Libertarianism. Anyone! Let's go!

[Psychoblues]

Most of these jerks get their "balanced" approach from Bill O'Really and his circlejerk of a comadreship.

Clear enough?

[actsnoblemartin]

how do you know

I get mine from both cnn and fox news, with the very rare occasional drop of msnbc

Most of these jerks get their "balanced" approach from Bill O'Really and his circlejerk of a comadreship.

Clear enough?

[emmett]

Most of these jerks get their "balanced" approach from Bill O'Really and his circlejerk of a comadreship.

Clear enough?

Ah...........What jerks are you referring to? Libertarians?

[DragonStryk72]

Most of these jerks get their "balanced" approach from Bill O'Really and his circlejerk of a comadreship.

Clear enough?

Actually, alot of people lump all conservatives into that group, including conservatives themselves (our team would never do that), but when you look at it, being conservative with government means that you can't go purely one way or purely the other, cause neither works.

[actsnoblemartin]

http://www.rootforamerica.com/

And The Winner of the Presidential Debate Was….

There were no winners in the latest Presidential debate. But there was a clear-cut loser: the American taxpayer. While Barack Obama and John McCain argued strongly about a multitude of issues, they never even discussed or debated (or even commented) on the biggest bailout in American history. You know…that $700 billion dollar taxpayer rip-off that was so necessary to our economic survival that in the days since it passed, the U.S. stock market has literally crashed.

Bush, McCain, Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Barney Frank- they all joined hands and cried wolf. “Without the bailout, our economy is doomed, our stock market will plummet” they shrieked. So what do they say now? The market has plummeted hundreds of points SINCE the bailout was approved. We are in a free fall and it is obvious the vote is in: the average American stock investor has rejected the bailout. If I'm not mistaken, I thought I heard all of our politicians hysterically screaming in unison that only a

Actually, alot of people lump all conservatives into that group, including conservatives themselves (our team would never do that), but when you look at it, being conservative with government means that you can't go purely one way or purely the other, cause neither works.

[actsnoblemartin]

http://www.lp.org/news/press-release...y-intervention

Bush Administration Hypes Danger to Justify Intervention

"The Bush administration once again misled Americans into believing extreme danger was imminent and extraordinary U.S. government intervention was required to save our country," says Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party's presidential nominee. "And, once again, the intervention of the Bush administration has made things much worse."

"In 2003, the Bush administration said that if we did not act immediately in Iraq, Americans faced imminent threats, and conjured images of mushroom clouds and terror attacks," Barr explains. "Americans, trusting that our government officials knew what they were talking about, went along with the panicked calls for action, only to be bogged down in an occupation of Iraq for the last five years."

[Psychoblues]

Another one bites the dust!!!!!!!!!

[MtnBiker]

8. l

[Psychoblues]

8. l

Mtnbiker, you forgot to send me the Captain Blueberry decoder ring that you promised!!!!!!!!!!



Psychoblues

[actsnoblemartin]

Another one bites the dust!!!!!!!!!

libertarian and proud

[emmett]

libertarian and proud

Martin.... last week you were a democrat, this week a Libertarian, used to be a republican. With all due respect I would suggest you are an:



INDEPENDENT

[actsnoblemartin]

hahaha

but i feel libertarian.

Martin.... last week you were a democrat, this week a Libertarian, used to be a republican. With all due respect I would suggest you are an:



INDEPENDENT

[n0spam4me]

I have a suggestion
as a political statement
ALL Voters in this land
Change their registration from Democrat or Republican
to anything but Democrat or Republican

Abandon The Donkey and the Elephant!

anyhow, there is really so little difference between them
They both are pro-big Government and Pro-Big Business (Greed Inc.)

[Little-Acorn]

It is my sole purpose until November, and at all other times actually to educate folks as to why the LP is better for America than the two clusterfucks we have in power. Anyone care to debate it?

I fully agree.

However, I worked my *ss off for the Libertarian party for about seven years back in the 1980s. We got zero, zilch, nada of our members elected (OK, a few lower govt seats, BFD) and were able to forward NONE of our agenda.

I finally concluded that while the agenda and ideals of the Libertarian party were far superior to any other party's (despite some kookiness on the issue of how to remedy present Constitutional violations), I was pouring my efforts down a rat hole with no chance of seeing ANY of those ideals enacted. So I decided to work instead for a party that would get at least some of them enacted. And the Republicans did enact some of them (tax cuts, diminished Federal presence, some Constitutional adherence, increasing roles for state govts, strong national defense).

That "some" has been dwindling over the last decade or so, and has even been heading the other way, though not nearly as fast as the other major U.S. party has. So I may be leaving that party soon - again, I have no interest in pouring my efforts down a rat hole. I'll try to find another party that (a) supports my desires for conservatism, prosperity, afreedom, and responsibility, and (b) has Clue 1 on how to actually get it enacted into law. At present, Point (b) still cuts out the Libertarian party.

[Agnapostate]

How about the anti-libertarian tendencies of the "Libertarian" Party? As opposed to, say, Dejacque or Kropotkin?