jimnyc
01-28-2020, 01:12 PM
About damn time, and they need to continue with this and this appropriate angle. The Dems want to say its debunked but couldn't be farther from the truth. This is one of the main reasons that Ukraine needed to be investigated and much still does. But the Dems don't want Biden and Son exposed. Continue and prove this, which I think is a quite easy task, and that shows why Trump was doing what he was. It was legit either way, but this makes it certain and also holds someone responsible, to an extent.
--
Trump Defense Lawyer Pam Bondi Rakes Hunter Biden Over the Coals, Exposing Burisma Corruption
On Monday, former Florida attorney general and Trump defense lawyer Pam Bondi laid out the case that President Donald Trump was right to be concerned that Hunter Biden and his father engaged in corruption with the Ukrainian gas firm Burisma. Burisma hired Hunter Biden to its board as Joe Biden was the Obama point man on Ukraine, paying him handsomely. Later, Joe Biden pressured Ukraine's president to fire a prosecutor who was investigating Burisma at the time. The Democrat House impeachment managers referenced Hunter Biden and Burisma hundreds of times but insisted there was no scandal.
"When the House managers gave you their presentation when they submitted their brief, they repeatedly referenced Hunter Biden and Burisma. They spoke to you for over 21 hours and they referenced Biden or Burisma over 400 times," Bondi explained. "And when they gave these presentations, they said there was nothing, nothing to see, it was a sham."
"This is fiction," the former Florida AG declared. "In their trial memorandum, the House managers describe this as 'baseless.' Why did they invoke Biden or Burisma over 400 times? The reason they needed to do that is because they’re here saying that the president must be impeached and removed from office for raising a concern."
White House Counsel Pam Bondi delivers argument focused on Hunter Biden and Burisma https://t.co/iwYPRsRtGP pic.twitter.com/PdZ8NLfpvk
— CBS News (@CBSNews) January 27, 2020
Indeed, the Democrats' impeachment case rests on the claim that Trump abused his power by asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Hunter Biden and Burisma in order to gain a political advantage in the 2020 election against former Vice President Joe Biden. Democrats insist the president engaged in a corrupt quid pro quo, withholding military aid and a White House meeting until Zelensky agreed to investigate Biden.
Central to this argument is the idea that there is nothing to see in the Burisma caper. Indeed, in his infamous fake quotes "parody" of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) characterized Trump's request as pressuring Zelensky to "make up dirt" on Trump's "political opponent."
Yet Bondi went on to explain that Trump was far from alone in being concerned about the Bidens' conflict of interest. She quoted exhaustively from impeachment witnesses and news outlets, noting that Hunter Biden's hiring at the firm "raised eyebrows the world over."
Rest - https://pjmedia.com/trending/pam-bondi-rakes-hunter-biden-over-the-coals-exposing-burisma-corruption/
--
Trump Defense Lawyer Pam Bondi Rakes Hunter Biden Over the Coals, Exposing Burisma Corruption
On Monday, former Florida attorney general and Trump defense lawyer Pam Bondi laid out the case that President Donald Trump was right to be concerned that Hunter Biden and his father engaged in corruption with the Ukrainian gas firm Burisma. Burisma hired Hunter Biden to its board as Joe Biden was the Obama point man on Ukraine, paying him handsomely. Later, Joe Biden pressured Ukraine's president to fire a prosecutor who was investigating Burisma at the time. The Democrat House impeachment managers referenced Hunter Biden and Burisma hundreds of times but insisted there was no scandal.
"When the House managers gave you their presentation when they submitted their brief, they repeatedly referenced Hunter Biden and Burisma. They spoke to you for over 21 hours and they referenced Biden or Burisma over 400 times," Bondi explained. "And when they gave these presentations, they said there was nothing, nothing to see, it was a sham."
"This is fiction," the former Florida AG declared. "In their trial memorandum, the House managers describe this as 'baseless.' Why did they invoke Biden or Burisma over 400 times? The reason they needed to do that is because they’re here saying that the president must be impeached and removed from office for raising a concern."
White House Counsel Pam Bondi delivers argument focused on Hunter Biden and Burisma https://t.co/iwYPRsRtGP pic.twitter.com/PdZ8NLfpvk
— CBS News (@CBSNews) January 27, 2020
Indeed, the Democrats' impeachment case rests on the claim that Trump abused his power by asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Hunter Biden and Burisma in order to gain a political advantage in the 2020 election against former Vice President Joe Biden. Democrats insist the president engaged in a corrupt quid pro quo, withholding military aid and a White House meeting until Zelensky agreed to investigate Biden.
Central to this argument is the idea that there is nothing to see in the Burisma caper. Indeed, in his infamous fake quotes "parody" of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) characterized Trump's request as pressuring Zelensky to "make up dirt" on Trump's "political opponent."
Yet Bondi went on to explain that Trump was far from alone in being concerned about the Bidens' conflict of interest. She quoted exhaustively from impeachment witnesses and news outlets, noting that Hunter Biden's hiring at the firm "raised eyebrows the world over."
Rest - https://pjmedia.com/trending/pam-bondi-rakes-hunter-biden-over-the-coals-exposing-burisma-corruption/