Why Body Cameras Will be Good for Police and Bad for Blacks

[LongTermGuy]

http://i1.wp.com/www.ambrosekane.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Cameras-2.jpg?resize=512%2C341

http://i1.wp.com/www.ambrosekane.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Cameras-3.jpg?resize=400%2C267
http://i1.wp.com/www.ambrosekane.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Cameras-9.jpg?resize=407%2C302

Quote:

<tbody>
`Why Body Cameras Will be Good for Police and Bad for Blacks


`If you’re a well-trained, ethical and professional law enforcement officer – which comprises the vast majority of our men and women in blue – you’ll have nothing to fear. You’ll treat people and handle your job in the same way you always have when there wasn’t a body camera attached to your uniform.

`But for those officers who are unethical and less than professional in their conduct toward the public, they’ll either get quickly rooted out or be forced to change their ways.

*Allow me to explain, however, why body cameras will be good for police officers, but generally bad for blacks.


1. Police body cameras will only help to further expose the brutal and antagonizing nature of blacks, particularly young black males. It will show how violent police encounters involving blacks are almost always provoked by the aggressive, confrontational and criminal conduct of blacks themselves.


2. Whether cops wears body cameras or no cameras at all, blacks will not stop their criminal and savage ways. The notion that blacks will automatically stop all their thuggery and piss-poor attitudes simply because a cop is recording encounters with them, is naive and wishful thinking.

3. Body camera videos will help to awaken whites from their multicultural slumber. For perhaps the first time in their lives, a good many whites will start to question the ‘blacks are innocent and oppressed while whites are evil and racist’ dogma they’ve been fed their entire lives.

When the suspect’s defense attorney or jury later watches the video footage, they’ll see a calm and perfectly reasonable police officer trying his best to communicate with an angry, self-righteous and violent thug.

This kind of encounter – ‘killing them with kindness’ – contrary to what blacks and liberals say, will not usually get black thugs to comply in the least. Black criminal types want white cops to be ‘racist’ toward them so they can manipulate the system and make themselves appear innocent. It’s their way of escaping accountability for their crimes.

When cops do the opposite, it disrupts their entire goal when questioned or detained.`

http://www.ambrosekane.com/2014/12/0...ad-for-blacks/ (http://www.ambrosekane.com/2014/12/03/why-body-cameras-will-be-good-for-police-and-bad-for-blacks/)




*Ouch! Keep reading

</tbody>

[LongTermGuy]

* more:

4. ``Police body cameras prove, as many of us already know, that blacks are a ‘special people’ that must always be monitored by the authorities. Due to their disproportionate levels of crimes that are higher than all other racial groups, blacks must be closely watched by the police.

`Thus, when Obama is so willing to spend hundreds of millions for police body cameras nationwide, he’s essentially declaring before all that his people need to recorded and carefully monitored.

`Oh sure, I understand that it’s the police he actually wants monitored. But little does he realize how badly this will backfire for him and how it will demonstrate before the world just how badly blacks need to be monitored in all that they do, especially when coming into contact with the police. ``

[revelarts]

really?
So far the Cameras in the Cars and stations have exposed to a mostly police reverent public that the police DO lie on and beat people on more occasions than expected.

I'm not sure how body cams are going to make such a horrible impact on Blacks or hispanics.

If cameras are so good for Police why do they want them (have had them) outlawed in some states and are constantly caught taking cameras away or asking... demanding.. ordering .. not to be filmed.

and have to be reminded that hte constitution prohibits them from infringing on the public's rights to film them.

so, sorry i don't by it.
and the articles it's laces with all kinds of race baiting language.

geez lousie
look, it seems many whites... a few here maybe? ..and the writer of this article ALREADY think blacks are mean, criminal, --add random several negative adjectives here--. I'm not sure how cameras are going to make it any worse for those "i'm not a racist butts.."

[revelarts]

Already coping with the never-ending plethora of lurking dangers that keep cops fearing for their lives, the president of the Miami-Dade Police union is outraged (http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/08/22/4304006/police-union-tries-to-block-camera.html) that the county mayor now wants cops to start wearing body cams, a move he says “can cost that officer his or her life.”
John Rivera, president the Police Benevolent Association, also said the introduction of body-mounted cameras “will distract officers from their duties, and hamper their ability to act and react in dangerous situations.”
If anything, the cameras would hamper their ability to write fabricated police reports, not to mention physically abuse citizens.
After all, the Miami-Dade Police Department not only arrested me for recording in 2012 (http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2012/11/08/not-guilty/) as well as arrested another man for recording earlier this year (http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/07/07/case-dismissed-miami-man-arrested-video-recording-arrest/), but also attacked a 14-year-old boy carrying a puppy on a beach, placing him in a chokehold (caught on video (http://gawker.com/florida-cops-choke-black-teen-holding-puppy-over-dehum-510491930)), after the teen gave them “dehumanizing stares.”
And that, of course, is the exact reason why Rivera is trying to block the introduction of body-mounted cameras into the largest law enforcement agency in the Southeast United States.
He could do without the accountability.
Ironically, even Miami-Dade police spokeswoman Nancy Perez, who arrested me for recording (http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2012/02/05/miami-dade-cop-who-arrested-me-is-a-media-spokesperson/), then had my footage deleted, only for me to recover it (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/02/journalist-recovers-video-of-his-arrest-after-police-deleted-it/) – and then was caught lying (http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2012/11/12/miami-dade-major-nancy-perez-caught-in-lie-on-witness-stand/)on the witness stand – told the media (http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2014/08/miami-dade_police_may_start_wearing_body_camera.php) that she was all for the cameras.
A police spokeswoman tells the Miami Herald that the force actually wants the cameras because they’re concerned that footage recorded by citizens with their cellphones don’t always tell the full story.
“You see the public is requesting for all police to be recorded. They’re always recording them with their phones,” said Major Nancy Perez. “This gives police a chance to record the public.”

Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez brought up the subject last week after the nation’s attention turned to Ferguson, where protesters clashed with police (http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/08/18/ferguson/) for two weeks after a cop shot an unarmed man (http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/08/10/missouri-cop-kills-unarmed-man-holding-arms-air-sparking-angry-residents-take-streets/)in an incident not caught on camera, leaving actual eye witnesses reports contradicting reports from mythical eye witnesses conjured by police. (http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/08/22/ferguson-cop-never-filled-incident-report-shooting-allowing-police-sources-spin-truth/)


http://photographyisnotacrime.com/2014/08/miami-dade-police-union-boss-fights-body-cams-claiming-get-cops-killed/


2012
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal of a controversial Illinois law prohibiting people from recording police officers on the job.

By passing on the issue, the justices left in place a federal appeals court ruling that found that the state's anti-eavesdropping law violates free-speech rights when used against people who audiotape police officers..

Illinois' eavesdropping law is one of the harshest in the country, making audio recording of a law enforcement officer — even while on duty and in public — a felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison..
..

But a federal appeals panel ruled that the law "restricts far more speech than necessary to protect legitimate privacy interests."

Chicago police Superintendent Garry McCarthy has said he would favor a change allowing citizens to tape the police and vice versa.

Meanwhile, several efforts to amend the statute in Springfield have stalled in committee amid heavy lobbying from law enforcement groups in favor of the current law.

Tribune reporter Liam Ford contributed.
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-11-26/news/chi-supreme-court-rejects-plea-to-prohibit-taping-of-police-20121126_1_cook-and-crawford-counties-police-officers-enforcement


http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/20/new-york-cops-know-people-have-a-right-t

New York Cops Know People Have a Right to Record Them; They Just Don't Care (http://reason.com/blog/2014/08/20/new-york-cops-know-people-have-a-right-t)

Jacob Sullum (http://reason.com/people/jacob-sullum/all)|<time datetime="2014-08-20T16:37:00+00:00">Aug. 20, 2014 12:37 pm



Two weeks agothe NYPD sent officers a memo (http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-cops-told-memo-filmed-article-1.1898379) reminding them that "members of the publicare legally allowed to record police interactions." Infact, "intentional interference such as blocking orobstructing cameras or ordering the person to cease constitutescensorship and also violates the First Amendment." The memosaid cops may take action against camera-wielding civilians only ifthey "interfere with police operations." The directive soundssimilar to one issued (http://reason.com/blog/2012/07/23/dc-police-officially-declare-photography) by Washington, D.C., Police Chief Cathy Lanier two yearsago. If you are wondering why such reminders are considerednecessary, it is because of incidents like this, described in afederal lawsuit (http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/dicklawsuit.pdf) filed last year by Brooklyn resident DickGeorge:....</time>On or about June 14, 2012, at approximately 6:00p.m., Plaintiff was sitting in his motor vehicle and parked ator near the intersection of Ocean Avenue and Albemarle Road,Brooklyn, New York, when he observed Lt. [Dennis] Ferber, Sgt.[Patrick] Golden and PO [Stacey] Robinson exit their unmarkedpolice vehicle and approach three young, black youths congregatedon the sidewalk and immediately begin to frisk and search them.
Plaintiff took photographs of this encounter between thedefendant police officers and the three youths with his cellulartelephone.
As the defendant police officers were returning to theirvehicle, Plaintiff commented to one of the youths that "insituations like that, next time make sure and ask to see a badgenumber or some identification from the police," or words to thateffect.
Having apparently heard what Plaintiff had said, Lt. Ferberretorted, "What did he just say to them, get our badgenumber...let's go get him," or words to that effect.
The defendant police officers then entered their police vehicleand began following Plaintiff's vehicle.

After stopping George's car, the cops roughed him up, handcuffedhim, and took him to the precinct house, where he wasstrip-searched, locked in a cell, and charged with disorderlyconduct. When he got his cellphone back after being released with adesk appearance ticket, he found that the photos of thestop-and-frisk encounter had been deleted.
According to George's complaint, the cops repeatedly told him hewas getting what he deserved for "being an activist." Ferber allegedly said something like: "Now we are going to give you whatyou deserve for meddling in our business and when we finish with you, you can sue the city for $5,000,000 and get rich. We don'tcare."
<time datetime="2014-08-20T16:37:00+00:00">That estimate was off by a factor of 40. The New York DailyNews reported (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/125g-deal-vid-stop-frisk-article-1.1906965) on Monday that the city agreed to settle George'slawsuit for $125,000. "After a thorough review of the case facts,"a lawyer for the city said, "it was in the best interest of all toresolve this matter without costly litigation and trial."....

Badges we don't need to show u no badges

</time>

[fj1200]

<tbody>
http://www.ambrosekane.com/2014/12/0...ad-for-blacks/ (http://www.ambrosekane.com/2014/12/03/why-body-cameras-will-be-good-for-police-and-bad-for-blacks/)


</tbody>


One doesn't want to overplay pointing out racists but...


A race of people that must always be closely monitored

[Drummond]

One doesn't want to overplay pointing out racists but...

Ah, playing the Al Sharpton card, eh, FJ ? Or is it the Jesse Jackson card ?

Either way, I'm sure Carter would approve ... :rolleyes::rolleyes:

To the extent that American policing is really my business .. as a measure which would prove the truthfulness of the police side of things .. I think they're a good thing.

I must admit to some slight reservation, though. The UK has the most densely populated 'CCTV population' per human head of population, anywhere on the planet -- we maybe come the closest, anywhere, to having a 'surveillance society'. So my applauding camera surveillance maybe goes against the grain a bit. Still .. in this case, they'd serve a useful purpose.

[fj1200]

Ah, playing the Al Sharpton card, eh, FJ ? Or is it the Jesse Jackson card ?

Either way, I'm sure Carter would approve ... :rolleyes::rolleyes:

To the extent that American policing is really my business .. as a measure which would prove the truthfulness of the police side of things .. I think they're a good thing.

I must admit to some slight reservation, though. The UK has the most densely populated 'CCTV population' per human head of population, anywhere on the planet -- we maybe come the closest, anywhere, to having a 'surveillance society'. So my applauding camera surveillance maybe goes against the grain a bit. Still .. in this case, they'd serve a useful purpose.

I'm pretty sure Jimmy and Mags don't approve of racism, it's a shame that you do.

I'm not sure why anyone would be opposed to transparency.

[Drummond]

I'm pretty sure Jimmy and Mags don't approve of racism, it's a shame that you do.

I'm not sure why anyone would be opposed to transparency.

I've decided to delete my reply (.. good a reply, though it was ..). I'm not going to assist you in an attempt at thread derailing.

My previous comments stand.

[LongTermGuy]

One doesn't want to overplay pointing out racists but...


`But what?....................

[jimnyc]

The main reason I think body cams would be good is because they would show the entire story on the streets. Seems like the majority of videos we see now are from the public, and the majority of the time its long after any interaction has started. Then people tend to fill in the blanks and generally accuse the police of wrongdoing when they have no idea what took place prior. I'm sure plenty of them are on the police, but more often than not the police are involved in such altercations for a reason.

[fj1200]

I've decided to delete my reply (.. good a reply, though it was ..). I'm not going to assist you in an attempt at thread derailing.

My previous comments stand.

Because it shows you to support a racist? And nothing off track about my post though I'm sure that you certainly dragged it off course by your prattling ignorance.


`But what?....................

But you linked to a racist as shown by the quote from his site.

[fj1200]

The main reason I think body cams would be good is because they would show the entire story on the streets. Seems like the majority of videos we see now are from the public, and the majority of the time its long after any interaction has started. Then people tend to fill in the blanks and generally accuse the police of wrongdoing when they have no idea what took place prior. I'm sure plenty of them are on the police, but more often than not the police are involved in such altercations for a reason.

They've started to implement them in Atlanta, limited to the airport AFAIK and apparently no push back by the officers. Anyone doing their job properly shouldn't be afraid of the information that comes from the video.

[LongTermGuy]

Because it shows you to support a racist? And nothing off track about my post though I'm sure that you certainly dragged it off course by your prattling ignorance.



But you linked to a racist as shown by the quote from his site.


`Everything is racists to Leftists....who use the term racism for control....getting old....Meh...

[fj1200]

`Everything is racists to Leftists....who use the term racism for control....getting old....Meh...

Leftists avoid their failures by blaming racism. But your link? Racist and it's a shame when "conservatives" revel in it.

[LongTermGuy]

`I think body cams are the way to go. Police Officers, who act improperly or criminally...will be punished, and people who make false complaints against police officers will be........... *shown to be liars.

They should be charged `for making false police reports` and the officers will start to *sue these people civilly.......`

[aboutime]

I personally believe officers wearing body cam's will be the answer...Obama, Holder, Sharpton, and all members of the Congressional Black Caucus/NAACP will eventually fight. Because, it will serve to prove what most Americans...despite their race, or color, has been insisting for years.

Congress critters keep saying they need a CONVERSATION about this problem, while ignoring facts.

Just watch how quickly they are forced to learn the truth about "HOW VIDEO'S DO NOT LIE".

It just may mean an end to Racial Extortion, and Fund Raising efforts by the NAACP, BLACK CAUCUS, and Hundreds of Racist members of the U.S. Congress whose LIES will never work again.

[SassyLady]

I think the idea of law enforcement wearing cameras is a great idea. Let's hope during a confrontation they don't get disconnected as Wilson's did.

I do think there will be those that will decry the validity of the videos ... insinuating that they are editing in favor of the police.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I think the idea of law enforcement wearing cameras is a great idea. Let's hope during a confrontation they don't get disconnected as Wilson's did.

I do think there will be those that will decry the validity of the videos ... insinuating that they are editing in favor of the police.
Will not matter, the TRUTH does not matter to the protestors. All that matters is they get to play the victim card so as to demand special treatment/status and ever more freebies!
The Dem party rewards such behavior and in returns gets a solid 93%+ monolithic black vote..

This paint the cops as the bad guys in every case where a black thug meets with violence he causes by his actions is being pushed as a political tactic by Obama and Holder. Many reasons for them to do so but number one reason is division! The bamscum wants this nation divided as it suits his agenda and gives him cause and a way to present his failures as being caused by his massive opposition from WE dirty ever so racist whites!
WE that are to blame for every black man's failure rather than their irresponsibility, laziness, drug use, criminality and propensity for violence.
ALL the while the huge elephant(black on black crime) is ignored and attention placed on get whitey cause he is to blame. Its damn sickening and I for one am tired of reading the lying crap the idiots and corrupt politicians(mostly dems) spew forth daily. --Tyr

[glockmail]

They cost like $115. Pretty cheap way to gather more evidence of a crime.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

They cost like $115. Pretty cheap way to gather more evidence of a crime.

The retraining is the problem not the cameras being provided. That retraining is geared towards making the police far, far less effective and far more likely to let the suspect just walk away when he presents violent opposition. Its already happening where the re-training has already been instituted.



http://nypost.com/2014/12/07/eric-holder-believes-all-cops-are-racists-targets-unconscious-bias/

Federal trainers teach cops not only to think twice about stopping or questioning suspects of color, but also to ignore signs of criminal behavior and threat indicators they’ve gleaned from years of street experience. That puts their own lives in danger — and risks the safety of residents.

The Justice Department’s unprecedented shift from prosecuting intentional discrimination to investigating unconscious or “implicit” bias began long before Ferguson, Mo. It’s part of a “racial justice” movement launched by the Obama administration to “reform” the criminal-justice system.

In the past five years, Holder has more than doubled the number of police department probes compared with the previous five years, opening more than 20 investigations and pressuring 15 consent orders to stop “biased policing” and other alleged violations.

What’s striking about these federally mandated orders is the lack of evidence investigators found to show cops stopped and arrested black people simply because of bias. They assumed, but couldn’t prove, they targeted blacks due to an automatic and unfair association between them and crime and not because they actually committed crimes.
Since Holder stepped in, crime is up 13% overall in Seattle. But it’s not just minor infractions. It’s the biggies — aggravated assaults up 14%, car theft up a whopping 44% and murders up 21%.

More than 120 Seattle police officers, detectives and sergeants have filed a lawsuit against Holder, claiming his de-biasing order has jeopardized their own safety.

The 80-page suit, filed in US District Court, contends the reforms have created “hesitation and paralysis” among officers, robbing them of their ability to make reasonable, split-second judgments in the line of duty.

“There is evidence of a dramatic decrease in proactive police work to investigate and stop crime,” the suit says.

Officers have stopped wearing Tasers and responding to backup calls out of fear their actions will be second-guessed by federal bias monitors. Beat cops have even retreated from suspects “who threatened [them] with death or serious injury.”

“These are not problems that can be tweaked, adjusted to or trained around with ‘self-analysis,’ ” the police complaint asserts.

Such “unconscious bias” training forces cops to “engage in mental gymnastics wholly unreasonable in light of the dangerous and fast-evolving circumstances we face every day,” it adds. “This creates unnecessary risks to safety.”

Some of the directives are bizarre.

[aboutime]

From all I have read here on this thread, about this subject. Nobody agree's about anything. Nobody can be pleased for whatever reason any individual decides so...Let's all just forget the LAWS. Forget we have a need for the police, laws, rules, common sense, or individual opinions.

Nothing anybody says, thinks, does, dreams, eats, inhales, wears, uses PLEASES anybody else.

We're all so busy worrying about "ME", "I", and what everybody else thinks because we're insulted, offended, bothered, angry. The STUPIDITY is destroying all of us, and the enemies of Freedom, Liberty, and Rights are having a celebration. Watching the Once, Greatest Nation, and People on Earth Become Total Idiots about everything.

I no longer care what anybody thinks about me. Honestly. I learned not to worry about that long ago.
But everyone should just take a private moment to YOURSELF. And decide When, Who, What, Where, Why, and How Any of us will ever agree on ANYTHING.???

[LongTermGuy]

Will not matter, the TRUTH does not matter to the protestors. All that matters is they get to play the victim card so as to demand special treatment/status and ever more freebies!
The Dem party rewards such behavior and in returns gets a solid 93%+ monolithic black vote..

This paint the cops as the bad guys in every case where a black thug meets with violence he causes by his actions is being pushed as a political tactic by Obama and Holder. Many reasons for them to do so but number one reason is division! The bamscum wants this nation divided as it suits his agenda and gives him cause and a way to present his failures as being caused by his massive opposition from WE dirty ever so racist whites!
WE that are to blame for every black man's failure rather than their irresponsibility, laziness, drug use, criminality and propensity for violence.
ALL the while the huge elephant(black on black crime) is ignored and attention placed on get whitey cause he is to blame. Its damn sickening and I for one am tired of reading the lying crap the idiots and corrupt politicians(mostly dems) spew forth daily. --Tyr


​This ^^^^^^

[aboutime]

As we are all seeing. Whatever the RACIST TWINS Holder, and Obama say. Is how the nation has become.

They insist on having a national conversation about race. But, as we also know. That conversation can only be permitted in one direction. Anyone who isn't a perpetual victim of the phony Race game..IS NOT ALLOWED to take part in any conversation. For, if you do, and you are not Black. Then...YOU ARE INSTANTLY A RACIST.

That is the OBAMA Plan.

[Anton Chigurh]

really?
So far the Cameras in the Cars and stations have exposed to a mostly police reverent public that the police DO lie on and beat people on more occasions than expected.Umm, no. Wishful thinking.

By far the #1 thing these are shown to do, is greatly DECREASE reports of abuse.

Seems like they would pay for themselves in short order, just on savings of administrative labor, legal costs and other costs associated with false claims.

[fj1200]

`Everything is racists to Leftists....who use the term racism for control....getting old....Meh...

Serious question: Do you think Ambrose Kane is not a racist?

[red states rule]

If individual states and counties want to put body cameras of their Police Officers fine, But the Feds should be demanding or forcing them to do so

Obama wants to spend $263 million for police "training" and body cameras. First where is money going to come from and second, the money would cover about 50,000 cameras. I wonder if Obama knows there are about 500,000 Police Officers in the US

Again. Obama is once again throwing money at a local problem and not solving anything

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

If individual states and counties want to put body cameras of their Police Officers fine, But the Feds should be demanding or forcing them to do so

Obama wants to spend $263 million for police "training" and body cameras. First where is money going to come from and second, the money would cover about 50,000 cameras. I wonder if Obama knows there are about 500,000 Police Officers in the US

Again. Obama is once again throwing money at a local problem and not solving anything

bambastard cares only about the "retraining part". That's where he in federal guidelines can introduce military weapons, military training and subvert the current police force into that civilian force he mention when he first got elected . The one he wanted -EQUAL- to the current military. Which means-- a Gestapo type force under his command.
Now using the unrest he and Holder engineering to get funding and support for doing just that. -Tyr

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Serious question: Do you think Ambrose Kane is not a racist?
Who cares?
The point that truly matters is that Obama and Holder both are!--Tyr

[red states rule]

bambastard cares only about the "retraining part". That's where he in federal guidelines can introduce military weapons, military training and subvert the current police force into that civilian force he mention when he first got elected . The one he wanted -EQUAL- to the current military. Which means-- a Gestapo type force under his command.
Now using the unrest he and Holder engineering to get funding and support for doing just that. -Tyr

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQESGPptucda0Cn-Z6_7rg7jVp4Z4jNOpouDusI9LvUnal9LvdWMw

[aboutime]

"All Law enforcement agencies, and officers should obey Holder. From now on.
Whenever anyone is looking for a suspect, purp, or known shooter.
All they need to say on the wanted poster is
"Suspect either looks like Obama, or Holder". Problem solved."

[red states rule]

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/141208biggovRGB20141209024255.jpg

[fj1200]

Who cares?
The point that truly matters is that Obama and Holder both are!--Tyr

Anyone who elevates his opinion should care. Link to BO and Holder thinking that blacks are superior?

And if you don't care if Kane is a racist why would you care if BO is?

[aboutime]

Anyone who elevates his opinion should care. Link to BO and Holder thinking that blacks are superior?

And if you don't care if Kane is a racist why would you care if BO is?


Kane was never elected by the people to be their pretender-in-chief.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Link to BO and Holder thinking that blacks are superior?


A link you ask for!
Have you not paid attention to the words from THE, " I will not prosecute MY PEOPLE HOLDER"
OR THE WORDS AND ACTIONS FROM THE OBAMA??-TYR





http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-this-fired-up-fox-news-host-body-slams-racial-hatred-obama-in-an-unforgettable-way/#5GXsW4YgvxhbrhiH.97

You see racism everywhere,” charged Judge Jeanine Pirro, who pulled no punches in accusing President Obama of fanning the flames of “racial hatred, resentment and divisiveness” in America.

On her Fox News show, Judge Jeanine didn’t hide her feelings any more than Barack Obama hid his over the weekend. In an interview with Black Entertainment Television, Obama played directly to the frayed emotions of his audience, claiming that racism remains “deeply rooted” throughout the country.

In fact, Obama used the phrase “deeply rooted” three times in a matter of seconds as he spoke about the ongoing controversy and violent protests arising from racially charged events in Ferguson and New York City.

In a post on breitbart.com, William Bigelow describes what Obama said as “playing the race card more overtly than ever before.”


In Obama’s interview, which will be broadcast Monday evening, he intoned, “This is something that is deeply rooted in our society, it’s deeply rooted in our history.

When you’re dealing with something as deeply rooted as racism or bias… you’ve got to have vigilance but you have to recognize that it’s going to take some time, and you just have to be steady so you don’t give up when we don’t get all the way there.”

By clicking on the video above, you can watch how Judge Jeanine Pirro laid out her compelling case against Obama’s tendency to “see racism everywhere.” The Judge also lets Obama have it for associating with Al Sharpton, whom Pirro condemns as:


“…the greatest charlatan of them all, a man who makes a living inciting racial hatred, a tax cheat and a liar….”

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-this-fired-up-fox-news-host-body-slams-racial-hatred-obama-in-an-unforgettable-way/#zqBrky9kMPBCkuQF.99

[fj1200]

A link you ask for!
Have you not paid attention to the words from THE, " I will not prosecute MY PEOPLE HOLDER"
OR THE WORDS AND ACTIONS FROM THE OBAMA??-TYR

:confused: Seeing racism is not being a racist, try again. BO sucks, I just don't have to lie to myself to know it.

Do you want to try answering the question? It seems the intellectually non-curious don't want to take it up. Do you think Ambrose Kane is not a racist?

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

:confused: Seeing racism is not being a racist, try again. BO sucks, I just don't have to lie to myself to know it.

Do you want to try answering the question? It seems the intellectually non-curious don't want to take it up. Do you think Ambrose Kane is not a racist?

Really? He does more than just see it --he talks about it and acts upon those personal biases.
Such action is racism -plain and simple..
No, you do not get off with the line --BO SUXS and then dismiss the point of him being a raging racist..
One that stirs violence with his words and his actions.
Instead of asking for calm and trying to encourage peace he went the opposite direction!-Tyr

[fj1200]

Really? He does more than just see it --he talks about it and acts upon those personal biases.
Such action is racism -plain and simple..
No, you do not get off with the line --BO SUXS and then dismiss the point of him being a raging racist..
One that stirs violence with his words and his actions.
Instead of asking for calm and trying to encourage peace he went the opposite direction!-Tyr

BO sucks, I don't need a rundown of why to know it. Do you need the definition for racism again?

Why haven't you answered the question?

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

BO sucks, I don't need a rundown of why to know it. Do you need the definition for racism again?

Why haven't you answered the question?
BO SUXS , doesn't cut it Hoss. Leaves room for future denial.
Answer the question, is Obama racist?
Simple yes or no will suffice.
We already know BO SUXS. -Tyr
Why so evasive? Why not be specific about whether you think him a racist or not?



Answer the question, is Obama racist?
Simple yes or no will suffice.--Tyr

[fj1200]

BO SUXS , doesn't cut it Hoss. Leaves room for future denial.
Answer the question, is Obama racist?
Simple yes or no will suffice.
We already know BO SUXS. -Tyr
Why so evasive? Why not be specific about whether you think him a racist or not?

Deny that I said BO sucks? Kinda hard, I've posted it for all eternity. He hasn't given evidence that he's a racist. He's much closer to a bigot (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot).


a person who is obstinately (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obstinate) or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

I'm not sure why you don't understand that words have actual definitions. :dunno:

Oh yeah, BO sucks.

EDIT:

Do you need me to repost the question you won't answer?

[revelarts]

Law enforcement has more than 30 years of experience with recording interactions with the public via in-car cameras, but has much less practical experience with the newer concept of body-worn cameras.

Some European law enforcement agencies have embraced almost every imaginable form of video surveillance and recording for many years, while few municipalities within the United States have enough experience from which to draw conclusions.
Examining the positive and negative qualities of body-worn cameras — as well as examining their future use — is an important step in the debate over this method of recording encounters with the public.

Body-Worn Camera Successes

....


In the United States, the Rialto California Police Department has been one of the primary testing grounds for the use of body-worn cameras. In one of the first major studies (http://www.policefoundation.org/sites/g/files/g798246/f/201303/The%20Effect%20of%20Body-Worn%20Cameras%20on%20Police%20Use-of-Force.pdf) on body-worn cameras in the United States, the department had some amazing results.

During a 12-month experiment, 6,776 video files of 724 gigabytes of memory were captured and analyzed:


The use of force by police dropped by 250 percent;
Complaints against police officers dropped by over 900 percent;
The rate of police-initiated physical contact dropped from 23.5 percent to 0 percent;
A decreased usage of firearms and an increased usage of Tasers (non-lethal weapons) by police.

The Rialto study definitely highlights body-worn cameras in the best way possible, but unfortunately things don’t always turn out this well....

don't police HAVE TO physically contact how did it drop to ZERO
250% drop in use of force. don't they HAVE TO use force everytime they do?
Looks like those mean ol black people are going to be in a lot of trouble once the police have cameras mmm hmmm.:rolleyes:

But seriously i'm surprised the numbers are this high.





When Body-Worn Cameras Fail The ACLU (https://www.aclu.org/files/assets/police_body-mounted_cameras.pdf)has long been against the expansion of video surveillance among police departments, but is for the integration of body-worn cameras. From their position, the potential benefits for protecting both the public and the police outweigh the potential risks — but they do have some caveats:


Police should not have control over when the camera is on or off, or that the camera shouldn’t “accidentally” turn itself off due to design.
Significant safeguards need to be employed in handling and storing the video recordings.
Strong public discussion and legislation should be in place pertaining to the privacy of video recordings.



Cameras being off at critical moments is a very real and substantial concern. Take, for instance, the case of Officer Jeremy Dear, a former police officer (http://www.koat.com/news/apd-fires-officer-jeremy-dear/30004296) with the Albuquerque Police Department. Dear had a history of a malfunctioning camera not recording the events in important cases, including the fatal shooting of a 19-year-old woman.


"Safeguards in handling video recordings should be the same as the handling procedures of all critical evidence."<small>David Yee, IVN contributor</small>
Dear asserted that the camera, a lapel-design body-worn camera, had a flawed design (http://krqe.com/2014/06/26/apd-requests-updates-to-lapel-camera-technology/) — it was intentionally designed to disconnect cables when the unit was stressed to protect officers from being strangled by the cable. Critics, including the police department’s own investigation, contended that the design was being advantageously used by officers not wanting their actions recorded....
http://ivn.us/2014/12/05/study-use-force-incidents-drop-dramatically-police-use-body-worn-cameras/?utm_source=ivn&utm_medium=listing&utm_campaign=opt-beta-v-1-1


say it ain't so.
But as has been stated only bad cops will have this problem. the ones who need it the most.

[revelarts]

Seems several conclusions might be drawn from that study but one stands out in my mind.
it's That it's NOT that many cops DON'T know how to act it's that they DON'T want to. RE-training is not necessarily an issue.

[LongTermGuy]

Seems several conclusions might be drawn from that study but one stands out in my mind.
it's That it's NOT that many cops DON'T know how to act it's that they DON'T want to. RE-training is not necessarily an issue.



Yup...and `These days` who can blame them....for not acting or want to...

[Jeff]

Cameras on police officers is a great idea, but the first time it doesn't go Sharpton's way you honestly don't believe at that point we will hear how the police deleted the part where poor Leroy was minding his own business as the shop owner was laying bloody underneath him. the best way to handle the black population that is crying foul ( the inner cities ) is let black cops police them, and then the first time one of those cops shoot someone he will be labeled a Uncle Tom and said that he would really rather be white, there is no pleasing these folks that are rioting and looting, this is what they want to do and no matter what you throw at it to stop it it isn't going to change.

Are there corrupt police officers absolutely but they are few and far between, hell there are corrupt garbage men it happens no matter what proffesion you are in. I was a trucker for many years and never ever stole anything off of a load on the other hand I had friends that got new computers, TV's ect... weekly , does that make all truckers bad no. Lets face it people if ya aren't out breaking the law the police aren't going to be in your face, so it's real simple, don't break the law and ya don't get shot !!