Oberlin College and Bakery

[Kathianne]

I thought I posted on this last week, I was mistaken. It was found guilty of malicious defamation. Partially because staff involved with social justice warrior students, even being quoted as 'unleashing them.'

Today the $11M judgement was hit with another $22M in punitive damages!

That seems to be a strong message to universities throughout the country.

https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/gibsons-bakery-v-oberlin-college-punitive-damages-verdict-watch/

[STTAB]

I thought I posted on this last week, I was mistaken. It was found guilty of malicious defamation. Partially because staff involved with social justice warrior students, even being quoted as 'unleashing them.'

Today the $11M judgement was hit with another $22M in punitive damages!

That seems to be a strong message to universities throughout the country.

https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/gibsons-bakery-v-oberlin-college-punitive-damages-verdict-watch/

Universities will simply raise tuition costs and continue doing what they are doing now.

[Kathianne]

Guess what university has a new (old) problem that could cost them big time?

Update since OP:


Appeals
On October 8, 2019, the college filed a Notice of Appeal appealing the case to the Ninth District Court of Appeals in Akron, Ohio.[21] Days later, Gibson's Bakery filed their own Notice of Appeal asking for review of Ohio's statutory caps on monetary damages, rulings made by Judge Miraldi on motions, and the exclusion of expert witness testimony in the trial.[22] Oberlin College filed their principal appeals brief June 5, 2020.[23]


https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/08/appeals-court-denies-oberlin-college-rehearing-expelled-male-student-discrimination-case-moves-forward/


Appeals Court Denies Oberlin College Rehearing, Expelled Male Student Discrimination Case Moves Forward
Comments Permalink



Posted by William A. Jacobson Monday, August 24, 2020 at 8:00pm
Full Sixth Circuit refuses rehearing en banc in case where panel found Oberlin College’s “100 percent responsibility rate—in cases where most if not all the respondents were male—supports an inference regarding bias in the hearings themselves”


...

So woke