High_Plains_Drifter
04-13-2019, 04:59 PM
Since we have such a small group here, wouldn't it be OK to lift or relax the "must spread rep around" rule?
And think about it... isn't that kinda socialistic? You can't give rep to the same person twice in a row even though they deserve it, you have to "spread it around?" What if forcing someone to spread it around causes you to give out rep to someone just for the sole purpose of spreading it out so you can rep someone who deserves it again?
I understand the principle. Way back when on the other board people abused the rep system by daily repping people in their little rep clubs in order to build it up so that they could NEG rep someone. But with as few people as we have here, and no one really here that's an unhinged leftist to neg, since Pete has disappeared, do we really need the spread it around rule?
Just asking...
And think about it... isn't that kinda socialistic? You can't give rep to the same person twice in a row even though they deserve it, you have to "spread it around?" What if forcing someone to spread it around causes you to give out rep to someone just for the sole purpose of spreading it out so you can rep someone who deserves it again?
I understand the principle. Way back when on the other board people abused the rep system by daily repping people in their little rep clubs in order to build it up so that they could NEG rep someone. But with as few people as we have here, and no one really here that's an unhinged leftist to neg, since Pete has disappeared, do we really need the spread it around rule?
Just asking...