revelarts
11-11-2015, 10:15 AM
Judge Rules In Favor of Man Who Shot Down Drone
Kentucky Judge Rebecca Ward has cleared all charges against William Merideth who destroyed a drone hovering over his property with a shotgun, saying the drone was a invasion of privacy, local TV station WDRB-TV reports.
“He had a right to shoot at this drone, and I’m gonna dismiss this charge,” said Ward.
Merideth was arrested and charged with wanton endangerment, along with criminal mischief in July for destroying a drone that he suspected was spying on his 16-year-old daughter, who was sun-tanning in the backyard.
William was happy with the Judge’s decision stating, “I was in my right to protect my family and my property.” He expressed the importance of his case against the use of drones to harass people, he went on to say “The next time something like this happens, they’re gonna refer to it,” and encouraged property owners to use common sense when making these decisions. “Now I don’t encourage people to just go out and start blasting stuff for no reason – but three times in one day, three times over the course of a year, six times total, over one property? That’s not right, that’s harassment.”
Drone owner David Boggs testified that flight data recorded provides a different story and that his drone was flying higher than Meredith claimed, however since multiple people witnessed the drone flying below the tree line, Ward decided it was an invasion of privacy.
Judge Rules In Favor of Man Who Shot Down Drone for Spying on Daughter While Sun Tanning (http://therundownlive.com/judge-rules-in-favor-of-man-who-shot-down-drone-for-spying-on-daughter-while-sun-tanning/)
the Judge is Right.
Some want to claim it's wrong because a drone is Private Property.
But it's not like an unwanted car in your driveway, which you can have towed or push it down the street.
It like someone sticking a camera through your window.
there's an expected level of privacy you have on your property.
the invention of drones doesn't negate that expectation.
I'm glad the judge ruled this way I'd like to hope that if more Juries saw these cases the drone Crap would be shut down and people would get the message. this crap aint cool or legal. and will cost you your drone and Juries asking for damages.
Kentucky Judge Rebecca Ward has cleared all charges against William Merideth who destroyed a drone hovering over his property with a shotgun, saying the drone was a invasion of privacy, local TV station WDRB-TV reports.
“He had a right to shoot at this drone, and I’m gonna dismiss this charge,” said Ward.
Merideth was arrested and charged with wanton endangerment, along with criminal mischief in July for destroying a drone that he suspected was spying on his 16-year-old daughter, who was sun-tanning in the backyard.
William was happy with the Judge’s decision stating, “I was in my right to protect my family and my property.” He expressed the importance of his case against the use of drones to harass people, he went on to say “The next time something like this happens, they’re gonna refer to it,” and encouraged property owners to use common sense when making these decisions. “Now I don’t encourage people to just go out and start blasting stuff for no reason – but three times in one day, three times over the course of a year, six times total, over one property? That’s not right, that’s harassment.”
Drone owner David Boggs testified that flight data recorded provides a different story and that his drone was flying higher than Meredith claimed, however since multiple people witnessed the drone flying below the tree line, Ward decided it was an invasion of privacy.
Judge Rules In Favor of Man Who Shot Down Drone for Spying on Daughter While Sun Tanning (http://therundownlive.com/judge-rules-in-favor-of-man-who-shot-down-drone-for-spying-on-daughter-while-sun-tanning/)
the Judge is Right.
Some want to claim it's wrong because a drone is Private Property.
But it's not like an unwanted car in your driveway, which you can have towed or push it down the street.
It like someone sticking a camera through your window.
there's an expected level of privacy you have on your property.
the invention of drones doesn't negate that expectation.
I'm glad the judge ruled this way I'd like to hope that if more Juries saw these cases the drone Crap would be shut down and people would get the message. this crap aint cool or legal. and will cost you your drone and Juries asking for damages.