jimnyc
04-03-2018, 02:22 PM
Not even semi auto pistols? Not even older non-scary looking rifles? No bending at all? Or is this solely about scary rifles that seemingly shoot so much faster and more accurate than non-scary looking rifles. This guy is still a dipshit.
---
Piers Morgan: Ban All Semi-Automatic Guns, ‘No Civilian Needs One’
Piers Morgan used a series of tweets Monday to call for a ban on all semi-automatic guns and stress his conviction that “no civilian needs one.”
His call for a ban on semi-automatic firearms was followed by other tweets in which he told Americans that the Second Amendment was never intended to protect an individual right to keep and bear arms. Rather, it was only intended to protect militias members’ ability to be armed.
Regarding a ban on semi-automatic firearms, Morgan tweeted:
https://i.imgur.com/Q6KUt3f.png
Morgan’s call overlooks the fact that millions upon millions of semi-automatic firearms are carried every day in America by licensed concealed permit holders. The firearms are a weapon of choice because they allow the vulnerable, who may not be physically strong, to carry a tool with which they can defend their lives. This is because a semi-automatic firearm uses it own recoil to cycle the next round into the chamber, thereby reducing the felt-recoil and allowing petite individuals–and persons who may have physical limitations–to carry a firearm with a round large enough to stop attackers.
In another tweet, Morgan explained his call for a ban on semi-automatic firearms by saying he fired an AR-15 “rapidly.” What he did not mention is the fact that an AR-15 or a Glock handgun or a Smith & Wesson double-action revolver will all shoot as fast as you pull the trigger but there is a difference between shooting fast and shooting accurately. In other words, shooting “rapidly” often undercuts the gun’s usefulness.
Rest - http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/03/piers-morgan-2nd-amendment-never-intended-protect-individual-right-gun-ownership/
---
Piers Morgan: Ban All Semi-Automatic Guns, ‘No Civilian Needs One’
Piers Morgan used a series of tweets Monday to call for a ban on all semi-automatic guns and stress his conviction that “no civilian needs one.”
His call for a ban on semi-automatic firearms was followed by other tweets in which he told Americans that the Second Amendment was never intended to protect an individual right to keep and bear arms. Rather, it was only intended to protect militias members’ ability to be armed.
Regarding a ban on semi-automatic firearms, Morgan tweeted:
https://i.imgur.com/Q6KUt3f.png
Morgan’s call overlooks the fact that millions upon millions of semi-automatic firearms are carried every day in America by licensed concealed permit holders. The firearms are a weapon of choice because they allow the vulnerable, who may not be physically strong, to carry a tool with which they can defend their lives. This is because a semi-automatic firearm uses it own recoil to cycle the next round into the chamber, thereby reducing the felt-recoil and allowing petite individuals–and persons who may have physical limitations–to carry a firearm with a round large enough to stop attackers.
In another tweet, Morgan explained his call for a ban on semi-automatic firearms by saying he fired an AR-15 “rapidly.” What he did not mention is the fact that an AR-15 or a Glock handgun or a Smith & Wesson double-action revolver will all shoot as fast as you pull the trigger but there is a difference between shooting fast and shooting accurately. In other words, shooting “rapidly” often undercuts the gun’s usefulness.
Rest - http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/03/piers-morgan-2nd-amendment-never-intended-protect-individual-right-gun-ownership/