What a bunch of clowns!

[truthmatters]

4

[OCA]

They have as much right as the KKK does to be there.

The key word is peacefully just like you said.

The clowns did it peacefully and the KKK did not.

Would the clowns have been there if the Klan hadn't?

Were the clowns not there solely to provoke? If so that is limiting the Klan's civil rights.

[truthmatters]

4

[Pale Rider]

No they were there to express their opinion that the KKK message was silly and did a great job of it.

There is room in America for more than one opinion.

So, since you REFUSE to answer my question, and the whole board will be able read through this thread and see that, what you are saying is, that YOU BELIEVE, that when a group of dumb ass mother fucking piss bags show up to try and silence WHITE PEOPLE, it's a GREAT FUCKING DAY, but you DON'T believe it's good for BLACKS, or MEXICANS, or ANY OTHER RACE to get the same treatment.

YOU'RE A FUCKING RACIST!

[truthmatters]

4

[OCA]

It does not matter wether they were there because of the KKK or not they have just as much right to be there.

Speaking out in opposition is not provoking violence it is freedom of speech.

The KKK would have had no problem if they had not resorted to violence.

It does matter, answer the question and stop evading................would the clowns have been there if the KKK had not been there? No, the clowns were simply there to taunt and provoke, I guess you think the flour thing wasn't provocative.

Would you be as supportive of the Klan as you are of the Clowns if the Klan showed up at a JDL rally with an opposing viewpoint, wearing hooknoses and throwing Manischewitz in the air?

[OCA]

Truth hates caucasians............well, caucasians on the right side of the political spectrum.

[OCA]

No they will read this and realise you dont understand freedom of speech

Does freedom of speech include unsolicited provocation in your book?

[truthmatters]

4

[Pale Rider]

No they were there to express their opinion that the KKK message was silly and did a great job of it.

There is room in America for more than one opinion.

Yeah we all get it now... the "WHITE" Klans message is silly, but the "black" panther's isn't, the "brown" la raza's isn't, etc., just "WHITEY" is "SILLY."

You're a fucking racist.

[truthmatters]

4

[truthmatters]

4

[Pale Rider]

No they will read this and realise you dont understand freedom of speech

No, they'll read this and see that YOU hate any speech coming from "WHITE" people. If they're blacks, or browns, or clowns just there to start shit, that's all fine and dandy. YOU think ONLY the WHITE people should have no say.... or in your words... "they're silly."

Yeah... freedom of speech... just so long as it alines with your warped liberal handbook right? "WHITE" people aren't supposed to be proud of who they are. Only blacks and mexicans and clowns can do that. Yeah... freedom of speech.

You're one fucked up little twit.

[OCA]

Your silly infantile insults fool no one with more than two brain cells to rub together.

Well that is unless the insults are spot on such as the case is here. Why don't you poll the board to find out if they think that was a well placed and well timed insult completely appropriate given your views.

[OCA]

why are you so concerned with the words of one group and NOT the violence of the other?

Because without the unsolicited provocation there would have been ZERO violence.

Why do you not want the Klan to exercise its first amendment rights? Couldn't be because you hate caucasians, could it?