PDA

View Full Version : $81k Before Overtime-Turn Down 50% Raise Offer



Kathianne
10-02-2024, 06:48 PM
This sucks. So does Biden's refusal to intervene.

https://hotair.com/tree-hugging-sister/2024/10/02/please-return-your-cargo-cranes-to-their-upright-stowed-and-locked-positions-n3795307


Please Return Your Cargo Cranes to Their Upright, Stowed and Locked PositionsBeege Welborn 6:40 PM | October 02, 2024



Mr. Bingley
Ah, the sound of silence.


Gampy POTATUS must really love it. That's probably why he beats feet every week out of his chi-chi digs in the center of Washington to his pricey little retreat on the beach in Rehobeth. Secret Service can keep all those intrusive tourista beach crawlers away from him who'd normally be sharing sand not a meter from the edge of his towel.


JoePa can lay back in his beach chair, his spindly legs akimbo, and peacefully bask in the breezes and ocean warmth.


The "president" is making sure that it's equally as restful and quiet on the normally busy docks of the American East and Gulf Coasts as you might be able to tell from the pictures Bingley snapped of the Port of Bayonne's waterfront yesterday on his way home.


Normally bustling with ships, people, tiny moving parts of every description as freight and cargo goes up, down, sideways, into, out of, is loaded and unloaded from ships and trucks. Humming with activity.


All was still.


There were no ships at the docks. The cranes were lined up like little erector sets. The vast parking lot was two-thirds empty.


Lonely looking.


The head of the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA), a blustering old-school union goon named Daggett (who, in old-school union fashion, lives very well and colorfully), moved his rhetoric from an appeal for compensation thanks to services rendered during COVID...




...to bellowing threats of economic destruction because the country "owes" the dockworkers for working during the pandemic.


CARS WON'T COME IN, FOOD WON'T COME IN




Because, as you know, no one else worked during COVID. There were no other essential personnel doing anything during that time except longshoremen, or so Mr. Daggett would have you believe.


*LAUGHS IN* GROCERY STORE CLERK, NURSE, POSTMAN, TRUCK DRIVER, GARABGEMAN, COP, ETC


Well, to be fair, most of them weren't making what longshoremen were when they slogged off to the jobs in their stupid face diapers.


I did wonder if any of these feeling neglected longshoremen ever thanked a stockboy at Publix or the mail lady for their work "during COVID." Probably not, right?


The ILA bragged about turning down a last-minute 50% raise offer...


International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) negotiators have turned down a near 50 percent pay increase offer from the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) as workers continue to strike across U.S. ports.


East and Gulf Coast port workers walked off the job at midnight on October 1 after negotiations failed to produce an agreement on a new master contract between the USMX and ILA members. Among the sticking points between the two parties are arguments over pay and the use of automation at American ports. It is the first strike among longshoremen and other associated port roles in nearly 50 years.


The union has now said it has rejected a "so-called nearly 50 percent wage increase" as it "fails to address the demands of our members adequately."


...and walked out.


So there's silence, and a helluva thank you on the waterfront now - the only thing blowing is the steam off the union leader's shiny pate.


There's silence from Washington, too - after a little "up yours" from the president to Americans worried about the economy.


POTATUS is protecting his buddies, not the middle class he claims to be so fond of. There won't be any Taft-Hartley, get back to work invocation on his watch - no, sir.


THE SPICE SHALL NOT FLOW




How about what Mr. Daggett's group and their bi-coastal tantrum has the potential to do to Americans already struggling with the effects of #Bidenomics?


Massive port strike could have ‘devastating consequences’ for consumers, expert says


A dockworker strike at seaports along the U.S. East and Gulf coasts is expected to cause massive problems for global supply chains and the economy. American consumers will likely pay the price.


The International Longshoremen’s Association, or ILA, went on strike early Tuesday at 14 major ports over wage increases and use of automation. In all, the ports threatened with strikes handle $3 trillion annually in U.S. international trade, according to an analysis by The Conference Board.




“A disruption of this scale during this pivotal moment in our nation’s economic recovery will have devastating consequences for American workers, their families and local communities,” Matthew Shay, president and CEO of the National Retail Federation, said in a statement Tuesday. Supply chain dynamics are a key issue for the NRF, the retail industry’s largest trade association, especially ahead of the peak holiday season.
No worries - we OWE them.


What do the dockworkers owe people whose lives depend on what comes into these ports?


What does a president owe the Americans whose welfare he has sworn to protect?


...As a port strike stretching from New England to Texas halted nearly half of all trade coming into the U.S., customs data shows that critical medical devices and drug components for the booming, expensive weight-loss and diabetes drugs from Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly — Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and Zepbound — are among the trade casualties in the ILA union port work stoppage.


Bills of lading, the digital receipts of freight containers, show that the delivery mechanisms for insulin and weight-loss drugs rely on East Coast ports for incoming trade.


“Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly are both heavily reliant on the Port of Norfolk,” said William George, director of research at ImportGenius, which tracks the customs data.


It's easy to giggle about the Ozempic crowd until you remember it was a diabetes treatment before it became a fad.


People's lives depend on being able to inject it. American livelihoods depend on what comes in on those boats.


And Daggett knows it.


...Harold Daggett, head of the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA), made the vow on a picket line in New Jersey on Tuesday, as tens of thousands of dockworkers on the east and gulf coasts walked out in a bid to win a better labour deal.


"We're going to fight for it and we're going to win or this port will never open up again," he said. "I'm not playing games here."


For his part, Trump is all over the map. He openly supports the union's right to negotiate for better wages, which isn't surprising, as well as his antipathy to the foreign interests who are the majority of the shipping company owners and port operator board.


He has a point there.


But he also says he would "never let it come to this," and that I can believe. There's no way, with the power of a T-HA, Trump would allow things to devolve to this point and become paralyzed. It also hammers home what has always been a constant Trump theme - we need to bring things home.




...These have become choke points.


All you have to do is shut down cargo flows at these choke points, and you shutter supply chains.


Since most of our manufacturing sector has some level of global dependency (raw materials, components, etc) - when you put a chokehold on these entry points, you shut off the oxygen to a large percentage of our manufacturing supply chain—even products manufactured and produced in the US.


This should be illegal.


But it's not.


Union members operate under a scorched earth policy, willing to take us all down if they don't get their way. Their asks are extreme: 77% pay increase and absolutely no automation.


The refusal to accept automation is based on the fact that technology will eliminate union members. Without automation, we will be even more vulnerable in the future.


Worse yet, the counter-party the union is negotiating with includes many companies not based in the United States.


Globalization has left us incredibly vulnerable, and Biden is the only party that can force the Union back to work.


It's a no-win situation for Biden.


If he intervenes, he will upset union members across the country.


If he doesn't intervene, he reminds every American that we are incredibly vulnerable to these choke points and, thus, globalization.


Unfortunately for Biden, his unwillingness to take action proves that Donald Trump's war on globalization has merit.


Again, Trump's not president - we think we know who is. The man is doing nothing to alleviate the impasse.


Biden's VP - now running from the press while running for his job - has nothing to add. Shocker there.




I couldn't even begin to tell you what to stock up on. This situation is so unbelievable and unbelievably complicated now that it's been allowed to progress to this.


FYI, regarding the details, Sal Mercogliano has a terrific background thread on the ILA v USMX and the state of our ports which have a great deal to do with the dispute.


It's a big game of chicken now.

hjmick
10-03-2024, 01:19 PM
On the upside, traffic has never been better in my area...

Kathianne
10-04-2024, 04:25 PM
With the strike 'settled' until Jan. 15, seems this is a good read:

https://reason.com/2024/10/04/automate-the-ports/?utm_medium=reason_email&utm_source=new_at_reason&utm_campaign=reason_brand&utm_content=Automate%20the%20Ports&utm_term=&time=October%204th,%202024&mpid=125326&mpweb=2534-4609-125326


Free Trade

Automate the Ports
The dockworkers' strike is over, but America's ports will be some of the least efficient in the world whether they are open or closed.
Eric Boehm | 10.4.2024 9:50 AM


Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Container ship at port | Photo by Dominik Lückmann on Unsplash
(Photo by Dominik Lückmann on Unsplash)
The news that the International Longshoreman Association (ILA) agreed to suspend its strike until January is undeniably good news for just about every aspect of America's economy.


But whether they are open or closed, many American ports rank among the least efficient in the entire world. The ports in New York, Baltimore, and Houston—three of the largest of the 36 ports that could have been shut down by the ILA strike—are ranked no higher than 300th place (out of 348 in total) in the World Bank's most recent report on port efficiency. Not a single U.S. port ranks in the top 50. Slow-moving ports act as bottlenecks to commerce both coming and going, which "reduces the competitiveness of the country…and hinders economic growth and poverty reduction," the World Bank notes.


That so many American ports are struggling to keep up with the rest of the world should be unacceptable. Fixing that ought to be one of the top priorities as negotiations between the ports and the ILA resume.


The union's position is, unfortunately, that those inefficiencies aren't just acceptable, but actually desirable.


The ILA's strike had little to do with demands for higher wages—the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX), which operates the ports, had reportedly offered a 50 percent raise to ILA workers, many of whom are already very well compensated. Instead, it seems to be driven mainly by the union's desire to block automation at the ports where its members work.


As econ blogger Noah Smith points out, "port automation is already heavily discouraged, both by the ILA's existing contract, and by Department of Transportation Rules that stipulate that automation is never allowed to reduce the number or quality of jobs. But now the ILA wants to ban automation completely."


"Let me be clear: we don't want any form of semi-automation or full automation," two of the ILA's top executives wrote in a letter to their members last month.


The problem is that American ports need more automation just to catch up with what's considered normal in the rest of the world. For example, automated cranes in use at the port of Rotterdam in the Netherlands since the 1990s are 80 percent faster than the human-operated cranes used at the port in Oakland, California, according to an estimate by one trade publication.


It's worth noting that the lack of automation, and the resulting inefficiencies, at American ports was a major factor in the supply chain issues that popped up during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.


From the union's perspective, of course, more automation means fewer human beings who can be forced into joining the union as a condition of their job. Harold Daggett, president of the ILA, has been very clear that he doesn't care who else gets hurt by the inefficiencies that his union is fighting to preserve—as Reason's Liz Wolfe covered earlier this week.


He's also complained about things like automated tolling, which is a useful comparison for the fight over automation at the ports. To Daggett, the transition from toll booths to electronic options like E-ZPass has meant that "all those union jobs are gone."


To the rest of the world, that transition meant less time wasted sitting in line to pay a toll, so you get to your destination more quickly. There's no right to a job as a toll taker—and unions exist to protect workers from unsafe working conditions, not from market forces.


Additionally, the tradeoff between automation and jobs is not a zero-sum game. A study published in 2022 found that the partial automation of the Port of Los Angeles had resulted in "significant gains in throughput, productivity, and efficiency, resulting in more hours than ever for workers." As with other forms of automation, some job losses are inevitable, but efficiency gains benefit dockworkers too—and the truckers, manufacturers, and others in the supply chain who are waiting for goods to be loaded or unloaded.


Indeed, if maximizing the number of union jobs at ports was the highest value to society, Daggett and the ILA might want to change their demands. Why not demand a ban on cranes, forklifts, and tractor-trailers too? It would take a lot more workers to unload a freighter if everything had to be lifted by hand, after all.


The absurdity of the ILA's position is perhaps best illustrated by a pair of tweets about the strike that were posted in quick succession by More Perfect Union, a progressive nonprofit news outlet. The first notes that the striking ILA workers were attempting to block "job-killing automation," while the second described the union laborers' work as "backbreaking."


Those workers ought to be saved from their backbreaking labor in much the same way that I'm saved from having to wash the dishes by hand or scrub my clothes on a washboard: by letting robots handle as much of the work as possible.


Conceding to the Luddites makes no sense. As Daggett made clear in the run-up to this week's strike, what happens at America's ports is of vital importance to the rest of the economy as well. Now that the strike is off until at least mid-January and negotiations have restarted, the USMX must avoid agreeing to concessions that will cause America's ports to fall farther behind the rest of the world.

fj1200
10-05-2024, 08:12 AM
With the strike 'settled' until Jan. 15, seems this is a good read:

https://reason.com/2024/10/04/automate-the-ports/?utm_medium=reason_email&utm_source=new_at_reason&utm_campaign=reason_brand&utm_content=Automate%20the%20Ports&utm_term=&time=October%204th,%202024&mpid=125326&mpweb=2534-4609-125326


But whether they are open or closed, many American ports rank among the least efficient in the entire world. The ports in New York, Baltimore, and Houston—three of the largest of the 36 ports that could have been shut down by the ILA strike—are ranked no higher than 300th place (out of 348 in total) in the World Bank's most recent report on port efficiency. Not a single U.S. port ranks in the top 50. Slow-moving ports act as bottlenecks to commerce both coming and going, which "reduces the competitiveness of the country…and hinders economic growth and poverty reduction," the World Bank notes.

So what again is the rationale for a 50% raise over the next four years? I thought monopolies were bad but here we have government fiat granting monopoly power to a critical part of the economy? Idiots.

Gunny
10-05-2024, 10:18 AM
So what again is the rationale for a 50% raise over the next four years? I thought monopolies were bad but here we have government fiat granting monopoly power to a critical part of the economy? Idiots.

Election within 60 days. They put it off until after. Dems won't touch it.

Kathianne
10-05-2024, 10:32 AM
Election within 60 days. They put it off until after. Dems won't touch it.

The only other issue outstanding is 'no tech' the union wants. My guess is they are going to get the tech, but not nearly what is warranted, see the West Coast Unions.