Latest polling - not nice to Trump!

[jimnyc]

I knew it was a huge problem when the day before last I saw him with a 10 point loss behind Hillary at the moment. The aggregate against him is nearly 7 points now with latest polling out.

-----

RCP Average 7/28 - 8/3 -- -- 47.4 40.6 Clinton +6.8

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 7/31 - 8/3 800 RV 3.5 47 38 Clinton +9
McClatchy/Marist 8/1 - 8/3 983 RV 3.1 48 33 Clinton +15
FOX News 7/31 - 8/2 1022 RV 3.0 49 39 Clinton +10
Reuters/Ipsos 7/30 - 8/3 1072 LV 3.5 43 39 Clinton +4
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/28 - 8/3 2175 LV -- 45 44 Clinton +1
CBS News 7/29 - 7/31 1131 RV 3.0 47 41 Clinton +6
CNN/ORC 7/29 - 7/31 894 RV 3.5 52 43 Clinton +9
PPP (D) 7/29 - 7/30 1276 LV 2.7 50 45 Clinton +5

[Gunny]

I knew it was a huge problem when the day before last I saw him with a 10 point loss behind Hillary at the moment. The aggregate against him is nearly 7 points now with latest polling out.

-----

RCP Average 7/28 - 8/3 -- -- 47.4 40.6 Clinton +6.8

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 7/31 - 8/3 800 RV 3.5 47 38 Clinton +9
McClatchy/Marist 8/1 - 8/3 983 RV 3.1 48 33 Clinton +15
FOX News 7/31 - 8/2 1022 RV 3.0 49 39 Clinton +10
Reuters/Ipsos 7/30 - 8/3 1072 LV 3.5 43 39 Clinton +4
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/28 - 8/3 2175 LV -- 45 44 Clinton +1
CBS News 7/29 - 7/31 1131 RV 3.0 47 41 Clinton +6
CNN/ORC 7/29 - 7/31 894 RV 3.5 52 43 Clinton +9
PPP (D) 7/29 - 7/30 1276 LV 2.7 50 45 Clinton +5

Geez, look at your sources. I wouldn't trust them to tell me the sky was blue.

This is nothing but pure MSM propaganda.

[jimnyc]

Geez, look at your sources. I wouldn't trust them to tell me the sky was blue.

This is nothing but pure MSM propaganda.

Some yes, some no. I don't think FOX would be against him, but I honestly don't follow a single one, other than online. I don't know what to trust and what not to. :dunno:

I do think, without a doubt, he took a serious drop in the past few weeks, whether 100% his own doing or with a little help from the Dems and the media, really matters not I suppose. And give them an inch and they will make it seem like a mile. Time to get back on the horse and regroup from all of this and concentrate on Hillary and the general. Also, while of course pay attention to the whole prize, also concentrate on the swing states, of which he isn't as far behind there as he is nationally.

[Gunny]

Some yes, some no. I don't think FOX would be against him, but I honestly don't follow a single one, other than online. I don't know what to trust and what not to. :dunno:

I do think, without a doubt, he took a serious drop in the past few weeks, whether 100% his own doing or with a little help from the Dems and the media, really matters not I suppose. And give them an inch and they will make it seem like a mile. Time to get back on the horse and regroup from all of this and concentrate on Hillary and the general. Also, while of course pay attention to the whole prize, also concentrate on the swing states, of which he isn't as far behind there as he is nationally.

I have honestly made an effort to not look. My mind's made up. Hillary needs to be in handcuffs, not the WH.

Do you know NBC owns just about everything media-wise? This is their same old crap. These polls are not for committed people. They are for the ones on the bubble. The undecided. The message is: "All is lost so why bother?". It takes players out of the game because people believe the stuff.

As a blue collar worker I had to make a concerted effort to take time out of my life to vote. Conversely, the lefties sucking off of WiC and welfare have all day to saunter on down.

It's a Jedi mind trick and it's been working like a charm for 8 years.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I knew it was a huge problem when the day before last I saw him with a 10 point loss behind Hillary at the moment. The aggregate against him is nearly 7 points now with latest polling out.

