Cancelled NETFLIX

[SassyLady]

Because of they are involved in the sexual exploitation of minors by streaming movie, Cuties.

[aboutime]

Obamas Settling Into New Role as Netflix Producers

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/obamas-settle-new-role-as-netflix-producers-1229621

https://static.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/2019/08/ted_and_nicole_greet_president_obama-928x523.jpg

[FakeNewsSux]

Because of they are involved in the sexual exploitation of minors by streaming movie, Cuties.
So did I. Does this make me a member of the #MeToo movement?

[SassyLady]

So did I. Does this make me a member of the #MeToo movement?

Makes you a member of The Decency Club.

[SassyLady]

Obamas Settling Into New Role as Netflix Producers

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/obamas-settle-new-role-as-netflix-producers-1229621

https://static.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/2019/08/ted_and_nicole_greet_president_obama-928x523.jpg



I doubt it. And, even if they do, probably don't care.

The lady I talked with when I cancelled asked me why I was cancelling and I told her exactly why. She mentioned they had been warned this was happening and I said I couldn't believe that the Obama's or the royal couple haven't denounced it. She didn't understand it either.

[Abbey Marie]

Because of they are involved in the sexual exploitation of minors by streaming movie, Cuties.

Can you give me a synopsis? I don’t want to search it as it gives it more attention, and will probably result in my getting ugly ads and spam.

[aboutime]

Can you give me a synopsis? I don’t want to search it as it gives it more attention, and will probably result in my getting ugly ads and spam.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8720041/Viewers-call-Netflix-cancel-controversial-Cuties-film.html

[Black Diamond]

12912

[Black Diamond]

Seriously. This is how far we have devolved.

[jimnyc]

I saw a blurb about someone who stated folks got it wrong, and then a headline stating that Netflix still supports the flick and what not. So I had to find out a little more myself.

Here is a brief synopsis of the movie:


Amy, an 11-year-old girl, joins a group of dancers named "the cuties" at school, and rapidly grows aware of her burgeoning femininity - upsetting her mother and her values in the process.

I got that from IMDB where I also then watched the trailer for the movie - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9196192/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0

And that's all she wrote for me and all I need to see. That should not be aired IMO.

These are all 11 year olds. One is a foreign girl with a very conservative mother and what seems to be a little stricter of an upbringing. Then she gets a cell phone it appears, and of course access to social media. Which first I don't know, but she's then watching videos of girls "dancing" and twerking and acting more adult like - and also sneakily watching girls, I guess the so called cuties, dancing somewhere. Somehow they become friends, and then realize they get "likes" when they dance and do certain moves for the audience. She starts dressing more seductively and dancing and out with her new friends. One point appears she steals mom's CC and buys stuff for all her friends. -- seems the girls were wearing leather, mini skirts and other shit an 11yr old should not be wearing.

And like I then read - they then display this and "entertain" the world showing all the other young girls out there about dressing like that, dancing like that and social media and likes. Yeah, that's a great movie and idea. Idiots.

[jimnyc]

Btw, that twerking shit. Seems it started in the dancing world, but the adult world, hip hop mostly & also many other female singers. Miley Cyrus for example. :rolleyes:

Even in the privacy of my home behind closed doors - I would NOT want to see my wife do shit like that. I find it degrading & it does nothing for me but bring me disgust for the person doing it.

It's bad enough that these adult idiots out there would degrade themselves as such and think it's so great and it makes them look sexy or something. Then more and more idiots on copy it and start doing it as well. Next thing you know it's all over social media and the internet. Non famous girls copy the behavior and think it's cool, and then they share it on social media with the world.

To each their own, but that's me.

Plus - who is the DUMB FU*K at Netflix who came up with the idea? Who decided that dancing and seductive outfits on 11yr girls is somehow ok, no matter the story or how you tell it. :rolleyes:

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Seems like from the description it is like a muslim grooming set up.
They seem to have no problem with having sex with underage girls, marrying them at 9/10/11/12 years old.

Link to just three examples - there are many more.
Do check out the pictures of the guilty men in third link.....---Tyr


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring


Rochdale child sex abuse ring
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The Rochdale child sex abuse ring involved underage teenage girls in Rochdale, Greater Manchester, England. Nine men were convicted of sex trafficking and other offences including rape, trafficking girls for sex and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child in May 2012. This resulted in Greater Manchester Police launching Operation Doublet to investigate further claims of abuse with 19 men so far being convicted.[1] Forty-seven girls were identified as victims of child sexual exploitation during the police investigation.[2][3][4] The men were British Pakistanis, which led to discussion on whether the failure to investigate them was linked to the authorities' fear of being accused of racial prejudice.[5] The girls were mainly White British.[5] In March 2015, Greater Manchester Police apologised for its failure to investigate the child sexual exploitation allegations more thoroughly between 2008–10.[6] Sara Rowbotham, the sexual health worker who first recognised patterns of child abuse in the community and fought to bring these crimes to police attention, was made redundant in 2014.[7] A former Detective Constable who was investigating the grooming gangs, Margaret Oliver, resigned in 2012 in disgust of the handling of the cases by the police force and spoke out as a whistleblower to inform the public.[8]


