Were you wondering what the Fed govt is spending your money on?

[Little-Acorn]

From the Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2012 edition, published by the Federal government.

The government has decided not to publish this annual accounting any more. Look at the graph below to understand why.

[Little-Acorn]

As usual, the liberals won't touch this subject with a ten-foot pole. Who can blame them for being afraid of the truth?

[darin]

not specifically authorized by the constitution doesn't necessarily mean 'illegal'. But yup. Ours is now a nation of takers - weak, and prime for collapse.

[Little-Acorn]

not specifically authorized by the constitution doesn't necessarily mean 'illegal'.
Actually, that's exactly what it means. Illegal for the Fed govt to do. See the 10th amendment. And keep in mind the basic purpose for the Constitution in the first place: It was the instrument by which the People gave authority to the Federal government in the first place. If they didn't give it, the Fed didn't have it.

[fj1200]

Actually, that's exactly what it means. Illegal for the Fed govt to do.

Which is merely opinion.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Which is merely opinion.


Which is exactly what you just gave.....:laugh:

See how that works? ;)--Tyr





The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
10th Amendment


Annotations
Reserved Powers
Scope and Purpose
Effect of Provision on Federal Powers
Federal Taxing Powers
Federal Police Power
Federal Regulations Affecting State Activities and Instrumentalities
- See more at: http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment10.html#sthash.Fevse4a8.dpuf

[fj1200]

Which is exactly what you just gave.....:laugh:

See how that works? ;)--Tyr

Where did I disagree?

Try again.

[darin]

Lots of legal actions are not included in the constitution. (Shrug). Google it

[fj1200]

Lots of legal actions are not included in the constitution. (Shrug). Google it

And the legislature doesn't ask SCOTUS to rule prior to legislation, it's afterward and things are "constitutional" until they're not and too often things stay constitutional.