The World Government Summit

[revelarts]

Annnnnnd another "Conspiracy Theory" boldly takes off it's cloak and declares it's actually "Conspiracy Fact".

Economist at 'World Government Summit'
Among the things discussed but these elitist who think they run the world.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTTDzH2A1tM

•"New Financial World Order About to Shift In Dramatic New Direction... digital currency to track every purchase.." among other things
• A moderator ask the panelist unironically "are you ready for a new world order?"
•"We're already in WW3... for at least 4 years"
• the Chinese are showing the way for digital ID & finances ....
Secretary-General's video message to the World Government Summit
Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,
Let me start by congratulating the government and people of the UAE for so impressively hosting Expo 2020 under such challenging circumstances
You have brought the world together around the theme of connecting minds and creating the future with a focus on the Sustainable Development Goals.
That is very much the spirit of this World Government Summit.

Since 2013, the World Government Summit has drawn innovative thinkers and decisionmakers to Dubai to explore pathways to a better future for all humanity.

Your theme — “Shaping the Future of Governments” — is an important opportunity to discuss how governments can better respond to the needs of their people, and the planet we all share, at this challenging moment in history.
This year, you meet when hope is in short supply.
When mistrust, divisions and fear are growing.
When global recovery and the Sustainable Development Goals are slipping farther from reach.
And when the solutions to the challenges facing our world seem more distant than ever.
Governments are called upon to address these struggles head-on.
For their own people, but also for our common future.
And do so in solidarity — as a global family.
https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2022-03-30/secretary-generals-video-message-the-world-government-summit


IN Related news

In off-the-cuff remarks at a recent meeting of the Business Roundtable, President Biden said, “There’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it.”
forbes
https://archive.ph/F2n49#selection-3841.0-3843.148


So Alex Jones get's another 1, 2 ,3... 7 dollars in the jar for times he's been right.

GLOBALIST Elites
meet to plan World Gov't,
a new currency,
a cashless digital currency,
track all transactions world wide,
China is a model
All without the consent or consultation of the people.
All without regard to the U.S. congress, U.S. laws or U.S. constitution.

I'm guessing most of you have been aware of this
but i'm guessing the hard part to swallow at this point is that the elites are made up of people that are/have worked with both Democrats and Republicans....For Decades.

[fj1200]

I think this is still relevant.


I just don't see what you see. We can both look at post WWII history and see the growth of international organizations, partnerships, global corporations, etc. and see completely different things. I see liberalization of global trade that will benefit everyone who chooses to take part and you see coalitions of organizations to take power away from the people. The thing is that I look at the benefits that have come to the world with increased freedoms for billions of people with increases in almost any measure of economic advancement... I don't know if you agree with that last sentence or not but it is not a logical conclusion to me that all of this liberalization has been granted until the rug gets pulled out from underneath the whole thing. All due respect I just don't see that.

Not to say that the WGS isn't a fantastical pile of crap which I predict goes nowhere.

[Gunny]

I think this is still relevant.



Not to say that the WGS isn't a fantastical pile of crap which I predict goes nowhere.I see your argument. I also see Rev's. Power corrupts. Ultimate power corrupts ultimately. How many bureaucracies are there in the World that exist just to tell the World what to do? Global trade and opportunity is great. People inventing positions to tell others how they can or can't do it not so much.

Russia-Ukraine has put a spotlight on some of it to me because I check out the Euro news. Just off the top ... UN, NATO, EU, European Commission, G-20, The World Court ... I'm sure that's just the part of the iceberg we can see. All designed to accomplish nothing but get a cut of the profits from your aforementioned trade and opportunity.

That it's all one big conspiracy is giving selfish, greedy people who don't want to work WAY too much credit. Coincidence DOES matter when it leads to the same result.

[fj1200]

I see your argument. I also see Rev's. Power corrupts. Ultimate power corrupts ultimately. How many bureaucracies are there in the World that exist just to tell the World what to do? Global trade and opportunity is great. People inventing positions to tell others how they can or can't do it not so much.

Russia-Ukraine has put a spotlight on some of it to me because I check out the Euro news. Just off the top ... UN, NATO, EU, European Commission, G-20, The World Court ... I'm sure that's just the part of the iceberg we can see. All designed to accomplish nothing but get a cut of the profits from your aforementioned trade and opportunity.

That it's all one big conspiracy is giving selfish, greedy people who don't want to work WAY too much credit. Coincidence DOES matter when it leads to the same result.

I'm not sure that's his argument though. I don't dispute that power corrupts. I don't dispute that there are bureaucratic windbags. My issue is that either these insitutions are so inept that they've failed, for close to 80 years now, to impose their governmental control on the world to the detriment of countries who choose liberalized economies; or that they've been controlling things so much that those countries that have liberalized their economies will have all their economic gains wiped out when the powers that be impose massive controls. The latter making no logical sense.

Do I like many of those institutions? Not any more than I like government regulations getting in the way but sometimes organizations are useful; domestic court systems are useful and sometimes necessary as the WTO is useful and sometimes necessary for example. If we're going to be a globalized country then sometimes we need to make globalized agreements and all that is part of that.

But I'll say again, bureaucratic windbags suck though I think they are largely a non-issue.

[Gunny]

I'm not sure that's his argument though. I don't dispute that power corrupts. I don't dispute that there are bureaucratic windbags. My issue is that either these insitutions are so inept that they've failed, for close to 80 years now, to impose their governmental control on the world to the detriment of countries who choose liberalized economies; or that they've been controlling things so much that those countries that have liberalized their economies will have all their economic gains wiped out when the powers that be impose massive controls. The latter making no logical sense.

Do I like many of those institutions? Not any more than I like government regulations getting in the way but sometimes organizations are useful; domestic court systems are useful and sometimes necessary as the WTO is useful and sometimes necessary for example. If we're going to be a globalized country then sometimes we need to make globalized agreements and all that is part of that.

But I'll say again, bureaucratic windbags suck though I think they are largely a non-issue.The fine print is in the "globalized agreements".

Look at what it's done to Europe in the wake of Putin's invasion. The EU has been all over Russian gas and oil and some more than others have been willing to sell out Ukraine to invasion (while stating otherwise grandstanding on the tube) because they have made themselves vulnerable to the enemy. That's been my biggest bitch about the US.

IMO, we do not need to be so far underwater in foreign trade we cannot be self-sufficient. Dependency is ALWAYS a weakness and sooner or later someone's going to come along to exploit it. All of this Euro-Russia trade (and US - China for that matter) is supposedly made in good faith with bad actors.

Ending up on the short end of the stick sucks. We can be part of the global community at arm's length, IMO.

[fj1200]

The fine print is in the "globalized agreements".

Look at what it's done to Europe in the wake of Putin's invasion. The EU has been all over Russian gas and oil and some more than others have been willing to sell out Ukraine to invasion (while stating otherwise grandstanding on the tube) because they have made themselves vulnerable to the enemy. That's been my biggest bitch about the US.

IMO, we do not need to be so far underwater in foreign trade we cannot be self-sufficient. Dependency is ALWAYS a weakness and sooner or later someone's going to come along to exploit it. All of this Euro-Russia trade (and US - China for that matter) is supposedly made in good faith with bad actors.

Ending up on the short end of the stick sucks. We can be part of the global community at arm's length, IMO.

I disagree that we are under water but we've had that discussion in the past. And I don't think warring nations are germaine to this discussion but I take your point. We can make global agreements and be subjected to supranational organizations but we can't pick and choose.

[SassyLady]

I disagree that we are under water but we've had that discussion in the past. And I don't think warring nations are germaine to this discussion but I take your point. We can make global agreements and be subjected to supranational organizations but we can't pick and choose.
Why not?

Why are we considering a treaty to give up our decision to act on health issues to the WHO?

[Gunny]

I disagree that we are under water but we've had that discussion in the past. And I don't think warring nations are germaine to this discussion but I take your point. We can make global agreements and be subjected to supranational organizations but we can't pick and choose.If our economy/lifestyles/what-all can be affected by "Putin cutting off our oil" (example), we're sinking below the surface. If China was to suddenly cut all ties with us, it would take us a decade or more to recover, and probably a war.

Yes it would be stupid on their part just as it was stupid on Putin's part. Russia is paying a high price. So you can't say "never". China is openly hostile to us and if it was in the position to do something about is, it would.

Warring nations are the extreme, but germaine simply because non-warring nations generally aren't cutting off trade. Except us. We use it as punishment for any and everything.

Look at the two biggest products this war has affected: Gas/oil and wheat. His stupid little war is screwing up the entire World. Allowing people to have that kind of leverage over you is a definite weakness to be exploited. As Putin is doing.

And yes, I am aware we don't agree when it comes to globalization. Being at the mercy of the US Government is bad enough.

[fj1200]

Why not?

Why are we considering a treaty to give up our decision to act on health issues to the WHO?

Because if you enter into a free-trade treaty that has particular enforcement provisions don't start to complain about the enforcement provisions. If you don't like the enforcement provisions, exit the treaty.

I'm not aware of a pending treaty with the WHO being taken up by the Senate.

[fj1200]

If our economy/lifestyles/what-all can be affected by "Putin cutting off our oil" (example), we're sinking below the surface. If China was to suddenly cut all ties with us, it would take us a decade or more to recover, and probably a war.

Yes it would be stupid on their part just as it was stupid on Putin's part. Russia is paying a high price. So you can't say "never". China is openly hostile to us and if it was in the position to do something about is, it would.

Warring nations are the extreme, but germaine simply because non-warring nations generally aren't cutting off trade. Except us. We use it as punishment for any and everything.

Look at the two biggest products this war has affected: Gas/oil and wheat. His stupid little war is screwing up the entire World. Allowing people to have that kind of leverage over you is a definite weakness to be exploited. As Putin is doing.

And yes, I am aware we don't agree when it comes to globalization. Being at the mercy of the US Government is bad enough.

Very true.

To the rest, I'm not saying we don't take those things into account but generally free trade is good. We're certainly in a better position due to our size and generally good relations with the rest of the world. Smaller countries with less available resources are more likely to suffer.

[revelarts]

Been a long time coming

The Late Congressman Larry McDonald on Crossfire in 1983 Discusses the NWOhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy9rjf-QYpQ

[fj1200]

^Haven't seen Pat Buchanan in a minute. Nevertheless we're no closer now than then let alone 1947.

[SassyLady]

Are we giving up our sovereignty to W.H.O.?

https://www.americaoutloud.com/biden-handing-over-u-s-sovereignty-to-who/

[revelarts]

^Haven't seen Pat Buchanan in a minute. Nevertheless we're no closer now than then let alone 1947.
Well at least we've moved from
...."world gov't is a crazy conspiracy theory!"
to what sounds like...
...-Well it is real .... and it's been worked on since 1947 ....but it's still no closer to happening than the 1940's, so who cares.-

That is a move in the direction of reality.
But I have to say either you're being willingly blind or simply not looking at the larger picture.

Those in favor of world gov't have created various parts of the system they've outlined.
starting with the UN
then the EU,
and the Euro
making moves toward a world digital currency
They've Expanded NATO
Made China an integrated part of the world economy,
created the AU/African Union
Expanding treaties & trade agreements (via the UN & others) including:
the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules
NAFTA (now the USMCA)
Global "climate" treaties
Global "Food Code" The Codex Alimentarius
Still Pushing the TPP
The patch work acceptance world wide of things like Agenda 21/30 for land use
And a World Court

just to name a few ways they moved the ball FJ.

This Years WORLD GOVERNMENT SUMMIT is just another stepping stone to what they want.
It's not some small biz 2 or 3 year plan they're working on. And like any plan it morphs as it's played out.

You can pretend to yourself that it's nothing to worry about but don't try to con us into thinking it's not happening.
To anyone deciding to pay attention it's like watching vines grow over a neglected mansion.

[fj1200]

Well at least we've moved from
...

Then you completely misread my post. My quote from another thread still stands unreplied to. I also have no idea why you think trade agreements are evidence of one world government.

[SassyLady]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/time-running-stop-bidens-plot-secretly-undermine-u-s-national-sovereignty-one-thing-can-now/

[revelarts]

^Haven't seen Pat Buchanan in a minute.
Nevertheless we're no closer now than then let alone 1947.

Well at least we've moved from
...."world gov't is a crazy conspiracy theory!"
to what sounds like...
...-Well it is real .... and it's been worked on since 1947 ....but it's still no closer to happening than the 1940's, so who cares.-

That is a move in the direction of reality.
But I have to say either you're being willingly blind or simply not looking at the larger picture.

Those in favor of world gov't have created various parts of the system they've outlined.
starting with the UN
then the EU,
and the Euro
making moves toward a world digital currency
They've Expanded NATO
Made China an integrated part of the world economy,
created the AU/African Union
Expanding treaties & trade agreements (via the UN & others) including:
the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules
NAFTA (now the USMCA)
Global "climate" treaties
Global "Food Code" The Codex Alimentarius
Still Pushing the TPP
The patch work acceptance world wide of things like Agenda 21/30 for land use
And a World Court

just to name a few ways they moved the ball FJ.

This Years WORLD GOVERNMENT SUMMIT is just another stepping stone to what they want.
It's not some small biz 2 or 3 year plan they're working on. And like any plan it morphs as it's played out.

You can pretend to yourself that it's nothing to worry about but don't try to con us into thinking it's not happening.
To anyone deciding to pay attention it's like watching vines grow over a neglected mansion.


Then you completely misread my post. My quote from another thread still stands unreplied to. I also have no idea why you think trade agreements are evidence of one world government.
I'm not sure what i misread.
..."no closer now than... 1947"
no closer tooo "World Government", correct?

Your quote from the other thread talking about seeing all these changes as positives... lifting all boats :) .
Well to me that comes across as a very light version of old imperialist talk about bringing "civilization" to the backwards people of the world, while enslaving, raping and stealing resources.

Look FJ, here's an example, it's great to be able to send people money over the internet, Until the government (or World Gov't) decides they don't want you to have any money. Freezes/Seizes your digital assets from the banks, paypal, gofundme etc etc, as has been done to truckers and various alt news sources and activist.

We could "focus on the the positives" but it would be silly not to Acknowledge and try to DEFUSE all the the very real negatives, AND promote the DE-Centralized alternatives. Starting with Nationalism and the constitution.
Personally I am a nationalist. Even though some think I "hate America" I do not. I think America is (was) a GREAT work in progress.
And i want National sovereignty
and State sovereignty
and local sovereignty
and personal sovereignty
Under the U.S. constitution


Which brings me to answer your other question abut what's wrong with international trade agreements.
The short answer is that they TAKE AWAY all the sovereignty I mentioned above piecemeal.
they create regulations and standards "laws" that have to be adhered to which NO ONE on the local state level agreed to.
And on the national level they have no right to delegate the sovereignty to unelected international bodies who create them and change them.
Bodies made up of bureaucrats and representative of big biz.
The "free trade agreements" go beyond mere "free trade" and effect things like environmental laws and labor laws outright.
and some like the TPP specifically outlined rules so that member corporations could not be tried in U.S. courts for wrong doing but were only subject to discipline from some outside group authorized by the TPP. where the potentially offending corporate entity had a seat of influence.

so that's part of the problem FJ.
If they were simply agreements about Tariffs and "customs" rules they wouldn't be a major issue but they are more.
and intentionally so... creating a web of "trade" laws that help create ONE international system of laws by default.

[fj1200]

I'm not sure what i misread.
..."no closer now than... 1947"
no closer tooo "World Government", correct?

Your quote from the other thread talking about seeing all these changes as positives... lifting all boats :) .
Well to me that comes across as a very light version of old imperialist talk about bringing "civilization" to the backwards people of the world, while enslaving, raping and stealing resources.

Look FJ, here's an example, it's great to be able to send people money over the internet, Until the government (or World Gov't) decides they don't want you to have any money. Freezes/Seizes your digital assets from the banks, paypal, gofundme etc etc, as has been done to truckers and various alt news sources and activist.

We could "focus on the the positives" but it would be silly not to Acknowledge and try to DEFUSE all the the very real negatives, AND promote the DE-Centralized alternatives. Starting with Nationalism and the constitution.
Personally I am a nationalist. Even though some think I "hate America" I do not. I think America is (was) a GREAT work in progress.
And i want National sovereignty
and State sovereignty
and local sovereignty
and personal sovereignty
Under the U.S. constitution


Which brings me to answer your other question abut what's wrong with international trade agreements.
The short answer is that they TAKE AWAY all the sovereignty I mentioned above piecemeal.
they create regulations and standards "laws" that have to be adhered to which NO ONE on the local state level agreed to.
And on the national level they have no right to delegate the sovereignty to unelected international bodies who create them and change them.
Bodies made up of bureaucrats and representative of big biz.
The "free trade agreements" go beyond mere "free trade" and effect things like environmental laws and labor laws outright.
and some like the TPP specifically outlined rules so that member corporations could not be tried in U.S. courts for wrong doing but were only subject to discipline from some outside group authorized by the TPP. where the potentially offending corporate entity had a seat of influence.

so that's part of the problem FJ.
If they were simply agreements about Tariffs and "customs" rules they wouldn't be a major issue but they are more.
and intentionally so... creating a web of "trade" laws that help create ONE international system of laws by default.

