, I think both you and I know exactly what the result of that would be?

More important. The last time we had a mass shooting over here was in 2002. How many school shootings alone are there in the US ever year?