67 Percent of Independent Voters Say Joe Biden Should Not Seek Reelection

[jimnyc]

80 million though.

Between declining more and more numbers with democrats and independents as well, apparently in record time he has lost the support of like 40 million+ "supporters".

Ever seen a sitting president, where less than one year into winning the presidency the large majority of his supporters are already so disappointed that they do not want him even running again in '24 (or any other year prior)?

Even with poor results, usually people will still want their choice to run/win again, simply to keep the power alone, if anything. Never saw even similar myself.

---

67 Percent of Independent Voters Say Joe Biden Should Not Seek Reelection

Sixty-seven percent of independent registered voters believe President Joe Biden should not seek reelection in 2024, a Wednesday Politico/Morning Consult poll revealed.

As Washington, DC, insiders wait to see if Biden will make good on his promise to run for reelection amid 40 year-high inflation and the border crisis, a vast majority of independents do not support the president for a second term, Politico Playbook reported.

Overall, the poll found that 58 percent of registered voters oppose a Biden reelection campaign, while 34 wanted Biden to run for reelection.

Sixty-one percent of respondents also said the nation is on the wrong track. Just 39 percent of Americans believe it is headed in the correct direction.

The poor polling for Biden among swing voters comes as other Democrats are angling to enter the 2024 campaign.

As failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton continues to rebuild her political profile with interviews and media appearances, Vice President Kamala Harris and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg would seem to be the biggest contenders if Biden fails to run.

Rest - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/15/poll-67-percent-of-independent-voters-say-joe-biden-should-not-seek-reelection/

[Juicer66]

The amazing thing is that 33% think an 82 year old man ( in 2024 if still alive ) and already with early dementia and a habit of pissing his pants publicly, should be even considered .

I suppose by then the US will be a Chinese speaking full hand of Bananas Republic so that it will no longer much matter .

But really .

[Gunny]

80 million though.

Between declining more and more numbers with democrats and independents as well, apparently in record time he has lost the support of like 40 million+ "supporters".

Ever seen a sitting president, where less than one year into winning the presidency the large majority of his supporters are already so disappointed that they do not want him even running again in '24 (or any other year prior)?

Even with poor results, usually people will still want their choice to run/win again, simply to keep the power alone, if anything. Never saw even similar myself.

---

67 Percent of Independent Voters Say Joe Biden Should Not Seek Reelection

Sixty-seven percent of independent registered voters believe President Joe Biden should not seek reelection in 2024, a Wednesday Politico/Morning Consult poll revealed.

As Washington, DC, insiders wait to see if Biden will make good on his promise to run for reelection amid 40 year-high inflation and the border crisis, a vast majority of independents do not support the president for a second term, Politico Playbook reported.

Overall, the poll found that 58 percent of registered voters oppose a Biden reelection campaign, while 34 wanted Biden to run for reelection.

Sixty-one percent of respondents also said the nation is on the wrong track. Just 39 percent of Americans believe it is headed in the correct direction.

The poor polling for Biden among swing voters comes as other Democrats are angling to enter the 2024 campaign.

As failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton continues to rebuild her political profile with interviews and media appearances, Vice President Kamala Harris and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg would seem to be the biggest contenders if Biden fails to run.

Rest - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/15/poll-67-percent-of-independent-voters-say-joe-biden-should-not-seek-reelection/I know of no President that has failed as spectacularly and as fast as Biden. It's to the point where a good conspiracy theorist could make an argument for it being intentional. This administration is more screwy than a Jerry Lewis movie.

He's done it to himself and shows no signs of letup.

[Juicer66]

.------ It's to the point where a good conspiracy theorist could make an argument for it being intentional. ------.

Watch your spelling old timer .

You got the capital letters right but it is --- ritical and hinker that you have trouble with .

And never forget that matters that you do not understand are not therefore wrong or Conspiracy . Just things you might not understand -- like Quantum Theory for example .

Presumably a giant Conspiracy for 95%+ of people .Or a pile of Shite to quote a Normie .

[jimnyc]

Watch your spelling old timer .

You got the capital letters right but it is --- ritical and hinker that you have trouble with .

And never forget that matters that you do not understand are not therefore wrong or Conspiracy . Just things you might not understand -- like Quantum Theory for example .

Presumably a giant Conspiracy for 95%+ of people .Or a pile of Shite to quote a Normie .

Ok, I understand it, so go ahead and tell us about quantum theory. You brought it up now let's discuss.

[Juicer66]

*** Post removed. Member stole the work of another and then when busted then casually admitted to it like no big deal and demanded answers to THEIR questions, the victim of the plagiarist we have here - Juicer66 ***

[jimnyc]

*** Post removed. Member stole the work of another and then when busted then casually admitted to it like no big deal and demanded answers to THEIR questions, the victim of the plagiarist we have here - Juicer66 ***


Ya know, I was going to give a decent response until I realized a lot of this is lifted from Miles Mathis and his writing. Then I was going to delete it as lifted and no link included.

Instead I thought I would show that you are lifting the work of others to claim others are in over their head. So not only breaking the rules again, but plagiarizing.

And if you claim you didn't and attributed it in there somewhere - at a bare minimum you are trying to debate with another's words and claim superiority. How fucking lame.

So getting into hard details with you over this? Would have been and still am - if you will stop using the words of others and try offering your own.

So - asking politely for the LAST time - include links in your above opening post or have it deleted.

[Mr. P]

Cut and paste? You DAFT lil Girl ! :rofl1::rofl1:

[jimnyc]

Cut and paste? You DAFT lil Girl ! :rofl1::rofl1:

And she's too stupid to eliminate attributes and such. Her brain is too occupied to worry about such petty things. :rolleyes:

[Juicer66]

Ya know, I was going to give a decent response until I realized a lot of this is lifted from Miles Mathis and his writing. Then I was going to delete it as lifted and no link included.

Instead I thought I would show that you are lifting the work of others to claim others are in over their head. So not only breaking the rules again, but plagiarizing.

And if you claim you didn't and attributed it in there somewhere - at a bare minimum you are trying to debate with another's words and claim superiority. How fucking lame.

So getting into hard details with you over this? Would have been and still am - if you will stop using the words of others and try offering your own.

So - asking politely for the LAST time - include links in your above opening post or have it deleted.


Have told you about MM many times .

Answer his points and stop waffling .

You are so far out of your depth that you are going under .

Tell us about your Quantum Theory understanding -- 0/10 so far .

Deflection and total ignorance perhaps ?

[jimnyc]

Have told you about MM many times .

Answer his points and stop waffling .

You are so far out of your depth that you are going under .

Tell us about your Quantum Theory understanding -- 0/10 so far .

Deflection and total ignorance perhaps ?

So now I am answering HIS points?

You have no officially been nailed as a fraud. You are passing off the work of others as your own - and you're still stupid. I KNEW you didn't pass the sniff test and would screw up and out yourself as an idiot. Which you have now done with a cherry on top.

Fraudulent Idiot. Highlighted for all for all of eternity.

[jimnyc]

Original theft by member has been saved to the staff section for review.

[jimnyc]

And don't worry, Ms. IQ, your stolen post will remain as a sticky for all to see you steal the work of others.

[Juicer66]

I understand .

You feel like a bit of a plonker and don't know how to extricate yourself .

I will tell nobody and not laugh . Does that help ?

Jimmy Cricket , if you are a man you must accept that you have made a fool of yourself .

Not the end of the world .

[Gunny]

Watch your spelling old timer .

You got the capital letters right but it is --- ritical and hinker that you have trouble with .

And never forget that matters that you do not understand are not therefore wrong or Conspiracy . Just things you might not understand -- like Quantum Theory for example .

Presumably a giant Conspiracy for 95%+ of people .Or a pile of Shite to quote a Normie .Resorting to being a grammar Nazi now are you?:rolleyes:

One would think that when one presumes to be as all-knowing as you do, and attempts to correct others that one would at least know what the Hell one is talking about, right?

Spelling and grammar are fine, and far superior to anything you have yet to display. On the other hand, my typing sucks. I'm trying to work myself up to caring just for you :rolleyes:

[SassyLady]

I understand .

You feel like a bit of a plonker and don't know how to extricate yourself .

I will tell nobody and not laugh . Does that help ?

Jimmy Cricket , if you are a man you must accept that you have made a fool of yourself .

Not the end of the world .

No, Juice, you don't understand. We will debate YOU all day, every day, but not random plagiarized articles you post here as being your own thoughts and research.

I knew you were a fraud when you started posting Clif High musings and assertions as your own.

All you need to do when you cut and paste is include your source. That would be a legitimate way to interact with posters about a topic of interest. That way we can attribute the info to the original source.

[jimnyc]

Resorting to being a grammar Nazi now are you?:rolleyes:

One would think that when one presumes to be as all-knowing as you do, and attempts to correct others that one would at least know what the Hell one is talking about, right?

Spelling and grammar are fine, and far superior to anything you have yet to display. On the other hand, my typing sucks. I'm trying to work myself up to caring just for you :rolleyes:

No Grammar issue here...

Old Cackling Hen here posted lifted work from Miles Mathis on Quantum Theory to look so intelligent, only to immediately get busted. She's been trying to deflect it as no big deal.

But I do find it a big deal when someone posts the work of others without a citation. That alone bugs me as I can get shit about it. So I always ask for a link.

But she didn't post an article and forget a link - she stole work and tried to wiggle crap into her post to sound good, only she stole it from elsewhere and got busted.

When nailed she just says:


Have told you about MM many times .

Answer his points and stop waffling .

Casually mentioning the ACTUAL author suddenly, and then telling me to answer HIS points - when I asked her to discuss it and tell me what she knows.

Where I come from they call that "plagiarizing" and theft. Not a criminal matter but rather something a person can be sued for copyright infringement. Seen it happen to folks for less, with no warnings. Seems authors like getting credit for what they wrote and don't take kindly to thieves. Imagine that.

[jimnyc]

No, Juice, you don't understand. We will debate YOU all day, every day, but not random plagiarized articles you post here as being your own thoughts and research.

I knew you were a fraud when you started posting Clif High musings and assertions as your own.

All you need to do when you cut and paste is include your source. That would be a legitimate way to interact with posters about a topic of interest. That way we can attribute the info to the original source.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought her postings were a bit suspect at times.

That explains why most of her posts are written at a 6th grade level & every now and again something intelligent would appear. :rolleyes:

And I have no issue debating the old hen on ANY subject out there, but now anyone trying to do so knows what they will face - her and Google.