Misread as in we weren't close then and we're not close now. I'm not a fan of later Buchanan but he was right in that clip. Although I'm not sure the later Buchanan would have agreed with his younger self.

An open-minded reading of recent history suggests that those countries who embrace liberalized international trade and economic liberties have their boats lifted and are exactly not enslaved or raped. If you want to talk about stealing of resources then look at despotic countries who sell off their natural resources for personal gain and keep their people poor. I'm sure we could name the same countries. Personally I could name a whole continent.

I'm all for sovereignty, decentralized power, and I'm super-pumped about the Constitution but global trade is going to lead to global institutions and corporations. With free trade agreements we're not signing away our sovereignty we're choosing to engage with the world for the benefits that comparative advantage brings to both sides. We are free to disengage with FTAs but if we don't then there are dispute mechanisms that we should abide by. Are all such agreements perfect? Of course not, they were made by man. But neither is the fear mongering that counters them. Is everything in capitalism perfect? Of course not, man is involved, but neither is anything better.

[revelarts]

Misread as in we weren't close then and we're not close now. I'm not a fan of later Buchanan but he was right in that clip. Although I'm not sure the later Buchanan would have agreed with his younger self.

An open-minded reading of recent history suggests that those countries who embrace liberalized international trade and economic liberties have their boats lifted and are exactly not enslaved or raped. If you want to talk about stealing of resources then look at despotic countries who sell off their natural resources for personal gain and keep their people poor. I'm sure we could name the same countries. Personally I could name a whole continent.

I'm all for sovereignty, decentralized power, and I'm super-pumped about the Constitution but global trade is going to lead to global institutions and corporations. With free trade agreements we're not signing away our sovereignty we're choosing to engage with the world for the benefits that comparative advantage brings to both sides. We are free to disengage with FTAs but if we don't then there are dispute mechanisms that we should abide by. Are all such agreements perfect? Of course not, they were made by man. But neither is the fear mongering that counters them. Is everything in capitalism perfect? Of course not, man is involved, but neither is anything better.

So we have to give up some sovereignty & freedom in exchange for some financial prosperity?
Sorry, but do we have a choice to say no? Since it's not anything like Imperialism or Dictatorship.

Also it seems to me the financial prosperity is very one sided.
People like Klaus Swab, the head of the 'WORLD Economic Forum', have said outright that most people "will OWN NOTHING" but "be happy" somehow. Of Course he and a few UberRich will still have things. just not everyone else.
For the rest of us it's not quite the economic prosperity you seem to be suggesting. Not exactly the American dream.
And with NONE of the freedoms.

BTW they say to 'save the planet' most of us will have to eat bugs for protein... but we'll be happy.
Live where they say, eat what they feed us, but we'll be "prosperous". just less freedoms... less say. no thanks.

Look FJ, I'm not sure what Economic libertarian Sci-Fi dream world you're imagining but it's not the one that those you're defending are planing and WORKING ON.


By the way, Is the ONLY way to raise all boats by freedom gouging and labor breaking international trade agreements?
Somehow I don't think so.
I'm not sure why you do.

[fj1200]

So we have to give up some sovereignty & freedom in exchange for some financial prosperity?
Sorry, but do we have a choice to say no? Since it's not anything like Imperialism or Dictatorship.

Also it seems to me the financial prosperity is very one sided.
People like Klaus Swab, the head of the 'WORLD Economic Forum', have said outright that most people "will OWN NOTHING" but "be happy" somehow. Of Course he and a few UberRich will still have things. just not everyone else.
For the rest of us it's not quite the economic prosperity you seem to be suggesting. Not exactly the American dream.
And with NONE of the freedoms.

BTW they say to 'save the planet' most of us will have to eat bugs for protein... but we'll be happy.
Live where they say, eat what they feed us, but we'll be "prosperous". just less freedoms... less say. no thanks.

Look FJ, I'm not sure what Economic libertarian Sci-Fi dream world you're imagining but it's not the one that those you're defending are planing and WORKING ON.


By the way, Is the ONLY way to raise all boats by freedom gouging and labor breaking international trade agreements?
Somehow I don't think so.
I'm not sure why you do.

Apparently you're having a different conversation than I am. You'll find plenty of quotes of someone saying something that you don't like and proves whatever point you want to make to yourself. What I'm saying is that people who live in countries with economic liberties and engage in free trade have higher living standards than those who don't. But please just stop quoting do-nothing technocrats who have largely zero impact on a free world; they prove nothing.

And nowhere have I said to give up sovereignty. We can engage in, and pull out of, treaties that we don't like. But if we make agreements then there are likely to be enforcement provisions. Do you give up sovereignty when you engage in a mutually beneficial contractual relationship with enforcement provisions?

[revelarts]

Apparently you're having a different conversation than I am. You'll find plenty of quotes of someone saying something that you don't like and proves whatever point you want to make to yourself. What I'm saying is that people who live in countries with economic liberties and engage in free trade have higher living standards than those who don't. But please just stop quoting do-nothing technocrats who have largely zero impact on a free world; they prove nothing.

And nowhere have I said to give up sovereignty. We can engage in, and pull out of, treaties that we don't like. But if we make agreements then there are likely to be enforcement provisions. Do you give up sovereignty when you engage in a mutually beneficial contractual relationship with enforcement provisions?
(I'm not sure if your just playing devil's advocate or not but ok)

Not 2 conversations, Seems you're really trying to hand wave away the List of all the negatives.
Not acknowledging the real loss of liberties, loss of economic power & options and other the major problems outlined above.
Like you've dismissed idea that Klaus Swab & WEF have an impact in the world.
But below is a clip of Swab talking about the WEFs young global leaders programs, whos members are NOW in fact world leaders.
He list Tredeau, and many in Tredeau's cabinet, and how they "pack" other gov'ts leadeship circles.. Mentions the President of Argentina, Merkel, and others, he doesn't mention the New Zealand Covid control freak prime minister whos also a WEF young global leader.
But you say he has " Zero impact" , why?
Either you're unaware or just lying.
I suspect you're unaware like most people, because the methods and actions of the unelected elites are not broadly advertised. Doesn't mean they are "doing nothing"

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=daE0jthD5F8

[fj1200]

(I'm not sure if your just playing devil's advocate or not but ok)

Not 2 conversations, Seems you're really trying to hand wave away the List of all the negatives.
Not acknowledging the real loss of liberties, loss of economic power & options and other the major problems outlined above.
Like you've dismissed idea that Klaus Swab & WEF have an impact in the world.
But below is a clip of Swab talking about the WEFs young global leaders programs, whos members are NOW in fact world leaders.
He list Tredeau, and many in Tredeau's cabinet, and how they "pack" other gov'ts leadeship circles.. Mentions the President of Argentina, Merkel, and others, he doesn't mention the New Zealand Covid control freak prime minister whos also a WEF young global leader.
But you say he has " Zero impact" , why?
Either you're unaware or just lying.
I suspect you're unaware like most people, because the methods and actions of the unelected elites are not broadly advertised. Doesn't mean they are "doing nothing"

I'm hand waving away do-nothing technocrats who like to get together in big rooms and talk to each other. Do I want those things that you don't want? No. But I don't really see those things happening.

I see societies advance that choose the environments that allow advancement (as I've mentioned before) and I've noticed some/read some/watched some/ignored some/read headlines of some/etc. many of your posts on the subject. So based on the evidence presented I've determined that they are do-nothing technocrats who have largely zero impact on a free world. The other option is that they're not what I think they are at all and are in fact doing a great job (which I don't believe). As I've mentioned before I don't really see the logical outcome of granting freedoms, economic liberties, etc. for those that choose and then all of a sudden taking it all away. There is no logic to it.

This list:


Those in favor of world gov't have created various parts of the system they've outlined.
starting with the UN
then the EU,
and the Euro
making moves toward a world digital currency
They've Expanded NATO
Made China an integrated part of the world economy,
created the AU/African Union
Expanding treaties & trade agreements (via the UN & others) including:
the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules
NAFTA (now the USMCA)
Global "climate" treaties
Global "Food Code" The Codex Alimentarius
Still Pushing the TPP
The patch work acceptance world wide of things like Agenda 21/30 for land use
And a World Court

Is a patchwork of things which might be good, might be bad, might be nothing, might be a lot of things but you put it together and it's a conspiracy. I put it together and it's just a patchwork of things which could be debated on their own individual merits. I'm surprised you left out the IMF and the WorldBank; low hanging fruit right there.

[SassyLady]

I'm hand waving away do-nothing technocrats who like to get together in big rooms and talk to each other. Do I want those things that you don't want? No. But I don't really see those things happening.

I see societies advance that choose the environments that allow advancement (as I've mentioned before) and I've noticed some/read some/watched some/ignored some/read headlines of some/etc. many of your posts on the subject. So based on the evidence presented I've determined that they are do-nothing technocrats who have largely zero impact on a free world. The other option is that they're not what I think they are at all and are in fact doing a great job (which I don't believe). As I've mentioned before I don't really see the logical outcome of granting freedoms, economic liberties, etc. for those that choose and then all of a sudden taking it all away. There is no logic to it.

This list:



Is a patchwork of things which might be good, might be bad, might be nothing, might be a lot of things but you put it together and it's a conspiracy. I put it together and it's just a patchwork of things which could be debated on their own individual merits. I'm surprised you left out the IMF and the WorldBank; low hanging fruit right there.
Are you aware of the amendments the Biden Administration submitted to W.H.O.?

If you're not worried yet fj1200 then I wonder what it would take to get you worried.

[revelarts]

I'm hand waving away do-nothing technocrats who like to get together in big rooms and talk to each other. Do I want those things that you don't want? No. But I don't really see those things happening.I see societies advance that choose the environments that allow advancement (as I've mentioned before) and I've noticed some/read some/watched some/ignored some/read headlines of some/etc. many of your posts on the subject. So based on the evidence presented I've determined that they are do-nothing technocrats who have largely zero impact on a free world. The other option is that they're not what I think they are at all and are in fact doing a great job (which I don't believe). As I've mentioned before I don't really see the logical outcome of granting freedoms, economic liberties, etc. for those that choose and then all of a sudden taking it all away. There is no logic to it.

This list:

Is a patchwork of things which might be good, might be bad, might be nothing, might be a lot of things but you put it together and it's a conspiracy. I put it together and it's just a patchwork of things which could be debated on their own individual merits. I'm surprised you left out the IMF and the WorldBank; low hanging fruit right there.
you say you see the parts.
so you do see it.
you just don't want to admit to the fact they these technocrats have planned to implement each piece and SAY SO explicitly in various documents and now publicly recorded meetings.

neither you I have to make up anything to see a "conspiracy" in the actions.
It's simply and admittedly been a long term goal for decades. Multi faceted long term goal.
To look at the various aspect we've both mentioned as just some random parts that could be either 'good or bad' is naive at this point.

So if you really DON'T want what they want, then you can't honestly act like the patchwork pieces are benign.
they've made them happen.
With the help of "global leaders" trained to embrace their goals & mindset,
who are "randomly" placed in nations across the world.

Sassy has mentioned the latest major attempt to steal even MORE U.S. sovereignty in the form of this WHO agreement.
https://archive.ph/j0O0e
Pushed by the usual suspects who also happen to promote the IMF, World Bank, World Court, U.N., Climate Treaties, E.U. Global food codes, Global Cashless Currency, etc etc
...coincidentally...

even if it was coincidentally it should be countered BY the idea of DE-Centralization... and nationalism.. and freedom and local sovereignty.

FJ, here's another way to look at it.
You agree that competition is Great for the marketplace and the people overall.
And you've told me you think it's even even NATURAL, as long a gov'ts don't interfere.

ONE world gov't, is a Monopoly of GOV'T, Artificially created and artificially maintained.
NOT by choice of the people in the market place.
EVERY step in the patchwork we've talked about is ARTIFICIALLY created.
And most is not even driven by real market need but ginned up by BS, like Climate Crisis, and one size fits all "solutions" to a Pandemic of the elderly.

ONE world gov't leaves no room for BETTER gov't 'products' that is, forms and expressions of gov't.... Like LESS Gov't, if you're a real conservative right?
I could take the analogy further but I hope you see what i'm getting at.
What you're advocating is a Gov't monopoly created by stealth, with no representation or options to opt out,
No nations to flee to when the ship of state goes (starts) badly.

bottom line it's ultimately BAD for individuals.
But if you're more concerned about "business" it's bad for MOST businesses too, since the gov't regs WILL, as always, favor the major players, not truly free competition.

[fj1200]

Are you aware of the amendments the Biden Administration submitted to W.H.O.?

If you're not worried yet @fj1200 (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?u=728) then I wonder what it would take to get you worried.

I saw your thread. I'm not worried yet.

[fj1200]

you say you see the parts.
so you do see it.
you just don't want to admit to the fact they these technocrats have planned to implement each piece and SAY SO explicitly in various documents and now publicly recorded meetings.

neither you I have to make up anything to see a "conspiracy" in the actions.
It's simply and admittedly been a long term goal for decades. Multi faceted long term goal.
To look at the various aspect we've both mentioned as just some random parts that could be either 'good or bad' is naive at this point.

So if you really DON'T want what they want, then you can't honestly act like the patchwork pieces are benign.
they've made them happen.
With the help of "global leaders" trained to embrace their goals & mindset,
who are "randomly" placed in nations across the world.

Sassy has mentioned the latest major attempt to steal even MORE U.S. sovereignty in the form of this WHO agreement.
https://archive.ph/j0O0e
Pushed by the usual suspects who also happen to promote the IMF, World Bank, World Court, U.N., Climate Treaties, E.U. Global food codes, Global Cashless Currency, etc etc
...coincidentally...

even if it was coincidentally it should be countered BY the idea of DE-Centralization... and nationalism.. and freedom and local sovereignty.

FJ, here's another way to look at it.
You agree that competition is Great for the marketplace and the people overall.
And you've told me you think it's even even NATURAL, as long a gov'ts don't interfere.

ONE world gov't, is a Monopoly of GOV'T, Artificially created and artificially maintained.
NOT by choice of the people in the market place.
EVERY step in the patchwork we've talked about is ARTIFICIALLY created.
And most is not even driven by real market need but ginned up by BS, like Climate Crisis, and one size fits all "solutions" to a Pandemic of the elderly.

ONE world gov't leaves no room for BETTER gov't 'products' that is, forms and expressions of gov't.... Like LESS Gov't, if you're a real conservative right?
I could take the analogy further but I hope you see what i'm getting at.
What you're advocating is a Gov't monopoly created by stealth, with no representation or options to opt out,
No nations to flee to when the ship of state goes (starts) badly.

bottom line it's ultimately BAD for individuals.
But if you're more concerned about "business" it's bad for MOST businesses too, since the gov't regs WILL, as always, favor the major players, not truly free competition.

You're misquoting me.
I didn't say I see the parts; I see a list of things such as the UN, TPP, NAFTA, etc. You inferred that I agreed that they are "parts." And you very much need to make up things for it to be a conspiracy.

I said that I don't want the things that you don't want meaning whatever end game you think is just around the corner.

If I maintain that free trade agreements are positive then why do you think I would accept your premise that everything is a patchwork of OWG? A FTA just might be a FTA.

Please point out where I've argued for One World Government?

[Gunny]

You're misquoting me.
I didn't say I see the parts; I see a list of things such as the UN, TPP, NAFTA, etc. You inferred that I agreed that they are "parts." And you very much need to make up things for it to be a conspiracy.

I said that I don't want the things that you don't want meaning whatever end game you think is just around the corner.

If I maintain that free trade agreements are positive then why do you think I would accept your premise that everything is a patchwork of OWG? A FTA just might be a FTA.

Please point out where I've argued for One World Government?Entering into your aforementioned agreements, with penalties for not toeing the line, can easily be seen as leading to the "One World Government" that has been mentioned. As your own comment points out, trade really isn't free in reality. Europe is basically trying to control all trade in/by the West and give itself a cut for bureaucratic upkeep and luxury.

Note: I do not default believe that "free trade" and "One World Government" equal the same thing.

I get the point about signing up. Sign up for the US Marine Corps then tell them you were joking when you suddenly find out you had no freakin clue what you were signing up for :laugh:

[fj1200]

Entering into your aforementioned agreements, with penalties for not toeing the line, can easily be seen as leading to the "One World Government" that has been mentioned. As your own comment points out, trade really isn't free in reality. Europe is basically trying to control all trade in/by the West and give itself a cut for bureaucratic upkeep and luxury.

Note: I do not default believe that "free trade" and "One World Government" equal the same thing.

I get the point about signing up. Sign up for the US Marine Corps then tell them you were joking when you suddenly find out you had no freakin clue what you were signing up for :laugh:

It's not a matter of toeing the line, it's a matter of doing what's agreed to. As trump demonstrated we can always get out of a FTA. I'm not sure where I said trade isn't free in reality but I guess it's correct. Trade isn't free but FTAs get us closer to free trade.

Noted.