revelarts
05-02-2024, 10:50 PM
WHISTLEBLOWER: Insider Details How "New Knowledge" Cybersecurity Firm Created Disinformation in American Election
https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/whistleblower-insider-details-how
Some of the shine on the disinformation industry has gone dull in recent years, as many misinformation experts having been caught trafficking in misinformation themselves, or exposed for their ties to intelligence agencies. This should not come as a shock.
It’s a basic tenet of “mirror politics” and practitioners of propaganda to accuse others of the very same actions they plan to commit.
In late 2018, the New York Times and Washington Post reported on a leaked document discussing a secret project by Democratic Party operatives that falsely accused Republican candidate Roy Moore of support by Russians, while he was running in a tight race for the Senate in Alabama. The scheme linked the Moore campaign to thousands of Russian accounts on Twitter and drew national media attention.
“We orchestrated an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation that planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet,” the New York Times reported (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html) that the leaked documents stated.
The documents linked a relatively unknown company called New Knowledge to the Alabama disinformation campaign, although New Knowledge’s chief executive Jonathon Morgan said the company was not involved, and he worked on “Project Birmingham” in his personal capacity. Morgan also reached out at the time to Renee DiResta, a self-styled expert on disinformation, who told the New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html) she disagreed with such tactics, and later joined New Knowledge sometime, but only after Project Birmingham ended.
New Knowledge later changed names to Yonder, while DiResta joined Stanford University (https://fsi.stanford.edu/people/renee-diresta) as an expert in disinformation. However, New Knowledge could not stop landing in the media spotlight.
In early 2023, journalist Matt Taibbi released a “Twitter Files” (https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1619029819584565249) drop about “Hamilton 68,” a public dashboard created by New Knowledge. Hamiton 68 tracked hundreds of Twitter accounts to monitor the spread of purported pro-Russian propaganda online, but screenshots of emails sent by former Twitter executive, Yoel Roth, voiced alarm that the dashboard was creating, not tracking disinformation.
“I think we need to just call this out on the bullshit it is,” Roth wrote (https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1619029777444384768).
The “Hamilton 68” dashboard had spurred dozens of stories in major media outlets that accused conservatives of trafficking in Russian disinformation, but when Twitter looked into the dashboard’s accuracy, they found it was garbage in, garbage out.
Former FBI counterintelligence official Clint Watts headed the Hamilton 68 dashboard (https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1619029809417584640) and Jonathon Morgan of New Knowledge (https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Jonathon-Morgan-on-Tracking-Digital-Disinformation.pdf) had helped to build it, along with J.M. Berger at the Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), housed by the German Marshall Fund.
“No evidence to support the statement that the dashboard is a finger on the pulse of Russian information ops,” one Twitter official wrote (https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1619029835858444288) of Hamilton 68.
The internal Twitter emails were so damaging that the Washington Post later posted corrections (https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/2023/05/18/post-issues-minor-corrections-coverage-hamilton-68/) to multiple stories that reported on Hamilton 68 and its findings.
But every story about disinformation elites caught creating disinformation contains critical missing facts and minor elements of disinformation planted by the very experts being exposed. New Knowledge is no different.
Starting a month ago, I began discussing what the media got wrong about New Knowledge and Hamilton 68 with Betsy Dupuis, a former New Knowledge employee who worked on Hamilton 68. Dupuis tells me she was fired from New Knowledge after expressing misgivings upon discovering the company that branded itself “the world’s first platform for defending online communities from social media manipulation (https://eu.statesman.com/story/business/technology/2019/02/15/who-is-jonathon-morgan-austin-researcher-makes-name-and-finds-controversy-in-cybersecurity-world/5974403007/)” was itself engaging in blatant social media manipulation.
To back up her claims, Dupuis provided internal documents and photos from her time at New Knowledge, as well as screenshots of texts messages. Some of those we are publishing today.
New Knowledge poached Dupuis from another company and set her to work improving the Hamilton 68 dashboard, which was planned as a product for groups aligned with the Democratic Party. The development was underwritten with a year of funding by the Center for American Progress, a think tank and lobby shop run by party political operatives.
Dupuis says she enjoyed her work updating Hamilton 68, but she became concerned when people in the office discussed the “Alabama Project” and she began wondering if this had anything to do with Roy Moore, a Republican candidate running for Senate. When she had joined the company, Jonathon Morgan had assured her that New Knowledge would only monitor, never create disinformation.
But then several former employees from the National Security Agency (NSA) joined New Knowledge.
Out for company drinks, former NSA employees explained to Dupuis how agencies get around federal laws that ban the U.S. government from spying on and censoring Americans: they contract with companies like New Knowledge to do their dirty work. By the time New Knowledge announced they had secured a Department of Defense contract to create automated disinformation, Dupuis had had enough.
She met with Jonathon Morgan to discuss her concerns and was fired days later.
Speaking with me from her home in Austin, Dupuis says that neither Jonathon Morgan, nor Stanford’s Renee DiResta have come clean with journalists about what happened in Alabama to create disinformation during an American election. But she says she is tired of being scared and the time has come for her to speak up. “Silence doesn’t buy you safety, Dupuis says. “People will still come after you because of what you know.”
“I just kept quiet, until now, because I didn’t want to be accused of spreading a conspiracy theory,” Dupuis tells The DisInformation Chronicle. “After I was fired, I was just like, ‘You know what? This is so crazy. Nobody's ever going to believe me. I'm never going to talk about this again.’”
Jonathon Morgan did not return multiple requests for comment sent to his current job and personal cell phone number. This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.
https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/whistleblower-insider-details-how
Some of the shine on the disinformation industry has gone dull in recent years, as many misinformation experts having been caught trafficking in misinformation themselves, or exposed for their ties to intelligence agencies. This should not come as a shock.
It’s a basic tenet of “mirror politics” and practitioners of propaganda to accuse others of the very same actions they plan to commit.
In late 2018, the New York Times and Washington Post reported on a leaked document discussing a secret project by Democratic Party operatives that falsely accused Republican candidate Roy Moore of support by Russians, while he was running in a tight race for the Senate in Alabama. The scheme linked the Moore campaign to thousands of Russian accounts on Twitter and drew national media attention.
“We orchestrated an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation that planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet,” the New York Times reported (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html) that the leaked documents stated.
The documents linked a relatively unknown company called New Knowledge to the Alabama disinformation campaign, although New Knowledge’s chief executive Jonathon Morgan said the company was not involved, and he worked on “Project Birmingham” in his personal capacity. Morgan also reached out at the time to Renee DiResta, a self-styled expert on disinformation, who told the New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html) she disagreed with such tactics, and later joined New Knowledge sometime, but only after Project Birmingham ended.
New Knowledge later changed names to Yonder, while DiResta joined Stanford University (https://fsi.stanford.edu/people/renee-diresta) as an expert in disinformation. However, New Knowledge could not stop landing in the media spotlight.
In early 2023, journalist Matt Taibbi released a “Twitter Files” (https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1619029819584565249) drop about “Hamilton 68,” a public dashboard created by New Knowledge. Hamiton 68 tracked hundreds of Twitter accounts to monitor the spread of purported pro-Russian propaganda online, but screenshots of emails sent by former Twitter executive, Yoel Roth, voiced alarm that the dashboard was creating, not tracking disinformation.
“I think we need to just call this out on the bullshit it is,” Roth wrote (https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1619029777444384768).
The “Hamilton 68” dashboard had spurred dozens of stories in major media outlets that accused conservatives of trafficking in Russian disinformation, but when Twitter looked into the dashboard’s accuracy, they found it was garbage in, garbage out.
Former FBI counterintelligence official Clint Watts headed the Hamilton 68 dashboard (https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1619029809417584640) and Jonathon Morgan of New Knowledge (https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Jonathon-Morgan-on-Tracking-Digital-Disinformation.pdf) had helped to build it, along with J.M. Berger at the Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), housed by the German Marshall Fund.
“No evidence to support the statement that the dashboard is a finger on the pulse of Russian information ops,” one Twitter official wrote (https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1619029835858444288) of Hamilton 68.
The internal Twitter emails were so damaging that the Washington Post later posted corrections (https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/2023/05/18/post-issues-minor-corrections-coverage-hamilton-68/) to multiple stories that reported on Hamilton 68 and its findings.
But every story about disinformation elites caught creating disinformation contains critical missing facts and minor elements of disinformation planted by the very experts being exposed. New Knowledge is no different.
Starting a month ago, I began discussing what the media got wrong about New Knowledge and Hamilton 68 with Betsy Dupuis, a former New Knowledge employee who worked on Hamilton 68. Dupuis tells me she was fired from New Knowledge after expressing misgivings upon discovering the company that branded itself “the world’s first platform for defending online communities from social media manipulation (https://eu.statesman.com/story/business/technology/2019/02/15/who-is-jonathon-morgan-austin-researcher-makes-name-and-finds-controversy-in-cybersecurity-world/5974403007/)” was itself engaging in blatant social media manipulation.
To back up her claims, Dupuis provided internal documents and photos from her time at New Knowledge, as well as screenshots of texts messages. Some of those we are publishing today.
New Knowledge poached Dupuis from another company and set her to work improving the Hamilton 68 dashboard, which was planned as a product for groups aligned with the Democratic Party. The development was underwritten with a year of funding by the Center for American Progress, a think tank and lobby shop run by party political operatives.
Dupuis says she enjoyed her work updating Hamilton 68, but she became concerned when people in the office discussed the “Alabama Project” and she began wondering if this had anything to do with Roy Moore, a Republican candidate running for Senate. When she had joined the company, Jonathon Morgan had assured her that New Knowledge would only monitor, never create disinformation.
But then several former employees from the National Security Agency (NSA) joined New Knowledge.
Out for company drinks, former NSA employees explained to Dupuis how agencies get around federal laws that ban the U.S. government from spying on and censoring Americans: they contract with companies like New Knowledge to do their dirty work. By the time New Knowledge announced they had secured a Department of Defense contract to create automated disinformation, Dupuis had had enough.
She met with Jonathon Morgan to discuss her concerns and was fired days later.
Speaking with me from her home in Austin, Dupuis says that neither Jonathon Morgan, nor Stanford’s Renee DiResta have come clean with journalists about what happened in Alabama to create disinformation during an American election. But she says she is tired of being scared and the time has come for her to speak up. “Silence doesn’t buy you safety, Dupuis says. “People will still come after you because of what you know.”
“I just kept quiet, until now, because I didn’t want to be accused of spreading a conspiracy theory,” Dupuis tells The DisInformation Chronicle. “After I was fired, I was just like, ‘You know what? This is so crazy. Nobody's ever going to believe me. I'm never going to talk about this again.’”
Jonathon Morgan did not return multiple requests for comment sent to his current job and personal cell phone number. This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.