PDA

View Full Version : Very Interesting Poll Conducted Just Before Ginsbert's Death



Kathianne
09-21-2020, 05:52 PM
Wow:

https://law.marquette.edu/poll/2020/09/19/public-views-of-justice-ginsburg-and-appointments-to-the-supreme-court/




POLL RELEASE (https://law.marquette.edu/poll/category/poll-release/)
PUBLIC VIEWS OF JUSTICE GINSBURG AND APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURTSEPTEMBER 19, 2020 (https://law.marquette.edu/poll/2020/09/19/public-views-of-justice-ginsburg-and-appointments-to-the-supreme-court/) CHARLES FRANKLIN (https://law.marquette.edu/poll/author/charles-franklin/)
MILWAUKEE — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died on Sept. 18, was the best known of the current justices, according to a new Marquette Law School national survey of public opinion of the Supreme Court, completed three days before her death.

...

About the Marquette Law School Poll
The survey was conducted Sept. 8-15, 2020, interviewing 1,523 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.6 percentage points. Interviews were conducted by the National Opinion Research Center using its AmeriSpeak Panel, a national probability sample, with interviews conducted online. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available at https://law.marquette.edu/poll/category/results-and-data/.

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
09-22-2020, 05:18 AM
Wow:

https://law.marquette.edu/poll/2020/09/19/public-views-of-justice-ginsburg-and-appointments-to-the-supreme-court/

Best known because she was a political activist . That mainstream media championed.
Her political activism went directly against the sworn oath for the office she held.
And that is why she was celebrated by Hollywood morons, media and many entities that are avid enemies of this nation.
I make no bones about my disrespect for her and for the other two that engage in being political pawns for the dems/leftists, Kagan and Sotomayor.
One only needs to look at each ones track record and see they do not address the interpretation of the Constitution as the prime mandate for their judicial judgements-- instead they interpret based primarily upon their own personal/political beliefs.
Which is in direct opposition to their sworn oath of office.
Each one placed political and liberal/leftist ideology over that of the call to use faithful constitutional interpretations to render their decisions.
And in my opinion each one was put in place--TO DO JUST THAT!-- --Tyr