jimnyc
04-19-2019, 11:41 AM
And of course this shows it to be 100% true. So many more are doing the same damn thing. Pathetic little creatures they are.
look at her now, she thinks what Barr did is SO SO bad. She supported the SAME THING in 1998, up to and including seeing it so that a reply can be given at the same time.
---
Here's What Pelosi Said In 1998 About Giving A President A Preview Of A Report. It Isn't What She's Saying Now
AG Barr has confirmed the staggering partisan effort by the Trump Admin to spin public’s view of the #MuellerReport – complete with acknowledgment that the Trump team received a sneak preview. It’s more urgent than ever that Special Counsel Mueller testify before Congress.
https://i.imgur.com/lkzkH28.png
https://i.imgur.com/Mri7fkA.png
But as NTK Network points out, in 1998, Pelosi had the opposite perspective: when the House was debating H.R. 525, which demanded the immediate public release of Ken Starr’s report revolving around Bill Clinton’s sex scandal with Monica Lewinsky, Pelosi turned to House Speaker Newt Gingrich and stated:
Mr. Speaker, for seven of the eleven years that I have served in Congress, I have served on the Ethics Committee or the ethics task force. It is from that perspective that I have several questions to ask. If indeed what we are talking about here today is the process under which the Starr report will be released, why then have the airwaves been filled with details of the Starr report for the last 36 hours? It has supposedly been under lock and key here. One can only assume the leaks are coming from the independent counsel’s office. My second question is to you, Mr. Speaker: Why would you not afford the President of the United States the same opportunity you were given by the Ethics Committee of having almost a week’s advance notice to review the charges against you, and so that you could have your response be part of the report?
Rest - https://www.dailywire.com/news/46182/watch-heres-what-pelosi-said-1998-about-giving-hank-berrien
look at her now, she thinks what Barr did is SO SO bad. She supported the SAME THING in 1998, up to and including seeing it so that a reply can be given at the same time.
---
Here's What Pelosi Said In 1998 About Giving A President A Preview Of A Report. It Isn't What She's Saying Now
AG Barr has confirmed the staggering partisan effort by the Trump Admin to spin public’s view of the #MuellerReport – complete with acknowledgment that the Trump team received a sneak preview. It’s more urgent than ever that Special Counsel Mueller testify before Congress.
https://i.imgur.com/lkzkH28.png
https://i.imgur.com/Mri7fkA.png
But as NTK Network points out, in 1998, Pelosi had the opposite perspective: when the House was debating H.R. 525, which demanded the immediate public release of Ken Starr’s report revolving around Bill Clinton’s sex scandal with Monica Lewinsky, Pelosi turned to House Speaker Newt Gingrich and stated:
Mr. Speaker, for seven of the eleven years that I have served in Congress, I have served on the Ethics Committee or the ethics task force. It is from that perspective that I have several questions to ask. If indeed what we are talking about here today is the process under which the Starr report will be released, why then have the airwaves been filled with details of the Starr report for the last 36 hours? It has supposedly been under lock and key here. One can only assume the leaks are coming from the independent counsel’s office. My second question is to you, Mr. Speaker: Why would you not afford the President of the United States the same opportunity you were given by the Ethics Committee of having almost a week’s advance notice to review the charges against you, and so that you could have your response be part of the report?
Rest - https://www.dailywire.com/news/46182/watch-heres-what-pelosi-said-1998-about-giving-hank-berrien