Americans feel the supreme court is too far right

[Guernicaa]

Fewer See Balance in Court's Decisions
Bush Nominees Have Made Panel 'Too Conservative' for Many, Poll Indicates

By Robert Barnes and Jon Cohen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, July 29, 2007; A03

About half of the public thinks the Supreme Court is generally balanced in its decisions, but a growing number of Americans say the court has become "too conservative" in the two years since President Bush began nominating justices, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Nearly a third of the public -- 31 percent -- thinks the court is too far to the right, a noticeable jump since the question was last asked in July 2005. That's when Bush nominated John G. Roberts Jr. to the court and, in the six-month period that followed, the Senate approved Roberts as chief justice and confirmed Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.

The two have proved to be reliably conservative justices, and the increasingly polarized court this year moved to uphold restraints on abortion, restrict student speech rights and limit the ability of school districts to use race in student assignments, among other issues.

The public seems to have noticed the shift. The percentage who said the court is "too conservative" grew from 19 percent to 31 percent in the past two years, while those who said it is "generally balanced in its decisions" declined from 55 percent to 47 percent.

"I think it shows that we're at a tipping point in time," said Ralph G. Neas, president of the liberal People for the American Way. "And it's why a major priority for us over the next 16 months will be to emphasize the importance of the Supreme Court and why it should be an important factor in voting for president."

But conservative activists looking at the political consequences of the past term say the public is ambivalent about the two rulings that have most marked the court's turn to the right -- upholding the ban on the procedure sometimes called partial-birth abortion and restricting the use of race in school assignments.

The difference could lie in which side is most successful in framing the court's actions to a public that pays more attention to the president and Congress.

"As a political strategist, I'd take those two decisions any day of the week," said Gregory R. Mueller, a public relations consultant who has advised political candidates and represents some conservative judicial organizations. He said that racial classifications remind Americans of quotas, and that even the majority of the public that thinks abortion should generally be available favors some restrictions.

Liberals, on the other hand, portray the court's decision to uphold the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, passed by Congress in 2003, as the first step toward overruling Roe v. Wade and see the race decision as a retreat from civil rights.

Both sides will find support for their views in the Post-ABC poll results, which asked about the two key cases of the term.

Fifty-five percent of those polled -- including majorities of both women and men -- approved of the court's abortion ruling. The decision significantly shifted the court's abortion jurisprudence, marking the first time justices have upheld a restriction on a specific abortion procedure and one that does not include an exception for a woman's health.

But a majority disagreed with the court's decision that sharply restricted the ability of local school boards to use race when making school assignments to achieve diverse student bodies. Fifty-six percent of those polled disapproved of the decision; 40 percent approved.

Three out of four blacks disapproved of the court's ruling in the race case, as did a narrow majority of whites. Seven out of 10 Democrats disagreed with the ruling, while Republicans and independents both were evenly split.

"People really don't want to go backwards on civil rights," said Nan Aron, president of the liberal Alliance for Justice, which focuses on judicial nominations.

The increasing view of the court as more conservative than liberal, and angry rhetoric from Senate Democrats about the role of Roberts and Alito in moving the court in that direction, have energized liberal activist groups that focus on the judiciary.

People for the American Way launched a fundraising drive this month with an e-mail missive sent to 400,000 activists; in the message, Norman Lear, one of the group's founders, warned, "Only you and I stand between the new Supreme Court and the continued chiseling away at the rights and freedoms we Americans hold dear."

The group urges activists to sign online petitions to "Correct the Court" by legislatively overturning some of the court's decisions.

But activists on the right have found in recent years that their supporters are the ones for whom changing the federal judiciary has become a movement.

"It's a unifying issue in many ways for Republicans," Mueller said. For the GOP, nominating conservatives to the federal judiciary, he added, "is one of those issues that has almost become like anti-communism was during the Cold War."

Mueller and his colleague Keith Appell point to the presidential race, where, among Republican candidates, former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney have already named "justice advisory committees" for counsel on issues and nominations.

For Giuliani, a candidate seen in some Republican circles as too moderate, endorsements from conservative favorites such as former solicitor general Theodore B. Olson and Steven Calabresi, one of the founders of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization, were important.

The specter of "liberal activist judges" is still a strong rallying point for conservatives, despite the fact that, because of the Republican hold on the White House, seven of the nine justices on the Supreme Court were appointed by Republican presidents and GOP appointees are in the majority on 10 of the 13 U.S. courts of appeals.

Aron and Neas note that it was conservative anger over court decisions that fueled the right's interest in the federal courts, and they hope that this term's decisions similarly upset activists on the left. "Before, it was hypothetical," Neas said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800645_pf.html

Thank god this is all going to change in 2008:salute:

[nevadamedic]

Is everything you do a partisan attack?

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Bush stacked the deck as far as the SCOTUS is concerned.

He knew he was gonna be doin' some freaky illegal shit and breakin' laws left an' right, so he needed some partisan buddies in the right place so's he wouldn't wind up bent over the railings of Tier3/Cell Block B learnin' the finer points of bein a prison bitch.

He knew he was a corrupt, egotistical, fake christer, shit-suckin fascist, and all shit-suckin' fascists need a way to avoid justice.


The republifascisti know all about givin a big ol' fuckin' finger to the Laws of the US, and the Constitution!

After all, its just a goddam piece of paper, right?

[Nienna]

Who says "balanced" decisions are the BEST decisions? This article suggests that the courts should base their decisions upon popular opinion rather than on what is the LAW at the time. Here's a talking point that is very difficult for some out there to understand: The judicial branch is not supposed to make or change laws, only decide how and if existing laws have been breached. Popular opinion is something for legislators to worry over.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Mentally balanced people.

Only a half-brained idiot supports one-sided decision making.

[82Marine89]

Bush stacked the deck as far as the SCOTUS is concerned.

He knew he was gonna be doin' some freaky illegal shit and breakin' laws left an' right, so he needed some partisan buddies in the right place so's he wouldn't wind up bent over the railings of Tier3/Cell Block B learnin' the finer points of bein a prison bitch.

He knew he was a corrupt, egotistical, fake christer, shit-suckin fascist, and all shit-suckin' fascists need a way to avoid justice.


The republifascisti know all about givin a big ol' fuckin' finger to the Laws of the US, and the Constitution!

After all, its just a goddam piece of paper, right?

Can you back up your emotional outpouring with some cold, hard facts?

[Nienna]

Mentally balanced people.

Only a half-brained idiot supports one-sided decision making.

How "balanced" was Brown vs. the Board of Ed.? Did popular opinion determine the BEST decision in that case?

[nevadamedic]

How "balanced" was Brown vs. the Board of Ed.? Did popular opinion determine the BEST decision in that case?

He's obviously not that bright.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

And yer obviously not that perceptive.


How "balanced" was Brown vs. the Board of Ed.? Did popular opinion determine the BEST decision in that case?
And this has what to do with the issue?

Best watch out or I'll burn that fuckin strawman of yers in effigy to yer mindless partisan shilling.

[nevadamedic]

And yer obviously not that perceptive.


And this has what to do with the issue?

Best watch out or I'll burn that fuckin strawman of yers in effigy to yer mindless partisan shilling.

Wow 7 posts and your already starting shit on here hmmmmm.......... :pee:

[avatar4321]

And yer obviously not that perceptive.


And this has what to do with the issue?

Best watch out or I'll burn that fuckin strawman of yers in effigy to yer mindless partisan shilling.

It's not really that difficult of a concept to understand. The court is supposed to make the right decision. not the popular one.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

The right decision is not decided along party lines, or religious lines, but on judicial lines.
That means impartiality, and an attention to equiminity and fairness.

What Bush has donbe with the SCOTUS is slant their number along party lines, and chosen individuals with serious objectivity and social justice problems.
Who time and again make decisions based on their personal whim rather than any judicial neutrality.
And they told people that they ruled in that way.l


Wow 7 posts and your already starting shit on here hmmmmm
Get over it.

[nevadamedic]

The right decision is not decided along party lines, or religious lines, but on judicial lines.
That means impartiality, and an attention to equiminity and fairness.

What Bush has donbe with the SCOTUS is slant their number along party lines, and chosen individuals with serious objectivity and social justice problems.
Who time and again make decisions based on their personal whim rather than any judicial neutrality.
And they told people that they ruled in that way.l


Get over it.

And not to brite obviously.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

And not to brite obviously.

Hmmm.
I would think someone so critical of others "briteness" would learn to spell as well as being a bit more creative in their commentary.

Right now you sound like one of those "rain man" style autistic types when they get a phrase stuck in their "differently abled" brains and repeat it every three seconds in a monotone.

Ya got anything else?

[82Marine89]

The right decision is not decided along party lines, or religious lines, but on judicial lines.
That means impartiality, and an attention to equiminity and fairness.

What Bush has donbe with the SCOTUS is slant their number along party lines, and chosen individuals with serious objectivity and social justice problems.
Who time and again make decisions based on their personal whim rather than any judicial neutrality.
And they told people that they ruled in that way.l




And the Ginsburg nomination was impartial?

[82Marine89]

And not to brite obviously.

Please buy a spell-check.

[Angel Heart]

After Clinton's appointed the ones he did, the public viewed it as being too liberal leaning.

[nevadamedic]

After Clinton's appointed the ones he did, the public viewed it as being too liberal leaning.

To Liberal? Because of Slick Willy Clinton? No way! :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

[avatar4321]

And the Ginsburg nomination was impartial?

The nominations dont have to be impartial. They just have to be made by the President with the advise and consent of the Senate.

They do have to keep one standard though: The Constitution of the United States.

And that is exactly why liberals freak out about Justices like Alito, Roberts, Thomas, and Scalia. They meant it when they swore to obey the Constitution.

[Yurt]

Why don't you libs actually point out a case that was decided incorrectly instead of spouting boring lib talking points. What exactly about the justices do you not like? That they believe in a strong constitution and that judges should not "activate" or "legislate" from the bench.

[avatar4321]

Why don't you libs actually point out a case that was decided incorrectly instead of spouting boring lib talking points. What exactly about the justices do you not like? That they believe in a strong constitution and that judges should not "activate" or "legislate" from the bench.

They dont like the fact that people should have a say in the law. You know, the key to our Republic. The power in the hands of the people scares them. As well it should, because the people dont put up with the bull they teach.

[OCA]

And yer obviously not that perceptive.


And this has what to do with the issue?

Best watch out or I'll burn that fuckin strawman of yers in effigy to yer mindless partisan shilling.


Spyder shut the fuck up, you ain't shit.

[OCA]

The right decision is not decided along party lines, or religious lines, but on judicial lines.
That means impartiality, and an attention to equiminity and fairness.

What Bush has donbe with the SCOTUS is slant their number along party lines, and chosen individuals with serious objectivity and social justice problems.
Who time and again make decisions based on their personal whim rather than any judicial neutrality.
And they told people that they ruled in that way.l


Get over it.


Social justice! ROTFLMFAO!:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

[OCA]

And the Ginsburg nomination was impartial?


Exactly, nominating judges who agree with a president philisophically is one of the perks of the job, obviously Spyder here has run across a bunch of sour grapes.

[OCA]

Please buy a spell-check.

Nevada is an embarassment to our side, wish he'd just go the fuck away.

[Sir Evil]

Hmmm.
I would think someone so critical of others "briteness" would learn to spell as well as being a bit more creative in their commentary.

Right now you sound like one of those "rain man" style autistic types when they get a phrase stuck in their "differently abled" brains and repeat it every three seconds in a monotone.

Ya got anything else?

Thing is, do you have anything at all? Talk about "rain man" style of posting? Geez, this is the same style & mentality of any bush bashing dem, same shit you will find posted on most every political forum. Isn't it time for judge wapner sphincter jerusalem?

[red states rule]

The nominations dont have to be impartial. They just have to be made by the President with the advise and consent of the Senate.

They do have to keep one standard though: The Constitution of the United States.

And that is exactly why liberals freak out about Justices like Alito, Roberts, Thomas, and Scalia. They meant it when they swore to obey the Constitution.

Sworn to obey the US Constitution and NOT MAKE LAW FROM THE BENCH

That is really what drives libs nuts

[red states rule]

Now the left will go after Judges who do not make laws from the bench


snip

Liberals talking about the Supreme Court in recent days are a bit like those cellmates — both in the dire nature of their plight, now that the conservative victory at the court has revealed itself in full dimension, and in their belief that there must be something they can do about it.

Political activists within the liberal camp came up with a plan quickly enough: to “take back the court,” in the words of Norman Lear, a founder of People for the American Way, which sent 400,000 e-mail messages last week as part of a campaign to make the court a central issue in the 2008 Senate and presidential elections.

In mid-June, before the final flood of decisions but after the court voted 5 to 4 to uphold the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation mailed an appeal in envelopes with a line from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissenting opinion in that case, her complaint about the majority’s resurrection of “ancient notions about women’s place.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/we...ew&oref=slogin

[Hugh Lincoln]

Who says "balanced" decisions are the BEST decisions? This article suggests that the courts should base their decisions upon popular opinion rather than on what is the LAW at the time. Here's a talking point that is very difficult for some out there to understand: The judicial branch is not supposed to make or change laws, only decide how and if existing laws have been breached. Popular opinion is something for legislators to worry over.

Thanks, important point. The Washington Post, Obama08 and Spyderman Jerusalem obviously think of the Supreme Court as a plaything meant to advance their political agendas. How should we judge a COURT, as opposed to legislators? BY HOW WELL IT INTERPRETS THE LAWS ALREADY DOWN. "Social justice," for fuck's sake. Talk about phrases that DON'T appear in the Constitution!

[red states rule]

Thanks, important point. The Washington Post, Obama08 and Spyderman Jerusalem obviously think of the Supreme Court as a plaything meant to advance their political agendas. How should we judge a COURT, as opposed to legislators? BY HOW WELL IT INTERPRETS THE LAWS ALREADY DOWN. "Social justice," for fuck's sake. Talk about phrases that DON'T appear in the Constitution!

Libs shape and bend the US Constitution into more positions then a Bill Clinton intern

[Nienna]

And this has what to do with the issue?
We obviously have different perspectives on exactly what the issue is.


Best watch out or I'll burn that fuckin strawman of yers in effigy to yer mindless partisan shilling.

My "straw man" isn't afraid of your ad hominem. :p

[red states rule]

We obviously have different perspectives on exactly what the issue is.



My "straw man" isn't afraid of your ad hominem. :p

There is nothing like having a calm and rational discussion with a rabid lib

[avatar4321]

Social justice! ROTFLMFAO!:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Social justice is just a code word meaning he doesnt appoint liberal judges who will ignore the constitution to enforce liberalism.

[OCA]

Social justice is just a code word meaning he doesnt appoint liberal judges who will ignore the constitution to enforce liberalism.

Or it could be he doesn't like it when freaks are called freaks and not granted "special rights".

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Nevada is an embarassment to our side, wish he'd just go the fuck away.


So are you.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

We obviously have different perspectives on exactly what the issue is.



Mostly because you don't understand the issue, and I do.


My "straw man" isn't afraid of your ad hominem.
It doesn't appear that you know what those words mean either.

Try reading a book.

[OCA]

So are you.


What are you, 12 yrs old? Better bring your A game here or i'm gonna fucking devour you whole.

That "so are you" shit was weak and pathetic.

Next!

[OCA]

Mostly because you don't understand the issue, and I do.


It doesn't appear that you know what those words mean either.

Try reading a book.


You don't understand your asshole from your elbow. You are autistic, an idiot savant, only they haven't found the 1 thing you are good at yet.

[Kathianne]

From what I see in Obama's first article, 1/3 of the country says 'too conservative', interestingly enough, nearly the same percentage that declares themselves 'Democrat'. The majority, which includes presumably those calling themselves Republicans and a sizeable percentage of independents.

No news article.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

What are you, 12 yrs old? Better bring your A game here or i'm gonna fucking devour you whole.

That "so are you" shit was weak and pathetic.

Next!


For someone who says they'll devour me whole" why do you look like a fuckin' sandwich.
I could eat you for lunch with a side of fries and coke.

That "so are you shit" was right on the mark, or ya wouldn't be pulin' over it, loser.

NEXT!

[Spyder Jerusalem]

You don't understand your asshole from your elbow. You are autistic, an idiot savant, only they haven't found the 1 thing you are good at yet.


My asshole looks like a sandwich named OCA, and my elbow is what I'm gonna bend when I bitchslap him over and over again.

Oh, and I am good at one thing.
Making you look like an utter buffon, asswipe.

[red states rule]

My asshole looks like a sandwich named OCA, and my elbow is what I'm gonna bend when I bitchslap him over and over again.

Oh, and I am good at one thing.
Making you look like an utter buffon, asswipe.

You really are a nut

Are you here because you were banned from the Dem Underground or Daily Kos?

[Spyder Jerusalem]

No.

I was drawn the heady stench of republifascist bullshit and pseudo-christer moralizing.

I am welcome at every political board I have ever posted at, and know several of your regular posters here.

If you must know, I was invited here to slap around the idiot christers and republifascists that swarm all over this board like flies on dogshit.

Its what I do...

[OCA]

My asshole looks like a sandwich named OCA, and my elbow is what I'm gonna bend when I bitchslap him over and over again.

Oh, and I am good at one thing.
Making you look like an utter buffon, asswipe.


Still waiting for you to get started queer apologist.

You are an appetizer, finger food.

[nevadamedic]

For someone who says they'll devour me whole" why do you look like a fuckin' sandwich.
I could eat you for lunch with a side of fries and coke.

That "so are you shit" was right on the mark, or ya wouldn't be pulin' over it, loser.

NEXT!

Word of advice, not that you'll take it since your about the dumbest shit head I think I have ran into on the internet.....Don't call out OCA especially after only fourty something posts.

[nevadamedic]

No.

I was drawn the heady stench of republifascist bullshit and pseudo-christer moralizing.

I am welcome at every political board I have ever posted at, and know several of your regular posters here.

If you must know, I was invited here to slap around the idiot christers and republifascists that swarm all over this board like flies on dogshit.

Its what I do...

And who were you invited by?

[OCA]

No.


Its what I do...

besides jerking off in dark corners....neither of which you are worth a shit at.

Politics just isn't your game man, accept it and move on.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

And who were you invited by?

Don't end sentences in prepositions.

The correct way to say that is "By whom were you invited?"

My answer is "Why should I tell you?"


besides jerking off in dark corners....neither of which you are worth a shit at.
I'm sure givin you a beating, though.
Musta been all that muscle I get from jerkin' off workin' for me when I pimpslap yer bitch ass or sump[in.

Loser.

[OCA]

Don't end sentences in prepositions.

The correct way to say that is "By whom were you invited?"

My answer is "Why should I tell you?"


I'm sure givin you a beating, though.
Musta been all that muscle I get from jerkin' off workin' for me when I pimpslap yer bitch ass or sump[in.

Loser.

Lol still waiting for you to start...............boy.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Politics just isn't your game man, accept it and move on.

This, comin' from a sandwich, is quite a joke.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Lol still waiting for you to start...............boy.
I still can't take anything a sandwich says seriously enough to give much of a shit.

When you start bein' creative enough to inspire my ire, then will I use you as the outlet for it.

Till then, yer just boring.

[OCA]

This, comin' from a sandwich, is quite a joke.


You got nothing but avatar shit, admit it, you got zero game.

[OCA]

I still can't take anything a sandwich says seriously enough to give much of a shit.

When you start bein' creative enough to inspire my ire, then will I use you as the outlet for it.

Till then, yer just boring.

You can't fool me, you know you can't deal with me, you know you are a minor leaguer, get the fuck out while you still can. Run bitch.

[red states rule]

You can't fool me, you know you can't deal with me, you know you are a minor leaguer, get the fuck out while you still can. Run bitch.

Why are you insulting the minor leagues? He is lower then then them - much lower

[Spyder Jerusalem]

You can't fool me, you know you can't deal with me, you know you are a minor leaguer, get the fuck out while you still can. Run bitch.


:lol:


Don't make me hafta raise my pimp hand!

http://is1.okcupid.com/users/156/664/1566642811609810544/mt1114812009.jpg

[red states rule]

Why am I not surprised you are a big enough jerk to slap a women around?

and I thought libs were opposed to violence

[Spyder Jerusalem]

I'm not a "lib".

[red states rule]

I'm not a "lib".

If it screams like a lib

rants like a lib

insults like a lib

Yes, you are a lib

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Not much of a definition.

But, its anbout what I'd expect from a semi-literate republifascist turd-for-brains.

[red states rule]

Not much of a definition.

But, its anbout what I'd expect from a semi-literate republifascist turd-for-brains.

With you - it fits

Another liberal troll on a message board - that is the burden the rest of us must endure

[OCA]

:lol:


Don't make me hafta raise my pimp hand!

http://is1.okcupid.com/users/156/664/1566642811609810544/mt1114812009.jpg


After you extract it from your buddy's ass raise it up......boy.

[OCA]

I'm not a "lib".


:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

[red states rule]

:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Libs are piss poor liers

[OCA]

Libs are piss poor liers

Lets face it, a lib is a step up for this guy, probably wipes his ass with a doughnut.

[red states rule]

Lets face it, a lib is a step up for this guy, probably wipes his ass with a doughnut.

and uses a toilet brush as a combination tooth brush and back scratcher

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Oh, gee.

Insults from a bunch of fucktarded republifascists.
I am truly wounded.

Now, wipe the spooge off yer chins and get back to work makin'
me look good, lazy bastards.

[OCA]

Oh, gee.

Insults from a bunch of fucktarded republifascists.
I am truly wounded.

Now, wipe the spooge off yer chins and get back to work makin'
me look good, lazy bastards.

C-.................come on Spydey we have a higher standard for flaming around here, pick up the fucking pace!

[red states rule]

C-.................come on Spydey we have a higher standard for flaming around here, pick up the fucking pace!

If that is the best he can do - you will have so much fun

[Hugh Lincoln]

Oh, gee.

Insults from a bunch of fucktarded republifascists.
I am truly wounded.

Now, wipe the spooge off yer chins and get back to work makin'
me look good, lazy bastards.

I'm rubbing my temples and getting a signal... yes... the picture is coming in... it's

http://badtux.net/uploaded_images/fat_man-729010.jpg

Spyder Jerusalem at his keyboard.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

C-.................come on Spydey we have a higher standard for flaming around here, pick up the fucking pace!

A grade from a loser like you?

You say that as if your opinion matters to me.

Yer startin' to bore me.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

I'm rubbing my temples and getting a signal... yes... the picture is coming in... it's

http://badtux.net/uploaded_images/fat_man-729010.jpg

Spyder Jerusalem at his keyboard.

Hey, Hugh.

Yer mom said not to post any more pictures of her.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

If that is the best he can do - you will have so much fun

Loser punks like you only deserve about ten percent the effort that reserve for real challenges.

Smackin' you shitheels around is easy.

[Nienna]

I'm rubbing my temples and getting a signal... yes... the picture is coming in... it's

http://badtux.net/uploaded_images/fat_man-729010.jpg

Spyder Jerusalem at his keyboard.

OH! That POOR man! :(

[nevadamedic]

Hey, Hugh.

Yer mom said not to post any more pictures of her.

Wow you can't have a civil debate and you have to talk about someones family. You have no right to talk about anyone's family unless they open the door, and then you still don't you pathetic fucking piece of shit.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Sombody call the WAAAAAHmbulance, I think she's gonna cry!

[nevadamedic]

Sombody call the WAAAAAHmbulance, I think she's gonna cry!

Nope just gonna report you, it's much easier.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Ooooh, scary.

Maybe you shoulda just kept yer mouth shut about yer daughter, and not compared her to me.
That would have been easiest.

But, like all republifascist conservatards, you pass the buck and shift the blame.

If yer offended, its yer own damn fault.

[nevadamedic]

Ooooh, scary.

Maybe you shoulda just kept yer mouth shut about yer daughter, and not compared her to me.
That would have been easiest.

But, like all republifascist conservatards, you pass the buck and shift the blame.

If yer offended, its yer own damn fault.

Actually you were talking about someon's mother dumbshit.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

So?

What do you care, babe?

Don't post silly pictures in an attempt to insult them, and then cry when its turned around on you.

[nevadamedic]

So?

What do you care, babe?

Don't post silly pictures in an attempt to insult them, and then cry when its turned around on you.

I'm far from crying, it's just not right to ever talk about someone elses family PERIOD.

Don't call me Babe you Gay Bastard.

[Spyder Jerusalem]

Don't call me Babe you Gay Bastard.

My wife just looked up from her place between my knees and thought that was very funny.
She wonders if maybe you aren't frigid, or a dyke?
I think yer just pissed because everytime you get some, its like throwin a hotdog down a hallway.

So which is it?

[avatar4321]

My wife just looked up from her place between my knees and thought that was very funny.
She wonders if maybe you aren't frigid, or a dyke?
I think yer just pissed because everytime you get some, its like throwin a hotdog down a hallway.

So which is it?

So you not only slap your women, but disrespect them in public too? Poor woman.

You realize that lack of respect in the way you talk and the words you use are a sign of a man's intelligence? Well, I guess you don't realize it.

I don't know what makes you such a bitter man, but I sincerely hope you can fix it before you wake up one day miserable because you've wasted your life.

[Yurt]

My wife just looked up from her place between my knees and thought that was very funny.
She wonders if maybe you aren't frigid, or a dyke?
I think yer just pissed because everytime you get some, its like throwin a hotdog down a hallway.

So which is it?

And you are freakin typin after that, BIOTCH. LOOOOL.

Gutter boy, get a life.

And tell your wife that kissing a motherboard casing is NOT giving head. Though explains your immediate post........

[Spyder Jerusalem]

So you not only slap your women
When they deserve it.

Don't deserve it.


but disrespect them in public too

It's not disrespect when its done out of love, babe.


Poor woman.
She loves it.

Women get hot when you treat them like shit.

That's why women always go for the bad boys that shit on em, and the good boys go home and beat off into a sock.
Bad boys get laid.

Its just a fact.


You realize that lack of respect in the way you talk and the words you use are a sign of a man's intelligence?
You do realize that that kind of vagina-centric pussification is the mark of either a woman talking, or a ball-less wonder of a eunuch of a "man", so which is it?


And tell your wife that kissing a motherboard casing is NOT giving head.
Do you start making sense anytime soon, or is this kind of shit the best we can expect from you?

[red states rule]

Wow you can't have a civil debate and you have to talk about someones family. You have no right to talk about anyone's family unless they open the door, and then you still don't you pathetic fucking piece of shit.

Don't feed the troll NV

I think he is Edward from the other board

[red states rule]

Nope just gonna report you, it's much easier.

Maybe he will get some time off for bad behaviour

[darin]

Spider / Psycho joint-person banned from thread.

[nevadamedic]

Don't feed the troll NV

I think he is Edward from the other board

I don't think it's Edward. His structure is a lot different. I have a couple ideas who it might be though.............

[theHawk]

How "balanced" was Brown vs. the Board of Ed.? Did popular opinion determine the BEST decision in that case?



And this has what to do with the issue?

Best watch out or I'll burn that fuckin strawman of yers in effigy to yer mindless partisan shilling.


LOL, anyone else notice every time a liberal's arguement is exposed as a fraud they scream "strawman"!

That seems to be their new catch phrase that they think acts as a 'get-out-of-jail-free' card. :laugh2:

[PostmodernProphet]

If you must know, I was invited here to slap around the idiot christers and republifascists that swarm all over this board like flies on dogshit.

Its what I do...

ROFL, seems like the last time I mentioned that was your purpose, you denied it....my purpose is the exorcism of demons....

[red states rule]

I don't think it's Edward. His structure is a lot different. I have a couple ideas who it might be though.............

Seems he is psycho in more ways then one

[red states rule]

LOL, anyone else notice every time a liberal's arguement is exposed as a fraud they scream "strawman"!

That seems to be their new catch phrase that they think acts as a 'get-out-of-jail-free' card. :laugh2:

Libs never let facts get in the way of their rants

[Hugh Lincoln]

You do realize that that kind of vagina-centric pussification is the mark of either a woman talking, or a ball-less wonder of a eunuch of a "man", so which is it?

This guy came here to rip on conservatives? Something tells me he wouldn't last long at Democratic Underground.

[red states rule]

This guy came here to rip on conservatives? Something tells me he wouldn't last long at Democratic Underground.

He is an example of the left's best and brightest

[actsnoblemartin]

The supreme court was too far left for many years, what, americans want it to go back to judges making law instead of interpreting it?

[red states rule]

The supreme court was too far left for many years, what, americans want it to go back to judges making law instead of interpreting it?

When that happens - libs are shit out of luck

[nevadamedic]

The supreme court was too far left for many years, what, americans want it to go back to judges making law instead of interpreting it?

A judge can't make the law................

[red states rule]

A judge can't make the law................

Liberal Judges do it anyway

What do they know or care about the law?

[Hugh Lincoln]

Liberal Judges do it anyway

What do they know or care about the law?

Enough to make it look like their decisions are "legal." But they're not. They are the advancement of a liberal agenda, and nothing else.

[red states rule]

Enough to make it look like their decisions are "legal." But they're not. They are the advancement of a liberal agenda, and nothing else.

One of the few things Pres Bush did right were his SC appointments

[Yurt]

A judge can't make the law................

Somewhat true, however, they interpret the law and that interpretation becomes "case law."

they cannot "create" law.

that is where libs get all fussied overed. they want lib judges to make their laws, but HATE it when allegedly conservative judges do their JOB.

[red states rule]

Somewhat true, however, they interpret the law and that interpretation becomes "case law."

they cannot "create" law.

that is where libs get all fussied overed. they want lib judges to make their laws, but HATE it when allegedly conservative judges do their JOB.

The liberal Judges are praised for their insight when they do it

Nothing is said abouth their legal errors when they are overturned however

[Yurt]

The liberal Judges are praised for their insight when they do it

Nothing is said abouth their legal errors when they are overturned however

Maybe they should take another poll :dunno: