Uh-oh Edwards!

[hjmick]

Don't you just love this time of year?

ROFLMAO

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y113/hjmc3rd/ne.jpg

[MtnBiker]

Who is the blonde, Britney Spears?

[Psychoblues]

Edwards must be more serious than you realize? Wuzza matter? Are you scared?

[hjmick]

Not even remotely.

[Psychoblues]

I so love the smears, the back-a-ways and the exclamations of "not me".

Even if it is remotely.

[Sitarro]

I so love the smears, the back-a-ways and the exclamations of "not me".

Even if it is remotely.

How very pathetic and partisan of you Psycho, you will even defend a faggot like Edwards....... weak, really.:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

[theHawk]

I heard Edwards was on top of one of the polls in Iowa!! We can only hope such a loser would ever get the nomination for the Dems!!

[hjmick]

I so love the smears, the back-a-ways and the exclamations of "not me".

Even if it is remotely.

I'm not the one smearing him, I'm not the one publishing the story, I'm not the one tipping off the National Enquirer. Hell, I don't even know of the story is true and quite frankly I don't care. What Edwards does is his business. The purpose of the thread was not, and on my part is still not to smear Edwards, it's a commentary on the feeding frenzy that is today's politics.

[Psychoblues]

I'll buy that.


I'm not the one smearing him, I'm not the one publishing the story, I'm not the one tipping off the National Enquirer. Hell, I don't even know of the story is true and quite frankly I don't care. What Edwards does is his business. The purpose of the thread was not, and on my part is still not to smear Edwards, it's a commentary on the feeding frenzy that is today's politics.

I sincerely pray that one day we will have a truly independent media that will print and report facts without other agenda.

[avatar4321]

I'll buy that.



I sincerely pray that one day we will have a truly independent media that will print and report facts without other agenda.

having the agenda isnt a problem. its the lack of transparency. They pretend to be neutral when they have biases and agendas.

[hjmick]

I sincerely pray that one day we will have a truly independent media that will print and report facts without other agenda.

On this we agree.

[Psychoblues]

I gotta 2'fer!!!!!!!!

a'21and hmjick agree with me on this one!!!!!!!!!! Good for you both!!!!!!!!

[avatar4321]

I gotta 2'fer!!!!!!!!

a'21and hmjick agree with me on this one!!!!!!!!!! Good for you both!!!!!!!!

i didnt agree with you. I have no problem with people in the news having biases. I just dont like it when they claim they dont.

The fact is all people have biases. Just be upfront and honest with everyone and stop pretending otherwise.

[stephanie]

I've heard that the National Enquire is owned by..............people close to the Clintons...

Next we'll probably see that Obambam is really the love child of Al Sharpton..:laugh2:

[Pale Rider]

Who is the blonde, Britney Spears?

I think it's her little sister.

[Psychoblues]

I've never claimed that I had no bias.



i didnt agree with you. I have no problem with people in the news having biases. I just dont like it when they claim they dont.

The fact is all people have biases. Just be upfront and honest with everyone and stop pretending otherwise.

Are you still defending the fauxnews jerks as legitimate reporters and objective journalists? They do have an objective, just not one that coincides with American ideals and American goodwill.

[avatar4321]

I've never claimed that I had no bias.




Are you still defending the fauxnews jerks as legitimate reporters and objective journalists? They do have an objective, just not one that coincides with American ideals and American goodwill.

do you even read what anyone says?

[Psychoblues]

Your question as evidence of your defense is your only hope?



do you even read what anyone says?

You were defeated before you opened your mouth.

[actsnoblemartin]

what do you base that fox is bad on?


I've never claimed that I had no bias.




Are you still defending the fauxnews jerks as legitimate reporters and objective journalists? They do have an objective, just not one that coincides with American ideals and American goodwill.

[Psychoblues]

They have a niche market.


what do you base that fox is bad on?

They are good at nurturing it. They are certainly not "fair and balanced" by any stretch.

[actsnoblemartin]

Honestly, i dont think anyone is fair and balanced.

I jokingly say: im fairly unbalanced. that said, do you find any of the other networks any better, and what criteria are you using?

I happen to like cnn, i know its a crime to say that, but i like some of their programs/personalities

:laugh2:


They have a niche market.



They are good at nurturing it. They are certainly not "fair and balanced" by any stretch.

[Psychoblues]

I didn't sue anyone for the use of the "fair and balanced" mantra.



Honestly, i dont think anyone is fair and balanced.

I jokingly say: im fairly unbalanced. that said, do you find any of the other networks any better, and what criteria are you using?

I happen to like cnn, i know its a crime to say that, but i like some of their programs/personalities

:laugh2:

faux did and they lost their ass on it.

[GW in Ohio]

How very pathetic and partisan of you Psycho, you will even defend a faggot like Edwards....... weak, really.:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

A...faggot...like...Edwards?

Don't tell me.......you think Ann Coulter is our leading political commentator, right?

By the way, if Edwards was a "faggot," he couldn't have gotten that woman pregnant, could he?

[Kathianne]

A...faggot...like...Edwards?

Don't tell me.......you think Ann Coulter is our leading political commentator, right?

By the way, if Edwards was a "faggot," he couldn't have gotten that woman pregnant, could he?

So the National Enquirer was right again? :lol:

[actsnoblemartin]

isnt that a tabloid?

[Psychoblues]

So, I guess Edwards is not a "faggot" after all? Who told that lie?