NYT Trump Lies List

[pete311]

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html

[pete311]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/24/politics/trump-health-care-promises/index.html

[hjmick]

Do you have any comment or are you too busy jerking off while you read the lists?


Oh, I get it, no one has yet told you what you think... My bad.


There should be a policy around this place about just posting fucking links with no original content. It's just flat out lazy.

[pete311]

Do you have any comment or are you too busy jerking off while you read the lists?


Oh, I get it, no one has yet told you what you think... My bad.


There should be a policy around this place about just posting fucking links with no original content. It's just flat out lazy.

lol you fucking tool. This is exactly what a repubtard posts when they can't debate the facts.

[Black Diamond]

lol you fucking tool. This is exactly what a repubtard posts when they can't debate the facts.
Still reeling from last Tuesday? Or Tuesday November 8?

[Black Diamond]

Debating facts from CNN is like debating facts from a birther website or 9/11 truther website.

[BoogyMan]

lol you fucking tool. This is exactly what a repubtard posts when they can't debate the facts. You select a link from 2 virulently anti-Trump sources who have truth-challenges of their own and then come in here cursing at members who call you out on that fact? Leftism does actually seem to be a mental disorder.

[pete311]

Keep debating the facts guys, good work. Like Brietbart will ever post anything that doesn't support Trump. Use your heads lemmings.

[pete311]

Debating facts from CNN is like debating facts from a birther website or 9/11 truther website.

Interesting you use both those examples where Trump has classically lied and spouted conspiracy theories about.

[hjmick]

lol you fucking tool. This is exactly what a repubtard posts when they can't debate the facts.


What's wrong? Does the truth hurt? Or is that what your masters told you to type? Oh so predictable.


First, why would I want to debate with the likes of you? You have nothing, you are nothing. Debating you would be a waste of my time. You are a one trick pony. Not only that, debate would suggest your mind is open to being changed, we all know it is not. Nor are you actually interested in hearing or respecting the views of anyone who thinks differently than you politically.

Second, I am not a Republican. I did not vote for Trump. I do not defend Trump except in instances of people like you being intellectually dishonest about their complaints, just like I did Obama for eight years.

Third, I know Trump lies. I know when he lies. I don't need the likes of the New York Times or CNN telling me so. I think for myself.


Now, if you take issue with someone suggesting that the author of an OP should, at the very least, offer up some original content rather than simply cutting and pasting the words of someone else and a link, or just a link itself, too fucking bad you fucking loser. All you've done by posting only a link is show me, and probably everyone else, that you are lazy, incapable of original thought, and interested only in hit pieces and not any sort of discussion or debate.


And you call me a "tool"? Fuck you.

[pete311]

What's wrong? Does the truth hurt? Or is that what your masters told you to type? Oh so predictable.


First, why would I want to debate with the likes of you? You have nothing, you are nothing. Debating you would be a waste of my time. You are a one trick pony. Not only that, debate would suggest your mind is open to being changed, we all know it is not. Nor are you actually interested in hearing or respecting the views of anyone who thinks differently than you politically.

Second, I am not a Republican. I did not vote for Trump. I do not defend Trump except in instances of people like you being intellectually dishonest about their complaints, just like I did Obama for eight years.

Third, I know Trump lies. I know when he lies. I don't need the likes of the New York Times or CNN telling me so. I think for myself.


Now, if you take issue with someone suggesting that the author of an OP should, at the very least, offer up some original content rather than simply cutting and pasting the words of someone else and a link, or just a link itself, too fucking bad you fucking loser. All you've done by posting only a link is show me, and probably everyone else, that you are lazy, incapable of original thought, and interested only in hit pieces and not any sort of discussion or debate.


And you call me a "tool"? Fuck you.

Long response to someone who's a waste of time. I will not give you such time. I'm going out to enjoy the sun. Go fuck yourself tool.

[Black Diamond]

Long response to someone who's a waste of time. I will not give you such time. I'm going out to enjoy the sun. Go fuck yourself tool.
Whatever gets you through the night. It's alright. It's alright.

[jimnyc]

There's no doubt that he's told some whoppers, Pete. I'll admit that. Just like a lot of presidents before him. He often speaks from the hip, unlike prior presidents. He also says a lot more things that we wouldn't normally hear about if not for his style. But yes, he's told some whoppers. Like Obama did. Like Bush did.

And he's accomplished a ton in his short time, other than what the MSM will shovel in your direction. That stuff doesn't help the 'hate Trump' agenda of so many.

I think overall that he's doing just fine. That coming from folks pisses a lot of others off. The fact that it's true REALLY pisses others off.

[jimnyc]

What's wrong? Does the truth hurt? Or is that what your masters told you to type? Oh so predictable.


First, why would I want to debate with the likes of you? You have nothing, you are nothing. Debating you would be a waste of my time. You are a one trick pony. Not only that, debate would suggest your mind is open to being changed, we all know it is not. Nor are you actually interested in hearing or respecting the views of anyone who thinks differently than you politically.

Second, I am not a Republican. I did not vote for Trump. I do not defend Trump except in instances of people like you being intellectually dishonest about their complaints, just like I did Obama for eight years.

Third, I know Trump lies. I know when he lies. I don't need the likes of the New York Times or CNN telling me so. I think for myself.


Now, if you take issue with someone suggesting that the author of an OP should, at the very least, offer up some original content rather than simply cutting and pasting the words of someone else and a link, or just a link itself, too fucking bad you fucking loser. All you've done by posting only a link is show me, and probably everyone else, that you are lazy, incapable of original thought, and interested only in hit pieces and not any sort of discussion or debate.


And you call me a "tool"? Fuck you.

hjmick - will you marry me? I read this and fell in love with you. :)

[aboutime]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/01/19/obamas-biggest-whoppers/?utm_term=.83ce085883fd
<img src="https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_960w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/01/11/National-Politics/Videos/Images/t_1484103926253_name_Obama_19939_jpg_e4553.jpg&w=480>
The Fact Checker started during the 2008 campaign and then went on hiatus for the first two years of President Obama’s presidency before becoming a permanent Washington Post feature in 2011. All told, we’ve fact-checked more than 250 statements by Obama.
The Fact Checker started during the 2008 campaign and then went on hiatus for the first two years of President Obama’s presidency before becoming a permanent Washington Post feature in 2011. All told, we’ve fact-checked more than 250 statements by Obama.
The Fact Checker started during the 2008 campaign and then went on hiatus for the first two years of President Obama’s presidency before becoming a permanent Washington Post feature in 2011. All told, we’ve fact-checked more than 250 statements by Obama.

With his presidency coming to a close, here’s a look at 10 of Obama’s biggest whoppers, listed in chronological order.
With his presidency coming to a close, here’s a look at 10 of Obama’s biggest whoppers, listed in chronological order.

[NightTrain]

:laugh2:

And today's Awesome Beatdown Award goes to....
hjmick

http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10100&stc=1

[hjmick]

Long response to someone who's a waste of time. I will not give you such time. I'm going out to enjoy the sun. Go fuck yourself tool.


Long response? Oh, I suppose to someone of your limited capacity it might seem long. Tell you what, in the future, if I respond to one of your posts, I will do my utmost to be pithy and use as many single syllable words as possible...

[gabosaurus]

There should be a policy around this place about just posting fucking links with no original content. It's just flat out lazy.

I don't think Jim would agree with you on this.

[hjmick]

I don't think Jim would agree with you on this.


You may be right. It's his board, his rules. I'm okay with that. Won't stop me from making suggestions.

[aboutime]

Long response to someone who's a waste of time. I will not give you such time. I'm going out to enjoy the sun. Go fuck yourself tool.


Thanks petey. If anyone had to learn how to go and fuck themselves...We can all depend on you to show us How, and WHY you enjoy being such a douchebag enough to share your experience here with us.

[Black Diamond]

:laugh2:

And today's Awesome Beatdown Award goes to....
@hjmick (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?u=208)

http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10100&stc=1
That looks like the guy from raging bull that Vicki thought was good looking before the fight.