-----

RCP Average 7/28 - 8/3 -- -- 47.4 40.6 Clinton +6.8

NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 7/31 - 8/3 800 RV 3.5 47 38 Clinton +9
McClatchy/Marist 8/1 - 8/3 983 RV 3.1 48 33 Clinton +15
FOX News 7/31 - 8/2 1022 RV 3.0 49 39 Clinton +10
Reuters/Ipsos 7/30 - 8/3 1072 LV 3.5 43 39 Clinton +4
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/28 - 8/3 2175 LV -- 45 44 Clinton +1
CBS News 7/29 - 7/31 1131 RV 3.0 47 41 Clinton +6
CNN/ORC 7/29 - 7/31 894 RV 3.5 52 43 Clinton +9
PPP (D) 7/29 - 7/30 1276 LV 2.7 50 45 Clinton +5

Do not let the rigged propaganda sway you.
Did you think the power aligned against Trump would not exercise its influence by way of slanted polling, outright lying etc.?
I do not know of a single poling apparatus that I would trust now for the true results.
These polling sources all depend on the status quo and none of them ant the change that Trump speaks of my friend.
With that in mind do you think they would not rigged the questions and/or lie about the results-- as in if Trump had a 3% -they report it as a 9 % drop..
Just who monitors them??? What trustworthy power keeps them honest? --NONE..
That is right nobody does..

With all the recent leaks hurting hillary, this is damage control by her hidden allies , media and cohorts.
They minimize here negatives and maximize and lie to increase his....
They are part of the corruption in the process my friend..

Now imagine how much help it is to hillary for this crap to be taken seriously and dishearten Trumps supporters!
Propaganda works,especially if people fail to see it for what it is..

Remember how they did this to try to defeat Trump in the primaries...

Media, pollsters etc.. none of those ffing scum can be trusted as far as I can throw my car.--Tyr

[fj1200]

Do not let the rigged propaganda sway you.

Fingers still firmly in ears I see.

[crin63]

Larry Sabato who has been between 97% - 100% accurate in predicting election outcomes since 2004 show Hillary winning by a landslide in November. The debates can be a game changer but as of today, it's not even close.

[Gunny]

Fingers still firmly in ears I see.

The sentence you quoted is actually a correct statement.

[Black Diamond]

This is a manageable deficit. More e-mails, debates...


I don't care if Putin interferes to get trump in.

[Black Diamond]

Larry Sabato who has been between 97% - 100% accurate in predicting election outcomes since 2004 show Hillary winning by a landslide in November. The debates can be a game changer but as of today, it's not even close.

What was the redskins record? :)

[Gunny]

What was the redskins record? :)

If it was 0-16 It wouldn't be bad enough for me. :laugh2:

[fj1200]

The sentence you quoted is actually a correct statement.

Paranoid ramblings.

[Gunny]

Paranoid ramblings.

Nah. It's called not being you. I've lived in the government system most of my life and know how it works. Difference between paranoia and observation of a system.

Might be why you always end up at odds with the career vets here. We've seen the system in all it's glory. You?

We aren't paranoid. We're aware. We've always had to be.

[fj1200]

Nah. It's called not being you. I've lived in the government system most of my life and know how it works. Difference between paranoia and observation of a system.

Might be why you always end up at odds with the career vets here. We've seen the system in all it's glory. You?

We aren't paranoid. We're aware. We've always had to be.

It's incredible how you didn't describe the individual I quoted not to mention that the polls are not government generated. Good job.

If all I get is, "you suck, you're not me" then there was no point in coming back.

[Gunny]

It's incredible how you didn't describe the individual I quoted not to mention that the polls are not government generated. Good job.

If all I get is, "you suck, you're not me" then there was no point in coming back.

That what you get out of it? You quoted one sentence from a post. I agreed with the sentence that YOU quoted.

I've never said you suck and in fact have defended you on many an occasion. That doesn't mean you're always right. That doesn't mean it's all about you. I'm not always right, neither are you nor is tyr.

YOU chose to cut out one sentence and go after it instead of the content of his post. I responded to you removing his argument and hitting one sentence.

And acting like a brat will get you nowhere with me. I personally wish they'd start the damned Olympics so I don't have to listen to partisan politics all the time. They've been dragging this sh*t out, and now I'll have to suffer through the opening ceremony the media is going to drag out forever. Been broadcasting it for days and no damned sports. Get to the sh*t. I don't care what some idiot commentator has to say nor who your sponsors are.

Lighten up, Ajax. I still like you just as much as I never have. :slap: :laugh:

[Black Diamond]

It's incredible how you didn't describe the individual I quoted not to mention that the polls are not government generated. Good job.

If all I get is, "you suck, you're not me" then there was no point in coming back.

You can't leave. All the plants are gonna die.

[fj1200]

That what you get out of it?

Yes, that's what I got out of your post that talked about your life and your involvement in bureaucracy, etc. which was irrelevant to the thread and frankly a distraction. Besides, I quoted one sentence but spoke to the entire content. ;)


You can't leave. All the plants are gonna die.

Those plants are called weeds. :poke: