This Seems Possibly BIG Regarding Hillary Emails

[Kathianne]

I currently don't have the time for a deep dive into this, but looks like this would be possibly related to all that was ferreted out by Judicial Watch:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1162001040415363073.html?

I don't think this will copy perfectly, so you may want to hit the link above.



4,339 views
https://threadreaderapp.com/images/avatars/39076082.jpg
Brian Cates (https://threadreaderapp.com/user/drawandstrike)
@drawandstrike (https://threadreaderapp.com/user/drawandstrike)
Subscribe




7 hours ago, 42 tweets, 15 min read Read on Twitter (https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1162001040415363073)






Bookmark Save as PDF


If you've followed SpyGate from the beginning - and I have - then you know that it came out months ago via anonymous sources in news reports that all of Hillary Clinton's St. Dept. emails were being automatically copied & sent to a Chinese-related email account.


So what changed today?

Documentation was released that verifies these anonymously sourced prior news accounts.

Unroll available on Thread Reader (https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1161930684954550272.html)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1082326225245347841/Omgcka3P_normal.jpg (https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov)Ivan Pentchoukov@IvanPentchoukov
(https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov)

(https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1161930684954550272)


NEWS: The metadata in Hillary Clinton's emails contained a Gmail address with the name of a Chinese company: "carterheavyindustries@gmail.com" according to documents released by a Senate committee yesterday.


2,804 (https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1161930684954550272)
2:20 AM - Aug 15, 2019 (https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1161930684954550272)
Twitter Ads info and privacy (https://support.twitter.com/articles/20175256)





2,407 people are talking about this


(https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1161930684954550272)










The Senate Judiciary Committee has now released documents that contain information that verifies that yes indeed, then-Secretary of State Clinton was having all her emails copied and forwarded to a Chinese companies' email account.

Unroll available on Thread Reader (https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1161930684954550272.html)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1082326225245347841/Omgcka3P_normal.jpg (https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov)Ivan Pentchoukov@IvanPentchoukov
(https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov)

(https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1161932941922054144)

Replying to @IvanPentchoukov (https://twitter.com/_/status/1161930684954550272)

Jeannette McMillian, an attorney for the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG), told Congress that this email with the name of a Chinese company appeared to serve as a "live dropbox" for all of Clinton's emails.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ECADz7BX4AAi4Ux?format=jpg&name=small (https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1161932941922054144/photo/1)





1,273 (https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1161932941922054144)
2:29 AM - Aug 15, 2019 (https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1161932941922054144)
Twitter Ads info and privacy (https://support.twitter.com/articles/20175256)





1,154 people are talking about this


(https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1161932941922054144)










It's not an unverified rumor coming from an anonymous source at this point. The documentary evidence has just been made public.

...

[STTAB]

I currently don't have the time for a deep dive into this, but looks like this would be possibly related to all that was ferreted out by Judicial Watch:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1162001040415363073.html?

I don't think this will copy perfectly, so you may want to hit the link above.

She broke the law, she did it on purpose, her "I thought it would be more convenient" excuse is bullshit and we all know it. Her CLEAR intent was too shield her shady dealings from FOIA requests. There is not a sane person on the planet who knows the situation who thinks differently. Only liars who pretend as if she didn't violate the law for political reasons.

And exactly nothing will ever be done about it, so it's not even worth delving into further.

[Elessar]

I hope she gets called on to the carpet over it and that
the government will explain In Detail what the nature of
her wanton misbehavior was.

Give that finding to the people of this nation.

It is not 'Pick on Hillary" or payback. She broke both trust
and security procedures, which security procedures is LAW!

[STTAB]

I hope she gets called on to the carpet over it and that
the government will explain In Detail what the nature of
her wanton misbehavior was.

Give that finding to the people of this nation.

It is not 'Pick on Hillary" or payback. She broke both trust
and security procedures, which security procedures is LAW!

It's time to move on , for both sides.

Yes Hillary broke the law and got away with it, but she isn't going to be prosecuted, PERIOD

Besides, losing to Trump even though almost the entire world cheated for her was far worse than any punishment that the US legal system could inflict on that bitch

[Gunny]

It's time to move on , for both sides.

Yes Hillary broke the law and got away with it, but she isn't going to be prosecuted, PERIOD

Besides, losing to Trump even though almost the entire world cheated for her was far worse than any punishment that the US legal system could inflict on that bitchHave to agree that she's gotten away with it. It STILL irks me because I have seen a few go down for less with confidential info. The same law that applied to them applies to her at a much more "grievous harm to the Nation" level. You are allowed to used deadly force to stop a breach at that level.

I might get over it and move on when I'm sure she isn't in the 2020 race. I'm still not betting against that happening.

[Elessar]

Have to agree that she's gotten away with it. It STILL irks me because I have seen a few go down for less with confidential info. The same law that applied to them applies to her at a much more "grievous harm to the Nation" level. You are allowed to used deadly force to stop a breach at that level.

I might get over it and move on when I'm sure she isn't in the 2020 race. I'm still not betting against that happening.

I hope I am wrong, but somehow think that after all of these Dem 'candidates' debates,
she will crawl out of the woodwork and try to latch on as a running mate, for name
recognition strength.

I sure hope I am wrong!

[STTAB]

Have to agree that she's gotten away with it. It STILL irks me because I have seen a few go down for less with confidential info. The same law that applied to them applies to her at a much more "grievous harm to the Nation" level. You are allowed to used deadly force to stop a breach at that level.

I might get over it and move on when I'm sure she isn't in the 2020 race. I'm still not betting against that happening.

I myself would LOVE for her to get in the race, and believe me I agree she wants to, I just don't think she has ANY support within the Party at this point. I actually think she's made a deal with the DNC she pipes down for a bit and at some point the DNC backs a Chelsea Senate run.