Who did not see that this dictatorial-gestapo-type bullshat was coming???

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/u-s-agency-makes-clear-companies-can-require-workers-to-be-vaccinated-against-covid/ar-AAKvKLO?ocid=msedgdhp


Newsweek
Newsweek
U.S. Agency Makes Clear Companies Can Require Workers to Be Vaccinated Against COVID
Emma Mayer - Yesterday 7:30 PM


WHEATON, MARYLAND - MAY 21: Maryland National Guard PFC Caitlyn Conver fills a syringe with a dose of the Moderna coronavirus vaccine during a clinic at CASA de Maryland's Wheaton Welcome Center on May 21, 2021 in Wheaton, Maryland. Updated guidance from the EEOC revealed Friday that employers and companies can now mandate the vaccination of their employees. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
WHEATON, MARYLAND - MAY 21: Maryland National Guard PFC Caitlyn Conver fills a syringe with a dose of the Moderna coronavirus vaccine during a clinic at CASA de Maryland's Wheaton Welcome Center on May 21, 2021 in Wheaton, Maryland. Updated guidance from the EEOC revealed Friday that employers and companies can now mandate the vaccination of their employees. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Updated statements from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) say that U.S. companies and employers are allowed to require their employees to receive COVID-19 vaccinations.

On Friday, the EEOC updated its guidance to include that employers can mandate vaccines, as well as legally incentivize the vaccination, as long as the incentive is not coercive.


For employees exempt from mandatory vaccination, employers must comply with accommodation requirements, such as the Disabilities Act and other laws. The EEOC highlighted reasonable accommodations, including continuing to wear a mask, working at a social distance, or working virtually if applicable.

EEOC Chair Charlotte A. Burrows said in a statement that these new guidances are responses to frequently asked questions in the employment context.

"The EEOC will continue to clarify and update our COVID-19 technical assistance to ensure that we are providing the public with clear, easy-to-understand, and helpful information," Burrows stated.

Federal laws do not prevent companies or employers from incentivizing immunization, either, according to the EEOC. According to the commission's statement: "Because vaccinations require employees to answer pre-vaccination disability-related screening questions, a very large incentive could make employees feel pressured to disclose protected medical information."

quote::


On Friday, the EEOC updated its guidance to include that employers can mandate vaccines, as well as legally incentivize the vaccination, as long as the incentive is not coercive.

"" as long as the incentive is not coercive ""

lol. as if --mandating employees --must take the vaccine is not coercive and totally a nazi-type action....

The mandate would be --get the damn shot or else you are fired!

But hey-that is not coercive... :rolleyes:

I've said all along eventually they would start ways to force vaccinations...

And these worthless, lying liberal/dem assholes wonder why so many Americans have bought guns these last few decades..-- :salute:

And why so many states have legalized open carry laws... --Tyr

[Gunny]

Sure it was coming. Have to have more vaccinations than 1 just to go to public school here. The military shot me up with all kinds of vaccines for 40 years. Saw several lose stripes for refusing to take anthrax.

Here's what I think: if and when I decide I've been pushed over the line and going all Rambo, i'm going down in flames and e everybody 's gonna know my name. It ain't gonna be over a mask or the hundredth and whatever shot the government is dishing out.

Our entire lives we've done what big brother tells us to. And if big brother can't talk you into it, he's going to make it impossible for us another way. Keeping in mind the previous paragraph, doing something tbat is for the common good is hardly worth trying to take a stand on. If I'm going to be the bad guy, it's got to be worth it to me.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/employees-sue-hospital-over-vaccine-mandate-you-re-forcing-us-to-be-human-guinea-pigs-in-experimental-vaccine-trial/ar-AAKwian?ocid=msedgdhp


Law & Crime
Employees Sue Hospital over Vaccine Mandate: You’re Forcing Us to Be ‘Human Guinea Pigs’ in ‘Experimental Vaccine Trial’
Aaron Keller - Saturday


Employees Sue Hospital over Vaccine Mandate: You’re Forcing Us to Be ‘Human Guinea Pigs’ in ‘Experimental Vaccine Trial’
© Provided by Law & Crime
Employees Sue Hospital over Vaccine Mandate: You’re Forcing Us to Be ‘Human Guinea Pigs’ in ‘Experimental Vaccine Trial’
Lead plaintiff Jennifer Bridges.

A group of 117 Houston-area hospital employees on Friday filed a civil lawsuit against an employer hospital’s coronavirus vaccine mandate. The lawsuit alleges that the mandate violates both the Nuremberg Code and U.S. statutes that allow Americans to refuse “unapproved” medical treatments. It also alleges violations of Texas labor and employment laws.


That “people” are “trying to force you to put something into your body that you’re not comfortable with to keep your job is just insane,” lead plaintiff Jennifer Bridges told Houston CBS affiliate KHOU.

The defendants are The Methodist Hospital, the Methodist Hospital System, and Houston Methodist The Woodlands Hospital. The people in charge of those entities responded to the litigation by saying the plaintiffs are but a small minority of voices among 26,000 employees and that it is “legal for health care institutions to mandate vaccines.”

The Lawsuit.

The sharply worded 56-page complaint argues that the COVID-19 vaccines currently on the market were authorized merely as “emergency” measures and, thus, are not fully “approved” vaccines.

At the top of the document are words attributed to David Bernard, the CEO of Houston Methodist San Jacinto Hospital: “100% vaccination is more important than your individual freedom. Everyone [sic] of you is replaceable. If you don’t like what your [sic] doing you can leave and we will replace your spot.”

Those alleged words did not sit well with the plaintiffs.

“For the first time in the history of the United States, an employer is forcing an employee to participate in an experimental vaccine trial as a condition for continued employment,” the lawsuit argues.

The document continues by alleging that the defendant hospital “became the first major health care system in the country to force it [sic] employees to be injected with an experimental COVID-19 mRNA gene modification injection (‘experimental vaccine’) or be fired.”

“Methodist Hospital is forcing its employees to be human ‘guinea pigs’ as a condition for continued employment,” the lawsuit’s opening paragraph also says.


Video: Senate, House intelligence committees also probing COVID-19 origins -officials (Reuters)

Pause
Current Time 0:36
/
Duration 1:24
Unmute
0
LQ
CaptionsFullscreen
Senate, House intelligence committees also probing COVID-19 origins -officials
The Washington Post on May 14 reported that the coronavirus vaccines available in the U.S. are no longer considered “experimental” because they have “completed clinical trials and have been authorized for emergency use.” The same report quotes a bevy of experts who asserted that the current vaccines are safe while noting that millions of Americans have been vaccinated without serious harm.

Still, the plaintiff employees remain skeptical.

“[T]here is much the FDA does not know about these products even as it authorizes them for emergency use, including their effectiveness against infection, death, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that is allegedly the cause of the COVID disease,” the lawsuit claims.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Friday updated its COVID-19 vaccination guidance documents for employers.

“Federal EEO laws do not prevent an employer from requiring all employees physically entering the workplace to be vaccinated for COVID-19, so long as employers comply with the reasonable accommodation provisions of the ADA and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other EEO considerations,” the new EEOC technical assistance document reads.

Documents submitted as exhibits to the plaintiff’s lawsuit do point out that the hospital defendants have a system in place for such exemption requests. The Houston-area plaintiffs have alleged that the hospital has “arbitrarily denied” claims for religious or medical exemptions.

The lawsuit further alleges that hospital marketing materials are putting “profits over people” by advertising that all employees and physicians are required to be vaccinated.

The case was filed in state court in Montgomery County, Texas. It alleges wrongful discharge and a violation of the at-will employment doctrine’s public policy exception. It seeks declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and attorneys fees.

The Response.

Dr. Marc Boom, the president and CEO of Houston Methodist, released a statement to Houston NBC affiliate KPRC. It reads:

As of today, 99 percent of Houston Methodist’s 26,000 employees have met the requirements for the vaccination mandate. We are extremely proud of our employees for doing the right thing and protecting our patients from this deadly virus. As health care workers, it is our sacred obligation to do whatever we can to protect our patients, who are the most vulnerable in our community. It is our duty and our privilege.

It is unfortunate that the few remaining employees who refuse to get vaccinated and put our patients first are responding in this way. It is legal for health care institutions to mandate vaccines, as we have done with the flu vaccine since 2009. The COVID-19 vaccines have proven through rigorous trials to be very safe and very effective and are not experimental. More than 165 million people in the U.S. alone have received vaccines against COVID-19, and this has resulted in the lowest numbers of infections in our country and in the Houston region in more than a year.

A full legal response has not yet been filed.

I knew the powers that be , that want every human on earth to be a part of their agenda would start finding ways to force the people that do not want the vaccine to be forced to accept taking the shots...
That to me is just another indication of the devious agenda behind this ongoing scam and power play..-Tyr

[icansayit]

Another reason why the LEFT/DEMOCRATS want to control Education (or the lack of it) and they cheer the Destruction of our History.
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NAZIS.CHAP1.HTM

As usual. Some will instantly declare this is all HOGWASH, and CONSPIRACY until they see the HISTORICAL FACTS for themselves. And they will still deny this could take place now.


