JFK: The Voter Fraud President

[tailfins]

Kennedy's election in 1960 over Nixon involved heavy fraud in Illinois and Texas. (If Nixon had won those two states, he would have won the presidency.) As examples of ballot box stuffing: In Texas's Angelina County, in one precinct, only 86 people voted yet the final tally was 147 for Kennedy, 24 for Nixon; in Fannin County the 4895 registered voters cast 6138 votes (75% for Kennedy). Discarded spoiled ballots were to be placed by Texas law in "ballot box 4" for later re-examination, but many counties (e.g. Fort Bend County, which had a huge 16% spoilage rate, topping even the worst Florida 2000 County) just discarded them, and did not store them, making any biased discarding decisions uncorrectable and unprovable. The 100%-Democrat Texas Election Board refused to conduct a recount, so game over.

Kennedy carried Illinois by 8858 votes thanks to a 456,312-vote advantage in Chicago, whose precincts reported their totals remarkably late. (Compare this with Kennedy's nationwide victory margin of 118,574.) The "turnout" in Daley-machine Chicago was a spectacular 89%. This contrasts with the nationwide turnout of 63%. It also contrasts with the fact that in the 11 presidential elections during 1960-2000, totalling 550 statewide contests, not once did any state ever exceed 1964 Utah's 78.4% turnout, and the states with the largest-% turnout were always rural (namely North and South Dakota, Utah, Minnesota, and Maine), not urban.

http://rangevoting.org/PresFraud.html

[aboutime]

Who cares, and what can anyone do about it now?

Kennedy was elected in 1960. Tell us WHY you had to create this thread, other than because of your endless hatred?

[tailfins]

Who cares, and what can anyone do about it now?

Kennedy was elected in 1960. Tell us WHY you had to create this thread, other than because of your endless hatred?

That would require an understanding how they dynamics of history works. I see why you're confused. I remind other readers that any of the men that might have been Obama's father would either be outside the USA or locked up if the McCarthy wing of the GOP had been in power. One Marxist victory leads to another.

[aboutime]

That would require an understanding how they dynamics of history works. I see why you're confused. I remind other readers that any of the men that might have been Obama's father would either be outside the USA or locked up if the McCarthy wing of the GOP had been in power. One Marxist victory leads to another.



Here ya go. You won. http://icansayit.com/images/lastword.jpg


Now you can read everything back to yourself, endlessly, and prove nothing but how desperate, and literally dumb you are.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

http://rangevoting.org/PresFraud.html
The lousy dems have always cheated.. Anybody that thinks they did not cheat even more in bambastard's second election than they did in his first election lives in LaLa land.. -Tyr

[revelarts]

Bush Cheated as well.
there no question for those that are honest and don't have R blinders on.
and i'm not talking about hanging chads, I'm talking about illegally and willy nilly kicking 1000s of likely Dems off the voter rolls before the election.


But JFK cheated too. Poppy Kennedy the bootleger had mob ties and the mob delivered. But the Mob was upset that the Bobby "turned" on them after Jack was elected.
Though i wonder if he really needed the help.

[aboutime]

Bush Cheated as well.
there no question for those that are honest and don't have R blinders on.
and i'm not talking about hanging chads, I'm talking about illegally and willy nilly kicking 1000s of likely Dems off the voter rolls before the election.


But JFK cheated too. Poppy Kennedy the bootleger had mob ties and the mob delivered. But the Mob was upset that the Bobby "turned" on them after Jack was elected.
Though i wonder if he really needed the help.


And you call some of us crazy? Keep telling yourself those lies rev. It's much more comfortable knowing how easy it is to fool some people like you. When you come here to prove it.

[gabosaurus]

So instead of being a crooked and corrupt president in the 70's, Nixon could have been a corrupt president in thr 60's. Right, tailfins? :rolleyes:

Once again, the utter hypocrisy of someone who supports a party that stole an election in 2000 complaining about states being stolen in an earlier election is remarkable.

I notice that tailfins doesn't bring up the fact that Republicans were so upset about Kennedy "stealing" the 1960 election that they had him bumped off three years later.

[revelarts]

Florida's flawed "voter-cleansing" program - Salon.com's politics story of the year (http://www.gregpalast.com/floridas-flawed-voter-cleansing-program-saloncoms-politics-story-of-the-year/)


Monday, December 4, 2000
If Vice President Al Gore is wondering where his Florida votes went, rather than sift through a pile of chad, he might want to look at a "scrub list" of 173,000 names targeted to be knocked off the Florida voter registry by a division of the office of Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris. A close examination suggests thousands of voters may have lost their right to vote based on a flaw-ridden list that included purported "felons" provided by a private firm with tight Republican ties.

Early in the year, the company, ChoicePoint, gave Florida officials a list with the names of 8,000 ex-felons to "scrub" from their list of voters.
But it turns out none on the list were guilty of felonies, only misdemeanors. The company acknowledged the error, and blamed it on the original source of the list -- the state of Texas.
Florida officials moved to put those falsely accused by Texas back on voter rolls before the election. Nevertheless, the large number of errors uncovered in individual counties suggests that thousands of eligible voters may have been turned away at the polls.
Florida is the only state that pays a private company that promises to "cleanse" voter rolls.The state signed in 1998 a $4 million contract with DBT Online, since merged into ChoicePoint, of Atlanta. The creation of the scrub list, called the central voter file, was mandated by a 1998 state voter fraud law, which followed a tumultuous year that saw Miami's mayor removed after voter fraud in the election, with dead people discovered to have cast ballots. The voter fraud law required all 67 counties to purge voter registries of duplicate registrations, deceased voters and felons, many of whom, but not all, are barred from voting in Florida.
In the process, however, the list invariably targets a minority population in Florida, where 31 percent of all black men cannot vote because of a ban on felons. In compiling a list by looking at felons from other states, Florida could, in the process, single out citizens who committed felons in other states but, after serving their time or successfully petitioning the courts, had their voting rights returned to them. According to Florida law, felons can vote once their voting rights have been reinstated.
And if this unfairly singled out minorities, it unfairly handicapped Gore: In Florida, 93 percent of African-Americans voted for the vice president.
In the 10 counties contacted by Salon, use of the central voter file seemed to vary wildly. Some found the list too unreliable and didn't use it at all. But most counties appear to have used the file as a resource to purge names from their voter rolls, with some counties making little -- or no -- effort at all to alert the "purged" voters. Counties that did their best to vet the file discovered a high level of errors, with as many as 15 percent of names incorrectly identified as felons.
News coverage has focused on some maverick Florida counties that decided not to use the central voter file, essentially breaking the law and possibly letting some ineligible felons vote.
On Friday, the Miami Herald reported that after researching voter records in 12 Florida counties -- but primarily in Palm Beach and Duval counties, which didn't use the file -- it found that more than 445 felons had apparently cast ballots in the presidential election.
But Palm Beach and Duval weren't the only counties to dump the list after questioning its accuracy. Madison County's elections supervisor, Linda Howell, had a peculiarly personal reason for distrusting the central voter file: She had received a letter saying that since she had committed a felony, she would not be allowed to vote.

Howell, who said she has never committed a felony, said the letter she received in March shook her faith in the process. "It really is a mess," she said.
"I was very upset," Howell said. "I know I'm not a felon." Though the mistake did get corrected and law enforcement officials were quite apologetic, Howell decided not to use the state list anymore because its "information is so flawed." She's unsure of the number of warning letters that were sent out to county residents when she first received the list in 1999, but she recalls that there were many problems. "One day we would send a letter to have someone taken off the rolls, and the next day, we would send one to put them back on again," Howell said. "It makes you look like you must be a dummy."

Dixie and Washington counties also refused to use the scrub lists. Starlet Cannon, Dixie's deputy assistant supervisor of elections, said, "I'm scared to work with it because of lot of the information they have on there is not accurate."
Carol Griffin, supervisor of elections for Washington, said, "It hasn't been accurate in the past, so we had no reason to suspect it was accurate this year."
But if some counties refused to use the list altogether, others seemed to embrace it all too enthusiastically. Etta Rosado, spokeswoman for the Volusia County Department of Elections, said the county essentially accepted the file at face value, did nothing to confirm the accuracy of it and doesn't inform citizens ahead of time that they have been dropped from the voter rolls.
"When we get the con felon list, we automatically start going through our rolls on the computer. If there's a name that says John Smith was convicted of a felony, then we enter a notation on our computer that says convicted felon -- we mark an "f" for felon -- and the date that we received it," Rosado said. "They're still on our computer, but they're on purge status," meaning they have been marked ineligible to vote.
"I don't think that it's up to us to tell them they're a convicted felon," Rosado said. "If he's on our rolls, we make a notation on there. If they show up at a polling place, we'll say, 'Wait a minute, you're a convicted felon, you can't vote. Nine out of 10 times when we repeat that to the person, they say 'Thank you' and walk away.
They don't put up arguments." Rosado doesn't know how many people in Volusia were dropped from the list as a result of being identified as felons.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_4kJHphEpE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_4kJHphEpE

[tailfins]

And you call some of us crazy? Keep telling yourself those lies rev. It's much more comfortable knowing how easy it is to fool some people like you. When you come here to prove it.

You and Gabs make a great "Kennedy defense team". You two are on the same side after all. The truth comes out.

[aboutime]

You and Gabs make a great "Kennedy defense team". You two are on the same side after all. The truth comes out.


Far as I can tell. If you also claim to be an American. You are supposed to be on our side as well.

Why are you so angry, and filled with so much hatred for JFK after all these years? Your paranoia is laughable, at best.

Otherwise. You are simply a fool, and a joke.