PDA

View Full Version : Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release



jimnyc
01-29-2016, 03:49 PM
EXCLUSIVE: The intelligence community has now deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding.

The decision to withhold the documents in full, and not provide even a partial release with redactions, further undercuts claims by the State Department and the Clinton campaign that none of the intelligence in the emails was classified when it hit Clinton's personal server.

Fox News is told the emails include intelligence from "special access programs," or SAP, which is considered beyond “Top Secret.” A Jan. 14 letter, first reported by Fox News, from intelligence community Inspector General Charles McCullough III notified senior intelligence and foreign relations committee leaders that "several dozen emails containing classified information” were determined to be “at the CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, AND TOP SECRET/SAP levels."

The State Department is trying to finish its review and public release of thousands of Clinton emails, as the Democratic presidential primary contests get underway in early February.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/29/official-some-clinton-emails-too-damaging-to-release.html

jimnyc
01-29-2016, 03:50 PM
US declares 22 Clinton emails 'top secret'

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Obama administration confirmed for the first time Friday that Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server contained closely guarded government secrets, censoring 22 emails with material requiring one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation comes just three days before the Iowa presidential nominating caucuses in which Clinton is a candidate.

Department officials also said the agency's Diplomatic Security and Intelligence and Research bureaus will investigate whether any of the information was classified at the time of transmission, going to the heart of one of Clinton's primary defenses of her email practices.

The State Department will release its next batch of emails from Clinton's time as secretary of state later Friday.

But The Associated Press learned seven email chains are being withheld in full from the Friday release because they contain information deemed to be "top secret." The 37 pages include messages recently described by a key intelligence official as concerning so-called "special access programs" - a highly restricted subset of classified material that could point to confidential sources or clandestine programs like drone strikes or government eavesdropping.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CLINTON_EMAILS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-01-29-14-48-31

Abbey Marie
01-29-2016, 03:54 PM
I have zero problem with them withholding some sensitive emails. But why can't they start prosecution? Surely they have enough to go on.

jimnyc
01-29-2016, 04:03 PM
I have zero problem with them withholding some sensitive emails. But why can't they start prosecution? Surely they have enough to go on.

Maybe building a stronger case? I wouldn't have a clue. Sure as hell sounds like they have enough for an arrest and the beginning of prosecution. Maybe there already is some grand jury work behind the scenes or similar? Or do I maybe watch way too much tv?

Slowly but surely, I'm starting to believe that we may be seeing the beginning of the Wicked Witch melting to the ground. A lot of stories as of late and seems like we may hear from the FBI soon.

LongTermGuy
01-29-2016, 04:31 PM
Maybe building a stronger case? I wouldn't have a clue. Sure as hell sounds like they have enough for an arrest and the beginning of prosecution. Maybe there already is some grand jury work behind the scenes or similar? Or do I maybe watch way too much tv?

Slowly but surely, I'm starting to believe that we may be seeing the beginning of the Wicked Witch melting to the ground. A lot of stories as of late and seems like we may hear from the FBI soon.


Wrong...IMO.....(Like our enemies haven't seen the e-mails yet) Really???:laugh:

​They are just Buying more time...so they can get with "Loretta Lynch" ...`o`s main squeeze in crimes against the people...and to figure "timing" and what to do with "Hillary"...Holding back everything buys time...Obviously...

https://sp.yimg.com/xj/th?id=OIP.Mccfce00b2a54e7ea9c7b7ee146cf78d2o0&pid=15.1&P=0&w=359&h=188

Gunny
01-29-2016, 04:32 PM
EXCLUSIVE: The intelligence community has now deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding.

The decision to withhold the documents in full, and not provide even a partial release with redactions, further undercuts claims by the State Department and the Clinton campaign that none of the intelligence in the emails was classified when it hit Clinton's personal server.

Fox News is told the emails include intelligence from "special access programs," or SAP, which is considered beyond “Top Secret.” A Jan. 14 letter, first reported by Fox News, from intelligence community Inspector General Charles McCullough III notified senior intelligence and foreign relations committee leaders that "several dozen emails containing classified information” were determined to be “at the CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, AND TOP SECRET/SAP levels."

The State Department is trying to finish its review and public release of thousands of Clinton emails, as the Democratic presidential primary contests get underway in early February.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/29/official-some-clinton-emails-too-damaging-to-release.html

And she's not in jail yet why exactly?

aboutime
01-29-2016, 05:48 PM
Everyone connected to, aware of, included in, and Dumb enough to have voted for Obama...TWICE. Is as crooked, undependable, irresponsible, and totally committed to LIES????

Namely...Everyone in the Democrat party/Liberals/Socialists who have a last name of either Obama or Clinton?