Biden Claims Vaccines Aren’t About Personal Rights Or Freedom, Calls For Even Stricte

[Gunny]

Anti-vaxxers will like this video. ANyone who thinks Biden is overstepping his bounds will agree with that portion. Any direction you look at it from, Biden needs to go f*ck himself.


OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:49 AM PT – Thursday, September 30, 2021Joe Biden has called for businesses to take more restrictive measures against customers by imposing his coronavirus vaccine mandates. One America’s Pearson Sharp has more.
video @ link https://www.oann.com/biden-claims-vaccines-arent-about-personal-rights-or-freedom-calls-for-even-stricter-mandates/

[Black Diamond]

Anti-vaxxers will like this video. ANyone who thinks Biden is overstepping his bounds will agree with that portion. Any direction you look at it from, Biden needs to go f*ck himself.

video @ link https://www.oann.com/biden-claims-vaccines-arent-about-personal-rights-or-freedom-calls-for-even-stricter-mandates/

People don't respond well to someone they already don't like saying with condescension "we have been patient but,"
And then threatening their jobs if they refuse

[Gunny]

People don't respond well to someone they already don't like saying with condescension "we have been patient but,"
And then threatening their jobs if they refuseI have to keep in mind I chose to get vaccinated based on my circumstances and the other people affected by my decision. I promise you being threatened isn't any reason on my list. Probably a good thing all this threatening people cam after I had already been vaccinated.

[JakeStarkey]

SCOTUS decided this type of thing in 1905.

Does not matter at law if I agree or not.

[Gunny]

SCOTUS decided this type of thing in 1905.

Does not matter at law if I agree or not.Did they? Any particular case you are aware of? I'd like to see what it states.

FWIW, I agree the government is going to force everyone to get vaccinated before it's over. That's just how the US government rolls.

[Juicer66]

Are Sleepy and his care team that thick or so under total control or both ?

Cannot see him being around in even a full month's time .

Unparalleled stupidity that reflects on all Americans .

[JakeStarkey]

^^^^ Your unparalleled silliness reflects on you.

[Abbey Marie]

Anti-vaxxers will like this video. ANyone who thinks Biden is overstepping his bounds will agree with that portion. Any direction you look at it from, Biden needs to go f*ck himself.

video @ link https://www.oann.com/biden-claims-vaccines-arent-about-personal-rights-or-freedom-calls-for-even-stricter-mandates/

:rolleyes:

I just can’t with this man.

[Gunny]

:rolleyes:

I just can’t with this man.He has no credibility. Fauci has no credibility. Nobody trying to force the vaccine down everyone's throats has any kind of credibility. They've been caught lying time and again, and usually to cover up for not knowing WTF they're talking about.

Not to give them any ideas, but remember how they shoved Obamacare down our throats? Tied it to our taxes.

[Abbey Marie]

Are Sleepy and his care team that thick or so under total control or both ?

Cannot see him being around in even a full month's time .

Unparalleled stupidity that reflects on all Americans .

Actually, only reflects on about half of us. :cool:

[JakeStarkey]

Disagree all you want



How the Supreme Court ruled on a vaccine mandate in 1905 (https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrE19KULVdhmGoAij1XNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9 zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1633132053/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.newsweek.com%2fwhat-jacobson-v-massachusetts-how-supreme-court-ruled-vaccine-mandate-1905-1627761/RK=2/RS=oMxFp4LpzqvzLIQ5c6z9PzoA6eY-)


Sep 10, 2021 · In 1905, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a mandatory vaccination law. Jon Cherry/Getty Images Request Reprint & Licensing , Submit Correction or view Editorial Guidelines



mtsu.edu › first-amendment › articleJacobson v. Massachusetts | The First Amendment Encyclopedia (https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1824/jacobson-v-massachusetts)


Massachusetts (1905), the Supreme Court upheld a state’s mandatory compulsory smallpox vaccination law over the challenge of a pastor who alleged that it violated his religious liberty rights. Pastor Henning Jacobson contended that he had a right under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to avoid the mandatory vaccination law.



constitutioncenter.org › blog › on-this-day-theOn this day, the Supreme Court rules on vaccines and public ... (https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-the-supreme-court-rules-on-vaccines-and-public-health)


Feb 20, 2021 · February 20, 2021 by Nicholas Mosvick. Shares. In the face of future public health emergencies like the Coronavirus, a precedential Supreme Court decision about the government’s power to protect citizens by quarantine and forced vaccinations could receive new interest. On February 20, 1905, the Supreme Court, by a 7-2 majority, said in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts could fine residents who refused to receive smallpox injections.



www.history.com › news › smallpox-vaccine-supreme-courtCan the Government Make Vaccines Mandatory? - HISTORY (https://www.history.com/news/smallpox-vaccine-supreme-court)


Jan 06, 2021 · A 1905 Supreme Court ruling backing a city-issued fine for refusing the smallpox vaccination provided a powerful and controversial precedent for the flexing of government authority.



Author: Dave Roos




theshaderoom.com › the-u-s-has-authority-to-fineThe U.S. Has Authority To Fine Or Jail Anyone Who Refuses ... (https://theshaderoom.com/the-u-s-has-authority-to-fine-or-jail-anyone-who-refuses-coronavirus-vaccine-according-to-law-enacted-in-1905/)


Aug 13, 2020 · Dating back to a law initially enacted in 1905, the United States has the full authority to place anyone in jail or fine them for refusing the vaccine. @ABC10News reports, during a recent interview Dov Fox, a law professor and the Director of the Center for Health Law Policy and Bioethics at the University of San Diego, explained just how much power the U.S. has in regard to forcing citizens to take a vaccine or accept the consequences.



en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Jacobson_vJacobson v. Massachusetts - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobson_v._Massachusetts)


Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.



reason.com › 2020/04/30 › when-the-supreme-courtWhen the Supreme Court Upheld a Compulsory Vaccination Law ... (https://reason.com/2020/04/30/when-the-supreme-court-upheld-a-compulsory-vaccination-law/)


Apr 30, 2020 · Massachusetts (1905), the U.S. Supreme Court confronted a state law that allowed local governments to require smallpox vaccinations when the local health authorities deemed them necessary ...









(https://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AwrE19KULVdhmGoApD1XNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNi ZjEEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3BhZ2luYXRpb24-?p=1905+SCOTUS+finding+settles+vaccination+law&type=E210US91088G0&fr=mcafee&b=8&pz=7&bct=0&xargs=0)

[Gunny]

Disagree all you want



How the Supreme Court ruled on a vaccine mandate in 1905 (https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrE19KULVdhmGoAij1XNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9 zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1633132053/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.newsweek.com%2fwhat-jacobson-v-massachusetts-how-supreme-court-ruled-vaccine-mandate-1905-1627761/RK=2/RS=oMxFp4LpzqvzLIQ5c6z9PzoA6eY-)




Sep 10, 2021 · In 1905, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a mandatory vaccination law. Jon Cherry/Getty Images Request Reprint & Licensing , Submit Correction or view Editorial Guidelines
mtsu.edu › first-amendment › articleJacobson v. Massachusetts | The First Amendment Encyclopedia (https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1824/jacobson-v-massachusetts)




Massachusetts (1905), the Supreme Court upheld a state’s mandatory compulsory smallpox vaccination law over the challenge of a pastor who alleged that it violated his religious liberty rights. Pastor Henning Jacobson contended that he had a right under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to avoid the mandatory vaccination law.
constitutioncenter.org › blog › on-this-day-theOn this day, the Supreme Court rules on vaccines and public ... (https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-the-supreme-court-rules-on-vaccines-and-public-health)




Feb 20, 2021 · February 20, 2021 by Nicholas Mosvick. Shares. In the face of future public health emergencies like the Coronavirus, a precedential Supreme Court decision about the government’s power to protect citizens by quarantine and forced vaccinations could receive new interest. On February 20, 1905, the Supreme Court, by a 7-2 majority, said in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts could fine residents who refused to receive smallpox injections.
www.history.com › news › smallpox-vaccine-supreme-courtCan the Government Make Vaccines Mandatory? - HISTORY (https://www.history.com/news/smallpox-vaccine-supreme-court)




Jan 06, 2021 · A 1905 Supreme Court ruling backing a city-issued fine for refusing the smallpox vaccination provided a powerful and controversial precedent for the flexing of government authority.

