PDA

View Full Version : 15-Year-Old Girl Charged with Sexually Abusing Herself


Dfresh
02-04-2007, 12:49 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2004-03-29-child-self-porn_x.htm
Dilloduck
02-04-2007, 12:56 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2004-03-29-child-self-porn_x.htm

Oh boy--what next ?:dunno:
Insein
02-04-2007, 02:19 PM
Oh boy--what next ?:dunno:

She's charged with child pornography for photographing herself? LOL Now ive heard it all. She'll probably have to register as a sex offender too, lol.

On a side note, yes kids are so innocent arent they. :rolleyes:
darin
02-04-2007, 02:21 PM
She's charged with child pornography for photographing herself? LOL Now ive heard it all. She'll probably have to register as a sex offender too, lol.

On a side note, yes kids are so innocent arent they. :rolleyes:

But she's a minor...so - will she be charged in the Adult courts?
Mr. P
02-04-2007, 02:30 PM
She has been charged with sexual abuse of children, possession of child pornography and dissemination of child pornography.

Your extreme Christian right at work

Question….Who did she hurt? Who ?
Dilloduck
02-04-2007, 02:46 PM
Your extreme Christian right at work

Question….Who did she hurt? Who ?

Using that logic I guess its ok to screw down at the playground?
Mr. P
02-04-2007, 02:50 PM
Using that logic I guess its ok to screw down at the playground?

No that would be hurting someone. :)
Dilloduck
02-04-2007, 02:52 PM
No that would be hurting someone. :)

Who?
Mr. P
02-04-2007, 02:54 PM
Who?

Most likely the victom of rape..then again if they both wanted it, it would 'hurt' eighter.
Insein
02-04-2007, 02:56 PM
Using that logic I guess its ok to screw down at the playground?

No that would be in public where people that don't want to see it are forced to see it. On the internet, anyone that doesnt want to view that stuff doesnt have to.

But thats another issue. The fact that she is being charged is ridiculous. Her parents should have been notified and then they should have handled it from there.
Dilloduck
02-04-2007, 02:59 PM
No that would be in public where people that don't want to see it are forced to see it. On the internet, anyone that doesnt want to view that stuff doesnt have to.

But thats another issue. The fact that she is being charged is ridiculous. Her parents should have been notified and then they should have handled it from there.

Tough--using Mr. Ps' logic it's not hurting anyone--consenting adults ! If they don't like seeing it they can look away.
darin
02-04-2007, 02:59 PM
Your extreme Christian right at work

Question….Who did she hurt? Who ?


It's godless liberal left's "Zero Tolerance" laws at work. If Christians WERE at work around that girl, she would likely not be slutty.

She hurt HERSELF and people she sent the pics to. Of course..PORN is HEALTHY and GOOD and HARMLESS right? Ask Mr. Bundy..
Mr. P
02-04-2007, 03:01 PM
Tough--using Mr. Ps' logic it's not hurting anyone--consenting adults ! If they don't like seeing it they can look away.

Who was the victim, dillo? Was there one?
Mr. P
02-04-2007, 03:05 PM
It's godless liberal left's "Zero Tolerance" laws at work. If Christians WERE at work around that girl, she would likely not be slutty.

She hurt HERSELF and people she sent the pics to. Of course..PORN is HEALTHY and GOOD and HARMLESS right? Ask Mr. Bundy..

Same question, dmp. Who did she hurt? Who? And how do you know?

Its a crime to take pics of yourself? Or a crime to send them to friends?
Dilloduck
02-04-2007, 03:07 PM
Who was the victim, dillo? Was there one?

Not using your logic-----hell let's jsut pitch out all the age of consent laws too. I mean let's party !!!
darin
02-04-2007, 03:10 PM
Same question, dmp. Who did she hurt? Who? And how do you know?

Its a crime to take pics of yourself? Or a crime to send them to friends?

She hurt herself - causing emotional scars. She hurt others who willinging Looked at the images of her.

Should be charged with being an idiot? No. Should she get treatment? yes.
Mr. P
02-04-2007, 03:11 PM
Not using your logic-----hell let's jsut pitch out all the age of consent laws too. I mean let's party !!!

No we can't do that and I wouldn't suggest it either.

But you're right there was no victem. Therefore, no crime.:)
Mr. P
02-04-2007, 03:13 PM
She hurt herself - causing emotional scars. She hurt others who willinging Looked at the images of her.

Should be charged with being an idiot? No. Should she get treatment? yes.

You don't know that. You, like the jail worker, are doing nothing more that projecting YOUR beliefs on others. :)
Yurt
02-04-2007, 03:25 PM
:dunno: I thought that the members of the "protected class" could not be charged with the crime that was made a "crime" to protect the class.