Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    48,793
    Thanks (Given)
    25245
    Thanks (Received)
    18712
    Likes (Given)
    10618
    Likes (Received)
    7190
    Piss Off (Given)
    86
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475540

    Default Israeli Retaliation

    It's coming, what will they do? I've already said, IMO regime and nukes:

    https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/...cture-n3795396

    Israel Should Strike Nuclear Sites in Iran, Not Energy InfrastructureDavid Strom 6:00 PM | October 04, 2024



    AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File
    Ed and I discussed this in our Week in Review podcast that was published earlier today, but I thought it deserved a post as well since our non-VIP readers could get a bit of our wisdom.


    President Biden has sent a clear signal to Israel that he doesn't want it to strike at Iran's nuclear weapons development facilities, but signaled that hitting Iran's oil facilities would be an acceptable response to Iran's ballistic missile attack.




    As is so often the case, Biden is 100% wrong. Biden is always wrong, so that is no surprise.


    Here's why:


    Netanyahu has made it very clear that his fight is not with the people of Iran, who are groaning under the Islamist regime's tyranny, but with the regime itself. That, alone, might be a good reason to avoid hitting the oil infrastructure because it will impose a high cost to the civilians, although it would also harm the regime. It would not be immoral to take those facilities out, but it is not the best choice for them.




    Netanyahu is aiming for regime change in Iran, not to create pain for civilians in retaliation. He may have to settle for hitting those sites, but they are far from the best choice.


    The oil facilities are not a threat to Israel, except as a source of funding that could be cut off by other means. Trump did it, nearly bankrupting the regime. Biden has allowed Iran to profit off its oil production, and if he actually wanted to help Israel he would turn the profit spigot off.


    Obviously.


    The refineries certainly provide energy for the regime, but most of the fuel goes to civilians. The regime will do fine regardless, but civilians would be hurt disproportionately. If Israel wants to spark a backlash against the regime and support its opponents, it would probably be counterproductive to hit these facilities.


    The nuclear sites, though, ARE a threat to Israel and her Arab neighbors, who would also be thrilled to see them gone. The Arab countries have signaled support for Israel or remained silent, which is a signal itself. They hate Iran as much as Israel, just as they hate Hamas and Hezbollah. They are among the least critical of Israel compared to the UN and Europe. They make a few noises and grunts but obviously would love to see Iran and its proxies destroyed.


    Hitting the nuclear facilities--if they seriously damage them--would be a huge blow to the Iranian regime. Hitting Iran's leadership would be a death blow, and many Persians would take the opportunity to take down the evil regime.


    Israel should take out the threats, not take revenge. Revenge doesn't change the strategic situation. It might be satisfying but not especially productive.


    Of course, the most obvious reason to do this is that Joe Biden tells them not to--Biden hasn't been right about foreign policy once in his lifetime.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  2. Thanks Gunny thanked this post
    Likes Gunny liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    49,333
    Thanks (Given)
    35826
    Thanks (Received)
    27589
    Likes (Given)
    3281
    Likes (Received)
    10966
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475546

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    It's coming, what will they do? I've already said, IMO regime and nukes:

    https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/...cture-n3795396
    I agree. Makes perfect sense. With the exception of taking out Iran's government.

    I have zero problem with taking out Iran's government EXCEPT there needs to be a reasonable replacement. "The devil you know ..". Last time Iran's government got taken out they ended up with current. More of the same or worse hardly seems worth the effort.

    Destroying its nuclear facilities would however if nothing else buy time. We are sorely in need of time while we search and wait for a President with a functioning brain.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    48,793
    Thanks (Given)
    25245
    Thanks (Received)
    18712
    Likes (Given)
    10618
    Likes (Received)
    7190
    Piss Off (Given)
    86
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I agree. Makes perfect sense. With the exception of taking out Iran's government.

    I have zero problem with taking out Iran's government EXCEPT there needs to be a reasonable replacement. "The devil you know ..". Last time Iran's government got taken out they ended up with current. More of the same or worse hardly seems worth the effort.

    Destroying its nuclear facilities would however if nothing else buy time. We are sorely in need of time while we search and wait for a President with a functioning brain.
    If the nukes are gone and Khomeini on shaky ground, the people will take care of the rest, they were poised to do so and Obama screwed them. Many were neutralized.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums