Roy Moore accuser Beverly Nelson admits she wrote part of Moore's yearbook inscriptio

[LongTermGuy]

"Roy Moore accuser Beverly Nelson admits she wrote part of Moore's yearbook inscription"

https://www.westernjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Roy_Moore_Yearbook_Beverly_Young_Nelson.jpg

https://www.yahoo.com/news/roy-moore-accuser-beverly-nelson-181550285.html (https://www.yahoo.com/news/roy-moore-accuser-beverly-nelson-181550285.html)

*************************************
**Now...She says... but only part of it....But Interesting thing is ..her and her Attorney refuse to turn over the yearbook and have it analyzed....especially..> the Ink...Is it 40 years old or it is it a month or two old??

:coffee:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuABhumm6fY

[Russ]

If part of her story is proven to be a lie, then we have to suspect her whole story is full of lies. Oops!

I actually would find it easy to believe Roy Moore has done a lot of inappropriate stuff over the years, but I also find it very easy to believe that his current accusers are much more interested in politics than they are in justice.

[Gunny]

Moore's going to be sacrificed. After the Dems get done "cleaning house" (putting on a show of it anyway), they're going to demand a pound of flesh. I see the Republicans grooming Moore as that candidate.

[Abbey Marie]

Hmmm. More lies to try to bring down a conservative.

[LongTermGuy]

Roy aint going anywhere...The left and Never Trumpers can wish...and Huff and Puff all they want....The left will work hard on trying to remove him...so what...they always work hard with their bull-shit...and Paid Shills....

Show some real Proof...Pic`s...audio or video...otherwise go home.

Funny how the left can never have real proof ...its always "say so"..."alleged..." and "many say"....or "American agree" ..words they use...mostly all horse shit.

[Russ]

I think you're right, LongTerm. Roy will probably win.

[Gunny]

Hmmm. More lies to try to bring down a conservative.It will be there "quit looking at us now" moment. They sacrifice a couple of theirs, then with the MSM's help focus all eyes on Moore. It isn't about proving he's guilty. There's no way he can prove his innocence. Could you prove yours from 1977? I have exactly a HS diploma from 1977, and a few pics of me with long hair and bell bottoms :laugh: I couldn't prove nor disprove anything I did then that is not historically recorded. No one goes through life (or used to not anyway) thinking "I can't make a single mistake ever" because 40 years from now I'l be running for Congress.

An accusation against a Republican is as good as a conviction for the left.

[Black Diamond]

It will be there "quit looking at us now" moment. They sacrifice a couple of theirs, then with the MSM's help focus all eyes on Moore. It isn't about proving he's guilty. There's no way he can prove his innocence. Could you prove yours from 1977? I have exactly a HS diploma from 1977, and a few pics of me with long hair and bell bottoms :laugh: I couldn't prove nor disprove anything I did then that is not historically recorded. No one goes through life (or used to not anyway) thinking "I can't make a single mistake ever" because 40 years from now I'l be running for Congress.

An accusation against a Republican is as good as a conviction for the left.
That didn't work when it came to trump.

[Gunny]

That didn't work when it came to trump.Sure it has. He's Satan incarnate to lefties and NOTHING you can say or do will change their minds. Trump "worked" solely because the left thought he was a done deal the same as McLame and Romney. They were overconfident. arrogant, and probably didn't show to vote. I'll bet you all these "millenials" doing all this crying were the biggest no-shows for the Dems.

Not to mention some probably stayed home because of who their candidate was. I STILL say last election was not a vote "for Trump"; rather, an indictment of Hitlery.

They've acted so stupid the past year I wouldn't bet the left will fix the obvious issues they had, but IF they do, Trump will be in trouble. His actual supporters are outnumbered by a lock-step voting left.

[NightTrain]

Moore will win easily. These accusations are the products of your everyday democrat.

Also, Moore is a judge and has made enemies over the years of people on the wrong end of his rulings... something to consider.

[Gunny]

Moore will win easily. These accusations are the products of your everyday democrat.

Also, Moore is a judge and has made enemies over the years of people on the wrong end of his rulings... something to consider.That's not in question. The Republicans have no choice at this point but support Moore, or lose the seat. They don't have enough time to mount another campaign starting from scratch.

What happens AFTER is what IS a question. The Republicans don't want Moore. I doubt they're going to come to his defense in any real manner. As was stated before by someone else not wearing rose-colored glasses, the Dems want the seat, and they want want Moore because Trump has backed him. They'll go after him, and they're going to use their "look what we did to our womanizers" as their theme.

The Republicans know this, but they also know if Moore loses the seat while in office, they have to hold another election where they'll get a level playing field.

I see him winning because both parties are playing their own respective games of dirty pool/politics. I don't see him holding it.

[NightTrain]

Nah, if there were any credible evidence, rest assured that the dems would have trotted it out front & center by now. They've got nothing.

Once Moore wins, the bogus accusations will evaporate like they always do.

And you know that the dems want that Senate seat in the worst way to obstruct Trump, so no expense has been spared to get evidence.

There just isn't any, even with Gloria Allred on the payroll.

[Gunny]

Nah, if there were any credible evidence, rest assured that the dems would have trotted it out front & center by now. They've got nothing.

Once Moore wins, the bogus accusations will evaporate like they always do.

And you know that the dems want that Senate seat in the worst way to obstruct Trump, so no expense has been spared to get evidence.

There just isn't any, even with Gloria Allred on the payroll.Since when did the Dems and/or MSM need "anything"? This WILL come back around.

And just so you know, I have a mother AND a father. My paternal family lives all over the hills in AL. I'm NOT rooting for the bad guys. Just seen 'em in action too many times.

[mundame]

Roy Moore was ahead a little already, if you believe the polls. Since no one with a brain does anymore, they put out this October Surprise. This is Friday, the election is Tuesday, perfect timing.

It's Senator Roy Moore for sure.

[pete311]

She added the date and location. I don't see how that changes anything.

[jimnyc]

She added the date and location. I don't see how that changes anything.

Not really surprising - but it's called credibility, and it throws it ALL into question. They should have been thruthful about this from the beginning, and shared for authentication from the beginning. But for whatever reason they wanted to pass it ALL off as his, and refuse to authenticate the signature. And then the timing of course. But writing stuff herself and lying about it sure as hell throws a credibility issue out there. And hugely.

Don't matter really though. I think he had this nailed from the beginning. And even in the lowest part, he never trailed. And now he picked up speed, and then even more speed after the past few days. I could be wrong, but I think he wins convincingly anyway.

[tailfins]

Not really surprising - but it's called credibility, and it throws it ALL into question. They should have been thruthful about this from the beginning, and shared for authentication from the beginning. But for whatever reason they wanted to pass it ALL off as his, and refuse to authenticate the signature. And then the timing of course. But writing stuff herself and lying about it sure as hell throws a credibility issue out there. And hugely.

Don't matter really though. I think he had this nailed from the beginning. And even in the lowest part, he never trailed. And now he picked up speed, and then even more speed after the past few days. I could be wrong, but I think he wins convincingly anyway.


So much for "always believe the woman".

[jimnyc]

So much for "always believe the woman".

Case by case basis - and then believe the facts. No sex should be believed just because they say so.

[NightTrain]

She added the date and location. I don't see how that changes anything.

Don't be a fool. They won't turn that book over for analysis and that says it all.

[High_Plains_Drifter]

Don't be a fool. They won't turn that book over for analysis and that says it all.
THEIR "expert," ahem... said the other writing was consistent with Roy Moore. Problem is, we have NO IDEA who this "expert" was of their's, and as you say, they have NOT turned the book over for OUTSIDE, INDEPENDENT analysis, and yup, that does say it all.

[tailfins]

She added the date and location. I don't see how that changes anything.

Pete, you're such a Mangina.

[Gunny]

She added the date and location. I don't see how that changes anything.Thanks for making my point, Pete. The truth doesn't matter to you leftwingnuts. Only the power matters. Obviously personal integrity is a dirty word and to be avoided by you lefties at all cost.