Author: Dave Roos



theshaderoom.com › the-u-s-has-authority-to-fineThe U.S. Has Authority To Fine Or Jail Anyone Who Refuses ... (https://theshaderoom.com/the-u-s-has-authority-to-fine-or-jail-anyone-who-refuses-coronavirus-vaccine-according-to-law-enacted-in-1905/)




Aug 13, 2020 · Dating back to a law initially enacted in 1905, the United States has the full authority to place anyone in jail or fine them for refusing the vaccine. @ABC10News reports, during a recent interview Dov Fox, a law professor and the Director of the Center for Health Law Policy and Bioethics at the University of San Diego, explained just how much power the U.S. has in regard to forcing citizens to take a vaccine or accept the consequences.
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Jacobson_vJacobson v. Massachusetts - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobson_v._Massachusetts)




Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.
reason.com › 2020/04/30 › when-the-supreme-courtWhen the Supreme Court Upheld a Compulsory Vaccination Law ... (https://reason.com/2020/04/30/when-the-supreme-court-upheld-a-compulsory-vaccination-law/)




Apr 30, 2020 · Massachusetts (1905), the U.S. Supreme Court confronted a state law that allowed local governments to require smallpox vaccinations when the local health authorities deemed them necessary ...







(https://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AwrE19KULVdhmGoApD1XNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNi ZjEEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3BhZ2luYXRpb24-?p=1905+SCOTUS+finding+settles+vaccination+law&type=E210US91088G0&fr=mcafee&b=8&pz=7&bct=0&xargs=0)









Yep. Doesn't make you right about anything except the law is going to win because the law has declared it will.

Now if we could just get all thoose people on the left refusing to get vaccinated to get with the program :salute:

[Bilgerat]

https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/241694069_10225994970721476_621658616496336892_n.j pg?_nc_cat=107&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=VaHwuGN873AAX_1QyyY&_nc_oc=AQmGNMtcPQ8WAAirhYGPaB1dtsFbTa2NAyq5066rScX dS8uyv2Xl54Qun5wPP8qsbSk&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&oh=9217a2850d01bb5c5677807f49691cac&oe=617EA10C

[Gunny]

https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/241694069_10225994970721476_621658616496336892_n.j pg?_nc_cat=107&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=VaHwuGN873AAX_1QyyY&_nc_oc=AQmGNMtcPQ8WAAirhYGPaB1dtsFbTa2NAyq5066rScX dS8uyv2Xl54Qun5wPP8qsbSk&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&oh=9217a2850d01bb5c5677807f49691cac&oe=617EA10C

Welcome the USA :) We'll give you a job and hook you up with the Company Store ...

[icansayit]

NEED TO READ THE CONSTITUTION. Not even the Supreme Court can OVERRULE any of the AMENDMENTS...For ANY reason the IDIOTS insist they can.
IN SIMPLER TERMS FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT COMPREHEND. GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER TO TELL ANY CITIZEN WHAT CAN BE SWALLOWED, INHALED, INSERTED, INJECTED into their body. Doing so is a violation of their Constitutional rights.

Let's start with the 4TH Amendment, and go from there.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qnZQFRyy3oY/U2BFSMKEFhI/AAAAAAAAe70/-bB2iTSi_Bg/s1600/fourth-amendment.jpg

https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/styles/sidebar/public/fourthamendment_0.png?itok=8cdhCX5O

[JakeStarkey]

Yep. Doesn't make you right about anything except the law is going to win because the law has declared it will.

Now if we could just get all thoose people on the left refusing to get vaccinated to get with the program :salute:
Of course that makes me right. Your libertarian values, you believe, are trampled by a We the People government.

[Gunny]

Of course that makes me right. Your libertarian values, you believe, are trampled by a We the People government.Libertarian values, huh?:laugh:

No, our government tramples my sense of honesty, decency, integrity,