jimnyc
10-22-2019, 02:29 PM
Yes, you read that right. It would be one thing if they got in the face and directly said it to someone , a verbal fight of sorts. But these scumbags were just walking through a parking lot and apparently used racial slurs - but not even to anyone. But yes, granted, someone obviously heard it and recorded it.
So not only did they get charged with a crime - but a hate crime. How stupid. But at least the law doesn't support anyone in the LBGTQ group and I'm free to ridicule them all day long!! :laugh2:
---
UConn students ARRESTED for 'ridiculing' speech in viral video
Two University of Connecticut students were arrested Monday after video allegedly showed them using racial slurs.
The school confirmed to Campus Reform that the men were charged under a Connecticut statute that makes it a crime to "ridicule" certain people.
University of Connecticut Police arrested Monday two men who were allegedly seen in a viral video reciting a racial slur.
The incident occurred on Oct. 11 in the parking lot of an off-campus apartment complex. In the video, there are three men walking through the lot. An individual took the video from the window of an apartment building, according to local media reports.
The video prompted the UConn NAACP chapter to pen a letter to the editor of the campus newspaper, The Daily Campus, calling on officials "to fully investigate this incident and apply the proper justice." Following those calls, the university confirmed to Campus Reform Monday that two of the three men allegedly seen in the video were arrested under a Connecticut state statute that makes it a crime to "ridicule" certain persons.
"Any person who, by his advertisement, ridicules or holds up to contempt any person or class of persons, on account of the creed, religion, color, denomination, nationality or race of such person or class of persons, shall be guilty of a class D misdemeanor," the statute states.
https://i.imgur.com/BEZlCrj.png
UConn spokeswoman Stephanie Reitz confirmed in a statement to Campus Reform the arrests of the men who were "heard shouting a racial slur."
"The two students both were charged under CGS 53-37, ridicule on account of creed, religion, color, denomination, nationality or race," Reitz said. "A third person had accompanied them as they walked outside of the apartments, but the police investigation determined that individual had not participated in the behavior."
The two men arrested were identified in a police report obtained by Campus Reform as Ryan Mucaj and Jarred Karal, both 21. The police report states that Mucaj and Karal "played a game in which they yelled vulgar words" after leaving an area business.
Mucaj and Karal are scheduled to appear in court on Oct. 30. If convicted, they could face fines of up to $50, up to 30 days in jail, or both.
UConn President Thomas Katsouleas released a statement reacting to the arrests, saying, “It is supportive of our core values to pursue accountability, through due process, for an egregious assault on our community that has caused considerable harm. I’m grateful for the university’s collective effort in responding to this incident, especially the hard work of the UConn Police Department, which has been investigating the case since it was reported.”
In a 2018 column for Reason, University of California at Los Angeles law professor Eugene Volokh called the statute under which the men were charged "obviously unconstitutional, because it suppresses speech based on its content (and viewpoint), and because there's no First Amendment exception for speech that insults based on race or religion."
The arrests come less than one month after New York City banned the use of the term, "illegal alien," which is the legal term in the U.S. code for “any person not a citizen or national of the United States.” The arrests come the same week that Massachusetts lawmakers hold a hearing on whether to impose a fine of up to $200 for using the word "bitch."
The arrests also follow Campus Reform's reporting on a Knight Foundation survey that found 41 percent of college students do not believe hate speech should be protected under the First Amendment.
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=13898
CONNECTICUT HATE CRIMES LAWS
By: Christopher Reinhart, Senior Attorney
You asked for a summary of Connecticut's hate crimes laws.
SUMMARY
Connecticut has a number of statutes on hate crimes that protect a range of people, enhance penalties for bias crimes, and allow an injured person to sue for money damages. The primary criminal statutes are the intimidation based on bigotry or bias crimes. These statutes provide three degrees of penalties. They address certain actions that intimidate or harass another person because of his actual or perceived race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression.
Other provisions on hate crimes; education programs as conditions of accelerated rehabilitation, probation, and conditional discharge; police training; and an advisory committee are described below.
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/rpt/2008-R-0276.htm
So not only did they get charged with a crime - but a hate crime. How stupid. But at least the law doesn't support anyone in the LBGTQ group and I'm free to ridicule them all day long!! :laugh2:
---
UConn students ARRESTED for 'ridiculing' speech in viral video
Two University of Connecticut students were arrested Monday after video allegedly showed them using racial slurs.
The school confirmed to Campus Reform that the men were charged under a Connecticut statute that makes it a crime to "ridicule" certain people.
University of Connecticut Police arrested Monday two men who were allegedly seen in a viral video reciting a racial slur.
The incident occurred on Oct. 11 in the parking lot of an off-campus apartment complex. In the video, there are three men walking through the lot. An individual took the video from the window of an apartment building, according to local media reports.
The video prompted the UConn NAACP chapter to pen a letter to the editor of the campus newspaper, The Daily Campus, calling on officials "to fully investigate this incident and apply the proper justice." Following those calls, the university confirmed to Campus Reform Monday that two of the three men allegedly seen in the video were arrested under a Connecticut state statute that makes it a crime to "ridicule" certain persons.
"Any person who, by his advertisement, ridicules or holds up to contempt any person or class of persons, on account of the creed, religion, color, denomination, nationality or race of such person or class of persons, shall be guilty of a class D misdemeanor," the statute states.
https://i.imgur.com/BEZlCrj.png
UConn spokeswoman Stephanie Reitz confirmed in a statement to Campus Reform the arrests of the men who were "heard shouting a racial slur."
"The two students both were charged under CGS 53-37, ridicule on account of creed, religion, color, denomination, nationality or race," Reitz said. "A third person had accompanied them as they walked outside of the apartments, but the police investigation determined that individual had not participated in the behavior."
The two men arrested were identified in a police report obtained by Campus Reform as Ryan Mucaj and Jarred Karal, both 21. The police report states that Mucaj and Karal "played a game in which they yelled vulgar words" after leaving an area business.
Mucaj and Karal are scheduled to appear in court on Oct. 30. If convicted, they could face fines of up to $50, up to 30 days in jail, or both.
UConn President Thomas Katsouleas released a statement reacting to the arrests, saying, “It is supportive of our core values to pursue accountability, through due process, for an egregious assault on our community that has caused considerable harm. I’m grateful for the university’s collective effort in responding to this incident, especially the hard work of the UConn Police Department, which has been investigating the case since it was reported.”
In a 2018 column for Reason, University of California at Los Angeles law professor Eugene Volokh called the statute under which the men were charged "obviously unconstitutional, because it suppresses speech based on its content (and viewpoint), and because there's no First Amendment exception for speech that insults based on race or religion."
The arrests come less than one month after New York City banned the use of the term, "illegal alien," which is the legal term in the U.S. code for “any person not a citizen or national of the United States.” The arrests come the same week that Massachusetts lawmakers hold a hearing on whether to impose a fine of up to $200 for using the word "bitch."
The arrests also follow Campus Reform's reporting on a Knight Foundation survey that found 41 percent of college students do not believe hate speech should be protected under the First Amendment.
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=13898
CONNECTICUT HATE CRIMES LAWS
By: Christopher Reinhart, Senior Attorney
You asked for a summary of Connecticut's hate crimes laws.
SUMMARY
Connecticut has a number of statutes on hate crimes that protect a range of people, enhance penalties for bias crimes, and allow an injured person to sue for money damages. The primary criminal statutes are the intimidation based on bigotry or bias crimes. These statutes provide three degrees of penalties. They address certain actions that intimidate or harass another person because of his actual or perceived race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression.
Other provisions on hate crimes; education programs as conditions of accelerated rehabilitation, probation, and conditional discharge; police training; and an advisory committee are described below.
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/rpt/2008-R-0276.htm