What frightened the USS Donald Cook so much in the Black Sea?

[Balu]

How you would comment this, gentlemen?

"The State Department acknowledged that the crew of the destroyer USS Donald Cook has been gravely demoralized ever since their vessel was flown over in the Black Sea by a Russian Sukhoi-24 (Su-24) fighter jet which carried neither bombs nor missiles but only an electronic warfare device. ... "


http://www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

How you would comment this, gentlemen?

"The State Department acknowledged that the crew of the destroyer USS Donald Cook has been gravely demoralized ever since their vessel was flown over in the Black Sea by a Russian Sukhoi-24 (Su-24) fighter jet which carried neither bombs nor missiles but only an electronic warfare device. ... "


http://www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html

Do you believe that article word for word?
If you do, please look up the word- propaganda, then get back to me on it.. :laugh:--Tyr

[Balu]

Do you believe that article word for word?
If you do, please look up the word- propaganda, then get back to me on it.. :laugh:--Tyr
To believe or not this is a matter of Religion. But the fact is that after this "assault" about 30 servicemen asked for resignation.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

To believe or not this is a matter of Religion. But the fact is that after this "assault" about 30 servicemen asked for resignation.

Even if that were true there is another explanation. That is the dissatisfaction many service members have with being commanded by the fool, coward and traitor named obama!
Get used to our freedom of speech and our freedom to say what we think about our political leaders.
If you think that ship was blind you may be blind yourself IMHO.
I suspect that ship could have shot that rusky plane down any time it desired but was under "no fire unless fired upon orders"!
The coward obama is known for his insane --Rules of Engagement-- orders..
There is no magical device thats blocks all our electronic "military eyes".....
Wake up, you are dreaming methinks. -Tyr

[Balu]

Even if that were true there is another explanation. That is the dissatisfaction many service members have with being commanded by the fool, coward and traitor named obama!
Get used to our freedom of speech and our freedom to say what we think about our political leaders.
If you think that ship was blind you may be blind yourself IMHO.
I suspect that ship could have shot that rusky plane down any time it desired but was under "no fire unless fired upon orders"!
The coward obama is known for his insane --Rules of Engagement-- orders..
There is no magical device thats blocks all our electronic "military eyes".....
Wake up, you are dreaming methinks. -Tyr
Unfortunately Americans lost the feeling of reality - "Russia IS NOT a banana republic to speak the language you are accustomed to with." And you may only suspect. Let us suspect together:

Club-K Container Missile System 2013


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbUU_9bOcnM


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELgua-Slx2o

[Kathianne]

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/2014/0415/Russian-aircraft-buzz-US-Navy-destroyer-How-big-a-deal


Russian aircraft buzz US Navy destroyer: How big a deal?


The incident took place over the weekend in the international waters of the Black Sea – ‘a long way from US Navy bases and at the front doorstep’ of the Russian military, a naval analyst says.


By Anna Mulrine, Staff writer <time id="date-published" itemprop="datePublished" class="eza-publish_date outer_block all_caps" datetime="2014-04-15T18:34:00-04:00" title="Published: April 15, 2014 6:34 pm EDTLast updated: April 16, 2014 2:06 pm EDT" style="text-transform: uppercase; font-size: 11px; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: 0.04em; padding-right: 4px; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(136, 136, 136); padding-left: 10px;">APRIL 15, 2014</time>


WASHINGTON — When Russian attack aircraft buzzed the USS Donald Cook in the international waters of the Black Sea, even as tensions in the region ratchet up, Pentagon officials decried the move as “provocative.”

How big a deal are these “provocative” actions on the part of the Russian military – or were these just a couple of rogue Russian pilots out for a joy ride?

US military officials quickly dismissed the latter option. “I have difficulty believing that two Russian pilots, on their own, would choose to take such an action,” Col. Steve Warren said during a Pentagon briefing Monday.

“We’ve seen the Russians conduct themselves unprofessionally and in violation of international norms in Ukraine for several months,” he added.

During the cold war, these sorts of flybys “happened all the time,” says Christopher Harmer, a retired Navy officer who served as deputy director of future operations for the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet.

In fact, these kinds of incidents happen more often than ever makes it into the press, says Mr. Harmer, now a senior naval analyst with the Institute for the Study of War in Washington.

“We used to call it the ‘standard harassment package,’ ” and it was meant to send a message.

“It was their way of saying, ‘We the Russian military are still capable of monitoring the US Navy and still capable of putting ourselves in a position to harm you if it comes to that,’ ” he says.

Pentagon officials were quick to point out that the USS Cook “is more than capable of defending itself” against the Russian aircraft.

The incident, which took place Saturday, however, is “an overt reminder that this is their backyard,” Harmer adds, and that the Navy destroyer’s location in the Black Sea is “a long way from US Navy bases and at the front doorstep” of the Russian military.
The Russian aircraft flew within 1,000 yards of the ship and made roughly a dozen passes, but it did not fly over the destroyer, according to Pentagon officials.

“That is about as tame a flyby as you can get,” Harmer says. On the more aggressive end of the spectrum is a flyover of a ship such as an aircraft carrier, which happened on more than one occasion during Harmer’s time serving at sea.

...

[Balu]

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/2014/0415/Russian-aircraft-buzz-US-Navy-destroyer-How-big-a-deal

"A good face on a bad game." (c) What else could they say?! Let us see the other " non-professional act" (I wonder, who is professional and who is not not.) http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/derisive.gif

March 23, 2015
Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

<tbody>

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/klk1.jpg




</tbody>
The Naval Surface Forces (NSF (http://eng.mil.ru/en/structure/forces/navy/structure/surface_forces.htm)) of the Ministry of Defense (MoD (http://eng.mil.ru/)) are reporting today that three nuclear-powered Akula-class submarines belonging to the 24th Submarine Division of the Northern Fleet (NF (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Fleet)) successfully “war-gamed” the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (http://www.roosevelt.navy.mil/) [photo 2nd left] causing it to “flee in terror” towards the waters off the Hampshire coast in the United Kingdom.
Within hours of the NSF reporting this critical incident, it’s interesting to note, British press sources confirmed that this US Navy behemoth of “100,000 tons of firepower (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3006792/100-000-tons-U-S-firepower-big-dock-Portsmouth-Aircraft-carrier-USS-Theodore-Roosevelt-anchors-Hampshire-coast-arriving-UK-five-day-visit.html)” did indeed dock off Stokes Bay in Gosport stunning the thousands of spectators who jammed roads and lined the banks of the River Solent to see it, but which they, also, described as a port call, though none had been scheduled.
According to this NSF report, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and its combat escort ships, had been detected on a course towards the operating zone of the Northern Fleet which President Putin had put on full combat alert last week (http://fox6now.com/2015/03/16/amid-nato-exercises-russia-puts-northern-fleet-on-full-alert/) in response to a “State of War” threat (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1846.htm) detected from the United Kingdom…a threat, the MoD adds to this report, was, likewise, in response to the Federations “Shock of March” battle plan revealed on 4 February (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1835.htm).
With NATO forces, literally, lining the entire western border with troops (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-21/nato-launches-wide-scale-war-games-near-russian-border-creates-line-troops), including the unprecedented US Army’s “Dragon Ride” armored convoy (http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/03/22/402924/US-military-parade-across-eastern-europe) currently winding its way across six European nations, and Norway’s equally unprecedented “Joint Viking” combat war moves against the northern border (http://rt.com/news/239209-nato-norway-viking-drills/), this report continues, President Putin himself gave the order to “target and disable” the USS Theodore Roosevelt.
As Russia had warned its citizens last week to prepare for nuclear war (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1850.htm), and Moscow’s bomb shelters began to fill (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1848.htm) in response to the dire first-strike nuclear attack being planned by the US (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1849.htm), and nearly all of the Federations military forces being on full combat alert (http://rt.com/news/241745-russia-offensive-defense-drills/) across all 9 time zones (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJNuxi5wq6Y), this report further notes, the approach of the USS Theodore Roosevelt towards the Baltic Sea made it a “legitimate” target.
To how this US aircraft carrier was “disabled” by the Northern Fleet’s attack submarines, this report says, was due to the Federations successful implementation of “magrav technology (https://www.thenewenergyindustry.com/magrav-technology-cd-version-01/)” weapons which had previously been used against American warships, and had “disabled” them too.
In fact, NSF experts in this report state, it was only a few weeks ago that the USS Theodore Roosevelt was “sunk” by a French submarine (http://theaviationist.com/2015/03/05/us-aircraft-carrier-sunk-by-subs/) using “magrav technology” off the coast of Florida during a war game wherein the Americans were testing their countermeasures against this revolutionary new weapon prior to their ships deployment to confront Northern Fleet forces.
The necessity of the US Navy to develop countermeasures against “magrav technology”, this report says, was clearly shown to them last year after Federation air forces completely disabled the feared AEGIS destroyer USS Donald Cook in the Black Sea (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/). So demoralizing was this attack against the USS Donald Cook, when it limped into a Romanian port for repairs, all 27 of its officers put in for reassignment and/or retirement (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/).
“Magrav technology”, its import to note, was conceived by the Iranian-born nuclear engineer Mehran Keshe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehran_Tavakoli_Keshe) [photo 3rd left], but whose works are banned from public use in the United States under an Executive Order signed by President Obama on 23 April 2012 (https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/23/executive-order-blocking-property-and-suspending-entry-united-states-cer).
President Obama’s signing of his Executive Order against “magrav technology”, it should be remembered, was due to the Iranian’s using it to down, and then capture one of the United States most secretive and sophisticated drones (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-16095823) in December, 2011, and then Iran sharing this new weapon with Syria too.
Immediately upon President Obama banning “magrav technology” in 2012, it should also be noted, Mehran Keshe replied to the American leader in an open letter by stating: ...

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1853.htm

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

"A good face on a bad game." (c) What else could they say?! Let us see the other " non-professional act" (I wonder, who is professional and who is not not.) http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/derisive.gif

March 23, 2015
Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

<tbody>

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/klk1.jpg




</tbody>
The Naval Surface Forces (NSF (http://eng.mil.ru/en/structure/forces/navy/structure/surface_forces.htm)) of the Ministry of Defense (MoD (http://eng.mil.ru/)) are reporting today that three nuclear-powered Akula-class submarines belonging to the 24th Submarine Division of the Northern Fleet (NF (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Fleet)) successfully “war-gamed” the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (http://www.roosevelt.navy.mil/) [photo 2nd left] causing it to “flee in terror” towards the waters off the Hampshire coast in the United Kingdom.
Within hours of the NSF reporting this critical incident, it’s interesting to note, British press sources confirmed that this US Navy behemoth of “100,000 tons of firepower (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3006792/100-000-tons-U-S-firepower-big-dock-Portsmouth-Aircraft-carrier-USS-Theodore-Roosevelt-anchors-Hampshire-coast-arriving-UK-five-day-visit.html)” did indeed dock off Stokes Bay in Gosport stunning the thousands of spectators who jammed roads and lined the banks of the River Solent to see it, but which they, also, described as a port call, though none had been scheduled.
According to this NSF report, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and its combat escort ships, had been detected on a course towards the operating zone of the Northern Fleet which President Putin had put on full combat alert last week (http://fox6now.com/2015/03/16/amid-nato-exercises-russia-puts-northern-fleet-on-full-alert/) in response to a “State of War” threat (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1846.htm) detected from the United Kingdom…a threat, the MoD adds to this report, was, likewise, in response to the Federations “Shock of March” battle plan revealed on 4 February (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1835.htm).
With NATO forces, literally, lining the entire western border with troops (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-21/nato-launches-wide-scale-war-games-near-russian-border-creates-line-troops), including the unprecedented US Army’s “Dragon Ride” armored convoy (http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/03/22/402924/US-military-parade-across-eastern-europe) currently winding its way across six European nations, and Norway’s equally unprecedented “Joint Viking” combat war moves against the northern border (http://rt.com/news/239209-nato-norway-viking-drills/), this report continues, President Putin himself gave the order to “target and disable” the USS Theodore Roosevelt.
As Russia had warned its citizens last week to prepare for nuclear war (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1850.htm), and Moscow’s bomb shelters began to fill (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1848.htm) in response to the dire first-strike nuclear attack being planned by the US (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1849.htm), and nearly all of the Federations military forces being on full combat alert (http://rt.com/news/241745-russia-offensive-defense-drills/) across all 9 time zones (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJNuxi5wq6Y), this report further notes, the approach of the USS Theodore Roosevelt towards the Baltic Sea made it a “legitimate” target.
To how this US aircraft carrier was “disabled” by the Northern Fleet’s attack submarines, this report says, was due to the Federations successful implementation of “magrav technology (https://www.thenewenergyindustry.com/magrav-technology-cd-version-01/)” weapons which had previously been used against American warships, and had “disabled” them too.
In fact, NSF experts in this report state, it was only a few weeks ago that the USS Theodore Roosevelt was “sunk” by a French submarine (http://theaviationist.com/2015/03/05/us-aircraft-carrier-sunk-by-subs/) using “magrav technology” off the coast of Florida during a war game wherein the Americans were testing their countermeasures against this revolutionary new weapon prior to their ships deployment to confront Northern Fleet forces.
The necessity of the US Navy to develop countermeasures against “magrav technology”, this report says, was clearly shown to them last year after Federation air forces completely disabled the feared AEGIS destroyer USS Donald Cook in the Black Sea (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/). So demoralizing was this attack against the USS Donald Cook, when it limped into a Romanian port for repairs, all 27 of its officers put in for reassignment and/or retirement (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/).
“Magrav technology”, its import to note, was conceived by the Iranian-born nuclear engineer Mehran Keshe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehran_Tavakoli_Keshe) [photo 3rd left], but whose works are banned from public use in the United States under an Executive Order signed by President Obama on 23 April 2012 (https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/23/executive-order-blocking-property-and-suspending-entry-united-states-cer).
President Obama’s signing of his Executive Order against “magrav technology”, it should be remembered, was due to the Iranian’s using it to down, and then capture one of the United States most secretive and sophisticated drones (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-16095823) in December, 2011, and then Iran sharing this new weapon with Syria too.
Immediately upon President Obama banning “magrav technology” in 2012, it should also be noted, Mehran Keshe replied to the American leader in an open letter by stating: ...

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1853.htm

I have to ask. Do you really believe all that propaganda?
Are you not aware that such propaganda has been espoused by the old USSR and now Russia since immediately after WW2?
The U.S. military has advanced weapons that you guys have not a clue about.-Tyr

[Balu]

I have to ask. Do you really believe all that propaganda?
Are you not aware that such propaganda has been espoused by the old USSR and now Russia since immediately after WW2?
The U.S. military has advanced weapons that you guys have not a clue about.-Tyr

I will remain you in your beliefs, my dear friend. I noticed since late 60-s, that everything not corresponding to their imaginations the Americans use to call "propaganda". The only think I can assure you with is that those, who are responsible for it do not eat their bread for nothing. And no need to tell me about your facilities in Alaska. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif
The other think I would remind you of is that your famous invisible air-craft was shot down in Yugoslavia by an ancient AA complex "C-125" designed somewhere in 60-s. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/laugh1.gif

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I will remain you in your beliefs, my dear friend. I noticed since late 60-s, that everything not corresponding to their imaginations the Americans use to call "propaganda". The only think I can assure you with is that those, who are responsible for it do not eat their bread for nothing.
The only think I would remind you of is that your famous invisible air-craft was shot down in Yugoslavia by an ancient AA complex "C-125" designed somewhere in 60-s. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/laugh1.gif

Perhaps I should remind you--Reagan defeated the USSR with the mere stroke of a pen!-Tyr

We now have things far more powerful than a pen. A soon as the obama is gone , Russia's boasting and aggression, will be dealt with in a proper way IMHO.
Enjoy your cereal while the milk lasts amigo.. -Tyr

[Balu]

Perhaps I should remind you--Reagan defeated the USSR with the mere stroke of a pen!-Tyr

We now have things far more powerful than a pen. A soon as the obama is gone , Russia's boasting and aggression, will be dealt with in a proper way IMHO.
Enjoy your cereal while the milk lasts amigo.. -Tyr
Putin is not Gorbachev, and his successor will not be neither. We are able students and we learned very fast the lessons you taught us.http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

[Kathianne]

and Balu's propaganda regarding war games is just that. Good lord! That was comical.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Putin is not Gorbachev, and his successor will be neither. We are able students and we learned very fast the lessons you taught us.http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

Well, then perhaps you should learn that the house cat does not fight and defeat a tiger.
Appears to me that they are teaching over there that the cat morphed into a tiger.
Good that you are a student learning new things. You should learn to discern propaganda from truth. It would greatly improve your life and understanding .-Tyr

[Balu]

and Balu's propaganda regarding war games is just that. Good lord! That was comical.

Your confidence in your own unsurpassed once may serve you bad service.

[Balu]

Well, then perhaps you should learn that the house cat does not fight and defeat a tiger.
Appears to me that they are teaching over there that the cat morphed into a tiger.
Good that you are a student learning new things. You should learn to discern propaganda from truth. It would greatly improve your life and understanding .-Tyr
It may sound well for a freshman. But I am a pensioner and in my life I visited and worked in many countries, so I am able to judge what is what. I've got some experience under my belt. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

[Kathianne]

Your confidence in your own unsurpassed once may serve you bad service.

and if YOU think that most Americans believe what you think we believe, you are not dealing with reality.

[Max R.]

To believe or not this is a matter of Religion. But the fact is that after this "assault" about 30 servicemen asked for resignation.Says who? The Conspiracy Theorist Voltaire Network? Those idiots think 9/11 was a US internal plot: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltaire_Network#Notoriety

The only link in the article is to this one, http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/pentagon-protests-russian-jets-buzzing-antimissile-warship-black-sea/, and there is no mention of electronic devices, sailors resigning or "The State Department acknowledged that the crew of the destroyer USS Donald Cook has been gravely demoralized".

Logically, if the Russias did have such a device, why aren't they flying all over the Ukraine with it? All over Chechnya and anywhere else people oppose them? If this story were true, then the Russians are screwing up by not maximizing their use of this new miracle weapon.

[Balu]

Logically, if the Russias did have such a device, why aren't they flying all over the Ukraine with it? (1) All over Chechnya and anywhere else people oppose them? If this story were true, then the Russians are screwing up by not maximizing their use of this new miracle weapon.
First Russia DOES NOT fight in Ukraine. Russia HAS no intention to occupy it with all it's debts an ruined economy.
Second, this is NEWLY developed facility to be employed under certain conditions. And as far as our country doesn't conduct combat operations, there are no fields to use it in.

[Gunny]

How you would comment this, gentlemen?

"The State Department acknowledged that the crew of the destroyer USS Donald Cook has been gravely demoralized ever since their vessel was flown over in the Black Sea by a Russian Sukhoi-24 (Su-24) fighter jet which carried neither bombs nor missiles but only an electronic warfare device. ... "


http://www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html

That's an easy comment. Bullshit.

If you think a guided missile destroyer can't shoot that crap out of the sky, you just ain't thinking. And I don't know ANY squids that'll back down to a dumbass plane.

You go ahead and fuck with some squid's boat. I want a beer cooler, panama hat, bermuda shorts and a lounge chair. I'll sit up on deck and wait. I figure you might live right up to the point you piss off the engineering Chief.

[Gunny]

Do you believe that article word for word?
If you do, please look up the word- propaganda, then get back to me on it.. :laugh:--Tyr

Squids are mighty particular about their boats. You'd think they were married to them. :laugh:

Propaganda is an understatement. That plane would have so many holes in it it could be used as a spaghetti strainer.:laugh:

[Gunny]

To believe or not this is a matter of Religion. But the fact is that after this "assault" about 30 servicemen asked for resignation.

Fact is ... BULLSHIT. I can hear the comm center now: Can we shoot this fucker down?

No.

Why not? We've got 4 seawhiz's and 6 missiles locked on target and are tracking every inch he thinks he can make.

It wouldn't be nice.

Got your orders from Obama, huh?

[NightTrain]

How funny!

The Russian pilot was very careful not to fire up his targeting systems because he knew that he and that plane would have been vaporized within seconds.

Demoralized because of a flyby? LOL

Come on, Balu, you can do better than that.

If you Russians are wanting to demoralize the U.S. Navy sailors, you're going to have to sink their ship. Otherwise, I'm afraid you have no way to demoralize them.



Your guns are cute. It's nice that you've caught up to U.S. technology in use since 1973. Have you seen the new lasers that we're installing on our warships and warplanes?

[Gunny]

"A good face on a bad game." (c) What else could they say?! Let us see the other " non-professional act" (I wonder, who is professional and who is not not.) http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/derisive.gif

March 23, 2015
Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

<tbody>
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/klk1.jpg



</tbody>
The Naval Surface Forces (NSF (http://eng.mil.ru/en/structure/forces/navy/structure/surface_forces.htm)) of the Ministry of Defense (MoD (http://eng.mil.ru/)) are reporting today that three nuclear-powered Akula-class submarines belonging to the 24th Submarine Division of the Northern Fleet (NF (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Fleet)) successfully “war-gamed” the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (http://www.roosevelt.navy.mil/) [photo 2nd left] causing it to “flee in terror” towards the waters off the Hampshire coast in the United Kingdom.
Within hours of the NSF reporting this critical incident, it’s interesting to note, British press sources confirmed that this US Navy behemoth of “100,000 tons of firepower (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3006792/100-000-tons-U-S-firepower-big-dock-Portsmouth-Aircraft-carrier-USS-Theodore-Roosevelt-anchors-Hampshire-coast-arriving-UK-five-day-visit.html)” did indeed dock off Stokes Bay in Gosport stunning the thousands of spectators who jammed roads and lined the banks of the River Solent to see it, but which they, also, described as a port call, though none had been scheduled.
According to this NSF report, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and its combat escort ships, had been detected on a course towards the operating zone of the Northern Fleet which President Putin had put on full combat alert last week (http://fox6now.com/2015/03/16/amid-nato-exercises-russia-puts-northern-fleet-on-full-alert/) in response to a “State of War” threat (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1846.htm) detected from the United Kingdom…a threat, the MoD adds to this report, was, likewise, in response to the Federations “Shock of March” battle plan revealed on 4 February (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1835.htm).
With NATO forces, literally, lining the entire western border with troops (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-21/nato-launches-wide-scale-war-games-near-russian-border-creates-line-troops), including the unprecedented US Army’s “Dragon Ride” armored convoy (http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/03/22/402924/US-military-parade-across-eastern-europe) currently winding its way across six European nations, and Norway’s equally unprecedented “Joint Viking” combat war moves against the northern border (http://rt.com/news/239209-nato-norway-viking-drills/), this report continues, President Putin himself gave the order to “target and disable” the USS Theodore Roosevelt.
As Russia had warned its citizens last week to prepare for nuclear war (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1850.htm), and Moscow’s bomb shelters began to fill (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1848.htm) in response to the dire first-strike nuclear attack being planned by the US (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1849.htm), and nearly all of the Federations military forces being on full combat alert (http://rt.com/news/241745-russia-offensive-defense-drills/) across all 9 time zones (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJNuxi5wq6Y), this report further notes, the approach of the USS Theodore Roosevelt towards the Baltic Sea made it a “legitimate” target.
To how this US aircraft carrier was “disabled” by the Northern Fleet’s attack submarines, this report says, was due to the Federations successful implementation of “magrav technology (https://www.thenewenergyindustry.com/magrav-technology-cd-version-01/)” weapons which had previously been used against American warships, and had “disabled” them too.
In fact, NSF experts in this report state, it was only a few weeks ago that the USS Theodore Roosevelt was “sunk” by a French submarine (http://theaviationist.com/2015/03/05/us-aircraft-carrier-sunk-by-subs/) using “magrav technology” off the coast of Florida during a war game wherein the Americans were testing their countermeasures against this revolutionary new weapon prior to their ships deployment to confront Northern Fleet forces.
The necessity of the US Navy to develop countermeasures against “magrav technology”, this report says, was clearly shown to them last year after Federation air forces completely disabled the feared AEGIS destroyer USS Donald Cook in the Black Sea (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/). So demoralizing was this attack against the USS Donald Cook, when it limped into a Romanian port for repairs, all 27 of its officers put in for reassignment and/or retirement (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/).
“Magrav technology”, its import to note, was conceived by the Iranian-born nuclear engineer Mehran Keshe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehran_Tavakoli_Keshe) [photo 3rd left], but whose works are banned from public use in the United States under an Executive Order signed by President Obama on 23 April 2012 (https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/23/executive-order-blocking-property-and-suspending-entry-united-states-cer).
President Obama’s signing of his Executive Order against “magrav technology”, it should be remembered, was due to the Iranian’s using it to down, and then capture one of the United States most secretive and sophisticated drones (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-16095823) in December, 2011, and then Iran sharing this new weapon with Syria too.
Immediately upon President Obama banning “magrav technology” in 2012, it should also be noted, Mehran Keshe replied to the American leader in an open letter by stating: ...

