PDA

View Full Version : Tax Parents With More Than Two Kids, ‘Irresponsible Breeders’



jimnyc
07-24-2018, 02:12 PM
Democrats don't care, let anyone into our country, no matter where from and no matter the amount.

But in our OWN country? Well, any more than 2 kids and you're an "irresponsible breeder". What in the actual fu&k? Please tell me that this shithead is unique? I thought one or two were unique with the "abolish ice" thing, but then the next thing you know tons of democrats are supporting that crap. Same as free college, free income & other "freebies".

---

Dem Congressional Candidate: Tax Parents With More Than Two Kids, ‘Irresponsible Breeders’

"The privilege of irresponsible breeding"

A millionaire Democrat running for U.S. Congress in Pennsylvania is a population control zealot who believes in taxing families with more than two kids for being "irresponsible breeders."

As a challenger to U.S. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick for the 1st Congressional District of Pennsylvania, Scott Wallace has received endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW). According to PJ Media, Wallace has donated close to $7 million to population control groups over the past 20 years through his Wallace Global Fund. Some of the groups Wallace has donated to advocate for taxing families with more than two children. More from PJ Media:


Between 1997 and 2003, Wallace gave $420,000 to Zero Population Growth (ZPG) — now Population Connection — an organization co-founded by 'Population Bomb' author Paul Ehrlich, Fox News reported.

From before its inception, ZPG had announced its intentions to tax large families for the 'privilege of irresponsible breeding.' A 1968 brochure advocated abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that 'no responsible family should have more than two children.' Therefore, 'irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.'

Another group that Wallace gave $20,000 to is the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy, which has an executive board member named Herman Daly who advocates for a coercive two-child policy requiring families to buy licenses if they have more.

When confronted with such population control extremism, Wallace's campaign communications director Zoe Wilson-Meyer avoided addressed the issue directly, choosing to emphasize only Wallace's support for abortion.

Rest - https://www.dailywire.com/news/33489/dem-congressional-candidate-tax-parents-more-two-paul-bois

Elessar
07-24-2018, 04:50 PM
What?

Look.....I do not believe in over-breeding. All you have to look at are major population
centers such as NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia, New Orleans and the border states that
the locations that give out OUR TAXES to irresponsible whores and supposed studs
that fornicate and produce what will be lost young adults.

China did this same idea in the 1994 era, so the USA, Mexico, and Canada were sending them back.

Frikkin' adult restraint. What is so hard about that? Is the government required to issue rubbers and
birth control pills?

Frikkin liberal sickening.

aboutime
07-24-2018, 06:09 PM
I think it's fair to say. This IDIOT will NOT get any votes from number 3, and 4, children in any family. Not to mention, any parents who are responsible. Unlike HIS, who obviously were BOTTOM (BREEDERS) FEEDERS.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/17mfXnhopO8/hqdefault.jpg
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GmajKn5loV8/Wn4lf0uykYI/AAAAAAABMFk/gT-ordqcskU3d538FOWZNnGYP9OZ7GnMgCLcBGAs/s1600/schiff_house.jpg

SassyLady
07-25-2018, 01:21 AM
Clearly an attack on religions that promote multiplying. Or attack on farmers/ranchers that have several kids to help keep their livelihood solvent.

I don't care how many children anyone has as long as they are not on assistance. I'm one of seven and we were on welfare, so I made decision to not have anymore children than I could take care on my own. I had one child ... but raised my husband's two children from prior marriage. We actually received a deduction for each one.

Population control is slippery slope ... it started with abortion now they want to tax having children.

Currently, China has over population of males because female babies were put to death.



The long-term disparity has led to a significant gender imbalance or skewing of the sex ratio. As reported by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Broadcasting_Corporation), China has between 32million and 36million more males than would be expected naturally, and this has led to social problems. "Because of a traditional preference for baby boys over girls, the one-child policy is often cited as the cause of China's skewed sex ratio ... Even the government acknowledges the problem and has expressed concern about the tens of millions of young men who won't be able to find brides and may turn to kidnapping women, sex trafficking, other forms of crime or social unrest."[16] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy#cite_note-cbc.ca-16) The situation will not improve in the near future. According to the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Academy_of_Social_Sciences), there will be 24 million more men than women of marriageable age by 2020.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy