Vetting

[indago]

From The Associated Press 15 December 2015:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
US LOOKING AT WAYS TO BETTER SCREEN WOULD-BE IMMIGRANTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------

article (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_VISA_VETTING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-12-15-04-04-17)


NOW they're going to do it! After millions of immigrants have entered this country — some legally, some illegally — NOW they're going to start a more thorough vetting process.



.

[Kathianne]

They should have been doing this all along, agreed. Just glad they are doing so going forward.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

From The Associated Press 15 December 2015:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
US LOOKING AT WAYS TO BETTER SCREEN WOULD-BE IMMIGRANTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------

article (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_VISA_VETTING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-12-15-04-04-17)


NOW they're going to do it! After millions of immigrants have entered this country — some legally, some illegally — NOW they're going to start a more thorough vetting process.



.

"Why yes, now after we have infected the victim extremely well, we have decided to put said victim in a cleaner room! And we expect hearty thanks for this ever so generous action taken by we supremely enlightened geniuses.
Now bow to us, you ffing dolts! "
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Exactly how they think and do...-Tyr

[Bilgerat]

From The Associated Press 15 December 2015:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
US LOOKING AT WAYS TO BETTER SCREEN WOULD-BE IMMIGRANTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------

article (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_VISA_VETTING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-12-15-04-04-17)


NOW they're going to do it! After millions of immigrants have entered this country — some legally, some illegally — NOW they're going to start a more thorough vetting process.



.


"They" got jammed up after the Cali shooting. There was no way that they could hide their piss poor performance and wonder of wonders, the media actually covered it.

[Kathianne]

Ok, even when visas are revoked, many for terrorism concerns, DHS has no clue whether they are here or somewhere else. "You don't have a clue..."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/18/feds-cant-say-whereabouts-those-whose-visas-were-revoked-over-terror-threat.html


Feds can't say whereabouts of those whose visas were revoked over terror threat<time itemprop="datePublished" pubdate="" datetime="2015-12-18T00:15:00.000-05:00" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 0px; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(153, 153, 153); line-height: 22px; display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background: 0px 0px;">Published December 18, 2015</time>

The Obama administration cannot be sure of the whereabouts of thousands of foreigners in the U.S. who had their visas revoked over terror concerns and other reasons, a State Department official acknowledged Thursday.


The admission, made at a House oversight hearing examining immigrant vetting in the wake of major terror attacks, drew a sharp rebuke from the committee chairman.


“You don’t have a clue do you?” Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told Michele Thoren Bond, assistant secretary for the Bureau of Consular Affairs.


Bond initially said the U.S. has revoked more than 122,000 visas since 2001, including 9,500 because of the threat of terrorism.


But Chaffetz quickly pried at that stat, pressing the witness about the present location of those individuals.


"I don't know," she said.


The startling admission came as members of the committee pressed administration officials on what safeguards are in place to reduce the risk from would-be extremists.

...

[Drummond]

"Why yes, now after we have infected the victim extremely well, we have decided to put said victim in a cleaner room! And we expect hearty thanks for this ever so generous action taken by we supremely enlightened geniuses.
Now bow to us, you ffing dolts! "
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Exactly how they think and do...-Tyr:clap::clap::clap::clap:

Reality in a nutshell -- precisely.

[namvet]

http://www.cwporter.com/holocaust_tatto3.jpg

every fuckin' one of em

[Elessar]

From The Associated Press 15 December 2015:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
US LOOKING AT WAYS TO BETTER SCREEN WOULD-BE IMMIGRANTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------

article (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_VISA_VETTING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-12-15-04-04-17)


NOW they're going to do it! After millions of immigrants have entered this country — some legally, some illegally — NOW they're going to start a more thorough vetting process.



.

Well...it looks as if Trump is not entirely wrong.

The majority of "We The People" seem to be outraged
with this lax administration and ineptitude.

The HLS Secretary is in error, too.
Having a Visa does not make one a U.S. Citizen,
so they are not entitled to the same rights and consideration.

[Elessar]

"They" got jammed up after the Cali shooting. There was no way that they could hide their piss poor performance and wonder of wonders, the media actually covered it.

Maybe some of them are catching on now.

[gabosaurus]

How about "if you have any known racial, social or religious prejudices, you are not eligible to enter the U.S."

[Perianne]

How about "if you have any known racial, social or religious prejudices, you are not eligible to enter the U.S."

I agree with that!

[namvet]

how would you know if they have racial, social or religious prejudices ??? they all look alike

[LongTermGuy]

How about "if you have any known racial, social or religious prejudices, you are not eligible to enter the U.S."


But...but...How does one stop the natural Liers and deceivers with an agenda?

[Elessar]

How about "if you have any known racial, social or religious prejudices, you are not eligible to enter the U.S."

That's not a bad idea, Gabby.

[Drummond]

How about "if you have any known racial, social or religious prejudices, you are not eligible to enter the U.S."

... and of course, all those who have such prejudices will immediately own up to them, when required to .. eh ? :laugh::laugh:

[Gunny]

... and of course, all those who have such prejudices will immediately own up to them, when required to .. eh ? :laugh::laugh:

My idea of vetting is stay the f- out.