Kathianne
04-30-2015, 12:58 PM
Whoops, not ranch but Foundation, all is not calm:
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/clinton-foundation-bill-hillary-chelsea-117505.html
<header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: proxima-nova, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Clinton Foundation in campaign tailspin
Donors are having second thoughts about big giving as accusations fly about Hillary Clinton’s role.
</header><footer class="meta" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: proxima-nova, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">By Kenneth P. Vogel (http://www.politico.com/reporters/KennethPVogel.html)
<time datetime="2015-04-30T06:02-05:00" style="box-sizing: border-box;">4/30/15 6:02 AM EDT</time>
Updated <time datetime="2015-04-30T11:42-05:00" style="box-sizing: border-box;">4/30/15 11:42 AM EDT</time>
</footer>
A handful of deep-pocketed donors are reconsidering their gifts to the $2 billion Clinton Foundation amid mounting questions about how it’s spending their money and suggestions of influence peddling, according to donors and others familiar with the foundation’s fundraising.
One major donor who contributed at least $500,000 to the foundation last year said a 2015 donation is less likely because of revelations about sloppy record-keeping (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/clinton-foundation-made-mistakes-117369.html) and huge payments for travel (http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/clinton-foundation-travel-expenses-113053.html) and administrative costs.
“There are a lot of factors and the reputational is among them,” said the donor, who did not want to be identified discussing philanthropic plans that have not been finalized. “We had some questions about how the money was being spent — and that was long before the problems were in the press.”
At least three other major donors also are re-evaluating whether to continue giving large donations to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, according to people familiar with its fundraising.
They say increasing financial pressures and escalating outside scrutiny have sparked sometimes intense internal debates about the priorities and future of a pioneering charitable vehicle that was supposed to cement the family’s legacy.
The uncertainty comes at the beginning of what was supposed to have been a four-month victory lap of sorts — starting with Bill and Chelsea Clinton’s trip to Africa with major donors (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/bill-clintons-africa-entourage-117445.html) this week. Next week’s splashy Clinton Global Initiative conference in Marrakesh (https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative/meetings/cgi-middle-east-africa) was originally supposed to have been followed by a lavish reception and conference in Athens in June, and finally a September extravaganza in Manhattan featuring an appearance by Elton John.Instead, it’s turned into heartburn for Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination and for the foundation, which has been under increasing pressure to distance itself from its more controversial partners.
It scrapped early internal conversations about borrowing a private plane owned by Canadian billionaire donor Frank Giustra — whose business ties to Russia have brought recent scrutiny (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0) — to fly the delegation to Africa, according to sources with knowledge of the foundation’s planning (the foundation would not say who owns the plane that was ultimately used, which suffered engine problems Wednesday and was forced to make an unscheduled landing (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bill-clintons-plane-makes-unscheduled-landing-in-tanzania/)).
And it canceled the Athens conference amid what foundation sources describe as concerns about damaging Hillary Clinton’s campaign by collaborating with a Greek government that is increasingly close (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11523565/Alexis-Tsipras-risks-fresh-schism-with-Europe-warning-of-new-Cold-War-with-Putin.html) to Russia’s combative president Vladimir Putin.
Bill Clinton did not want to cancel the meeting, the sources said. They said the foundation had already booked a hotel and secured more than $1 million in funding from former Greek parliamentarian Gianna Angelopoulos, a major foundation donor who is friendly with the former (http://www.greeknewsonline.com/greece-is-back-samaras-told-greek-american-businessmen/)president (http://www.greeknewsonline.com/greece-is-back-samaras-told-greek-american-businessmen/).Meanwhile, the Clintons’ daughter, Chelsea Clinton, objected to a suggestion that a high-profile program she spearheads, the Clinton Global Initiative University, be scaled back because it is as much as $700,000 in the red, say the sources. At a foundation staff meeting this month the day after her mother stepped down (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/hillary-clinton-2016-quits-clinton-foundation-116905.html) from the foundation board and announced her campaign for president, Chelsea Clinton defended CGI U’s value, calling the program, which holds free college events to encourage student participation in service projects, the most “pure” platform at CGI, according to the foundation sources familiar with the meeting.
...
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/clinton-foundation-bill-hillary-chelsea-117505.html
<header style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: proxima-nova, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Clinton Foundation in campaign tailspin
Donors are having second thoughts about big giving as accusations fly about Hillary Clinton’s role.
</header><footer class="meta" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: proxima-nova, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">By Kenneth P. Vogel (http://www.politico.com/reporters/KennethPVogel.html)
<time datetime="2015-04-30T06:02-05:00" style="box-sizing: border-box;">4/30/15 6:02 AM EDT</time>
Updated <time datetime="2015-04-30T11:42-05:00" style="box-sizing: border-box;">4/30/15 11:42 AM EDT</time>
</footer>
A handful of deep-pocketed donors are reconsidering their gifts to the $2 billion Clinton Foundation amid mounting questions about how it’s spending their money and suggestions of influence peddling, according to donors and others familiar with the foundation’s fundraising.
One major donor who contributed at least $500,000 to the foundation last year said a 2015 donation is less likely because of revelations about sloppy record-keeping (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/clinton-foundation-made-mistakes-117369.html) and huge payments for travel (http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/clinton-foundation-travel-expenses-113053.html) and administrative costs.
“There are a lot of factors and the reputational is among them,” said the donor, who did not want to be identified discussing philanthropic plans that have not been finalized. “We had some questions about how the money was being spent — and that was long before the problems were in the press.”
At least three other major donors also are re-evaluating whether to continue giving large donations to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, according to people familiar with its fundraising.
They say increasing financial pressures and escalating outside scrutiny have sparked sometimes intense internal debates about the priorities and future of a pioneering charitable vehicle that was supposed to cement the family’s legacy.
The uncertainty comes at the beginning of what was supposed to have been a four-month victory lap of sorts — starting with Bill and Chelsea Clinton’s trip to Africa with major donors (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/bill-clintons-africa-entourage-117445.html) this week. Next week’s splashy Clinton Global Initiative conference in Marrakesh (https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative/meetings/cgi-middle-east-africa) was originally supposed to have been followed by a lavish reception and conference in Athens in June, and finally a September extravaganza in Manhattan featuring an appearance by Elton John.Instead, it’s turned into heartburn for Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination and for the foundation, which has been under increasing pressure to distance itself from its more controversial partners.
It scrapped early internal conversations about borrowing a private plane owned by Canadian billionaire donor Frank Giustra — whose business ties to Russia have brought recent scrutiny (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0) — to fly the delegation to Africa, according to sources with knowledge of the foundation’s planning (the foundation would not say who owns the plane that was ultimately used, which suffered engine problems Wednesday and was forced to make an unscheduled landing (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bill-clintons-plane-makes-unscheduled-landing-in-tanzania/)).
And it canceled the Athens conference amid what foundation sources describe as concerns about damaging Hillary Clinton’s campaign by collaborating with a Greek government that is increasingly close (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11523565/Alexis-Tsipras-risks-fresh-schism-with-Europe-warning-of-new-Cold-War-with-Putin.html) to Russia’s combative president Vladimir Putin.
Bill Clinton did not want to cancel the meeting, the sources said. They said the foundation had already booked a hotel and secured more than $1 million in funding from former Greek parliamentarian Gianna Angelopoulos, a major foundation donor who is friendly with the former (http://www.greeknewsonline.com/greece-is-back-samaras-told-greek-american-businessmen/)president (http://www.greeknewsonline.com/greece-is-back-samaras-told-greek-american-businessmen/).Meanwhile, the Clintons’ daughter, Chelsea Clinton, objected to a suggestion that a high-profile program she spearheads, the Clinton Global Initiative University, be scaled back because it is as much as $700,000 in the red, say the sources. At a foundation staff meeting this month the day after her mother stepped down (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/hillary-clinton-2016-quits-clinton-foundation-116905.html) from the foundation board and announced her campaign for president, Chelsea Clinton defended CGI U’s value, calling the program, which holds free college events to encourage student participation in service projects, the most “pure” platform at CGI, according to the foundation sources familiar with the meeting.
...