Trump Reveals Trailer of Explosive ‘2000 Mules’ Ballot Harvesting Documentary

[jimnyc]

Visit the site if you want and watch the documentary trailer.

Even if you don't like Trump, this is about our elections and the integrity. And I know that shows add sensationalism, and with Trump, so I'll take it lightly as of now. But I would really really like to see this in order to see what evidence they truly have and if this evidence pans out or not. The claims I am seeing in this video aren't even from Trump.

---

Trump Reveals Trailer of Explosive ‘2000 Mules’ Ballot Harvesting Documentary at Ohio Rally

Former President Donald Trump on Saturday evening played the trailer of the forthcoming explosive documentary “2000 Mules” which reveals a wide scale ballot trafficking network of ballot harvesters across several swing states. Trump played the trailer at the rally where he is campaigning with J.D. Vance, the candidate he endorsed for U.S. Senate in this year’s Ohio GOP Senate primary.

The documentary, the product of a years-long investigation by election integrity group True The Vote and produced by conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza, has been long-awaited and is chock full of surveillance footage showing specific instances of people taking multiple ballots to drop boxes and making trips to several boxes around their states. The investigation has been anticipated since Breitbart News first revealed it last summer, and Trump has been hyping it for some time now in statements and commentary.

The trailer opens with a panel of Salem Radio Network hosts split on what happened in the 2020 election. Salem Media Group worked with D’Souza and True The Vote on the film, and the panel—which includes Turning Point USA’s Charlie Kirk and radio hosts Dennis Prager, Larry Elder, Eric Metaxas, and Dr. Sebastian Gorka—opens with them discussing how they, before viewing this evidence, were not sure what exactly happened in the 2020 election and were awaiting more evidence.

Then the film cuts to True The Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht who tells D’Souza, “We have been working on something big.”
“I’ve been working with Gregg Phillips,” Engelbrecht says. “He has a deep background in election intelligence.”

On screen, voters see Engelbrecht and Phillips breaking down the data and information that they have collected. “True The Vote has the largest store of election intelligence for the 2020 elections in the world,” Phillips says. “No one has more data than we do.”

Rest - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/04/23/trump-reveals-trailer-of-explosive-2000-mules-ballot-harvesting-documentary-at-ohio-rally/

[fj1200]

Probably won't be very explosive. Unfortunately they weren't able to prove anything in a court of law after 11/2020 and that will probably remain true. That and the laws on ballot harvesting are all over the place making it hard to explain to the average voter and then try and make the extension of election altering outcomes.

https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_harvesting_(ballot_collection)_laws_by_stat e

[Gunny]

Probably won't be very explosive. Unfortunately they weren't able to prove anything in a court of law after 11/2020 and that will probably remain true. That and the laws on ballot harvesting are all over the place making it hard to explain to the average voter and then try and make the extension of election altering outcomes.

https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_harvesting_(ballot_collection)_laws_by_stat ePerhaps. Even so, it goes nowhere. When does anything against the left, evidence or no end with accountability?

I have no problem with Trump and/or whoever being right. Gather the evidence and take it to court and stop forcing Republicans to choose Trump's version of events or the highway, effectively splitting the party right before the midterms. The Republicans running are already doing themselves enough damage without Trump being part of the equation.

The opportunity the GOP has to take Congress by big numbers doesn't come often and they're pissing it away, with Trump leading the charge to the urinal.

Just to recap: the MSM narratives are: Trump's Jan 6th insurrection where he is presumed guilty. Anyone accepting Trump's endorsement is complicity with Trump and his lie of stolen election. I have noted the repeated and often used term "lie". They can't get enough of putting it out there in case someone has doubts:rolleyes:

There are 3 (?) incumbent/candidates so far they are trying to use the courts to block from running for supporting anyone involved with Jan 6th or not agreeing that it was an "insurrection". Regardless what one thinks of these people (I don't have a very high opinion of any of them), they have been convicted of nothing. So now the left can gin up legal rulings based on a presumption of guilt?

If the Republicans/Trump blow the midterms, might as well find another country to live in. Joe Manchin as a Godsend is going to stretch only so far.

[SassyLady]

I have tickets to see it on May 5th. Should be interesting.

[BoogyMan]

I will be streaming it. Looking forward to see it.

[Gunny]

Done with 2020 unless they have a case, backed by real, hard evidence, to present to a court. Then I'm all ears. Al gore and Hillary Clinton were "robbed: too :rolleyes:

[SassyLady]

Done with 2020 unless they have a case, backed by real, hard evidence, to present to a court. Then I'm all ears. Al gore and Hillary Clinton were "robbed: too :rolleyes:
So, be done with it.

Some prefer to pursue all leads until something holds up in court. Just because the criminals covered their tracks doesn't mean no criminal activity occurred. 2000 Mules has been documenting the material squashed by MSM, DOJ, corrupt Secretary of State, poll workers and voting machine companies. Will be interesting to see if any of it will hold up in court. If nothing else it puts quite the spotlight on the whole process.

I find it interesting that Gore and Hiliary cried election fraud and yet didn't have the nationwide backing of the populace to keep the investigation open. Trump's popularity with his supporters is the reason this hasn't died. In order to have any intention of moving on those suspicions need to be exposed and in the open so no lingering doubts about election integrity overshadow 2022 and going forward.

A lot of those cases you refer to being lost in court were due to the way they were presented. Not for lack of evidence. Lost on technicalities. Now out of the fog of war, so to speak, more time and effort has been put forth to gather evidence.

All I ask is that people keep an open mind regardless of their animosity to Trump.

[jimnyc]

Probably won't be very explosive. Unfortunately they weren't able to prove anything in a court of law after 11/2020 and that will probably remain true. That and the laws on ballot harvesting are all over the place making it hard to explain to the average voter and then try and make the extension of election altering outcomes.

https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_harvesting_(ballot_collection)_laws_by_stat e

I would still like to see what all they actually show and how convincing the so called evidence is. And just how much. Can they detail someone dropping off ballots all over in different collection boxes & also have knowledge directly connected to what was dropped off? It would be quite odd finding someone dropping off dozens of ballots at boxes all over the state. But not jumping to any conclusions until I see things myself.

[Gunny]

So, be done with it.

Some prefer to pursue all leads until something holds up in court. Just because the criminals covered their tracks doesn't mean no criminal activity occurred. 2000 Mules has been documenting the material squashed by MSM, DOJ, corrupt Secretary of State, poll workers and voting machine companies. Will be interesting to see if any of it will hold up in court. If nothing else it puts quite the spotlight on the whole process.

I find it interesting that Gore and Hiliary cried election fraud and yet didn't have the nationwide backing of the populace to keep the investigation open. Trump's popularity with his supporters is the reason this hasn't died. In order to have any intention of moving on those suspicions need to be exposed and in the open so no lingering doubts about election integrity overshadow 2022 and going forward.

A lot of those cases you refer to being lost in court were due to the way they were presented. Not for lack of evidence. Lost on technicalities. Now out of the fog of war, so to speak, more time and effort has been put forth to gather evidence.

All I ask is that people keep an open mind regardless of their animosity to Trump.I have an open mind. If this was about voter fraud, I'd be interested. It isn't. It's about Trump and his ego. He lost and he can't accept it. He was cheated. Enough leftwingnuts in the country got together and conspired to steal a Presidential election and NOT ONE talked. Not happening in THIS country.

He runs around calling anyone that doesn't follow his fairy tale RINO, when in fact, he is the dictionary definition of the term. He's not good for the Republican party nor the conservative cause. He's serving neither. He's serving himself and intends to use a reelection term to somehow prove he, Donald Trump was wronged :rolleyes:

He's making an easy, overwhelming trouncing in the midterms into a nightmare because of his ego. It's about him, not us.

The best way to describe his behavior is he is acting EXACTLY like the MSM/Dems/left did when he won in 2016, and he's dragging it out and carrying on just like they did. He can call himself conservative and a republican all day, but if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it's NOT an eagle.

I never thought I'd say this because I've preached against it for 42 years, but if he is the Republican nominee, I'll write in someone else's name. I see no difference in having a Dem President and one who is going to destroy the republican and the right over his titty-baby tantrum.

I'm all for tightening voter accountability to the point a covid germ couldn't get through. We tightened ours up here. Without Trump and his liberal victim stories.

[Gunny]

I would still like to see what all they actually show and how convincing the so called evidence is. And just how much. Can they detail someone dropping off ballots all over in different collection boxes & also have knowledge directly connected to what was dropped off? It would be quite odd finding someone dropping off dozens of ballots at boxes all over the state. But not jumping to any conclusions until I see things myself.The real issue here is where there's a vote, there're people figuring a way to cheat. Just how it is.

For every state like mine that tightened their laws up, you have the questionable (blue) ones trying to loosen theirs. The only fix is if the federal government takes control and takes it out of the states' hands which will set off another round of crying, and effectively do little more than move the cheating to a higher level.

So they'll come up with all kinds of voting irregularities and present them as the norm. This has been done before. Remember 2000 and 2004?

Best anyone can hope for is individual states tighten their laws. Blue states aren't going to. It's a circle jerk, and it isn't different this time just because it's Donald Trump.