jimnyc
12-14-2016, 05:29 PM
We need to be respectful to the needs of heroin addicts. Maybe they need safe spaces too? One of the LAST things I would ever want to do is separate a Mom from her child. But for the baby's best interest, they also need to ensure that the baby is in safe hands. Being cared for by a heroin addict is not in safe hands. Fentanyl Ithink is worse, dunno? All I know is from what I read - as that's the crap that killed Prince, and I remember them stating about how it's like 50x stronger than your normal drugs. Anyway, that's the only point I'm addressing, the part where she mentions that they shouldn't be criticized.
And yes, to the first liberal to bring it up, I am aware that this is Ann Coulter. I'm aware this is on Breitbart, but the place being talked about and coddled is from the NYT article. No, I don't care about Coulter other than the occasional awesome thing I read from her.
-----
Ann Coulter: Throwing the Baby out with the Bongwater
The New York Times posted a glowing article about a group home in New Hampshire, Hope on Haven Hill, founded with the express mission of keeping babies united with mothers who:
“… had used opioids, mostly heroin and fentanyl. Many had been incarcerated. Few had families they could turn to for help, and the fathers of their babies were out of the picture.”
Why would anyone do this? And why is the U.S. government giving these lunatics a half-million dollar grant to help them do it?
As the Times explains, “Haven Hill’s philosophy” is that babies should stay with their drug addict, single mothers, “alleviating the widespread fear among pregnant drug users that if they seek help, their children will be taken away.”
Even accepting that, in modern America, single mothers and drug addicts are People Who May Not Be Criticized, this is insane. It ought to be insane even to readers of the Times, who might have noticed, next to the perky article on Haven Hill, the headline for a related article in the Times: “Opioids May Interfere With Parenting Instincts, Study Finds.”
As the article explains, scientists found that the part of the brain that registers cute baby faces “as irresistible, kicking in our instinct to care for them” didn’t light up in people dependent on opioids, as it does in normal brains.
But forget that the mothers are heroin addicts — as Haven Hill does. Just consider the lottery tickets these kids have won by being born to single mothers. As recounted in gory detail in Guilty: Liberal ‘Victims’ and Their Assault on America, study after study has shown that children brought up by single mothers are doomed.
Regardless of socioeconomic status, race or residence, they are many, many multiple times more likely than children raised in two-parent families to: commit suicide, get pregnant, abuse drugs, run away, drop out of high school and go to prison. In fact, the single strongest predictor of whether a person will end up in prison is being raised by a single mother.
Rest here - http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/14/ann-coulter-throwing-baby-bongwater/
And yes, to the first liberal to bring it up, I am aware that this is Ann Coulter. I'm aware this is on Breitbart, but the place being talked about and coddled is from the NYT article. No, I don't care about Coulter other than the occasional awesome thing I read from her.
-----
Ann Coulter: Throwing the Baby out with the Bongwater
The New York Times posted a glowing article about a group home in New Hampshire, Hope on Haven Hill, founded with the express mission of keeping babies united with mothers who:
“… had used opioids, mostly heroin and fentanyl. Many had been incarcerated. Few had families they could turn to for help, and the fathers of their babies were out of the picture.”
Why would anyone do this? And why is the U.S. government giving these lunatics a half-million dollar grant to help them do it?
As the Times explains, “Haven Hill’s philosophy” is that babies should stay with their drug addict, single mothers, “alleviating the widespread fear among pregnant drug users that if they seek help, their children will be taken away.”
Even accepting that, in modern America, single mothers and drug addicts are People Who May Not Be Criticized, this is insane. It ought to be insane even to readers of the Times, who might have noticed, next to the perky article on Haven Hill, the headline for a related article in the Times: “Opioids May Interfere With Parenting Instincts, Study Finds.”
As the article explains, scientists found that the part of the brain that registers cute baby faces “as irresistible, kicking in our instinct to care for them” didn’t light up in people dependent on opioids, as it does in normal brains.
But forget that the mothers are heroin addicts — as Haven Hill does. Just consider the lottery tickets these kids have won by being born to single mothers. As recounted in gory detail in Guilty: Liberal ‘Victims’ and Their Assault on America, study after study has shown that children brought up by single mothers are doomed.
Regardless of socioeconomic status, race or residence, they are many, many multiple times more likely than children raised in two-parent families to: commit suicide, get pregnant, abuse drugs, run away, drop out of high school and go to prison. In fact, the single strongest predictor of whether a person will end up in prison is being raised by a single mother.
Rest here - http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/14/ann-coulter-throwing-baby-bongwater/