Kathianne
11-03-2016, 08:38 AM
Back when: http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?49401-Heard-About-That-Book-Regarding-Hillary-s-Foundation&p=731896&highlight=Clinton+Cash#post731896
Heard About That Book Regarding Hillary's Foundation?
I thought I'd written on it week or so ago, if so I can't find it. Anyways, NYT, WaPo, and FOX have exclusive rights to work from anything in the book and report. NYT has started, oh boy have they started! Don't fail to notice Reuters playing off of at the end!
http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Annie http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=333115#post333115)
The OP was dancing around the reaction to this book:
How foreign cash made Bill and Hillary | New York Post (http://nypost.com/2015/04/20/book-claims-foreign-cash-made-bill-and-hillary-filthy-rich/)
“Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich"
I read about it's release a couple weeks ago, I guess that may have helped move her 'announcement date' up. David Brock has been sent to sic (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/david-brock-warpath-against-anti-hillary-clinton-book-117178.html) on response to it, that doesn't bode well.
Not well at all:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...pany.html?_r=0 (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0)
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians Pressed for Control of Uranium Company
By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIREAPRIL 23, 2015
The headline in Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when the newspaper served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.
...
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the ClintonFoundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
...
The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.
Continue reading the main story
Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.
In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.
American political campaigns are barred from accepting foreign donations. But foreigners may give to foundations in the United States. In the days since Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy for president, the Clinton Foundation has announced changes meant to quell longstanding concerns about potential conflicts of interest in such donations; it has limited donations from foreign governments, with many, like Russia’s, barred from giving to all but its health care initiatives. That policy stops short of Mrs. Clinton’s agreement with the Obama administration, which prohibited all foreign government donations while she served as the nation’s top diplomat.
...
Undisclosed Donations
Before Mrs. Clinton could assume her post as secretary of state, the White House demanded that she sign a memorandum of understanding placing limits on her husband’s foundation’s activities. To avoid the perception of conflicts of interest, beyond the ban on foreign government donations, the foundation was required to publicly disclose all contributors.
To judge from those disclosures — which list the contributions in ranges rather than precise amounts — the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal began percolating.
...
One hour ago, Reuters:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0NE0CA20150423 (http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/23/us-usa-election-clinton-taxes-exclusive-idUSKBN0NE0CA20150423)
Thu Apr 23, 2015 11:51am EDT Related: U.S., POLITICS
Exclusive: Clinton charities will refile tax returns, audit for other errors
NEW YORK | BY JONATHAN ALLEN
...
Today: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/fbi-sources-leak-details-of-clinton-probe-to-the-press.html
Clinton Probe Was Delayed for Election, So FBI Sources Leak Details to the PressBy Margaret Hartmann (http://nymag.com/author/Margaret%20Hartmann/)
...
Several law enforcement sources told the Times this week that the New York agents’ case was mostly based on allegations in the book Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich by Peter Schweizer, senior editor-at-large for Breitbart News. The book was turned into a film by former Breitbart chairman and current Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon.
The book suggests that the Clintons engaged in shady dealings around the world, using their charity and Hillary’s position at the State Department to benefit themselves financially. The New York Times, the Washington Post, and Fox News made deals (http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/04/new-york-times-washington-post-fox-news-strike-deals-for-anti-clinton-research-205791) with Schweizer for early access to some of his Clinton opposition research. The book contained a number of serious errors (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book)and was dismissed by the Clinton campaign. Nevertheless, Schweizer was reportedly interviewed multiple times by the FBI.
Now sources tell (http://www.wsj.com/articles/secret-recordings-fueled-fbi-feud-in-clinton-probe-1478135518) The Wall Street Journal that some FBI agents felt they’d advanced the case well past the allegations made in the book. They had collected information on the Clinton Foundation from at least two informants in other public-corruption cases, and they had a secret recording of one of those conversations. The sources say that in the recording a suspect in another corruption case discusses improper deals made by the Clintons.
...
Heard About That Book Regarding Hillary's Foundation?
I thought I'd written on it week or so ago, if so I can't find it. Anyways, NYT, WaPo, and FOX have exclusive rights to work from anything in the book and report. NYT has started, oh boy have they started! Don't fail to notice Reuters playing off of at the end!
http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Annie http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=333115#post333115)
The OP was dancing around the reaction to this book:
How foreign cash made Bill and Hillary | New York Post (http://nypost.com/2015/04/20/book-claims-foreign-cash-made-bill-and-hillary-filthy-rich/)
“Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich"
I read about it's release a couple weeks ago, I guess that may have helped move her 'announcement date' up. David Brock has been sent to sic (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/david-brock-warpath-against-anti-hillary-clinton-book-117178.html) on response to it, that doesn't bode well.
Not well at all:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...pany.html?_r=0 (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0)
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians Pressed for Control of Uranium Company
By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIREAPRIL 23, 2015
The headline in Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when the newspaper served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.
...
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the ClintonFoundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
...
The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.
Continue reading the main story
Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.
In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.
American political campaigns are barred from accepting foreign donations. But foreigners may give to foundations in the United States. In the days since Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy for president, the Clinton Foundation has announced changes meant to quell longstanding concerns about potential conflicts of interest in such donations; it has limited donations from foreign governments, with many, like Russia’s, barred from giving to all but its health care initiatives. That policy stops short of Mrs. Clinton’s agreement with the Obama administration, which prohibited all foreign government donations while she served as the nation’s top diplomat.
...
Undisclosed Donations
Before Mrs. Clinton could assume her post as secretary of state, the White House demanded that she sign a memorandum of understanding placing limits on her husband’s foundation’s activities. To avoid the perception of conflicts of interest, beyond the ban on foreign government donations, the foundation was required to publicly disclose all contributors.
To judge from those disclosures — which list the contributions in ranges rather than precise amounts — the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal began percolating.
...
One hour ago, Reuters:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0NE0CA20150423 (http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/23/us-usa-election-clinton-taxes-exclusive-idUSKBN0NE0CA20150423)
Thu Apr 23, 2015 11:51am EDT Related: U.S., POLITICS
Exclusive: Clinton charities will refile tax returns, audit for other errors
NEW YORK | BY JONATHAN ALLEN
...
Today: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/fbi-sources-leak-details-of-clinton-probe-to-the-press.html
Clinton Probe Was Delayed for Election, So FBI Sources Leak Details to the PressBy Margaret Hartmann (http://nymag.com/author/Margaret%20Hartmann/)
...
Several law enforcement sources told the Times this week that the New York agents’ case was mostly based on allegations in the book Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich by Peter Schweizer, senior editor-at-large for Breitbart News. The book was turned into a film by former Breitbart chairman and current Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon.
The book suggests that the Clintons engaged in shady dealings around the world, using their charity and Hillary’s position at the State Department to benefit themselves financially. The New York Times, the Washington Post, and Fox News made deals (http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/04/new-york-times-washington-post-fox-news-strike-deals-for-anti-clinton-research-205791) with Schweizer for early access to some of his Clinton opposition research. The book contained a number of serious errors (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book)and was dismissed by the Clinton campaign. Nevertheless, Schweizer was reportedly interviewed multiple times by the FBI.
Now sources tell (http://www.wsj.com/articles/secret-recordings-fueled-fbi-feud-in-clinton-probe-1478135518) The Wall Street Journal that some FBI agents felt they’d advanced the case well past the allegations made in the book. They had collected information on the Clinton Foundation from at least two informants in other public-corruption cases, and they had a secret recording of one of those conversations. The sources say that in the recording a suspect in another corruption case discusses improper deals made by the Clintons.
...