Which party/candidate do you REALLY support?

[gabosaurus]

Take this quiz on the issues and find out for certain.

http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz

You probably know my stance already... :cool:

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075553010

[tailfins]

Candidates you side with...

99% (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556210)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556210.pngTed Cruz Republican

on immigration, education, healthcare, social, foreign policy, domestic policy, economic, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556210)
99%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/884185599.pngRick Santorum Republican

on immigration, education, social, healthcare, foreign policy, domestic policy, economic, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:884185599)
99%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556202.pngMarco Rubio Republican

on education, healthcare, social, foreign policy, economic, immigration, domestic policy, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556202)
95%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556207.pngRand Paul Republican

on education, healthcare, social, domestic policy, immigration, environmental, economic, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556207)
92%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556212.pngScott Walker Republican

on social, domestic policy, economic, education, healthcare, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556212)
91%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556206.pngBen Carson Republican

on social, healthcare, domestic policy, immigration, education, economic, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556206)
83%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/875605790.pngCarly Fiorina Republican

on healthcare, foreign policy, domestic policy, education, and economic issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:875605790)
15%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556211.pngBernie Sanders Democrat

on education issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556211)
5% (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556209)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556209.png (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556209)Hillary Clinton Democrat (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556209)

no major issues.
compare answers (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556209)



[/COLOR]

[gabosaurus]

I am SO not surprised. :cool:

[Gunny]

Take this quiz on the issues and find out for certain.

http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz

You probably know my stance already... :cool:

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075553010

I don't need a test. Anything that isn't a lefwingnut Democrat.

[darin]

92% Marco Rubio.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Candidates you side with...

99% (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556210)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556210.pngTed Cruz Republican

on immigration, education, healthcare, social, foreign policy, domestic policy, economic, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556210)
99%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/884185599.pngRick Santorum Republican

on immigration, education, social, healthcare, foreign policy, domestic policy, economic, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:884185599)
99%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556202.pngMarco Rubio Republican

on education, healthcare, social, foreign policy, economic, immigration, domestic policy, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556202)
95%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556207.pngRand Paul Republican

on education, healthcare, social, domestic policy, immigration, environmental, economic, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556207)
92%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556212.pngScott Walker Republican

on social, domestic policy, economic, education, healthcare, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556212)
91%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556206.pngBen Carson Republican

on social, healthcare, domestic policy, immigration, education, economic, and environmental issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556206)
83%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/875605790.pngCarly Fiorina Republican

on healthcare, foreign policy, domestic policy, education, and economic issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:875605790)
15%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556211.pngBernie Sanders Democrat

on education issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556211)
5% (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556209)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556209.png (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556209)Hillary Clinton Democrat (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556209)

no major issues.
compare answers (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075578495:801556209)



[/COLOR]

I like all but the last two. The last two are hideous creatures fit only to dwell in a dark chamber in the deepest hell IMHO.

Choices I think could win if teamed up = Rubio /Walker, Rubio /Cruz..... With either one as prez the other as vice prez.. -Tyr

[darin]

Take this quiz on the issues and find out for certain.

http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz

You probably know my stance already... :cool:

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1075553010

I simply cannot understand yours - and your party's - unabashed hatred for what it takes to make a successful society. WOW.

[tailfins]

The funny thing is while I agree that children of illegals should NOT be citizens, my approach to immigration is quite different:

1) Strictly enforced prevailing wage requirements for all work visas.
2) Those who hire illegal aliens are accomplices to human trafficking.
3) Suspension of deportation for alien employees that file a regulatory complaint against their employer (OSHA for example) so they can testify.
4) Those who support "public charges" (aka welfare recipients) coming into the country are guilty of election tampering and being accomplices to human trafficking.

I'm pro-immigrant. I think they should have a $15/hour minimum wage. They deserve premium pay for doing work Americans won't do.

[Loralei]

It says I side 88% with Rick Santorum.
hmmm!
Then there is my Ben Carson down there in 4th place with 77%.
;)

[PixieStix]

97% Marco Rubio

[Abbey Marie]

Marco Rubio 97%
Rick Santorum 94%
Ted Cruz 90%
Scott Walker 82%

[Jeff]

Cruz at this point, still on the fence who I would like to see run with him

OK now I took the quiz, but it was pretty close, or I should say right on, except it gave Hilliary 54 % and I would write in a vote for my dog before voting for her.


http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077159078

[Max R.]

I side with Rand Paul on most 2016 Presidential Election issues


Candidates you side with...

79% (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556207)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556207.pngRand Paul Republican

on immigration, foreign policy, healthcare, and domestic policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556207)
76% (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556210)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556210.pngTed Cruz Republican

on immigration, economic, foreign policy, and healthcare issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556210)
76%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556202.pngMarco Rubio Republican

on economic, immigration, domestic policy, healthcare, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556202)
75%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/884185599.pngRick Santorum Republican

on immigration, economic, healthcare, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:884185599)
74%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556212.pngScott Walker Republican

on economic, environmental, healthcare, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556212)
66%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556211.pngBernie Sanders Democrat

on social, environmental, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556211)
62%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/875605790.pngCarly Fiorina Republican

on economic, domestic policy, healthcare, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:875605790)
62%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556209.pngHillary Clinton Democrat

on social and education issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556209)
60%
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556206.pngBen Carson Republican

on economic and healthcare issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556206)

Show all candidates


Save Your Results (https://secure.isidewith.com/social-login?r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.isidewith.com%2Felections %2F2016-presidential%2F1077173262)Share The Quiz (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262)Share Your Results (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262)
Candidates you side with by issue...

http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/topics/5.png
Moreimportant to me
Social

I side with Hillary Clinton on most social issues
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262/issues/social)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/topics/3.png
Somewhatimportant to me
The Economy

I side with Marco Rubio on most economic issues
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262/issues/the-economy)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/topics/11.png
Somewhatimportant to me
The Environment

I side with Scott Walker on most environmental issues
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262/issues/the-environment)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/topics/3506783.png
Somewhatimportant to me
Domestic Policy

I side with Marco Rubio on most domestic policy issues
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262/issues/domestic-policy)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/topics/1.png
Somewhatimportant to me
Foreign Policy

I side with Mike Huckabee on most foreign policy issues
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262/issues/foreign-policy)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/topics/4.png
Somewhatimportant to me
Healthcare

I side with Rand Paul on most healthcare issues
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262/issues/healthcare)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/topics/966441.png
Somewhatimportant to me
Immigration

I side with Ted Cruz on most immigration issues
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262/issues/immigration)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/topics/292655624.png
Somewhatimportant to me
Education

I side with Hillary Clinton on most education issues
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262/issues/education)


You


(http://www.isidewith.com/results-map/Rand+Paul%3A54x30;Ted+Cruz%3A71x57;Marco+Rubio%3A7 2x53;Rick+Santorum%3A73x62;Scott+Walker%3A67x44;Je b+Bush%3A66x57;Lindsey+Graham%3A74x60;Bernie+Sande rs%3A29x52;Carly+Fiorina%3A69x45;Hillary+Clinton%3 A35x59;Mike+Huckabee%3A72x63;Rick+Perry%3A67x48;Be n+Carson%3A65x46;Chris+Christie%3A72x47;Donald+Tru mp%3A55x48;Martin+O%27Malley%3A28x62;You%3A54x37.j pg)

Libertarian
Your political beliefs would be considered moderately Libertarian on an ideological scale, meaning you tend to support policies that promote social and economic freedom

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

My top three results after the quiz.
Santorium 90%
rubio 87%
cruz 86%

i guess that confirms me as a conservative but several questions did not offer the best answers to select from .-tyr

[Gunny]

I don't need a test. Anything that isn't a lefwingnut Democrat.

I side with me 100%. I'd vote for me in a minute.

[aboutime]

Hoping many of the 'R's now running will take the hints from Trump.

We can all say WHO we want. But I am always reminded.....THEY ARE FIRST....POLITICIANS. And...I DO NOT TRUST ANY OF THEM!

If I had to vote tomorrow. I'd have to do a BEN FRANKLIN kind of reasoning... PRO............CON....lists.


Looking to identify the ONE who Tells the TRUTH the MOST. Not gonna be an easy pick. HONESTLY.

[Abbey Marie]

Just saw this at the bottom of my results. Yup, that's me!
:laugh2: :salute:

Right-Wing
Your political beliefs would be considered strongly Right-Wing on an ideological scale, meaning you tend to support policies that promote economic freedom and a society based on morals and values.

[gabosaurus]

I simply cannot understand yours - and your party's - unabashed hatred for what it takes to make a successful society. WOW.

What exactly does it take to make a "successful society?"


I'd vote for me in a minute.

Of course you would. :grenade:

[jimnyc]

I side with me 100%. I'd vote for me in a minute.

Re-read the thread and found a post you liked? :laugh2:

[Kathianne]

Surprised? LOL!


(http://www.isidewith.com/results-map/Rick+Santorum%3A73x62;Marco+Rubio%3A72x53;Rand+Pau l%3A54x30;Scott+Walker%3A67x44;Ted+Cruz%3A71x57;Ri ck+Perry%3A67x48;Lindsey+Graham%3A74x60;Chris+Chri stie%3A72x47;Mike+Huckabee%3A72x63;Jeb+Bush%3A66x5 7;Ben+Carson%3A65x46;Carly+Fiorina%3A69x45;Donald+ Trump%3A55x48;Bernie+Sanders%3A29x52;Hillary+Clint on%3A35x59;Martin+O%27Malley%3A28x62;You%3A68x38.j pg)

Right-Wing Libertarian



Your political beliefs would be considered moderately Right-Wing Libertarian on an ideological scale, meaning you tend to support policies that promote free market capitalism and smaller government.

[Abbey Marie]

Based on my and Kathianne's "ideology" results, I'd say the quiz is pretty accurate. What do you think, Kathianne?

[Kathianne]

Based on my and Kathianne's "ideology" results, I'd say the quiz is pretty accurate. What do you think, Kathianne?
Yep. I also answered some 'additional stances,' which probably helped make it more accurate. You?

[jimnyc]

I've leaned towards Rubio and still do, so not surprising that the quiz has him at the top of my list.

I'm VERY saddened to see that Hillary was on my list at all. Knowing I have anything in common with her at all makes me want to vomit.

[Abbey Marie]

Yep. I also answered some 'additional stances,' which probably helped make it more accurate. You?

I did, on most of them :thumb:

I never wrote-in an answer though, because who can read and quantify those?

[Abbey Marie]

I've leaned towards Rubio and still do, so not surprising that the quiz has him at the top of my list.

I'm VERY saddened to see that Hillary was on my list at all. Knowing I have anything in common with her at all makes me want to vomit.


Here's one: Neither of you would sleep with Bill. :laugh2:

[Kathianne]

I did, on most of them :thumb:

I never wrote-in an answer though, because who can read and quantify those?
Ditto!

We know the scantron answers win! LOL!

[fj1200]

A little surprising.


I side with Ted Cruz on most 2016 Presidential Election issues

[Drummond]

Just saw this at the bottom of my results. Yup, that's me!
:laugh2: :salute:

Right-Wing
Your political beliefs would be considered strongly Right-Wing on an ideological scale, meaning you tend to support policies that promote economic freedom and a society based on morals and values.


I just tried the test myself ... with some slight trepidation, because I wasn't sure if I was a competent-enough judge of American affairs to settle on good decisions. It worked out well, though, with a summary duplicating Abbey's ..

Your political beliefs would be considered strongly Right-Wing on an ideological scale, meaning you tend to support policies that promote economic freedom and a society based on morals and values.

The test decided I was most in line with Marco Rubio's policies (98 percent). There followed a long line of other Republicans I agreed with, in diminishing percentages ... Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee's immediately following. Not too bad !

[Drummond]

I've leaned towards Rubio and still do, so not surprising that the quiz has him at the top of my list.

I'm VERY saddened to see that Hillary was on my list at all. Knowing I have anything in common with her at all makes me want to vomit.

Same here. 98% Rubio ... a long list of Republicans followed ... and down at the bottom, Hillary Clinton at 20 percent.

I offer no creditable explanation, but I'd be less than honest if I didn't report what the test really showed. I'm staggered that she was there at all.

[Drummond]

I did, on most of them :thumb:

I never wrote-in an answer though, because who can read and quantify those?

Likewise !:thumb:

[LongTermGuy]

*​No accuracy what so ever based on my results -VS- candidates known public views IMO.

[Drummond]

I'll list mine ..

Mario Rubio - 98%
Ted Cruz - 97%
Rick Santorum - 94%
Mike Huckabee - 85%
Ben Carson - 73%
Rand Paul - 72%
Scott Walker - 72%
Carly Fiorina - 71%
Hillary Clinton - 20%
Bernie Sanders - 17%

I'm putting that 20% result down to contamination by my own Society. Generations of Leftie influence ... maybe it figures ? Anyway, at least the other results suggest I've shrugged it off at least reasonably well.

[Drummond]

Cruz at this point, still on the fence who I would like to see run with him

OK now I took the quiz, but it was pretty close, or I should say right on, except it gave Hilliary 54 % and I would write in a vote for my dog before voting for her.


http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077159078

I sympathise ! I'm unhappy about Hillary getting 20% on mine.

In my case, though (IF he reported it accurately) ... it seems I have something in common with FJ. Ted Cruz scored high on mine, too.

I didn't want to admit it ... but I've come clean .....

I console myself with having learned that Ted Cruz's father fought for that arch-Commie, Fidel Castro, against Batista.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz


Cruz's father, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, was born in 1939 in Matanzas, Cuba. As a teenager, he joined Fidel Castro's guerrilla groups to fight against the regime of Fulgencio Batista. He left Cuba in 1957 to attend the University of Texas.[19] Rafael Cruz became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2005.

[Drummond]

Noir -- take the test !! --

[red state]

Not sure if my refusal to answer the last question so as to not influence what I had punched in on the other questions but it listed Marco Rubio as my #1 candidate of choice and I know that is BULL$#!T and is a "fixed" test because here is what I think of rubio.....

He's actually at or near the bottom of my favorite candidates!!!


http://www.ifreelance.com/graphics/handlers/sampleimage.ashx?v=1&id=311266&si=1&sv=1&mw=695&mh=500&rmc=35
http://www.ifreelance.com/graphics/handlers/sampleimage.ashx?v=1&id=313843&si=1&sv=1&mw=695&mh=500&rmc=35

[LongTermGuy]

Not sure if my refusal to answer the last question so as to not influence what I had punched in on the other questions but it listed Marco Rubio as my #1 candidate of choice and I know that is BULL$#!T and is a "fixed" test because here is what I think of rubio.....

He's actually at or near the bottom of my favorite candidates!!!


http://www.ifreelance.com/graphics/handlers/sampleimage.ashx?v=1&id=311266&si=1&sv=1&mw=695&mh=500&rmc=35
http://www.ifreelance.com/graphics/handlers/sampleimage.ashx?v=1&id=313843&si=1&sv=1&mw=695&mh=500&rmc=35


Yup....listed me with Rubio also....NADA! Only if I had to....!

[red state]

Yup....listed me with Rubio also....NADA! Only if I had to....!

I'm sure we also agree that WE are sick and tired of being left with a 'Lesser of two evil" votes. I was actually hoping Santuram would beat out Mittens last go around (but only because Mittens was destined to be another mcSHAME.

We live in interesting times but nothing now surprises us. It almost disgusts you to the point of not voting.....especially if THEY are gonna trump your vote with a FIVE minority ruling class of tyrannical judges.

[Gunny]

What exactly does it take to make a "successful society?"



Of course you would. :grenade:

Why is it Nixon was a crook for one thing and Billary abd O=blah-blah have lied their ways through 30 years of uselessness and they get a pass? I at least have some integrity unlike people who vote for the "D no matter what.

[Gunny]

Re-read the thread and found a post you liked? :laugh2:

I'm STILL the best candidate. :laugh:

That's sad.:laugh2::laugh2:

[jimnyc]

I'm STILL the best candidate. :laugh:

That's sad.:laugh2::laugh2:

Hell, at this point you would have my vote too. No offense of course, but I would also vote for a rock at this point, as after dealing with Obama ANYTHING sounds good. But I would love to have a Marine in office that would stand in front of America and speak his mind and not hold back. Quite frankly, that's what we need. Stop with the PC shit, stop with the lies, stop with the appeasing... oh, and Nuke ISIS if you get in.

[LongTermGuy]

Hell, at this point you would have my vote too. No offense of course, but I would also vote for a rock at this point, as after dealing with Obama ANYTHING sounds good. But I would love to have a Marine in office that would stand in front of America and speak his mind and not hold back. Quite frankly, that's what we need. Stop with the PC shit, stop with the lies, stop with the appeasing... oh, and Nuke ISIS if you get in.


~"Stop with the PC shit, stop with the lies, stop with the appeasing... ." ~

*Straight up...get it done...Say and do what others are AFRAID too!

Good morning!:cool:

[fj1200]

In my case, though (IF he reported it accurately) ... it seems I have something in common with FJ. Ted Cruz scored high on mine, too.

:facepalm99:

[NightTrain]

Both Sharon and I took this quiz a couple of weeks ago, and Rubio was at the top of the list. I expected Walker to be the top guy, but he was down the list a ways.

But, if you look at the results, you'll see that on issues where there is no information about that candidates' stance about that particular question, a non-answer counts as a non-alignment with your answer. So that's not accurate and skews your results. There were several questions that Walker has no input on, and since I answered every question, they counted as strikes.

Either Rubio took this quiz and answered all the questions in a conservative manner, or it's skewing the results deliberately for Rubio.

Hellary and Sanders were still at the bottom of the list by a wide margin, so at least that portion seemed accurate.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I just tried the test myself ... with some slight trepidation, because I wasn't sure if I was a competent-enough judge of American affairs to settle on good decisions. It worked out well, though, with a summary duplicating Abbey's ..

Your political beliefs would be considered strongly Right-Wing on an ideological scale, meaning you tend to support policies that promote economic freedom and a society based on morals and values.

The test decided I was most in line with Marco Rubio's policies (98 percent). There followed a long line of other Republicans I agreed with, in diminishing percentages ... Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee's immediately following. Not too bad !

Quite an achievement for a person not a Native Son of this nation!! :beer: :salute: :beer:--Tyr

[fj1200]

But, if you look at the results, you'll see that on issues where there is no information about that candidates' stance about that particular question, a non-answer counts as a non-alignment with your answer. So that's not accurate and skews your results. There were several questions that Walker has no input on, and since I answered every question, they counted as strikes.

I think that they just tried to glean an answer from public statements or other sources. I'd be interested to know the difference between "no" and "no, because blah blah blah."

[Drummond]

:facepalm99:

Exactly !!!

[Max R.]

Both Sharon and I took this quiz a couple of weeks ago, and Rubio was at the top of the list. I expected Walker to be the top guy, but he was down the list a ways.

But, if you look at the results, you'll see that on issues where there is no information about that candidates' stance about that particular question, a non-answer counts as a non-alignment with your answer. So that's not accurate and skews your results. There were several questions that Walker has no input on, and since I answered every question, they counted as strikes.

Either Rubio took this quiz and answered all the questions in a conservative manner, or it's skewing the results deliberately for Rubio.

Hellary and Sanders were still at the bottom of the list by a wide margin, so at least that portion seemed accurate.
It's a fun indicator, but I doubt it's completely accurate without first seeing how the results are tallied.

I side with Rand Paul on most 2016 Presidential Election issues


Candidates you side with...

http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556207.pngRand Paul Republican 79%

on immigration, foreign policy, healthcare, and domestic policy issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556207)

http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556210.pngTed Cruz Republican 76%

on immigration, economic, foreign policy, and healthcare issues.
compare answers
(http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556210)
http://www.isidewith.com/_imgs/candidates/sm/801556202.pngMarco Rubio Republican 76%

on economic, immigration, domestic policy, healthcare, and foreign policy issues.
compare answers (http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1077173262:801556202)

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I'm sure we also agree that WE are sick and tired of being left with a 'Lesser of two evil" votes. I was actually hoping Santuram would beat out Mittens last go around (but only because Mittens was destined to be another mcSHAME.

We live in interesting times but nothing now surprises us. It almost disgusts you to the point of not voting.....especially if THEY are gonna trump your vote with a FIVE minority ruling class of tyrannical judges.

Never give in, never give up-- not even after the last bullet is fired. Use your blade and go down fighting that's how this nation was born..-Tyr

[Drummond]

Quite an achievement for a person not a Native Son of this nation!! :beer: :salute: :beer:--Tyr:clap::clap::clap::clap:

Or, maybe, the reverse ? There are some Conservatives here who completely rebel against the root-and-branch Leftie pervasiveness in the UK. I'm proud to be one of them.

It worried me that ignorance of American affairs might be too much of a handicap. Seems my concern was groundless.

[hjmick]

None yet.

[jimnyc]

None yet.

Not even Gunny? :poke:

[tailfins]

:clap::clap::clap::clap:

Or, maybe, the reverse ? There are some Conservatives here who completely rebel against the root-and-branch Leftie pervasiveness in the UK. I'm proud to be one of them.

It worried me that ignorance of American affairs might be too much of a handicap. Seems my concern was groundless.

"Conservatives" are just Leftie-light in the UK. Why aren't you a U-kipper?

[NightTrain]

I think that they just tried to glean an answer from public statements or other sources. I'd be interested to know the difference between "no" and "no, because blah blah blah."

Yeah, I noticed on a few questions where I chose a more detailed answer, it aligned me with another candidate. There were a couple that I wrote my own response and those were automatically counted as strikes with every candidate - the robot can't read and reason, apparently. :eek:

I think for the most accurate results, one should choose either a Yes or No answer. Maybe I'll take a mulligan and try that.

[jimnyc]

Yeah, I noticed on a few questions where I chose a more detailed answer, it aligned me with another candidate. There were a couple that I wrote my own response and those were automatically counted as strikes with every candidate - the robot can't read and reason, apparently. :eek:

I think for the most accurate results, one should choose either a Yes or No answer. Maybe I'll take a mulligan and try that.

I used only yes and no and it gave me Rubio, who is my choice thus far. I think it was dumb luck though. I'm still perplexed with my connection to Hillary. I wonder what stance I agree with her on?

[NightTrain]

I used only yes and no and it gave me Rubio, who is my choice thus far. I think it was dumb luck though. I'm still perplexed with my connection to Hillary. I wonder what stance I agree with her on?

It'll tell you where she made a speech indicating that you agreed with her on something... usually a softball like "Do you think oxygen is a good idea?".

[jimnyc]

It'll tell you where she made a speech indicating that you agreed with her on something... usually a softball like "Do you think oxygen is a good idea?".

Maybe there was a question on there asking about whether or not her husband was a bum. I'm confident we would have similar opinions on that issue. :)

[NightTrain]

Interesting. Staying within the Yes or No answers, now my results are 95% for Rick Santorum. And somehow Hellary is agreeing with me 52% of the time and I know that's not even close in reality.

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1083655271

[fj1200]

Exactly !!!

"Exactly" as in you make up something in your head and whatever the response is validation? :rolleyes:


Yeah, I noticed on a few questions where I chose a more detailed answer, it aligned me with another candidate. There were a couple that I wrote my own response and those were automatically counted as strikes with every candidate - the robot can't read and reason, apparently. :eek:

I think for the most accurate results, one should choose either a Yes or No answer. Maybe I'll take a mulligan and try that.

I suppose if you're really trying to drill down to find out who exactly you agree with it will show one thing but most of those other options were just variations on a theme and now worth the trouble. It asked me who exactly I preferred, I replied Walker because he's a governor, and Walker was down at number 5 I think. Those within say 10% is just a rounding error to me. And was Bush even in there?

[fj1200]

Interesting. Staying within the Yes or No answers, now my results are 95% for Rick Santorum. And somehow Hellary is agreeing with me 52% of the time and I know that's not even close in reality.

Well, given the premise of who you REALLY support then I would go with their methodology. Whether it really matters come general election time is a different question.

[Max R.]

Interesting. Staying within the Yes or No answers, now my results are 95% for Rick Santorum. And somehow Hellary is agreeing with me 52% of the time and I know that's not even close in reality.

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1083655271
A difference is the degree in which a person says yes or no. E.G., there's a difference between a person who thinks illegal immigrants should be deported and a person who strongly thinks illegals should be deported to the point of making it a priority over the economy and national defense against terrorism or other nations hacking into our data bases.

[Abbey Marie]

I used only yes and no and it gave me Rubio, who is my choice thus far. I think it was dumb luck though. I'm still perplexed with my connection to Hillary. I wonder what stance I agree with her on?

You can click under a candidate's name, and it will tell you where you agree and disagree.

[red state]

I think it is "fixed" just like the candidate the Republicants are gonna push on us (again).

[aboutime]

I think it is "fixed" just like the candidate the Republicants are gonna push on us (again).


red state... My apologies if I bore you, and others with what I am about to say. But....


Just another reminder. "I DO NOT TRUST ANY POLITICIAN....NO MATTER HOW MUCH ANYONE LOVES THEM!"

Trump is telling all of us..LIKE IT IS. Not that I would vote for him. But HONESTY, and HAVING NO FEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH...is something ALL OF AMERICA should be demanding from the Likely candidates who will be running.

[NightTrain]

And was Bush even in there?

#9 on my 'test' retake. He doesn't show until you hit the 'Show All Candidates' option for some reason.

[red state]

red state... My apologies if I bore you, and others with what I am about to say. But....


Just another reminder. "I DO NOT TRUST ANY POLITICIAN....NO MATTER HOW MUCH ANYONE LOVES THEM!"

Trump is telling all of us..LIKE IT IS. Not that I would vote for him. But HONESTY, and HAVING NO FEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH...is something ALL OF AMERICA should be demanding from the Likely candidates who will be running.


My friend, you are not a bore at all......but the choices we are usually given are a bit boring and i'm sick of it.

[Noir]

Noir -- take the test !! --

Marco Rubio - 73%
Rick Santorum - 67%
Mike Huckabee - 66%
Bernie Sanders - 63%
Rand Paul - 63%
Ted Cruz - 62%
Scott Wlaker - 56%
Ben Carson - 55%
Carly Fiorina - 33%

:puke:

[Abbey Marie]

Marco Rubio - 73%
Rick Santorum - 67%
Mike Huckabee - 66%
Bernie Sanders - 63%
Rand Paul - 63%
Ted Cruz - 62%
Scott Wlaker - 56%
Ben Carson - 55%
Carly Fiorina - 33%

:puke:


:eek:

[jimnyc]

Marco Rubio - 73%
Rick Santorum - 67%
Mike Huckabee - 66%
Bernie Sanders - 63%
Rand Paul - 63%
Ted Cruz - 62%
Scott Wlaker - 56%
Ben Carson - 55%
Carly Fiorina - 33%

:puke:

Don't fight it, get in touch with your conservative side! Arguments aside, it's good to see that when push comes to shove that you truly are one of us. :thumb:

[Gunny]

I came up with 95% Rick Santorum? Is he even running?

[Noir]

Don't fight it, get in touch with your conservative side! Arguments aside, it's good to see that when push comes to shove that you truly are one of us. :thumb:

tbh i think the results are a lil skewed because i was trying to answer more from an 'If i was an american living in America' perspective than a brit, but its interesting reading all the same.

[jimnyc]

I came up with 95% Rick Santorum? Is he even running?

Yep

[jimnyc]

tbh i think the results are a lil skewed because i was trying to answer more from an 'If i was an american living in America' perspective than a brit, but its interesting reading all the same.

Nope, it's spot on dead accurate, and you're now officially a conservative. :)

I'm just happy to see that Hillary didn't even make your list. There's a little hope for you starting to peek through. :)

[aboutime]

To those who demand an answer, this early in the game that can, and will change many times before 2016.I would run for the office myself IF...I could afford it. My health was better, and IF I was willing to become a liar, hypocrite, and YES man to win the popularity votes from the Un-educated, Un-informed, and Perpetually Easily-led.But...I will not give up MY LIFE TODAY, trying to be SOMEBODY I am not. Only to be intentionally Destroyed by those who hate, and need to pretend they are smarter than everyone else.Which is why I see Trump as THE ONLY HONEST candidate in the running, from both sides.Like him. I am not, and never have been afraid to tell the truth. State the obvious, and ignore some who believe they can destroy a FELLOW AMERICAN, based on their Endless Selfishness, and Stupidity.