Most Nazis were absolute racists, especially among the top echelon; they believed utterly in the superiority of the "Aryan" race. They had no doubt that they were the pinnacle of racial evolution, that eugenically they were the best. So science proved, as many German and non-German scientists told them. And therefore they could not allow inferior groups to pollute their racial strain. Inferior races were like diseased appendixes that had to be surgically removed for the health of the body. Therefore they must exterminate the Jew and Gypsy. So also must they liquidate the homosexual and handicapped. So eventually they must also eliminate the Slavs, after exploiting their slave labor. Slavs were not only biologically inferior, but also inhabited territory that Germany needed for the superior race to expand and grow.
These genocides cost the lives of probably 16,315,000 people. Most likely the Nazis wiped out 5,291,000 Jews, 258,000 Gypsies, 10,547,000 Slavs, and 220,000 homosexuals. They also "euthanized" 173,500 handicapped Germans. Then in repression, terrorism, reprisals, and other cold-blooded killings done to impose and maintain their rule throughout Europe, the Nazis murdered more millions including French, Dutch, Serbs, Slovenes, Czechs, and others. In total, they likely annihilated 20,946,000 human beings.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Another reason why the LEFT/DEMOCRATS want to control Education (or the lack of it) and they cheer the Destruction of our History.
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NAZIS.CHAP1.HTM

As usual. Some will instantly declare this is all HOGWASH, and CONSPIRACY until they see the HISTORICAL FACTS for themselves. And they will still deny this could take place now.


Most Nazis were absolute racists, especially among the top echelon; they believed utterly in the superiority of the "Aryan" race. They had no doubt that they were the pinnacle of racial evolution, that eugenically they were the best. So science proved, as many German and non-German scientists told them. And therefore they could not allow inferior groups to pollute their racial strain. Inferior races were like diseased appendixes that had to be surgically removed for the health of the body. Therefore they must exterminate the Jew and Gypsy. So also must they liquidate the homosexual and handicapped. So eventually they must also eliminate the Slavs, after exploiting their slave labor. Slavs were not only biologically inferior, but also inhabited territory that Germany needed for the superior race to expand and grow.
These genocides cost the lives of probably 16,315,000 people. Most likely the Nazis wiped out 5,291,000 Jews, 258,000 Gypsies, 10,547,000 Slavs, and 220,000 homosexuals. They also "euthanized" 173,500 handicapped Germans. Then in repression, terrorism, reprisals, and other cold-blooded killings done to impose and maintain their rule throughout Europe, the Nazis murdered more millions including French, Dutch, Serbs, Slovenes, Czechs, and others. In total, they likely annihilated 20,946,000 human beings.

Always it is these so-called superior beings that are going solve all this evil worlds ills by gaining absolute power and exterminating certain groups.
And what history repeatedly proves is these groups are themselves one of the world's ills and one of its biggest problems..
As is never more aptly proven than by the very example that you my friend cited--the murderous Nazi's....

Does anybody think the dems/libs/leftists are better- are immunized from engaging in the murderous rampage that the Nazi's went on?

If they do think that-- then they themselves are damn fools!!!

The character of those I named clearly show that they are already far over the halfway mark of being there along with the Nazi mentality.
Given more power -they will reach that desired goal... -Tyr

[Gunny]

The left.resembles Nazi fascism because the left is fascist. Figuring it out isn't hard. Why some are too stupid to get it is. The resemblance is too spot on.

[Kathianne]

Always it is these so-called superior beings that are going solve all this evil worlds ills by gaining absolute power and exterminating certain groups.
And what history repeatedly proves is these groups are themselves one of the world's ills and one of its biggest problems..
As is never more aptly proven than by the very example that you my friend cited--the murderous Nazi's....

Does anybody think the dems/libs/leftists are better- are immunized from engaging in the murderous rampage that the Nazi's went on?

If they do think that-- then they themselves are damn fools!!!

The character of those I named clearly show that they are already far over the halfway mark of being there along with the Nazi mentality.
Given more power -they will reach that desired goal... -Tyr
True. Those with the 'idea of solutions towards utopian usually don't buy in', though they have those that do and propogandize those ideas. They don't waiver. People are sold on said plans, even when they involve draconian enforcement of compliance. No shades of grey.

[fj1200]

Don't want the vaccine? Don't work there. Property rights.

[SassyLady]

Don't want the vaccine? Don't work there. Property rights.

If this were true then why do bakers have to bake cakes for anyone they don't like? Can they refuse now if someone isn't vaccinated? Property rights?

[fj1200]

If this were true then why do bakers have to bake cakes for anyone they don't like? Can they refuse now if someone isn't vaccinated? Property rights?

Because of stupid NDA laws in some jurisdictions. I'm not sure non-vaccinated people are a protected class yet. But yes, property rights as you are not guaranteed a job at that establishment as some have argued that people don't have a right to be served at other establishments.