********************************************


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal
Rotherham town centre, May 2010.jpg
Rotherham town centre, March 2010
Date 1980s–2013
Location Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England
Coordinates 53.430°N 1.357°WCoordinates: 53.430°N 1.357°W
Events Child sexual abuse of an estimated 1,400 (1997–2013, according to the Jay report) aged approx. 11–16
Reporter Andrew Norfolk of The Times, with information from Jayne Senior, youth worker[1]
Inquiries Home Affairs Committee (2013–2014)[2]
Jay inquiry (2014)[3]
Casey inquiry (2015)[4]
Trials Sheffield Crown Court, 2010, 2016–2017, convictions for rape, conspiracy to rape, aiding and abetting rape, sexual intercourse with a girl under 13, indecent assault, false imprisonment, procurement. Numerous individual prosecutions regarding child sexual exploitation over the years, including 8 in 2012, 9 in 2013, and 1 in the first quarter of 2014[5]
Convictions Operation Central: 5 men
Operation Clover: 18 men & 2 women
Operation Stovewood: 21 men (trials ongoing)
Awards Andrew Norfolk: Orwell Prize (2013), Journalist of the Year (2014)[6]
Jayne Senior: MBE (2016 Birthday Honours)[7]
The Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal consisted of the organised child sexual abuse that occurred in the town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, Northern England from the late 1980s until the 2010s and the failure of local authorities to act on reports of the abuse throughout most of that period.[8] Researcher Angie Heal, who was hired by local officials and warned them about child exploitation occurring between 2002 and 2007, has since described it as the "biggest child protection scandal in UK history".[9] Evidence of the abuse was first noted in the early 1990s, when care home managers investigated reports that children in their care were being picked up by taxi drivers.[10] From at least 2001, multiple reports passed names of alleged perpetrators, several from one family, to the police and Rotherham Council. The first group conviction took place in 2010, when five British-Pakistani men were convicted of sexual offences against girls aged 12–16.[11] From January 2011 Andrew Norfolk of The Times pressed the issue, reporting in 2012 that the abuse in the town was widespread, and that the police and council had known about it for over ten years.[a]

The Times articles, along with the 2012 trial of the Rochdale child sex abuse ring, prompted the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee to conduct hearings.[14] Following this and further articles from Norfolk, Rotherham Council commissioned an independent inquiry led by Professor Alexis Jay. In August 2014 the Jay report concluded that an estimated 1,400 children, most of them white British girls,[15] had been sexually abused in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013 by predominantly British-Pakistani men (Kurdish and Kosovar men were also involved).[16][13] British Asian girls in Rotherham also suffered abuse, but a fear of shame and dishonour made them reluctant to report the abuse to authorities.[17] A "common thread" was that taxi drivers had been picking the children up for sex from care homes and schools. The abuse included gang rape, forcing children to watch rape, dousing them with petrol and threatening to set them on fire, threatening to rape their mothers and younger sisters, and trafficking them to other towns.[20] There were pregnancies—one at age 12—terminations, miscarriages, babies raised by their mothers, and babies removed, causing further trauma.[21][22][23][24]

The failure to address the abuse was attributed to a combination of factors revolving around race, class and gender—contemptuous and sexist attitudes toward the mostly working-class victims; fear that th...................


************************************************** ********

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-45918845

Huddersfield grooming: Twenty guilty of campaign of rape and abuse
19 October 2018
Share this with Facebook Share this with Messenger Share this with Twitter Share this with Email Share
Image caption
The men, all from Yorkshire, went by nicknames including "Dracula", "Bully", "Beastie" and "Nurse"
Twenty men have been found guilty of being part of a grooming gang that raped and abused girls as young as 11 in Huddersfield.

The men were convicted of more than 120 offences against 15 girls.

Victims were plied with drink and drugs and then "used and abused at will" in a seven-year "campaign of rape and abuse" between 2004 and 2011.

At Leeds Crown Court, the ringleader, Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 35, was jailed for life with a minimum of 18 years.

Other members of the gang were jailed for between five and 18 years but the court heard many perpetrators have never been identified.

Details of the men's convictions and sentences can only now be published after reporting restrictions on a series of trials were partially lifted.

During the three trials, jurors heard how the men - who are all British Asians mainly of Pakistani heritage - preyed on young, vulnerable girls, one of whom was described as having the mental age of a seven-year-old.


Media captionBarry Sheerman MP says the authorities did not act quickly enough to investigate grooming
The men, all from Yorkshire, went by nicknames including "Dracula" - which Nahman Mohammed was known as.

Mohammed Imran Ibrar was known as "Bully", Abdul Rehman was nicknamed "Beastie", while Nasarat Hussain was known as "Nurse".

Jailing 16 of the men earlier this year, Judge Geoffrey Marson QC said: "The way you treated these girls defies understanding; this abuse was vile and wicked.

"As cases of sexual abuse with which the courts have to deal, this case comes top of the scale."


**************************************************

[B]Those bastards pictured should be executed immediately, if not sooner, imho..-Tyr

[jimnyc]

Good, and I hope it's just the beginning.

---

‘Texans Won’t Tolerate Their Perverted Filth:’ Texas Lawmaker To File Bill Cracking Down On ‘Cuties’

A Texas lawmaker says he’s going to introduce a bill in the state to make sure that the French-film “Cuties” is recognized as pedophilia, thus criminalizing it, a statement to the Daily Caller said.

Republican Texas State Senator Bob Hall told the Caller that he’s going to introduce the bill as soon as the session starts to prosecute Netflix for hosting “Cuties,” which has been criticized for sexual depictions of young girls and includes suggestive dancing, as well as close-up shots of the young girls’ buttocks and crotches.


Thank you @repmattschaefer! Next session I will file a bill to make pedophilia a crime in our Texas state constitution. We MUST never normalize this kind of wickedness in our Texas. #txlege https://t.co/iICPCsZZlX

— Senator Bob Hall (@SenatorBobHall) September 10, 2020

Hall told the Caller his staff is currently developing strategies in preparation of filling the bill, and follows the request by another Texas lawmaker, Matt Schaefer, that the state’s attorney general investigate for possible violations of child exploitation.


I have asked Texas Attorney General Paxton’s office to investigate the @netflix film “Cuties” for possible violations of child exploitation and child pornography laws. #CUTIES #txlege

— Matt Schaefer (@RepMattSchaefer) September 10, 2020

“Current Texas law is crystal clear on pedophilia being a crime,” Hall said. “However, we must ensure that movies like “Cuties” are recognized as such if our Attorney General, Ken Paxton, says current law is not sufficient to prosecute perpetrators like Netflix. If Ken is able to take action we still need to look at ways to permanently solidify the criminalization, as opposed to the normalization of pedophilia.”

The award-winning French film was released Wednesday on Netflix, and was rebuked on social media shortly after its debut. One scene in the film shows the young girl, called Amy, dressed only in panties and a tank top shivering as her mother and great-aunt throw water at her. Amy shivers, writhes, and dances on the floor, and the scene includes multiple shots of her buttocks clad only in the wet underwear.

Rest - https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/11/texas-state-senator-bob-hall-bill-criminal-pedophilia-cuties-movie-netflix/

[LongTermGuy]

Because of they are involved in the sexual exploitation of minors by streaming movie, Cuties.


​Good....!!!!!

[Black Diamond]

12913

[pete311]

Cancel culture!

[Gunny]

Because of they are involved in the sexual exploitation of minors by streaming movie, Cuties.Another boycott :). I won't watch Netflix because the Obama's are involved with it, so I got on the boycott train early. That's been a couple of years. Anything pimping anything Obama isn't getting a dime out of me.

Unless it's his trial. I'm down for that :)

[SassyLady]

Cancel culture!

Yep. We do it by withdrawing monetary support rather than burning it down. That gives the offender a chance to reconsider. The left cancels a person's life.

[jimnyc]

Cancel culture!

And you're canceled from this thread. No one wants to see you writing the same shit in multiple threads. Yes, I have sympathy for your intelligence level and inability to write a complete sentence, but no I don't really. Eat a bag of balls.

[jimnyc]

--

Tom Cotton Leads Lawmakers Calling on DOJ to Investigate Netflix for ‘Peddling Child Pornography’

https://i.imgur.com/t0GAwat.png

Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) is among the Republican lawmakers calling on the U.S. Department of Justice to open a criminal investigation into Netflix for what Cotton called “peddling child pornography” after the streaming giant released the preteen twerking film Cuties.

“Like any parent, I find ⁦[Netflix’s]⁩ decision to peddle child pornography disgusting. And it’s criminal,” tweeted Senator Cotton on Saturday. “The Justice Department] should take swift action.”

https://i.imgur.com/7vt5qXC.png

Netflix is facing heavy backlash for releasing the film many critics say engages in the sexual exploitation of children.

Netflix, however, has defended its release of Cuties — despite intense scrutiny it has faced over the movie’s sexually charged depiction of underage girls — calling the film a “social commentary.”

Cuties centers around 11-year-old Amy, who “joins a group of dancers named ‘the cuties’ at school, and rapidly grows aware of her burgeoning femininity — upsetting her mother and her values in the process,” according to the film’s IMDb page.

Rest - https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/09/12/tom-cotton-leads-lawmakers-calling-on-doj-to-investigate-netflix-cuties-for-peddling-child-pornography/

[Gunny]

Here goes another freedom of speech fight. Wonder which side John Roberts will take this time :rolleyes:

[Black Diamond]

Here goes another freedom of speech fight. Wonder which side John Roberts will take this time :rolleyes:

Could depend on how much he enjoys the program.

[Gunny]

Could depend on how much he enjoys the program.:laugh::laugh: