scientist says humans should become cannibals to fight climate change

[revelarts]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html

Swedish scientist says humans should become cannibals to fight climate change
because eating human flesh is more 'sustainable' than the meat industry





https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYny2TOXEAAvRad?format=jpg&name=large


the part i like best is how he says we can trick people into eating it.
Look, we've got to save the planet folks...

:puke3:

[icansayit]

EAT YOUR OWN FAMILY FIRST....THEN.....

https://seeklogo.com/images/B/Bart_Simpson_Eat_My_Shorts-logo-D8477F4A35-seeklogo.com.png

[Black Diamond]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html

Swedish scientist says humans should become cannibals to fight climate change
because eating human flesh is more 'sustainable' than the meat industry





https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYny2TOXEAAvRad?format=jpg&name=large


the part i like best is how he says we can trick people into eating it.
Look, we've got to save the planet folks...

:puke3:

An honest leftist?

[tailfins]

My wife's ancestors were cannibals. In fact the phrase, "I'm going to eat you" (often accompanied by brandishing a machete) is still used to express extreme anger. I wonder why they stopped the cannibalism 500 or so years ago. There has to be a reason. Beyond that, they used to refer to cultures that did this as "savages". It seems like society is going backwards. Maybe these people should go live in caves. If they want to go backwards, why do it by half? Clothes also use natural resources. Maybe they can go around naked to boot (well without boots).

[Gunny]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html

Swedish scientist says humans should become cannibals to fight climate change
because eating human flesh is more 'sustainable' than the meat industry





https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYny2TOXEAAvRad?format=jpg&name=large


the part i like best is how he says we can trick people into eating it.
Look, we've got to save the planet folks...

:puke3:Aside from the knee jerk reactions, it is a simple basic fact Man is overpopulating the planet. Add that to Man's careless waste of natural resources, and cutting back on humans and recycling them as chow is the most legit, logical plan I've heard so far.

Might not do anything for the average temperature of a planet zooming through space around a sun, but it couldn't help but clear up some air :)

Bet your ass this elitist envisions lowly mortals other than himself as the side dish. They always do :rolleyes:

[tailfins]

Aside from the knee jerk reactions, it is a simple basic fact Man is overpopulating the planet. Add that to Man's careless waste of natural resources, and cutting back on humans and recycling them as chow is the most legit, logical plan I've heard so far.

Might not do anything for the average temperature of a planet zooming through space around a sun, but it couldn't help but clear up some air :)

Bet your ass this elitist envisions lowly mortals other than himself as the side dish. They always do :rolleyes:

As an anti-socialist, you should remember that most "shortages" that we hear of are contrived. The only shortage that I see is a shortage of freedom.

[Gunny]

As an anti-socialist, you should remember that most "shortages" that we hear of are contrived. The only shortage that I see is a shortage of freedom.As a pragmatist, I would point out (referring to my previous response) that a shortage of space generally leads to shortage of freedom.

[icansayit]

Get all of those scientists together, and tell them to EAT each other. Then tell everyone else what it was like, and did it solve their Hunger?

[revelarts]

As a pragmatist, I would point out (referring to my previous response) that a shortage of space generally leads to shortage of freedom.

Thing is Gunny, like Climate Change, and several others things.
overpopulation is a Myth... full on BS.
It's just another tool of those in power to try to keep control.
they've been saying the world is to populated literally since the 1800s.
it's was BS then & it's BS Now.
remember the book "the population bomb" came out in the 70s i think.
claimed that by NOW the world would in flames and famine everywhere.
BS. never happened.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZVOU5bfHrM

[revelarts]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYjfKeEXgAAYL0t?format=jpg&name=small
https://www.businessinsider.co.za/oumph-fake-human-meat-burger-winning-awards-cannes-lions-festival-2022-7

" A plant-based company called Oumph! produced a burger they said tastes like human flesh.
The company advertised the Human Meat Plant-Based Burger around Sweden last year during Halloween.
"No humans were injured in the development of this product," the company said.
For more stories, go to www.BusinessInsider.co.za (http://www.BusinessInsider.co.za).
A plant-based meat brand decided to take an unusual — and cannibalistic — route to sway people to try their product.
European company Oumph! developed the Human Meat Plant-Based Burger — a burger they say tastes just like people — for those willing to indulge in fake human flesh.
"We developed this burger in no time as soon as we knew what taste and texture we were after," Oumph! Co-Founder Anders Linden said in a YouTube video.
During Halloween last year, the company set up a food truck in Stockholm, Sweden, serving the "scariest plant-based food ever." The company released a short advertisement, complete with a sinister voiceover depicting dark scenes in a kitchen as a a chef develops the human-based meat. The commercial then dares people to try it. ...

those crazy Swedes chortle chortle.


But
Ok sooo, How exactly would someone eating it be able to tell that it's not real human flesh?
I mean, without taking it to a lab.

And...umm, How exactly did they determine what the flavor should be?

[SassyLady]

Soylent green anyone.

[tailfins]

Get all of those scientists together, and tell them to EAT each other. Then tell everyone else what it was like, and did it solve their Hunger?



I would prefer to tell them to go eat shit.

[icansayit]

i would prefer to tell them to go eat shit.



that's exactly what they would be doing too!

[revelarts]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYif_uHUIAEW3Gq?format=jpg&name=small

[Black Diamond]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYif_uHUIAEW3Gq?format=jpg&name=small

You forgot to slurp

[Gunny]

Thing is Gunny, like Climate Change, and several others things.
overpopulation is a Myth... full on BS.
It's just another tool of those in power to try to keep control.
they've been saying the world is to populated literally since the 1800s.
it's was BS then & it's BS Now.
remember the book "the population bomb" came out in the 70s i think.
claimed that by NOW the world would in flames and famine everywhere.
BS. never happened.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZVOU5bfHrMNo sale. Overpopulation is not a myth -- at least on my part -- it's an observation. I don't know who else is selling what on the topic. I'm sure it's someone with genocide in mind, disguised as a the "Next Big Climate Change":rolleyes:

It is an observable fact that humans are outgrowing the resources available. It would be highly improbably for Man to outgrow the space available.

Could resources be better managed to accommodate an ever-increasing population v natural resources? Sure. That's about as probable as me growing a full head of hair.

This is a perfect example of what I have against conspiracy theories/theorists. Dismissing the obvious because it doesn't suit the narrative.

[fj1200]

Global population is set to level off around 2050 IIRC. Most developed countries have population declines, at least in the native population. The problem will take care of itself.

[Gunny]

Global population is set to level off around 2050 IIRC. Most developed countries have population declines, at least in the native population. The problem will take care of itself.

I have no doubt the problem will take care of itself. One way or the other :laugh:

I'll also state up front I really don't have much of a dog in this fight. Thinking I'm probably not going to be around. Given current World leadership, I wouldn't bet the farm people will be around long enough to overpopulate the planet.

I'm basing my comments on math, and current population growth on a planet that is not growing at all. Natural resources are finite. The virus called Man is not. Man will consume any and everything, while procreating.

People are stupid. What can I say?:)

[Black Diamond]

Global population is set to level off around 2050 IIRC. Most developed countries have population declines, at least in the native population. The problem will take care of itself.

Growth doesn't go on forever. I think they've proven that mathematically??

[Black Diamond]

I have no doubt the problem will take care of itself. One way or the other :laugh:

I'll also state up front I really don't have much of a dog in this fight. Thinking I'm probably not going to be around. Given current World leadership, I wouldn't bet the farm people will be around long enough to overpopulate the planet.

I'm basing my comments on math, and current population growth on a planet that is not growing at all. Natural resources are finite. The virus called Man is not. Man will consume any and everything, while procreating.

People are stupid. What can I say?:)
Consider the number of nuclear weapons on earth. And then consider the rhetoric be it between India and Pakistan or between putin and the West.

[Gunny]

Growth doesn't go on forever. I think they've proven that mathematically??Not an expert on the topic, but would you think consider the prime directive is procreate (at least up to Gen Z), growth would have to be stopped by some means?

I really don't consider population growth the main contributor. The ability/means to sustain a population would be as important if not more? Growth is irrelevant to life with no means of sustaining it. Anything in the unsustainable range will just die.

IF the entire Earth was inhabitable, sustainable life is STILL finite to those limitations. The way I look at it, someone has to whip out their algebra and figure out the equation of Man's population vs Man's phenomenal mismanagement of Earth's natural resources.

Problem is, that's an honest question that dishonest people have whored out personal/group gain. To the point that "saving the World" comes in the guise of many industries.

Just wondering ...:)

[SassyLady]

The Russia/Ukraine War is resulting in more than normal deaths on average and the food shortage coming up from sanctions will also reduce population. Factor in a possible nuclear war with the death count and destruction of finite resources and the population problem is pushed back for decades.

When the scientists theorized cannibalism were they thinking we would be eating people who died from diseases? Or will they be harvested based on criminality? Road kill (accidents)? Who do they think will be the food source? Eating dogs would be more palatable and that's just not something I'm on board for.

[fj1200]

Growth doesn't go on forever. I think they've proven that mathematically??

Projections at this point. My 2050 might have been wrong, could be 2100.


Not an expert on the topic, but would you think consider the prime directive is procreate (at least up to Gen Z), growth would have to be stopped by some means?

I really don't consider population growth the main contributor. The ability/means to sustain a population would be as important if not more? Growth is irrelevant to life with no means of sustaining it. Anything in the unsustainable range will just die.

IF the entire Earth was inhabitable, sustainable life is STILL finite to those limitations. The way I look at it, someone has to whip out their algebra and figure out the equation of Man's population vs Man's phenomenal mismanagement of Earth's natural resources.

Problem is, that's an honest question that dishonest people have whored out personal/group gain. To the point that "saving the World" comes in the guise of many industries.

Just wondering ...:)

To the bold, procreation is not the primary driver for the developed world anymore. The poorer you are then that is still true; kids are your retirement plan.

To the rest, that's what we're fighting about.

[BoogyMan]

Soylent Green is made out of people!!

These alarmist morons can pound sand.

[revelarts]

https://spectator.org/overpopulation-population-control/

The Population Bomb Doomsday Scam
The narrative we’ve been force-fed for decades is being abandoned by its strictest adherents.
...The New York Times put the point even more emphatically in its coverage of this amazing twist of fate, by acknowledging in a headline that the dreaded “population bomb” of the 1960s and ’70s has turned into a global “population bust.”
Beijing has announced that its demographic problem today is too few young people, not too many.
Let us put it even more concisely: the greatest environmental/demographic scare of the second half of the 20th century — overpopulation — is now officially conceded to have been a monumental fraud.

To appreciate what an embarrassing reversal this is for the green movement, consider that 40 to 50 years ago nearly all the scientists, policymakers, U.S. government agencies, and experts at the United Nations told us that rampaging population growth would lead to a Malthusian doomsday with the world in our lifetimes running out of food, energy, and nearly everything else. If ever there were an ironclad “scientific consensus,” this was it.
In their 1967 book Famine 1975!, U.S. government agronomist William Paddock and Foreign Service officer Paul Paddock predicted that population growth would soon lead to such mass starvation in so many nations that triage would be required and that nations like India and Egypt should be written off as “can’t-be-saved.”
Stanford scientist Paul Ehrlich became the most famous academic in the world with his mega-bestseller The Population Bomb and its widely quoted opening sentence: “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” Ehrlich was Al Gore before there was Al Gore....




https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FX1GwKIUIAICQHh?format=jpg&name=small


...and More LAWS and MORE "global" treaties/agreements.

[Gunny]

Projections at this point. My 2050 might have been wrong, could be 2100.



To the bold, procreation is not the primary driver for the developed world anymore. The poorer you are then that is still true; kids are your retirement plan.

To the rest, that's what we're fighting about.I was thinking biologically. Procreation is the natural prime directive of every living thing. I can't answer for Man brainwashing Man otherwise other than we don't have to look very far to see it.

[Gunny]

https://spectator.org/overpopulation-population-control/

The Population Bomb Doomsday Scam
The narrative we’ve been force-fed for decades is being abandoned by its strictest adherents.
...The New York Times put the point even more emphatically in its coverage of this amazing twist of fate, by acknowledging in a headline that the dreaded “population bomb” of the 1960s and ’70s has turned into a global “population bust.”
Beijing has announced that its demographic problem today is too few young people, not too many.
Let us put it even more concisely: the greatest environmental/demographic scare of the second half of the 20th century — overpopulation — is now officially conceded to have been a monumental fraud.

To appreciate what an embarrassing reversal this is for the green movement, consider that 40 to 50 years ago nearly all the scientists, policymakers, U.S. government agencies, and experts at the United Nations told us that rampaging population growth would lead to a Malthusian doomsday with the world in our lifetimes running out of food, energy, and nearly everything else. If ever there were an ironclad “scientific consensus,” this was it.
In their 1967 book Famine 1975!, U.S. government agronomist William Paddock and Foreign Service officer Paul Paddock predicted that population growth would soon lead to such mass starvation in so many nations that triage would be required and that nations like India and Egypt should be written off as “can’t-be-saved.”
Stanford scientist Paul Ehrlich became the most famous academic in the world with his mega-bestseller The Population Bomb and its widely quoted opening sentence: “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” Ehrlich was Al Gore before there was Al Gore....




https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FX1GwKIUIAICQHh?format=jpg&name=small


...and More LAWS and MORE "global" treaties/agreements.

Simple facts all your trash is ignoring:

The Planet is finite in space and has finite natural resources.

Man is capable of reproducing infinitely in the aforementioned finite space.

Conclusion: Man is capable of overpopulating both finite space and resources.

Try the science instead of the politics :rolleyes:

[fj1200]

I was thinking biologically. Procreation is the natural prime directive of every living thing. I can't answer for Man brainwashing Man otherwise other than we don't have to look very far to see it.

No brainwashing involved in people not needing to have multiple children as an economic decision and deciding to have fewer children.


Simple facts all your trash is ignoring:

The Planet is finite in space and has finite natural resources.

Man is capable of reproducing infinitely in the aforementioned finite space.

Conclusion: Man is capable of overpopulating both finite space and resources.

Try the science instead of the politics :rolleyes:

But that ignores that man makes choices based on scarcity of resources. Man has always done it and will continue to do it.

[Gunny]

I could be wrong, but I would guess the number of people making rational decisions on the matter are a small minority. Probably not much bigger than the minority I am referring to: the idiots who think they are what they aren't. The latter requires some serious brainwashing.

I understand the rationale of living within one's means (to include offspring). That reasoning is great if everyone's doing it. I'm not seeing that as any kind of prime reasoning that would have any major affect on population. It is easily offset by other factors, irresponsibility and religion being 2 factors right off the top of my head.

While your reasoning may be correct, that's just not what I'm seeing.

[tailfins]

I was thinking biologically. Procreation is the natural prime directive of every living thing. I can't answer for Man brainwashing Man otherwise other than we don't have to look very far to see it.


Feminism could slow down or stop population growth. More and more men are wising up to "family" courts. The risk of getting saddled with 20 years old child support and some cases even more in alimony is a big deterrent.

[Gunny]

Feminism could slow down or stop population growth. More and more men are wising up to "family" courts. The risk of getting saddled with 20 years old child support and some cases even more in alimony is a big deterrent.I completely understand using that line of reasoning.

Would work even better if that was a consideration BEFORE the pants come off.

[fj1200]

I could be wrong, but I would guess the number of people making rational decisions on the matter are a small minority. Probably not much bigger than the minority I am referring to: the idiots who think they are what they aren't. The latter requires some serious brainwashing.

I understand the rationale of living within one's means (to include offspring). That reasoning is great if everyone's doing it. I'm not seeing that as any kind of prime reasoning that would have any major affect on population. It is easily offset by other factors, irresponsibility and religion being 2 factors right off the top of my head.

While your reasoning may be correct, that's just not what I'm seeing.

I do not believe that there is any developed nation where the native population is replacing themselves. Undeveloped nations are continuing to grow but they have different rational reasons. The global population will level off, it's inevitable. :fingersnap: :poke:

You need to look at things globally because no one would guess that population growth would level off but statistically it is.

[Gunny]

I do not believe that there is any developed nation where the native population is replacing themselves. Undeveloped nations are continuing to grow but they have different rational reasons. The global population will level off, it's inevitable. :fingersnap: :poke:

You need to look at things globally because no one would guess that population growth would level off but statistically it is.I'm not arguing what it is doing globally statistically. You can be right :)

My argument is mathematical/scientific possibility. Not to be ignored until it bites you in the ass like China is going to.

I've been aware the "Great White West" is in decline, as well as Russia. China's decline has been mandated. What that tells me is current civilization is in decline because the part of the populace that is not in decline are a bunch of purposefully ignorant, 3rd World heathens.

One would think as smart as these "globalists" are purported to be, they might pay more attention to something as real as the decline of their civilization(s). Must not be as much money in it as fleecing people now over the promise of salvation from global warming.

[revelarts]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/sick-climate-scientist-suggests-culling-human-population-deadly/

SICK: Climate Scientist Suggests “Culling” the Human Population with a Deadly Pandemic to Solve the “Climate Crisis”

One government climate scientist made the mistake of blurting out the real end-game of so many radical environmental activists in a bid to preserve the planet: Killing off the human population.

Bill McGuire, a Professor of Geophysical & Climate Hazards at University College London (UCL), authored a tweet Sunday that lamented the fact carbon emissions were not falling nearly as fast as needed and suggested solving the “climate crisis” with a deadly pandemic to wipe out swaths of the human population.

“If I am brutally honest, the only realistic way I see emissions falling as fast as they need to, to avoid catastrophic #climate breakdown, is the culling of the human population by a pandemic with a very high fatality rate,” he wrote....

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GOo17WfW4AA2TGa?format=jpg&name=900x900


People just need to "Trust the Science".

[revelarts]

Head of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde:
"Climate change" requires a complete overhaul of the entire economy and financial system, in line with the "green transition"—including the need to "reduce our carbon footprint in everything we do, from banknotes to how we supervise banks."


seems the globalist are really giving people a heads up, they are going to push this climate crap a even harder down people's throats.
as an excuse to control how and what we buy, how we use money, how nations regulate people's & companies actions ...for the greater good... & our safety.
Not very "free market" minded of these banks. but these centralized mechanisms, the fed and int'l banks, major world agreements HELP free trade and "the economy" I've been told.
So not sure what to think here.


https://www.reuters.com/markets/rates-bonds/ecbs-lagarde-climate-change-has-clear-impact-inflation-2022-08-25/
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2024/html/ecb.pr240130~afa3d90e07.en.html
https://greencentralbanking.com/2024/02/05/ecb-climate-plan-monetary-policy-nature-risk-green-transition/

[revelarts]

do you guys think this chart is close to reality?
a lot?
a little?
completely false?




https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GOvAdd-XEAAsUBM?format=jpg&name=medium