View Full Version : Tough votes on Trump Cabinet picks could pose big risks for midterm Senate candidates
Gunny
11-16-2024, 11:00 AM
Tough votes on Trump Cabinet picks could pose big risks for midterm Senate candidates (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/tough-votes-on-trump-cabinet-picks-could-pose-big-risks-for-midterm-senate-candidates/ar-AA1ucnB0?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=be465bc7390d43eeb79d62e0fb6bbbf5&ei=31)
fj1200
11-16-2024, 11:12 AM
They should take their advise and consent role seriously.
Black Diamond
11-16-2024, 11:35 AM
Makes sense is this a mandate or not?
Gunny
11-16-2024, 11:57 AM
Makes sense is this a mandate or not?Does "mandate" mean blank check, no rules apply? It bothers me that just like in 2016-2020, the right has this "there is no tomorrow" mentality. Yes there is. We've been living it for 4 years. Come 2028, if the Republicans don't start setting themselves up now, we'll have another Dem President and I don't see any Abraham Lincolns on the Dems' horizon. They voted for Harris, one of the dumbest people to ever hold office.
Kathianne
11-16-2024, 12:01 PM
Does "mandate" mean blank check, no rules apply? It bothers me that just like in 2016-2020, the right has this "there is no tomorrow" mentality. Yes there is. We've been living it for 4 years. Come 2028, if the Republicans don't start setting themselves up now, we'll have another Dem President and I don't see any Abraham Lincolns on the Dems' horizon. They voted for Harris, one of the dumbest people to ever hold office.
Indeed. With the super crazies on the left, the 'most loyal opposition' is from the right; those who want Trump to address what's wrong and use the people's support to lead to future steps.
Something the left has always been way, way ahead on is 'one step and a time and don't give up.' Most of the 'compromises' on any issues have come from the left, leading to their furthering their choices.
My way or the highway doesn't work real well.
Black Diamond
11-16-2024, 12:07 PM
Does "mandate" mean blank check, no rules apply? It bothers me that just like in 2016-2020, the right has this "there is no tomorrow" mentality. Yes there is. We've been living it for 4 years. Come 2028, if the Republicans don't start setting themselves up now, we'll have another Dem President and I don't see any Abraham Lincolns on the Dems' horizon. They voted for Harris, one of the dumbest people to ever hold office.
No but it might mean people get pissed if every appointee gets rejected or held up. Especially when every single Democrat voted for that tranny for "health official"
fj1200
11-16-2024, 12:08 PM
Makes sense is this a mandate or not?
Mandate or not they have a job and mandate is not in the Constitution considering 2/3 of the Senate was not up for election. But I think POTUS gets some deference.
fj1200
11-16-2024, 12:10 PM
No but it might mean people get pissed if every appointee gets rejected or held up. Especially when every single Democrat voted for that tranny for "health official"
Hardly the case.
Black Diamond
11-16-2024, 12:13 PM
Hardly the case.
So you think Gaetz will be the only fight? Assuming he gets that far.
fj1200
11-16-2024, 12:15 PM
So you think Gaetz will be the only fight? Assuming he gets that far.
No. But he's made other selections that haven't gotten the collective eye roll that Gaetz got. Most will sail through.
Black Diamond
11-16-2024, 12:21 PM
No. But he's made other selections that haven't gotten the collective eye roll that Gaetz got. Most will sail through.
If the big names, if you will, get rejected the senate will be viewed quite negatively imo
fj1200
11-16-2024, 12:22 PM
If the big names, if you will, get rejected the senate will be viewed quite negatively imo
I disagree Gaetz being a big name.
Gunny
11-16-2024, 12:34 PM
So you think Gaetz will be the only fight? Assuming he gets that far.
Just my opinion: Gabbard and RFK,Jr for sure get a hard going over. Hegseth as well.
Gunny
11-16-2024, 12:35 PM
I disagree Gaetz being a big name.Depends on viewpoint. He's a controversial name that stands out for all the wrong reasons.
Black Diamond
11-16-2024, 12:50 PM
Just my opinion: Gabbard and RFK,Jr for sure get a hard going over. Hegseth as well.
Exactly. I agree. and then comes the rage and frustration
Gunny
11-16-2024, 01:14 PM
Exactly. I agree. and then comes the rage and frustrationWhat rage and frustration? From Trump? I haven't ruled out him setting up Jr and Gabbard to get them out of his hair.
Not sure on Hegseth. Last I saw last night they've dredged up an assault charge (against a woman) on him that apparently went nowhere. Due diligence would investigate that as well. The other problem is SecDef is over his head whether nor not Trump likes it. He's putting the Nation at risk putting an unqualified person in that job if confirmed.
Confirming Trump's uncontroversial choices in a timely manner throws him a bone.
Black Diamond
11-16-2024, 01:20 PM
What rage and frustration? From Trump? I haven't ruled out him setting up Jr and Gabbard to get them out of his hair.
Not sure on Hegseth. Last I saw last night they've dredged up an assault charge (against a woman) on him that apparently went nowhere. Due diligence would investigate that as well. The other problem is SecDef is over his head whether nor not Trump likes it. He's putting the Nation at risk putting an unqualified person in that job if confirmed.
Confirming Trump's uncontroversial choices in a timely manner throws him a bone.
From the voters. Which trump might stir up. To your point endorsements aren't free.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.