[LongTermGuy]

REVENGE? ROY MOORE RULED AGAINST 1999 DIVORCE HEARING OF ACCUSER BEVERLY YOUNG NELSON (https://70news.wordpress.com/2017/11/16/revenge-roy-moore-ruled-against-1999-divorce-hearing-of-accuser-beverly-young-nelson/)


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOtujrsVAAADY6F.jpg:large


https://70news.wordpress.com/2017/11/16/revenge-roy-moore-ruled-against-1999-divorce-hearing-of-accuser-beverly-young-nelson/

[Gunny]

REVENGE? ROY MOORE RULED AGAINST 1999 DIVORCE HEARING OF ACCUSER BEVERLY YOUNG NELSON (https://70news.wordpress.com/2017/11/16/revenge-roy-moore-ruled-against-1999-divorce-hearing-of-accuser-beverly-young-nelson/)


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOtujrsVAAADY6F.jpg:large


https://70news.wordpress.com/2017/11/16/revenge-roy-moore-ruled-against-1999-divorce-hearing-of-accuser-beverly-young-nelson/Interesting.

[aboutime]

Don't be a fool. They won't turn that book over for analysis and that says it all.

Why am I not surprised how petey would find any excuse to defend someone who lies, to accuse somebody petey hates?????
Liberal Brain Damage is increasing as we speak.

<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/736x/88/45/b9/8845b9cad23bef4df9482b9c517ead3f--liberal-democrats-liberal-logic.jpg">

[pete311]

Why am I not surprised how petey would find any excuse to defend someone who lies, to accuse somebody petey hates?????
Liberal Brain Damage is increasing as we speak.

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/88/45/b9/8845b9cad23bef4df9482b9c517ead3f--liberal-democrats-liberal-logic.jpg

So tattoos, beards and sun glasses are now a liberal thing?

[aboutime]

So tattoos, beards and sun glasses are now a liberal thing?


Hey dummy. Read the words. The tattoo's, beards, and sun glasses only demonstrate how silly YOU look, never honestly answering any questions here.

[pete311]

Even Moore admits he wrote some of it. He said it appears there had been some "tampering". Tampering implies there is something real to tamper with. He said he never met her. This exposes his lie.

[pete311]

Hey dummy. Read the words. The tattoo's, beards, and sun glasses only demonstrate how silly YOU look, never honestly answering any questions here.

I have no tattoos, no beard and rarely wear sunglasses.

[LongTermGuy]

Don't be a fool. They won't turn that book over for analysis and that says it all.


pete..read that again ^^^:laugh:


Exactly right...cause then it will be all over for "them"...first the embarrassment will come..then the shame...then the hiding...

[pete311]

pete..read that again ^^^:laugh:


Exactly right...cause then it will be all over for "them"...first the embarrassment will come..then the shame...then the hiding...



You can look for yourself and compare with past moore handwriting. It's widely available. It looks just like it.

[aboutime]

I have no tattoos, no beard and rarely wear sunglasses.


Never said you did petey. But look at how DEFENSIVE you are over this. Contact the DNC and ask for instructions on how to create more BULLSHIT for your entertainment.

[GravyBoat]

big deal, lots of people make notations next to an inscription in their yearbook

moore is a pervert, so get over it neocons, he's a dud

[NightTrain]

You can look for yourself and compare with past moore handwriting. It's widely available. It looks just like it.

Right. It totally makes sense to refuse to have a handwriting expert analyze the text and have a forensic expert confirm the date.

Everyone should just take her word for it, despite the fact that she's made false accusations before.

This is weak, Pete, even by your standards.

The fact that you back this silly shit is why you moonbats have no credibility - and all of you dig yourselves deeper at every opportunity on the flimsiest crap in a desperate bid to win an election.

I know you know this hag is lying, but you'll back her anyway because liberalism.

[Black Diamond]

Right. It totally makes sense to refuse to have a handwriting expert analyze the text and have a forensic expert confirm the date.

Everyone should just take her word for it, despite the fact that she's made false accusations before.

This is weak, Pete, even by your standards.

The fact that you back this silly shit is why you moonbats have no credibility - and all of you dig yourselves deeper at every opportunity on the flimsiest crap in a desperate bid to win an election.

I know you know this hag is lying, but you'll back her anyway because liberalism.
Let them keep making fools of themselves.

[LongTermGuy]

Let them keep making fools of themselves.


Exactly...Thing is they caint help it...

Its in their Lemming blood....
https://media.giphy.com/media/l41lJZoF1qGV4kjUA/giphy.gif
https://media1.giphy.com/media/si8E6R3YbWfle/giphy.gif

[tailfins]

big deal, lots of people make notations next to an inscription in their yearbook

moore is a pervert, so get over it neocons, he's a dud

If you're going to be a Huffpo hipster wannabe by using their buzzwords, at least get it right. The religious right is distinctly different from a neoconservative. Mitch McConnell and Lindsey "Goober" Graham are examples of neoconservatives.

By the way, I'm not defending Moore. I hope the neoconservatives running the Senate conduct a thorough investigation and either exhonorate Moore or expel him. What matters here is the people of Alabama and those people properly having their ideology represented.

[High_Plains_Drifter]

Tampering implies there is something real to tamper with.
Are you implying that this woman's tampering with what was written in the year book has some sort of legitimate justification?

[High_Plains_Drifter]

You can look for yourself and compare with past moore handwriting. It's widely available. It looks just like it.
Which is easily forged.

When they turn the book over to be examined by independent experts that can determine if the ink is new or 40 years old, then we'll believe whether or not Moore wrote it... not until.

This shit is right in line with the kenyan's digital forgery of a scan of his fabled hard copy Hawaii certificate of birth, or a more recent example would be the CLINTON CAMP / DNC fake dossier they had brewed up to smear and unseat a duly elected sitting president.

Ya know what REALLY surprises me... is that even though you people get CAUGHT LYING, and you KNOW people SEE your LIES and BULL SHIT, you don't STOP and sit back and think MAYBE we ought to COOL IT for a little bit and let things calm down, maybe regain a little credibility... NOPE, not you people, you just KEEP ON KEEPIN' ON with MORE LIES and BULL SHIT, and then wonder why you can't win an election. That to me says you people are REALLY freakin' RETARDED, and/or SO desparate that you've lost your ever lovin' damn minds.

[jimnyc]

big deal, lots of people make notations next to an inscription in their yearbook

moore is a pervert, so get over it neocons, he's a dud

And yet to date still no proof of anything. I'm willing to hear both sides, but that's what I see thus far. I see no wrongdoing on the part of Moore.

And folks can point at the neocons, call him a dud.... but I believe he is winning on Tuesday.

[tailfins]

And yet to date still no proof of anything. I'm willing to hear both sides, but that's what I see thus far. I see no wrongdoing on the part of Moore.

And folks can point at the neocons, call him a dud.... but I believe he is winning on Tuesday.


Moore will be a dud if there's not an investigation. Not having an investigation signals that the only principle the GOP has is the acquisition of power. Either the Dems are discredited or the GOP will be. If his background is found to be dirty after a fair investigation, Moore should be expelled.

[High_Plains_Drifter]

Moore will be a dud if there's not an investigation. Not having an investigation signals that the only principle the GOP has is the acquisition of power. Either the Dems are discredited or the GOP will be. If his background is found to be dirty after a fair investigation, Moore should be expelled.
No one has ever, EVER, been expelled from congress because of an ethics investigation.

If Moore wins, he's in, for the duration of his term.

[tailfins]

No one has ever, EVER, been expelled from congress because of an ethics investigation.

If Moore wins, he's in, for the duration of his term.


On the House side, Jim Traficant was https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Traficant

[High_Plains_Drifter]

On the House side, Jim Traficant was https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Traficant
Interesting, because I heard on tv, on the news, that no one has ever been thrown out of office because of an ethics investigation.

Maybe to clarify, "an ethics investigation for diddling some woman" should be added.