PDA

View Full Version : Report from Vancouver, Washington: Rep. Baird Gets Blasted



stephanie
08-29-2007, 01:35 PM
Here's how the left conducts business if you fall out of step with them...They just beat you down...How lovely...

Posted by Jonah Spangenthal-Lee on August 28 at 10:22 AM

Originally posted yesterday at 10pm.

This report is being filed by Josh, who’s down in Vancouver. He couldn’t find WiFi in the trendy Uptown Village neighborhood. The Starbucks on the corner of Main was closed and the password at the friendly Ice Cream Renaissance didn’t work, although they let Josh hang out well after closing. He’ll provide a longer report tomorrow, but he phoned this in.

Congressman Brian Baird (D-3 Vancouver, Washington) hosted a town hall tonight at Fort Vancouver High School. It was Baird’s first appearance in front of his constituents since reversing his position on the war. Although Baird’s been an adamant critic of the war—he voted against the war and the surge—he announced last week that he thinks the surge is working and he wants to give it time.
He spoke in a high school auditorium that was packed with at least 500 people who were overwhelmingly vocal in their opposition to Baird’s new stance. There were also protesters outside calling for Baird to resign.

He was hammered by Jon Soltz, the young, good looking, charismatic chairman and co-founder of political action committee VoteVets.org. Soltz is also an Iraq war veteran, having served in 2003. Speaking calmly and to raucous applause, he said Baird (who recently returned from a visit to Iraq) was fooled “by a dog and pony show” and is unfortunately “providing cover for President Bush.”


Soltz addresses Rep. Baird at Fort Vancouver High School

Afterwards, Soltz told me that his goal is to bring Baird back into the Democratic fold.

Another speaker who brought down the house was Zanne Joi, a Vancouver activist with Code Pink Women for Peace. Joi called Baird “arrogant” for trying to dictate how Iraqis should govern themselves and said the war was only about “American oil profit.”

A third speaker, who also spoke to tremendous applause, was Jan Lustig from Vancouver, whose main complaint was that Baird wasn’t representing his constituents, who, judging from this crowd, were against the war.

I also talked to several people as they left the auditorium and asked them if they found Baird—who was there to explain his new position—to be persuasive. To a person, everyone shook their head “no way,” including Doris Holmes, active member of the 18th district Democrats, who said, “He lied. He’s toeing the Bush party line. I can’t believe he’s a Democrat.”

:cuckoo:
http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/report_from_vancouver_washington_rep_bai

hjmick
08-29-2007, 02:11 PM
Yeah, the Democrats throw their own under the bus just as much as anyone, if not more. Especially when you dare to think for yourself rather than march lockstep to the party tune.

Some follow up to your post:


MoveOn targets pro-surge Democrat
By Aaron Blake
August 29, 2007

Rep. Brian Baird’s (D-Wash.) recent conversion on the Iraq war is beginning to affect more than the national dialogue. On Wednesday, liberal group MoveOn.org announced an ad campaign against the congressman in his own district.

Baird recently returned from a trip to Iraq and reversed his position on a withdrawal timetable, citing military progress in the four-year-old war.

MoveOn is calling the move a “flip-flop” and says it goes against the views of his constituents.

The ad does not make specific reference to Baird’s conversion. Instead, it features a soldier who served in Iraq talking about the amount of resistance troops encountered and at the end asks viewers to tell Baird to bring the troops home.

The soldier in the ad served in Iraq in 2003 and 2004 and describes a scene from that time, long before the current troop increase that Baird has cited as the reason for military progress.

Baird voted against the war in 2003 and had opposed it until last month. Republicans have been quick to key on his remarks as evidence of progress in Iraq.

MoveOn disagrees, calling the war “unwinnable.”

“So far this has been one of the bloodiest summers in Iraq, and voters don’t want to continue down a failed path,” said MoveOn campaigner Nita Chaudhary. “They want representatives who will stand up to President Bush’s reckless policy and bring our troops home.”

Baird has represented a swing district in southwest Washington since 1998 but has not seen strong challenges in recent years. He has taken more than 60 percent of the vote in each of the last three elections.

The ad buy is $20,000 in a cheap Vancouver market, and Chaudhary said it might be extended.


MoveOn targets pro-surge Democrat (http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/moveon-targets-pro-surge-democrat-2007-08-29.html)

hjmick
08-29-2007, 02:24 PM
MoveOn is calling the move a “flip-flop” and says it goes against the views of his constituents.

Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion. - Edmund Burke

darin
08-29-2007, 02:47 PM
Another sign that "The Left" (uber-liberals) don't seem to like ANY good news from Iraq - and MAY not be truly HAPPY until every Serviceman-or-woman currently in Iraq is killed.