PDA

View Full Version : Inside Obama’s "Secret" Outreach to Russia



jimnyc
05-29-2017, 04:14 PM
This is dated the end of December in 2014. Something to read. Keeping in mind that we are lead to believe by many how horrid it is to deal with folks from Russia. Mccain even says Putin is a global threat, more so than ISIS. Of course the democrats think pretty much any discussions are treason. Of course both sides will always have excuses as to why what they do is ok. My view is that there will always be some form of contact. The questions come as to whether or not everything is above board and legal. I'm not saying the Obama administration did either of those, but we also didn't see a crazy uproar over communications.

---

Inside Obama’s Secret Outreach to Russia

The U.S. has been working behind the scenes for months to forge a new working relationship with Russia, even enlisting Henry Kissinger.

President Barack Obama's administration has been working behind the scenes for months to forge a new working relationship with Russia, despite the fact that Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown little interest in repairing relations with Washington or halting his aggression in neighboring Ukraine.

This month, Obama's National Security Council finished an extensive and comprehensive review of U.S policy toward Russia that included dozens of meetings and input from the State Department, Defense Department and several other agencies, according to three senior administration officials. At the end of the sometimes-contentious process, Obama made a decision to continue to look for ways to work with Russia on a host of bilateral and international issues while also offering Putin a way out of the stalemate over the crisis in Ukraine.

“I don’t think that anybody at this point is under the impression that a wholesale reset of our relationship is possible at this time, but we might as well test out what they are actually willing to do,” a senior administration official told me. “Our theory of this all along has been, let's see what’s there. Regardless of the likelihood of success.”

Leading the charge has been Secretary of State John Kerry. This fall, Kerry even proposed going to Moscow and meeting with Putin directly. The negotiations over Kerry’s trip got to the point of scheduling, but ultimately were scuttled because there was little prospect of demonstrable progress.

In a separate attempt at outreach, the White House turned to an old friend of Putin’s for help. The White House called on former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to discuss having him call Putin directly, according to two officials. It’s unclear whether Kissinger actually made the call. The White House and Kissinger both refused to comment for this column.

Kerry has been the point man on dealing with Russia because his close relationship with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov represents the last remaining functional diplomatic channel between Washington and Moscow. They meet often, often without any staff members present, and talk on the phone regularly. Obama and Putin, on the other hand, are known to have an intense dislike for each other and very rarely speak.

In several conversations with Lavrov, Kerry has floated an offer to Russia that would pave the way for a partial release of some of the most onerous economic sanctions. Kerry’s conditions included Russia adhering to September's Minsk agreement and ceasing direct military support for the Ukrainian separatists. The issue of Crimea would be set aside for the time being, and some of the initial sanctions that were put in place after Crimea’s annexation would be kept in place.

“We are willing to isolate the issues of Donetsk and Luhansk from the issue of Crimea,” another senior administration official told me, naming two regions in Eastern Ukraine under separatist control. “If there was a settlement on Donetsk and Luhansk, there could be a removal of some sanctions while maintaining sanctions with regard to Crimea. That represents a way forward for Putin.”

Meanwhile, Kerry has been proposing increased U.S.-Russian cooperation on a wide range of international issues. Earlier this month, he invited Lavrov to a last-minute diplomatic confab in Rome to discuss the the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

After one meeting with Lavrov in Paris in October, Kerry announced that he had discussed potential U.S.-Russian cooperation on Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea, Syria and Yemen. But the apparent warming was overshadowed by Lavrov’s quick denial of Kerry’s claim that Russia had agreed to assist in the U.S.-led coalition against Islamic State in Iraq.

Rest here - https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2014-12-31/inside-obamas-secret-outreach-to-russia

aboutime
05-31-2017, 09:05 PM
There is NO "THERE" There. "NO SMOKING GUN", NO SILVER BULLET

If Obama did it, sounding like petey...."WHY CAN'T ANYBODY ELSE?"

Gunny
05-31-2017, 09:50 PM
John Kerry is a waste of natural resources. He is however living proof that humans can exist without a spine. In that light, he would be better suited to be a lab rat for medical science than anything else he's done in life.

aboutime
05-31-2017, 10:01 PM
John Kerry is a waste of natural resources. He is however living proof that humans can exist without a spine. In that light, he would be better suited to be a lab rat for medical science than anything else he's done in life.


Don't forget Kerry claims to be a WAR HERO too!9993

gabosaurus
05-31-2017, 10:05 PM
Obama is no longer president. Trump is president.
Which investigation should be more pressing and relevant?

aboutime
06-01-2017, 08:00 PM
Obama is no longer president. Trump is president.
Which investigation should be more pressing and relevant?


There you go again gabby-the-hypocrite and troll. Funny you never said anything like that when YOUR WONDERFUL OBAMA was still blaming BUSH, in his 8th year.

And of course. As before. You refuse to accept that both OBAMA, and HILLARY are now under investigation AGAIN...with Congress sending them INVITATIONS to appear.

You don't want anyone to pay any attention to that, Do ya?

BoogyMan
06-01-2017, 08:14 PM
Obama is no longer president. Trump is president.
Which investigation should be more pressing and relevant?

You work from the ridiculous assumption that an investigation of EITHER is necessitated. When you live in the land on the loons anything is possible I guess.

gabosaurus
06-01-2017, 11:11 PM
The president should be above suspicion. If suspicions arise, they need to be investigated. Why would Trump ask for any investigation into his ties with Russia be dropped if he had nothing to be worried about?
If you want to clear the air, stop putting up smoke screens.

NightTrain
06-01-2017, 11:15 PM
The president should be above suspicion. If suspicions arise, they need to be investigated. Why would Trump ask for any investigation into his ties with Russia be dropped if he had nothing to be worried about?
If you want to clear the air, stop putting up smoke screens.

Usually when the Boss sees a bunch of his employees chasing imaginary squirrels, he puts an end to it so they can do something productive.

That's how the world works.

aboutime
06-02-2017, 01:23 AM
The president should be above suspicion. If suspicions arise, they need to be investigated. Why would Trump ask for any investigation into his ties with Russia be dropped if he had nothing to be worried about?
If you want to clear the air, stop putting up smoke screens.

First gabby. YOU need to provide factual proof that the President asked to have any investigation dropped. You, like every other known Trump hater so easily are willing to ASSUME that he is guilty...long before any HONEST facts have been disclosed.

If you were accused of anything that might mean you go to jail. Wouldn't you DEMAND to be proven guilty while expressing your Innocence???

That's the way YOU and Liberals demand it for your FAKE NEWS. What's the difference?