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1853.htm

Wow. Are you 16 years old? Or 15? That carrier has enough firepower to reduce your entire country to rubble. Y'all are about as technologically advanced as we were in the 1970s.

However, folks, this guy is a perfect example for voting the Dems out of office. They'd rather suck a$$ than put a bully in his place. If there's any reason that military people are frustrated it's because they won't turn us loose.

[Gunny]

But I want you to go ahead and sink a US naval vessel. Go ahead and do it. You'll end up speaking English.

[sundaydriver]

Y'all are about as technologically advanced as we were in the 1970s.

In all fairness Russian capabilities have improved in the last 20 years or so thanks to commercially available western technologies. The Akula II subs built in the late 1990's, were the first quiet subs Russia or the USSR had ever built. Supposedly quieter than the US Los Angelo's class attack subs.

[Balu]

How funny!

Demoralized because of a flyby? LOL

Come on, Balu, you can do better than that.

If you Russians are wanting to demoralize the U.S. Navy sailors, you're going to have to sink their ship. Otherwise, I'm afraid you have no way to demoralize them.

Your guns are cute. It's nice that you've caught up to U.S. technology in use since 1973. Have you seen the new lasers that we're installing on our warships and warplanes?

1. It's a funny think, when you can visually see the fighter and is hot able to track this target. All the electronic is shut down and the only thing you have are black monitors of radars. Very encouraging. Tell me frankly, did you serve in the Army?
2. I know what you are trying to speak about. I am familiar with the results of their tests.
And now do enjoy a clip and think the subject over yourself. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

Russian Destroyer war ship in storm


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANv3rMZ-tA0&spfreload=10

[Gunny]

In all fairness Russian capabilities have improved in the last 20 years or so thanks to commercially available western technologies. The Akula II subs built in the late 1990's, were the first quiet subs Russia or the USSR had ever built. Supposedly quieter than the US Los Angelo's class attack subs.

Like I said ... go ahead and screw with some squid's boat. I'll watch.

[Gunny]

1. It's a funny think, when you can visually see the fighter and is hot able to track this target. All the electronic is shut down and the only thing you have are black monitors of radars. Very encouraging. Tell me frankly, did you serve in the Army?
2. I know what you are trying to speak about. I am familiar with the results of their tests.
And now do enjoy a clip and think the subject over yourself. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

Russian Destroyer war ship in storm


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANv3rMZ-tA0&spfreload=10

Nothing funny about orders to not engage.

Arrogance will be your downfall.

[sundaydriver]

Like I said ... go ahead and screw with some squid's boat. I'll watch.

Well. that goes without saying. :laugh:

[Gunny]

1. It's a funny think, when you can visually see the fighter and is hot able to track this target. All the electronic is shut down and the only thing you have are black monitors of radars. Very encouraging. Tell me frankly, did you serve in the Army?
2. I know what you are trying to speak about. I am familiar with the results of their tests.
And now do enjoy a clip and think the subject over yourself. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

Russian Destroyer war ship in storm


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANv3rMZ-tA0&spfreload=10

I AM a United States Marine. I'll take a sword and hack your head off. You and and any of your commie fuckwit buddies. I'm just that mean and just that talented. War is my game.

You think your pissant dumb ass can take on a guided missle destroyer. Go for it.

You aren't here for honest discouse. You're here to post propaganda. You can take your propoaganda and shove it up your ass. Destroying things is my job. You can't be first, but you CAN be next.

[aboutime]

This entire thread is nothing but a BALU....EXERCISE IN B.S.!

Balu believes all the UNTRUE Propaganda, and I personally find this entire thread HILARIOUS, and LAUGHABLE.

Balu could qualify as an Easily-Led Obama supporter who would happily be welcomed by the DNC.

I love it! Looks like the Russian people are just as gullible as the uninformed, uneducated Americans.:laugh:

[aboutime]

I AM a United States Marine. I'll take a sword and hack your head off. You and and any of your commie fuckwit buddies. I'm just that mean and just that talented. War is my game.

You think your pissant dumb ass can take on a guided missle destroyer. Go for it.

You aren't here for honest discouse. You're here to post propaganda. You can take your propoaganda and shove it up your ass. Destroying things is my job. You can't be first, but you CAN be next.

Gunny. Don't let this turd get your goat. Wish I could post some of the video/photo's from my years aboard a U.S. Navy Guided Missile Destroyer back in the 80's.
The video of the Russian ship in High Sea's is HONESTLY....nothing special, or unusual. We TIN-CAN sailors can make Carrier Sailors feel like Puking with our stories. And, I know YOU have been on Gator's that bounced around like Ping Pong Balls...even at the pier.
My first ship was an LPD back in the 60's. We called it a L arge P lastic D uck, and had races to see how many footprints we could put on the Main Deck Passageway in Rough seas.
Let them brag, and think whatever they want. BS only needs SHOVELS to get DEEPER.

[Balu]

Gunny. Don't let this turd get your goat. Wish I could post some of the video/photo's from my years aboard a U.S. Navy Guided Missile Destroyer back in the 80's.
The video of the Russian ship in High Sea's is HONESTLY....nothing special, or unusual. We TIN-CAN sailors can make Carrier Sailors feel like Puking with our stories. And, I know YOU have been on Gator's that bounced around like Ping Pong Balls...even at the pier.
My first ship was an LPD back in the 60's. We called it a L arge P lastic D uck, and had races to see how many footprints we could put on the Main Deck Passageway in Rough seas.
Let them brag, and think whatever they want. BS only needs SHOVELS to get DEEPER.
And now try to imaging the employment of laser guns under these conditions. So, no need to speak about excavators or ditchers. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

[aboutime]

And now try to imaging the employment of laser guns under these conditions. So, no need to speak about excavators or ditchers. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

Yeah. GREAT IDEA. By the way. The U.S. Air Force, and U.S. Navy have been experimenting with lasers for years. In fact. TWO of them, both shipboard, and airborne....have been tested successfully.
Which one would you prefer to experience if YOU were at sea?

[Balu]

Yeah. GREAT IDEA. By the way. The U.S. Air Force, and U.S. Navy have been experimenting with lasers for years. In fact. TWO of them, both shipboard, and airborne....have been tested successfully.
Which one would you prefer to experience if YOU were at sea?
May be only in windless, cloudless daytime weather when the sea was calm and there was no turbulence and maneuvering target. This conditions are suitable to achieve some positive results. Combat ships and air cratfs are not space crafts at all. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

[aboutime]

May be only in windless, cloudless daytime weather when the sea was calm and there was no turbulence and maneuvering target. This conditions are suitable to achieve some positive results. Combat ships and air cratfs are not space crafts at all. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

Never mind. Find someone else who will fall for your propaganda.

[Balu]

Never mind. Find someone else who will fall for your propaganda.
I would suggest you to think about a stabilizing systems and the required angle accuracy to be achieved, instead of permanent repeating the word 'propaganda'. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

[aboutime]

I would suggest you to think about a stabilizing systems and the required angle accuracy to be achieved, instead of permanent repeating the word 'propaganda'. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

I call them, the way I see them. If you disagree. That is your problem. Not mine. As we say here in America.

"I wasn't born yesterday. So I recognize that word, no matter how much you deny it!"

Do you have any idea what 30 Years in the U.S.Navy means? Because I am TOO OLD for you to understand. Doesn't mean I have forgotten all of those years.

[Balu]

I call them, the way I see them. If you disagree. That is your problem. Not mine. As we say here in America.

"I wasn't born yesterday. So I recognize that word, no matter how much you deny it!"

Do you have any idea what 30 Years in the U.S.Navy means? Because I am TOO OLD for you to understand. Doesn't mean I have forgotten all of those years.

30 years in the Navy may mens everything. It depends on your position. The higher it is, the farer you can see. You must agree that there is a difference between a Seaman Apprentice and a Captain and the class of the combat ship you served in. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif
And, today, June the 1-st., I am celebrating my 65-th anniversary. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/drinks.gif

[SassyLady]

How funny!

The Russian pilot was very careful not to fire up his targeting systems because he knew that he and that plane would have been vaporized within seconds.

Demoralized because of a flyby? LOL

Come on, Balu, you can do better than that.

If you Russians are wanting to demoralize the U.S. Navy sailors, you're going to have to sink their ship. Otherwise, I'm afraid you have no way to demoralize them.



Your guns are cute. It's nice that you've caught up to U.S. technology in use since 1973. Have you seen the new lasers that we're installing on our warships and warplanes?

Even then they wouldn't be demoralize them ... they would be pissed! And you don't want to piss us off!

[SassyLady]

May be only in windless, cloudless daytime weather when the sea was calm and there was no turbulence and maneuvering target. This conditions are suitable to achieve some positive results. Combat ships and air cratfs are not space crafts at all. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

NEMP, HEMP, EMP 1, 2 or 3 ... take your pick. Sink one of our ships and you'll get one or all.

[Noir]

....so it would appear that Russians are actually Cylons?! :tinfoil:

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

....so it would appear that Russians are actually Cylons?! :tinfoil:

If you think that they represent only an imaginary threat you are dead wrong. Putin may be a ruthless leader but he is a true leader while we have the lame-ass , marxist/muslim type community organizer.. Our plus is obama himself isn't the military-we still have a great military but as CIC obama controls it, that means its weak by default.. -Tyr

[Balu]

If you think that they represent only an imaginary threat you are dead wrong. Putin may be a ruthless leader but he is a true leader while we have the lame-ass , marxist/muslim type community organizer.. Our plus is obama himself isn't the military-we still have a great military but as CIC obama controls it, that means its weak by default.. -Tyr

We really respect our President, the majority of Russians, so he has such high ratings in our country. Не is very strong (in all respects) and clever. I hope you saw him on his press conferences and noticed how much information he keeps in his head, enabling him to answer all the questions of hand. His answers are always clear and distinct. But humanly, I feel sorry for him. He really plows like a galley slave. If he is strong enough and haven't make serious mistakes, I will vote for him for his second period, should he be nominated as a candidate for election.

[Gunny]

We really respect our President, the majority of Russians, so he has such high ratings in our country. Не is very strong (in all respects) and clever. I hope you saw him on his press conferences and noticed how much information he keeps in his head, enabling him to answer all the questions of hand. His answers are always clear and distinct. But humanly, I feel sorry for him. He really plows like a galley slave. If he is strong enough and haven't make serious mistakes, I will vote for him for his second period, should he be nominated as a candidate for election.

Gee ... let me be all diplomatic ... you're full of shit. The blatant lies you post are the proof.

Putin is playing a fool and getting away with it because our fool wears lacy pink panties. He didn't pull this crap on Bush, and he's going to tuck in his balls when we get a real President back.

In the meantime and for all your posturing, go ahead and fire on a US Naval vessel. Ain't nobody on that boat going to wait for Presidential approval to blow your commie asses out of the sky. We have the Right to defend ourselves against an immediate (non) threat -- because y'all can't threaten anything but little old ladies -- Your pilots couldn't take on OUR pilots if someone drugged our pilots. You'd think y'all'd learn a lesson with that 50 to 1 kill ratio in Vietnam.

And your ratings are a sham. Fear doesn't equal popularity.

[Jeff]

Gee ... let me be all diplomatic ... you're full of shit. The blatant lies you post are the proof.

Putin is playing a fool and getting away with it because our fool wears lacy pink panties. He didn't pull this crap on Bush, and he's going to tuck in his balls when we get a real President back.

In the meantime and for all your posturing, go ahead and fire on a US Naval vessel. Ain't nobody on that boat going to wait for Presidential approval to blow your commie asses out of the sky. We have the Right to defend ourselves against an immediate (non) threat -- because y'all can't threaten anything but little old ladies -- Your pilots couldn't take on OUR pilots if someone drugged our pilots. You'd think y'all'd learn a lesson with that 50 to 1 kill ratio in Vietnam.

And your ratings are a sham. Fear doesn't equal popularity.

I have to spread them before giving them again, but great post. I was waiting for someone to set the record straight without being politically correct !!! :thumb:

[namvet]

"A good face on a bad game." (c) What else could they say?! Let us see the other " non-professional act" (I wonder, who is professional and who is not not.) http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/derisive.gif

March 23, 2015
Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

<tbody>
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/klk1.jpg



</tbody>
The Naval Surface Forces (NSF (http://eng.mil.ru/en/structure/forces/navy/structure/surface_forces.htm)) of the Ministry of Defense (MoD (http://eng.mil.ru/)) are reporting today that three nuclear-powered Akula-class submarines belonging to the 24th Submarine Division of the Northern Fleet (NF (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Fleet)) successfully “war-gamed” the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (http://www.roosevelt.navy.mil/) [photo 2nd left] causing it to “flee in terror” towards the waters off the Hampshire coast in the United Kingdom.
Within hours of the NSF reporting this critical incident, it’s interesting to note, British press sources confirmed that this US Navy behemoth of “100,000 tons of firepower (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3006792/100-000-tons-U-S-firepower-big-dock-Portsmouth-Aircraft-carrier-USS-Theodore-Roosevelt-anchors-Hampshire-coast-arriving-UK-five-day-visit.html)” did indeed dock off Stokes Bay in Gosport stunning the thousands of spectators who jammed roads and lined the banks of the River Solent to see it, but which they, also, described as a port call, though none had been scheduled.
According to this NSF report, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, and its combat escort ships, had been detected on a course towards the operating zone of the Northern Fleet which President Putin had put on full combat alert last week (http://fox6now.com/2015/03/16/amid-nato-exercises-russia-puts-northern-fleet-on-full-alert/) in response to a “State of War” threat (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1846.htm) detected from the United Kingdom…a threat, the MoD adds to this report, was, likewise, in response to the Federations “Shock of March” battle plan revealed on 4 February (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1835.htm).
With NATO forces, literally, lining the entire western border with troops (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-21/nato-launches-wide-scale-war-games-near-russian-border-creates-line-troops), including the unprecedented US Army’s “Dragon Ride” armored convoy (http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/03/22/402924/US-military-parade-across-eastern-europe) currently winding its way across six European nations, and Norway’s equally unprecedented “Joint Viking” combat war moves against the northern border (http://rt.com/news/239209-nato-norway-viking-drills/), this report continues, President Putin himself gave the order to “target and disable” the USS Theodore Roosevelt.
As Russia had warned its citizens last week to prepare for nuclear war (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1850.htm), and Moscow’s bomb shelters began to fill (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1848.htm) in response to the dire first-strike nuclear attack being planned by the US (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1849.htm), and nearly all of the Federations military forces being on full combat alert (http://rt.com/news/241745-russia-offensive-defense-drills/) across all 9 time zones (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJNuxi5wq6Y), this report further notes, the approach of the USS Theodore Roosevelt towards the Baltic Sea made it a “legitimate” target.
To how this US aircraft carrier was “disabled” by the Northern Fleet’s attack submarines, this report says, was due to the Federations successful implementation of “magrav technology (https://www.thenewenergyindustry.com/magrav-technology-cd-version-01/)” weapons which had previously been used against American warships, and had “disabled” them too.
In fact, NSF experts in this report state, it was only a few weeks ago that the USS Theodore Roosevelt was “sunk” by a French submarine (http://theaviationist.com/2015/03/05/us-aircraft-carrier-sunk-by-subs/) using “magrav technology” off the coast of Florida during a war game wherein the Americans were testing their countermeasures against this revolutionary new weapon prior to their ships deployment to confront Northern Fleet forces.
The necessity of the US Navy to develop countermeasures against “magrav technology”, this report says, was clearly shown to them last year after Federation air forces completely disabled the feared AEGIS destroyer USS Donald Cook in the Black Sea (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/). So demoralizing was this attack against the USS Donald Cook, when it limped into a Romanian port for repairs, all 27 of its officers put in for reassignment and/or retirement (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/).
“Magrav technology”, its import to note, was conceived by the Iranian-born nuclear engineer Mehran Keshe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehran_Tavakoli_Keshe) [photo 3rd left], but whose works are banned from public use in the United States under an Executive Order signed by President Obama on 23 April 2012 (https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/23/executive-order-blocking-property-and-suspending-entry-united-states-cer).
President Obama’s signing of his Executive Order against “magrav technology”, it should be remembered, was due to the Iranian’s using it to down, and then capture one of the United States most secretive and sophisticated drones (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-16095823) in December, 2011, and then Iran sharing this new weapon with Syria too.
Immediately upon President Obama banning “magrav technology” in 2012, it should also be noted, Mehran Keshe replied to the American leader in an open letter by stating: ...

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1853.htm


great wallpaper. other than that............

[aboutime]

great wallpaper. other than that............


namvet. Too bad the propaganda jerks aren't smart enough to know....WE KNOW DIFFERENT?

Then again. Maybe they believe the Iranian reports about how their motor boats SANK a U.S. Carrier in
the Persian Gulf. But they forgot to tell the GULLIBLE..it was just a phony target to brag about???

Let them see for themselves...
http://youtu.be/s9eLN4IBmo0

[namvet]

1. It's a funny think, when you can visually see the fighter and is hot able to track this target. All the electronic is shut down and the only thing you have are black monitors of radars. Very encouraging. Tell me frankly, did you serve in the Army?
2. I know what you are trying to speak about. I am familiar with the results of their tests.
And now do enjoy a clip and think the subject over yourself. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

Russian Destroyer war ship in storm


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANv3rMZ-tA0&spfreload=10


hell that's good fishing weather. how bout some greasy pizza ???

[aboutime]

hell that's good fishing weather. how bout some greasy pizza ???


namvet. Our new Russian friend seems to be under the impression that our navy STOPS defending itself in bad weather because the sea's are too rough???
If JOHN KERRY was there...he'd be right. The WINTER SOLDIER/SAILOR is gonna get another Purple Heart for his BIKE accident today too!

Let's let them keep on thinking that. Whatever trips their (pardon the pun) TRIGGER!


Personally. I used to enjoy rough weather at sea. In fact. I find myself missing it more every day.

It's not for everybody. But it really is more fun, watching green faces, and having no competition in the Chow line.

[namvet]

namvet. Too bad the propaganda jerks aren't smart enough to know....WE KNOW DIFFERENT?

Then again. Maybe they believe the Iranian reports about how their motor boats SANK a U.S. Carrier in
the Persian Gulf. But they forgot to tell the GULLIBLE..it was just a phony target to brag about???

Let them see for themselves...
http://youtu.be/s9eLN4IBmo0

probably filmed in a bathtub :coffee:

[namvet]

namvet. Our new Russian friend seems to be under the impression that our navy STOPS defending itself in bad weather because the sea's are too rough???
If JOHN KERRY was there...he'd be right. The WINTER SOLDIER/SAILOR is gonna get another Purple Heart for his BIKE accident today too!

Let's let them keep on thinking that. Whatever trips their (pardon the pun) TRIGGER!


Personally. I used to enjoy rough weather at sea. In fact. I find myself missing it more every day.

It's not for everybody. But it really is more fun, watching green faces, and having no competition in the Chow line.

greasy pizza is what they always served our first night at sea. then a mad dash for the rail by the new guys and up it comes

[namvet]

http://picsoff.com/files/glamgalz/imgs/misc/military_women_04.jpg

good lookin' bitch's




but we have a lot more fun

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/11/21/23603AF400000578-0-image-9_1416591848069.jpg

[namvet]

also i was just wondering Mr ruskie, how ya gonna handle these??

http://u5aq4437zm120nck735bj1c6.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/25.-sub-life.jpg

[Balu]

also i was just wondering Mr ruskie, how ya gonna handle these??

http://u5aq4437zm120nck735bj1c6.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/25.-sub-life.jpg

Elementary! By anti-submarine missiles and torpedoes. Have ever heard of these, boy? http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif
Judging by your posts I am inclined to think that your rank in the Navy was not higher, than non-commissioned officer. Am I right? http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

[namvet]

Elementary! By anti-submarine missiles and torpedoes. Have ever heard of these, boy? http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif
Judging by your posts I am inclined to think that your rank in the Navy was not higher, than non-commissioned officer. Am I right? http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

ah your up. having your vodka breakfast??? say Ivan you can't hit what you can't see child. 2000 ft down in that big ocean. exactly where is it?? also it can "hear" anything coming. ill tell ya a little secret. there's boomers right off your coast line. 28 trident missiles per boat. that's a lot of nukes up your communist ass's. we can turn Russia into solid glass. and little puty knows it eh ??
I was an E-5. there start thumbing thru your book. and you Ivan. tell us all. did you serve?? or are you a momma's boy???

say when does YOUR dangerous submarines get underway up there at Kola peninsula???


http://i61.tinypic.com/bk5cz.jpg


http://i57.tinypic.com/96ccnk.jpg


http://i57.tinypic.com/aetls9.jpg

love how you use all that rust for camouflage :laugh::laugh::laugh:

say how bout some morning Russian music. you'll luv this


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKD7g56DNN0

comon IVAN shake it for us HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA................:dance:

[Gunny]

great wallpaper. other than that............

When do I quit laughing? A French boat sank something?:laugh::laugh::laugh:

[Gunny]

hell that's good fishing weather. how bout some greasy pizza ???

I'l go with a Grade D, not fit for human consumption double cheeseburger, rot gut coffee and some Gummy Bears. :)

[Gunny]

greasy pizza is what they always served our first night at sea. then a mad dash for the rail by the new guys and up it comes

I love it. The ship's a ghost town for 2 weeks. :laugh: I had a black Marine that turned green.:laugh:

[Gunny]

Elementary! By anti-submarine missiles and torpedoes. Have ever heard of these, boy? http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif
Judging by your posts I am inclined to think that your rank in the Navy was not higher, than non-commissioned officer. Am I right? http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/smile3.gif

Good luck with that.

Did you just dis NCO's? Let me guess, you're one of those uneducated asshats that think officers run the boats?

[namvet]

http://i61.tinypic.com/akbgp0.jpg

[Gunny]

http://i61.tinypic.com/akbgp0.jpg

I'm totally laughing at this crap. The USN has been unrivaled for 60+ years. And some French piece of Sh*t scared a carrier? Not in this lifetime.:laugh:

[namvet]

I'l go with a Grade D, not fit for human consumption double cheeseburger, rot gut coffee and some Gummy Bears. :)

damned. you have been in a Navy chow hall

[Gunny]

damned. you have been in a Navy chow hall

Mind you I ain't braggin'. :laugh:

[namvet]

I'm totally laughing at this crap. The USN has been unrivaled for 60+ years. And some French piece of Sh*t scared a carrier? Not in this lifetime.:laugh:

Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers, his # 7 post.

Faal is a hoax queen. surprised?? in fact no one can find her

On almost a weekly basis some outrageous claim is made in an ATS thread, and usually the topic is centered on the demise of civilization as we know it. Here are some recent threads that are based on Sorcha Faal's "research" and "insight."
Sorcha Faal... Internet Hoax Queen Courtesy of David Booth...


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread304918/pg1

and there many more. so i think this pretty much drives a nail thru this fuckers head




<tbody>

</tbody>

[Gunny]

Terrified US Aircraft Carrier Flees From Russian Subs To UK Safety
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers, his # 7 post.

Faal is a hoax queen. surprised?? in fact no one can find her

On almost a weekly basis some outrageous claim is made in an ATS thread, and usually the topic is centered on the demise of civilization as we know it. Here are some recent threads that are based on Sorcha Faal's "research" and "insight."
Sorcha Faal... Internet Hoax Queen Courtesy of David Booth...


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread304918/pg1

and there many more. so i think this pretty much drives a nail thru this fuckers head




<tbody>

</tbody>



Like I said ...I know two things about squids .... don't f*ck with their boats AND ... don't f*ck with their boats. Anybody that thinks they can scare off a carrier is just pipe dreaming. But the French couldn't scare my kitten. :laugh:

[Balu]

... tell us all. did you serve?? or are you a momma's boy???


Hey, you, Dick! In terms of US insignia I would have had "chickens" on my shoulder straps.
And then, boy, I would never let anybody to speak to me in this manner. So you are the second in my ignore list. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/dirol.gif

[namvet]

Hey, you, Dick! In terms of US insignia I would have had "chickens" on my shoulder straps.
And then, boy, I would never let anybody to speak to me in this manner. So you are the second in my ignore list. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/dirol.gif

yessir mr chicken shit

http://i.imgur.com/3ajh7LB.jpg

[aboutime]

Like I said ...I know two things about squids .... don't f*ck with their boats AND ... don't f*ck with their boats. Anybody that thinks they can scare off a carrier is just pipe dreaming. But the French couldn't scare my kitten. :laugh:

namvet. Every time I was aboard a Navy ship that visited either Italy, or France. We never failed to hear the jokes about their NAVY SHIPS from the 2nd World War, and....how, If we wanted to see them. We'd have to climb aboard GLASS BOTTOMED BOATS to see what they looked like!:laugh:

Come to think of it now. This reminds me of the Many RUSSIAN nuke subs that have had explosions, and deadly fires that took them to the Bottom. And our Russian member here...doesn't want us to remember how RUSSIAN authorities in their Navy, and the Kremlin...asked for AMERICAN NAVY HELP in those cases.

Guess we're just too busy Making our NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS run away from the BOOGIE MAN???

[Gunny]

Hey, you, Dick! In terms of US insignia I would have had "chickens" on my shoulder straps.
And then, boy, I would never let anybody to speak to me in this manner. So you are the second in my ignore list. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/dirol.gif

Really? The first sign of chickenshit is some wimp with an ignore list. Ain't got the balls to stand up like a man, huh?

You go right ahead and bring your sorry, commie ass. Bring "Fearless Leader" with you. I can solve the world's problems with a couple of right hooks. You like to talk the talk --- oh, no you don't -- a pussy that uses ignore.

No one can disagree with your loser ass or they get put on ignore? Go ahead. Make my day.:laugh:

[namvet]

namvet. Every time I was aboard a Navy ship that visited either Italy, or France. We never failed to hear the jokes about their NAVY SHIPS from the 2nd World War, and....how, If we wanted to see them. We'd have to climb aboard GLASS BOTTOMED BOATS to see what they looked like!:laugh:

Come to think of it now. This reminds me of the Many RUSSIAN nuke subs that have had explosions, and deadly fires that took them to the Bottom. And our Russian member here...doesn't want us to remember how RUSSIAN authorities in their Navy, and the Kremlin...asked for AMERICAN NAVY HELP in those cases.

Guess we're just too busy Making our NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS run away from the BOOGIE MAN???

I read a long time back, i think its the Arctic sea has so many Russian nuke reactors that blew up the sea floor is lit up like a Christmas tree. that and sub fires is their trademark. remember the Kursk disaster, Putin was asked by the press what happened. a brilliant come back


"IT SANK" - no shit ya think ??? :laugh::laugh:

[Gunny]

I read a long time back, i think its the Arctic sea has so many Russian nuke reactors that blew up the sea floor is lit up like a Christmas tree. that and sub fires is their trademark. remember the Kursk disaster, Putin was asked by the press what happened. a brilliant come back


"IT SANK" - no shit ya think ??? :laugh::laugh:

:laugh:

[Abbey Marie]

How you would comment this, gentlemen?

"The State Department acknowledged that the crew of the destroyer USS Donald Cook has been gravely demoralized ever since their vessel was flown over in the Black Sea by a Russian Sukhoi-24 (Su-24) fighter jet which carried neither bombs nor missiles but only an electronic warfare device. ... "


http://www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html


I would want to know who those "specialized sources" are that were referenced in the article. It's too easy to hide behind anonymity.

[Max R.]

I would want to know who those "specialized sources" are that were referenced in the article. It's too easy to hide behind anonymity.
Agreed. In fact, despite the assertions and links, none corroborated the OP's statements except that a Navy ship was overflown by a Russian Su-24. Being overflown is a common occurrence. My carrier was overflown by two Soviet Ilyushin Il-38s. It's an illegal maneuver, but if harm is done, it's an act of war.

[aboutime]

I would want to know who those "specialized sources" are that were referenced in the article. It's too easy to hide behind anonymity.


Abbey. Those "Specialized Sources" are, and generally can be identified as "Propaganda Experts".

Propaganda is their game, and they always prey on the Uninformed, Under-educated, and Easily-led Gullible.

[namvet]

in Nam it was Russian Trawlers. back behind us like sharks rolling film of unreps to see what weapons are being transferred and warning the North of incoming air attacks

http://i61.tinypic.com/152ezbb.jpg
AGI Russian Trawler heading across the
Bonnie Dick's Starboard Bow

you've heard of Russian roulette. that's what this fucker is doing. cutting in front of one of our carriers to force an emergency break away. in this case it was the Bonhomme Richard

Vietnam 1967 a "whale tale"

http://www.usshancockcv19.com/oralhistory/vietnam-1967_a_whale_tale.shtml




<b style="color: rgb(0, 0, 128); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; text-align: -webkit-center; background-color: rgb(192, 192, 192);"><big>


</big></b>

[aboutime]

in Nam it was Russian Trawlers. back behind us like sharks rolling film of unreps to see what weapons are being transferred and warning the North of incoming air attacks

http://i61.tinypic.com/152ezbb.jpg
AGI Russian Trawler heading across the
Bonnie Dick's Starboard Bow

you've heard of Russian roulette. that's what this fucker is doing. cutting in front of one of our carriers to force an emergency break away. in this case it was the Bonhomme Richard

Vietnam 1967 a "whale tale"

http://www.usshancockcv19.com/oralhistory/vietnam-1967_a_whale_tale.shtml




<b style="color: rgb(0, 0, 128); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; text-align: -webkit-center; background-color: rgb(192, 192, 192);"><big>


</big></b>



namvet. Totally agree, and remember a few of those AGI's as well. Oddly enough. We also saw many of them shadowing most of our ships down around Cuba, when we were operating out of Gitmo during Refresher Training. Saw them in the Med, South Atlantic, Red Sea, and Indian Ocean too.
Had several close calls where they intentionally crossed our bow by miles. Almost looking for trouble.
The BEAR'S overflying our ships, and off our Coast Lines may be ODD for civilians. But most of us who served at sea sort of got used to their weekly visits...NOBODY WANTED TO TALK ABOUT.

[namvet]

namvet. Totally agree, and remember a few of those AGI's as well. Oddly enough. We also saw many of them shadowing most of our ships down around Cuba, when we were operating out of Gitmo during Refresher Training. Saw them in the Med, South Atlantic, Red Sea, and Indian Ocean too.
Had several close calls where they intentionally crossed our bow by miles. Almost looking for trouble.
The BEAR'S overflying our ships, and off our Coast Lines may be ODD for civilians. But most of us who served at sea sort of got used to their weekly visits...NOBODY WANTED TO TALK ABOUT.

im surprised some of em didn't get plowed under. my unrep station was on the bridge manning the ship to ship phones. or CO to CO and I heard a lot of carrier CO's threaten to do just that. plow em under and let DC sort it out. most if not all CO's over there were ww2 vets and got a belly full of this crap

[aboutime]

im surprised some of em didn't get plowed under. my unrep station was on the bridge manning the ship to ship phones. or CO to CO and I heard a lot of carrier CO's threaten to do just that. plow em under and let DC sort it out. most if not all CO's over there were ww2 vets and got a belly full of this crap

I spent a lot of time on the signal bridge when I wasn't on watch in radio. Had good friends up there since I was a former Signalman converted to Radioman. We'd use the BIG EYES with our resident Spook onboard, who came to take pictures, and report to D.C. via message.

Funny thing was. When we looked at those out on deck. They all looked like they wished they were somewhere else. Those ugly looking boats always looked like they needed paint....but all the Antenna's that were supposed to be FISHING GEAR? didn't fool anybody.
I remember hearing the CO, and XO making jokes...and didn't know officers knew all the SWEAR WORDS like the rest of us.:laugh:

[namvet]

I spent a lot of time on the signal bridge when I wasn't on watch in radio. Had good friends up there since I was a former Signalman converted to Radioman. We'd use the BIG EYES with our resident Spook onboard, who came to take pictures, and report to D.C. via message.

Funny thing was. When we looked at those out on deck. They all looked like they wished they were somewhere else. Those ugly looking boats always looked like they needed paint....but all the Antenna's that were supposed to be FISHING GEAR? didn't fool anybody.
I remember hearing the CO, and XO making jokes...and didn't know officers knew all the SWEAR WORDS like the rest of us.:laugh:

I was an RM to pal RM2/E-5 when I left

https://scontent-dfw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/1913940_1176972078393_5039684_n.jpg?oh=ecaf23b2de7 bae9a392c6a58dc69820b&oe=55F6302B

[Gunny]

Hey, you, Dick! In terms of US insignia I would have had "chickens" on my shoulder straps.
And then, boy, I would never let anybody to speak to me in this manner. So you are the second in my ignore list. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/standart/dirol.gif

That what y'all Ivans wear on your shoulder straps? Oh, you wouldn't know. You'd have to earn them. One thing I hate worse than a Russian soldier is a lame-ass Russian shit-talker. At least I can respect the soldiers.

My being on an ignore list just makes you a wimp.

[Gunny]

I would want to know who those "specialized sources" are that were referenced in the article. It's too easy to hide behind anonymity.

Russian Wiki. :laugh:

[Gunny]

Agreed. In fact, despite the assertions and links, none corroborated the OP's statements except that a Navy ship was overflown by a Russian Su-24. Being overflown is a common occurrence. My carrier was overflown by two Soviet Ilyushin Il-38s. It's an illegal maneuver, but if harm is done, it's an act of war.

LMAO. Did you ever have the Iranians tool out in their motor boats and shake their fists at you? We'd just stand their on the port side catwalk and flip them off. :laugh:

[Max R.]

LMAO. Did you ever have the Iranians tool out in their motor boats and shake their fists at you? We'd just stand their on the port side catwalk and flip them off. :laugh:
Never made the Persian Gulf tour, just Okinawa/Korea/Japan with the Marine Corps and the Med with the Navy. Saw a lot of Soviet boats in the Med. Came within days of going across the "Line of Death" on a DD with three battlegroups in to back us up but that op was canceled when the Iranians began mining the shipping lanes in the Gulf.

This video was made from the prep for that Op.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLaVOoSuDcA

[Gunny]

Never made the Persian Gulf tour, just Okinawa/Korea/Japan with the Marine Corps and the Med with the Navy. Saw a lot of Soviet boats in the Med. Came within days of going across the "Line of Death" on a DD with three battlegroups in to back us up but that op was canceled when the Iranians began mining the shipping lanes in the Gulf.

This video was made from the prep for that Op.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLaVOoSuDcA

Just think kitty litter box and you made the tour.:laugh:

We always picked up a guided missile destroyer and a sub when we entered the Strait. Not to mention we had 4 20 mm, microwave, radar activated chain guns that once activated, could shoot anything but turn on the ship itself at close to a thousand rounds per minute.

Just like the overflight, they'd come shake their fists because they knew we wouldn't fire. Or hoped we wouldn't. :laugh: We damned sure won't with this weak-ass President.

[aboutime]

Just think kitty litter box and you made the tour.:laugh:

We always picked up a guided missile destroyer and a sub when we entered the Strait. Not to mention we had 4 20 mm, microwave, radar activated chain guns that once activated, could shoot anything but turn on the ship itself at close to a thousand rounds per minute.

Just like the overflight, they'd come shake their fists because they knew we wouldn't fire. Or hoped we wouldn't. :laugh: We damned sure won't with this weak-ass President.


Gunny. Those chain guns were called CWIS (SeeWiz) Close In Weapon System. Every navy ship has them. NOISY suckers, but WELCOME and HANDY to have. The IRANIANS still haven't figured how to EVADE them without losing everything!:laugh:
The Iranian propaganda film that shows all of their Fast Boats lined up during an attack...would never show a U.S. NAVY ship defending itself using the CWIS, BECAUSE....all those fast boats would become INVISIBLE, and nothing but Scraps of junk.:laugh:

[Gunny]

Gunny. Those chain guns were called CWIS (SeeWiz) Close In Weapon System. Every navy ship has them. NOISY suckers, but WELCOME and HANDY to have. The IRANIANS still haven't figured how to EVADE them without losing everything!:laugh:
The Iranian propaganda film that shows all of their Fast Boats lined up during an attack...would never show a U.S. NAVY ship defending itself using the CWIS, BECAUSE....all those fast boats would become INVISIBLE, and nothing but Scraps of junk.:laugh:

Tell you waht Balu (named after a bear from the Jungle Book) ....

Go ahead and f*ck with one of our squids. Make it special and screw with a green-side Doc. You won't even know what the f*ck hit you. A US aircraft carrier has more firepower than a WWII squadron. Hell, a Bell Supercobra has more firepower than a B-17.

You're just lucky the Captain showed some superior self control and didn't put your lame-ass bird in the drink.

[namvet]

http://s3-media2.ak.yelpcdn.com/bphoto/zSAFzwTSJcjfBRpS-dlttQ/o.jpg

can you hear us now ???