red states rule
11-21-2014, 05:58 PM
How much longer do we have to endure this monumental failure?
How much more evidene do people need before the admit Obamacare is a complete disaster?
Last spring, Obamacare supporters were ebullient when the Obama administration announced a milestone "victory:" Despite a truly disastrous (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/10/30/sebelius-it-would-be-illegal-for-me-to-enroll-in-obamacares-exchanges--false-n1733369) roll-out, they'd enrolled eight million Americans in the program. The Obamacare debate, the president said, was officially over. We expressed skepticism (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/17/analysis-obama-celebrates-eight-million-enrollments-again-declares-debate-over-n1826023) over the White House's stats almost immediately, noting that the official numbers didn't account for duplicates (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/05/07/confirmed-many-of-obamacares-8-million-enrollees-are-duplicates-n1834786), non-paying "customers," and consumer attrition (http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-08-18/more-bad-news-for-obamacare) -- not to mention the high percentage of "new" enrollees who previously had insurance (http://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/31/how-many-new-obamacare-exchange-enrollees-were-previously-uninsured/), but were forced to use Obamacare's exchanges to obtain plans after their existing arrangements were cancelled under the new law. The last two weeks have witnessed two more blows for the "it's working! (http://hotair.com/archives/2014/09/25/ezra-klein-despite-what-the-conservative-media-says-obamacare-is-working-great-in-the-real-world/)" crowd. First came the sharply revised (http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/10/news/economy/obamacare-enrollment-2015/) 2015 enrollment projections:
Fewer than 10 million people are expected to enroll in "Obamacare 2.0" for 2015, the Obama administration said Monday. That's a significant drop from the original goal. The Congressional Budget Office had projected 13 million, but officials said they expect the ramp up to be slower than the CBO originally thought. The revised goal is 9 to 9.9 million. It raises questions about whether Obamacare enrollment will reach projections down the road. The CBO had projected enrollment would hit 25 million by 2017, but now the administration says it will probably take at least one or two more years to reach that threshold. Officials are realizing it will find it tougher to convince the remaining uninsured to enroll. Many who opted not to sign up this year said the cost was too high.
It's almost as if many people aren't too excited about purchasing less-than-affordable (http://money.cnn.com/2014/09/29/news/economy/hospitals-deductibles-payments-patients/) coverage that saddles them with high out-of-pocket (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/us/unable-to-meet-the-deductible-or-the-doctor.html?_r=0) costs and sparse provider networks (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/05/16/ap-frustrated-consumers-losing-doctors-under-obamacare-n1838865). One thing the administration has going for it this year is that the individual mandate tax designed to punish shirkers is rising considerably (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/11/13/cbs-news-on-obamacare-higher-costs-higher-penalties-n1918297), although those penalties are still much lower than the costs associated with buying Obamacare health plans. Now we have this embarrassing admission (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-20/obamacare-s-subscriber-rolls-include-unpublicized-dental-plans.html) from administration officials, who've been forced to reveal how Team Obama inflated its top line enrollment figure:
The Obama administration said it erroneously calculated the number of people with health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, incorrectly adding 380,000 dental subscribers to raise the total above 7 million. The accurate number with full health-care plans is 6.7 million as of Oct. 15, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirmed today, saying the U.S. won’t include dental plans in future reports. “The mistake we made is unacceptable,” Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell said on her verified Twitter account. “I will be communicating that clearly throughout the department.” The error was brought to light by Republican investigators for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, using data they obtained from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services….The new count puts enrollment short of a 2013 estimate by the Congressional Budget Office, adopted last year as a goal by the Obama administration, that 7 million people would be enrolled this year. Federal officials said in September they had 7.3 million people enrolled in coverage through new government-run insurance exchanges. They didn’t distinguish between medical and dental plans, breaking from previous practice without notice
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/11/21/cms-obamacare-enrollment-stats-n1922119
How much more evidene do people need before the admit Obamacare is a complete disaster?
Last spring, Obamacare supporters were ebullient when the Obama administration announced a milestone "victory:" Despite a truly disastrous (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/10/30/sebelius-it-would-be-illegal-for-me-to-enroll-in-obamacares-exchanges--false-n1733369) roll-out, they'd enrolled eight million Americans in the program. The Obamacare debate, the president said, was officially over. We expressed skepticism (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/04/17/analysis-obama-celebrates-eight-million-enrollments-again-declares-debate-over-n1826023) over the White House's stats almost immediately, noting that the official numbers didn't account for duplicates (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/05/07/confirmed-many-of-obamacares-8-million-enrollees-are-duplicates-n1834786), non-paying "customers," and consumer attrition (http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-08-18/more-bad-news-for-obamacare) -- not to mention the high percentage of "new" enrollees who previously had insurance (http://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/31/how-many-new-obamacare-exchange-enrollees-were-previously-uninsured/), but were forced to use Obamacare's exchanges to obtain plans after their existing arrangements were cancelled under the new law. The last two weeks have witnessed two more blows for the "it's working! (http://hotair.com/archives/2014/09/25/ezra-klein-despite-what-the-conservative-media-says-obamacare-is-working-great-in-the-real-world/)" crowd. First came the sharply revised (http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/10/news/economy/obamacare-enrollment-2015/) 2015 enrollment projections:
Fewer than 10 million people are expected to enroll in "Obamacare 2.0" for 2015, the Obama administration said Monday. That's a significant drop from the original goal. The Congressional Budget Office had projected 13 million, but officials said they expect the ramp up to be slower than the CBO originally thought. The revised goal is 9 to 9.9 million. It raises questions about whether Obamacare enrollment will reach projections down the road. The CBO had projected enrollment would hit 25 million by 2017, but now the administration says it will probably take at least one or two more years to reach that threshold. Officials are realizing it will find it tougher to convince the remaining uninsured to enroll. Many who opted not to sign up this year said the cost was too high.
It's almost as if many people aren't too excited about purchasing less-than-affordable (http://money.cnn.com/2014/09/29/news/economy/hospitals-deductibles-payments-patients/) coverage that saddles them with high out-of-pocket (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/us/unable-to-meet-the-deductible-or-the-doctor.html?_r=0) costs and sparse provider networks (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/05/16/ap-frustrated-consumers-losing-doctors-under-obamacare-n1838865). One thing the administration has going for it this year is that the individual mandate tax designed to punish shirkers is rising considerably (http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/11/13/cbs-news-on-obamacare-higher-costs-higher-penalties-n1918297), although those penalties are still much lower than the costs associated with buying Obamacare health plans. Now we have this embarrassing admission (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-20/obamacare-s-subscriber-rolls-include-unpublicized-dental-plans.html) from administration officials, who've been forced to reveal how Team Obama inflated its top line enrollment figure:
The Obama administration said it erroneously calculated the number of people with health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, incorrectly adding 380,000 dental subscribers to raise the total above 7 million. The accurate number with full health-care plans is 6.7 million as of Oct. 15, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirmed today, saying the U.S. won’t include dental plans in future reports. “The mistake we made is unacceptable,” Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell said on her verified Twitter account. “I will be communicating that clearly throughout the department.” The error was brought to light by Republican investigators for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, using data they obtained from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services….The new count puts enrollment short of a 2013 estimate by the Congressional Budget Office, adopted last year as a goal by the Obama administration, that 7 million people would be enrolled this year. Federal officials said in September they had 7.3 million people enrolled in coverage through new government-run insurance exchanges. They didn’t distinguish between medical and dental plans, breaking from previous practice without notice
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/11/21/cms-obamacare-enrollment-stats-n1922119