PDA

View Full Version : Obama was scandal free



jimnyc
04-04-2019, 01:34 PM
I am SO tired of hearing this from the blind idiotic liberals. Are they truly truly THAT stupid? Are they just ignoring them and going https://i.imgur.com/DaTGZI7.gif ? They were so obvious.

Of course you would expect to hear it from the dolts on The View. So I'll post just one on that side, then the facts of some of them, and not even all of them. There are SO SO many others saying the same as this idiot.

Joy Behar? All rolled into one she is about 40 idiots in one. One of the stupidest women on any type of TV. Troof!

---

The View Hosts Berate Meghan McCain, Insist Obama Admin Was 'Completely Scandal-Free'

While lately co-host Meghan McCain agrees more than disagrees with her liberal peers at The View, Tuesday that changed when the Republican got into a shouting match with three of her co-hosts over a very familiar argument: the idea that the former administration was untainted by scandal.

The topic got brought up during a discussion on a report claiming 25 officials within the White House were given security clearances despite being “denied” or not being worthy of them. Co-host Abby Huntsman pointed out that Republicans would be all over this story had it happened under Obama. That drove Joy Behar to point out that Obama was “scandal-free.”

“And none of this happened in the Obama -- the minute people say if this was Obama. Nothing like this even remotely close ever happened in that administration. Completely scandal-free!” she gushed.

Meghan McCain started cracking up, which prompted Behar to ask, “Do you know a scandal? Can you name a scandal?” McCain declined, saying she didn’t want to get in an argument. But after Behar kept pressing, she dove right in.

“The Iran deal. Number one. I mean, billions of dollars in unmarked bills in the middle of the night given to Iran," she began.

“That was their money!” Behar countered. McCain kept deflecting, getting back to the topic of conversation when co-host Ana Navarro stepped in to defend Obama.

“I'll give you an Obama scandal. He wore a tan suit. Michelle showed her arms. And he ate Grey Poupon! That’s it!” she gushed. This is a debunked claim from the left and one the liberal hosts have made before. That bait finally got McCain who went into a tirade about how much she hates Trump but that liberals paint a rosy picture of the Obama administration:

Rest - https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kristine-marsh/2019/04/02/view-hosts-berate-meghan-mccain-insist-obama-admin-was-completely


The Seven Most Undercovered Obama Scandals

Donald Trump hasn’t even been sworn-in yet but the liberal media has obsessed almost over every Trump tweet and controversy. Conversely, Barack Obama’s administration has been full of scandals and gaffes but liberal reporters have insisted that his record is clean as a whistle.

Former NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw, after Obama’s January 10 farewell speech gushed: “He’s been scandal free, frankly, in the White House. We haven’t had that what for a while.” Time magazine’s Joe Klein, back in December declared there has been “absolutely no hint of scandal” during his eight years. And in 2013 reporters first took up this line when the GOP Congress began investigating the myriad of scandals from Obama’s first term. At that time ABC’s Jon Karl noted that this was “a White House that takes pride in being scandal-free.” NPR’s Steve Inskeep asserted “This administration has been described, I don’t even know how many times, as remarkably scandal-free,” and Time’s Rana Foroohar noted “the President has been very rightfully proud of the lack of scandal in his administration so far.”

These liberal reporters have the audacity to bless this administration as scandal free, because many of Obama’s controversies were either ignored or barely reported by the establishment media.

The following is a look through the MRC’s archives at some of the worst scandals and gaffes made during the Obama administration and how they were underreported at the time:

IRS Targets the Tea Party

After a partisan report in June 2013 absurdly suggested that progressive groups were just as likely to be scrutinized as conservative ones, ABC, CBS and NBC essentially abandoned their coverage of the IRS targeting scandal. After producing 136 stories on their morning and evening news show during the first seven weeks of the scandal, broadcast news coverage dried up, with just 14 more reports over the next 10 months, as the Big Three ignored numerous damning developments in the case.

During the seven weeks after news of the scandal broke (from May 10, 2013 through June 28, 2013), the ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening newscasts churned out a respectable 136 stories about the IRS targeting of Tea Party groups. After that, an MRC study shows, broadcast network coverage dried up. From June 29, 2013 through April 30, 2014 — a span of more than ten months — those same programs aired just 14 stories that even mentioned the IRS scandal. And, most of those were brief or inconsequential references that shed no light on the activities of either the IRS or the Obama administration.

....

Fast and Furious Scandal

In 2009, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) launched “Operation Fast and Furious,” which permitted thousands of guns to be illegally sold in the hope of tracking the weapons as they made their way up the ranks of Mexican drug cartels. In December 2010, one of those weapons was used to kill U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.

In a Republican administration, such incompetence and stonewalling would likely have been a major story. Yet ABC’s World News and the NBC Nightly News acted as if the scandal did not exist, never once mentioning it on their evening news programs in 2011. CBS Evening News ran a dozen full reports in 2011 exposing various elements of the scandal, thanks to then correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.

...

VA Scandal Gets Less Coverage Than Local New Jersey Story

On May 22, 2014 the MRC’s Scott Whitlock reported that in nearly four and a half weeks, the ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news shows have offered 110 minutes to Obama administration scandal involving secret lists designed to keep veterans from receiving proper medical treatment. Back in January 2014, it took those same network shows just four and a half days to churn that much coverage for Chris Christie's Bridgegate.

When the VA story broke on April 23, 2014 with news as many as 40 veterans seeking treatment at one Phoenix facility died while on secret waiting lists, CBS provided the most coverage, 48 minutes and 46 seconds. NBC allowed 44 minutes and 53 seconds and ABC came in last with a scant 16 minutes and 44 seconds. None of the networks bothered covering the story until May 6, 2014 almost two weeks after it broke. (This is despite heavy investigative reporting by Fox News and CNN.)

...

Relying on “Stupidity of the American Voter” to Pass ObamaCare

Just imagine the reaction of the liberal media if a video had surfaced of a George W. Bush administration official admitting that “lack of transparency” was “a huge political advantage” in selling the Iraq war and that they relied on the “stupidity of the American voter” to launch an attack on Iraq? That video would be everywhere.

However, the clip of ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber using those exact phrases in talking about the passage of the Affordable Care Act wasn’t reported until six days after the video had surfaced, on the November 13, 2014 CBS This Morning. It took nine days for ABC and NBC to finally arrive on the Gruber story on the November 16 ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos and NBC’s Meet the Press. Most stunning however was NBC Nightly News’ treatment of the Gruber scandal.

...

Rest - https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/geoffrey-dickens/2017/01/16/seven-most-undercovered-obama-scandals


And here is my own list in addition.

Benghazi. Yeah, Americans killed, help was refused.
Spying on journalists
Lois Lerner
Hillary's email crap
NSA spying
Bergdahl, letting terrorists go back to the "war"
Giving Iran $$$

and more...

Gunny
04-04-2019, 01:41 PM
How is it in today's "great" info age, and everyone's supposedly so much smarter than we ever were, that leftwingnuts listen to these cackling hens much less believe them?

We had cackling hens next door at my grandparents' when I was a kid and it made my Saturday to get to drive the lawn tractor past their pen and throw dirt all over them :) Damned things never shut up, and no one (that I know anyway) ever understaood a damned thing they said.

High_Plains_Drifter
04-04-2019, 02:18 PM
And it has always been HANDS OFF when it comes to obama. He has had unprecedented PROTECTION from day one. But when the walls of protection come down, and they will, someday, we'll see beyond a shadow of a doubt, that his administration was corrupt beyond what we could have ever imagined, but he was never constitutionally eligible to be president in the first place. He'll live out his life and all this will be proven after he's dead probably...

Obama’s birth certificate proven a forgery, fraudulently fabricated document, by forensic investigators on two continents

https://www.intellihub.com/obamas-birth-certificate-proven-forgery/

icansayit
04-04-2019, 03:00 PM
With all of the hub bub about the Mueller release of documents the DEMS are screaming about.

Maybe we aren't seeing, or hearing too much about the Obama's, and the Clinton's WHO HAVE TO KNOW....

The Mueller 400 pages may just be something THE DEMS...do not want to see...as they pretend, yell and demand the opposite.

Dems may be trying to cover up what the EMBARRASSING NEWS might be...Not of Trump, but of the Obama/Clinton gangs.

Just my opinion. But then. Think about it. And I'll watch for another thread just like this...where everything I just said...is never mentioned.

Gunny
04-04-2019, 03:06 PM
Yet another theory: If they're going to go after Biden, what about Hitlery? I say yes. I said it 2 years ago when her running again was brought up. I say she gets thrown to the wolves if she tries to run again.

Old school Dems need to start watching their sixes :laugh:

jimnyc
04-05-2019, 09:57 AM
While they are calling these obstruction, they are still damn more scandals from his administration and/or Obama involved himself.

---

The Top 5 Investigations Obstructed by the Obama Administration

With Democrats and the media licking their wounds over the Mueller Report not finding Russian collusion, they’ve been refocusing their energy on claims of obstruction of justice, even accusing Trump Attorney General William Barr of "protecting" Trump. Which is both amusing and hypocritical considering how they tolerated obstruction of justice by the Obama administration and sometimes assisted in that obstruction.

If Robert Mueller couldn’t conclude that Trump obstructed his investigation, then it’s quite clear there wasn’t any. Having written extensively about Obama-era corruption, I felt it was necessary to remind everyone that not only was the Obama administration plagued by multiple scandals but that obstructing investigations was standard operating procedure. For Democrats, Trump calling the Mueller an investigation a witch hunt is an impeachable offense, but Obama refusing to cooperate with investigations was much ado about nothing.

....

5. The investigation of the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation

You may remember images and video from Election Day 2008, with members of the New Black Panther Party standing outside a Philadelphia polling place wearing military garb making racial remarks and discouraging people from voting. A voter intimidation case against the New Black Panthers began weeks before Obama took office. It was an open-and-shut case, and the New Black Panthers didn’t even show up in court to defend themselves, assuring the government’s victory in the case. Then in May 2009, the case was inexplicably dropped by Attorney General Eric Holder. When the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights investigated, the Obama administration refused to respond to requests from the commission and Congress. Federal attorneys were instructed not to cooperate with the investigation and then-Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Tom Perez (the current chairman of the Democratic National Committee) lied under oath about who was involved in the decision to drop the case.

4. The investigation of the illegal firing of Inspector General Walpin

In 2009, Barack Obama inexplicably fired Inspector General Gerald Walpin, who had been investigating the misuse of federal grant money for AmeriCorps by Sacramento mayor and former NBA basketball star Kevin Johnson. Johnson took $850,000 of that money for his own nonprofit organization, where he used it to pay for political activity. During his investigation, Walpin discovered a cover-up of sexual abuse allegations made by three underage students against Johnson who were offered some of this grant money as hush money. As a result, Walpin recommended criminal charges against Johnson. But Johnson was an Obama ally and donor, and Obama wasn’t about to have him held accountable for his crimes, so Obama demanded Walpin’s resignation, which Walpin refused to give, and so Walpin was fired. However, the firing violated federal law—a law that Obama co-sponsored as a U.S. senator, no less. An investigation by Congress into the illegal firing was met with stonewalling by the Obama White House, and the withholding of documents. The Obama White House also deliberately misled Congress about the reasons for the firing.

3. The investigation of Fast & Furious

What happens when you send two thousand firearms across the border, lose hundreds of them, and then a border agent is killed with one of those guns? You lie, stonewall, and obstruct the investigation. At least, that’s what the Obama administration did. Attorney General Eric Holder falsely claimed to have no knowledge of the operation, and Obama personally obstructed the investigation by claiming executive privilege over documents requested by Congress. The obstruction by the Obama administration was so egregious that Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress, in a bipartisan vote, for refusing to cooperate with their investigation.

2. The investigation of the Iran ransom payments

A few short months after Obama had completed negotiations for the Iran Nuclear Deal, resulting in the lifting of sanctions and the unfreezing of billions in Iranian assets, the Obama administration made a shady payment to Iran in the amount of $400 million. The payment was made with foreign currency and done under the cover of night, and done in coordination with the release of four hostages, and completely in secret. Not even Congress knew about the payments or the hostage exchange. When the story broke, Obama repeatedly denied the payment was a ransom. An investigation began, and, of course, it was met with obstruction by the Obama administration. Attorney General Loretta Lynch refused to answer questions from Congress about the payments. Details of the deal weren’t classified, but the Obama administration hid key documents at a secure site to make access difficult. If the payments were on the level, there would be no reason to obstruct an investigation.

1. The investigation of Benghazi and the Hillary Clinton email scandal

The lies and the cover-up that followed the terrorist attack at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012, less than two months before the presidential election, were extraordinary. Misleading the American people to protect Obama before the election was bad enough, but the cover-up of those lies was truly the coup de grâce of Obama administration obstruction.

A Senate Intelligence Committee report on the attack said the following about the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi investigation:


Important questions remain unanswered as a direct result of the Obama administration’s failure to provide the Committee with access to necessary documents and witnesses. We have also learned that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has developed significant information about the attacks and the suspected attackers that is not being shared with Congress, even where doing so would not in any way impact an ongoing investigation.

Senate Democrats also assisted in that obstruction. According to then-Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy, the committee’s investigation was “repeatedly stonewalled by the Obama administration, Ranking Member Elijah Cummings, and Committee Democrats.” According to Gowdy, Democrats on the committee “affirmatively delayed the identification of witnesses and the production of unquestionably relevant documents. Committee Democrats have not lifted a finger to help the Select Committee speed up its investigation and release a report.”

As the investigation continued, Hillary Clinton’s emails were subpoenaed, which resulted in the uncovering of her private email server. The thousands of requested emails were deleted, hard drives and phones destroyed, in what can only be described as obstruction of justice. Oh, but it gets worse because Obama wanted Hillary to succeed him to enshrine his legacy and his administration did everything they could to protect her. She wasn’t put under oath when she was questioned by the FBI, and an exoneration letter was drafted before the investigation had been concluded. There were essentially two cover-ups going on at the same time: the Benghazi cover-up and the private email server cover-up, which required epic obstruction and stonewalling in order for Hillary and Obama to survive. Former FBI director James Comey even testified under oath that he was pressured by Attorney General Loretta Lynch not to call the investigation into Hillary Clinton an “investigation,” but a “matter” in order to match the language being used by the Clinton campaign.

Obama himself was guilty of obstruction for publicly defending Hillary Clinton, according to former Attorney General Michael Mukasey. “President Obama’s statement that he thought she shouldn’t be charged because she didn’t intend to violate the law is the real Clinton obstruction because that is a statement by him that ‘this is the way I want that investigation to come out.’”

https://pjmedia.com/trending/the-top-5-investigations-obstructed-by-the-obama-administration/

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
04-05-2019, 10:11 AM
The Benghazi and Bergdahl incidents both should have gotten the piece of shit obama impeached, IMHO.--Tyr

STTAB
04-05-2019, 11:02 AM
How is it in today's "great" info age, and everyone's supposedly so much smarter than we ever were, that leftwingnuts listen to these cackling hens much less believe them?

We had cackling hens next door at my grandparents' when I was a kid and it made my Saturday to get to drive the lawn tractor past their pen and throw dirt all over them :) Damned things never shut up, and no one (that I know anyway) ever understaood a damned thing they said.

If you don't want to know something, you won't know it, and that goes doubly when the media is covering things up. I watch a lot of news, and try to watch as much MSNBC and CNN as Fox News, and it is disturbing how many stories are glossed over or ignored completely by the two liberal cable news networks, for example they both completely ignored the IRS scandal that should have resulted in Lois Lerner losing her job. If they had given that story the same scrutiny as they give to Trump scandals, she would have lost her job, and possibly her freedom.

But if you only watched one of those networks for your news you wouldn't have even know about the scandal.