`Brazil's " left-leaning" President Dilma Rousseff was `re-elected` Sunday `........

[LongTermGuy]

`The Workers' Party candidate had 51.6 percent of the votes and challenger Aecio Neves 48.4 percent, with 99.5 percent of the ballots counted.......Speaking in front of a banner that read "New Government, New Ideas" and had a giant photo of Rousseff from her days as a militant who fought against Brazil's long military regime, the leader thanked her supporters, starting with her No. 1 backer, her political mentor and predecessor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who hand-picked her to take his place in 2010.
"My dears, my friends, we have arrived at the end of a campaign that intensely mobilized all the forces of this country," Rousseff said. "I thank every Brazilian, without exception."


*But the leader now faces the daunting task of sparking a moribund economy that's underperformed since 2011, with some fearing it could put the social gains at risk................

http://news.yahoo.com/brazil-votes-next-leader-bitter-campaign-040235793.html

`Brazil's President and Workers Party presidential candidate Dilma Rousseff, shows her electronic voting receipt that confirms she voted in the presidential runoff election as she drinks mate, an herbal tea, in Porto Alegre, Brazil, Sunday, Oct. 26, 2014.`
http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/szCgdoCxZRSpNb_VFBde9Q--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTYzOTtweW9mZj0wO3E9Nz U7dz05NjA-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/c4500f1d1f66a62a630f6a706700e747.jpg

[gabosaurus]

Brazil is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Both the president-elect and her opponent were known to have taken massive bribes and payoffs from companies seeking favor.

[tailfins]

Brazil is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Both the president-elect and her opponent were known to have taken massive bribes and payoffs from companies seeking favor.

Socialism NEEDS corruption or the country grinds to a halt.

[jimnyc]

I hope she falls down the stairs.

[tailfins]

I hope she falls down the stairs.

I'm guessing most people on the forum don't know the details, so I will fill in the blanks. She's a terrorist.


Dilma was part of a terrorist communist organization known as VAR-Palmares, whose goal was the establishment of a Marxist dictatorship in Brazil, funded and controlled by Fidel Castro.

Dilma confessed to keeping machine guns and plastic bombs under her bed for use by her buddies. Among other crimes, her organization robbed banks, exploded bombs on the street and killed people in cold blood. Most of the terrorists are now employed as ministers, heads of large state companies or influential politicians.

They also killed foreigners such as Major Edward Ernest Tito Otto Maximilian Von Westernhagen and a 19-year-old British sailor named David Cuthberg, besides dozens of Brazilians.

But their most heinous crime was perhaps the murder of American Captain Charles Rodney Chandler. Hero of the Vietnam War, he came to Brazil to study Sociology and Politics at the Alvares Penteado Foundation, Sao Paulo. - See more at: http://www.henrymakow.com/brazils_terrorist-in-_chief_vi.html#sthash.3QTqkONC.dpuf

http://www.henrymakow.com/brazils_terrorist-in-_chief_vi.html

[jimnyc]

Now I really do hope she falls down the stairs.

[DLT]

`The Workers' Party candidate had 51.6 percent of the votes and challenger Aecio Neves 48.4 percent, with 99.5 percent of the ballots counted.......Speaking in front of a banner that read "New Government, New Ideas" and had a giant photo of Rousseff from her days as a militant who fought against Brazil's long military regime, the leader thanked her supporters, starting with her No. 1 backer, her political mentor and predecessor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who hand-picked her to take his place in 2010.
"My dears, my friends, we have arrived at the end of a campaign that intensely mobilized all the forces of this country," Rousseff said. "I thank every Brazilian, without exception."


*But the leader now faces the daunting task of sparking a moribund economy that's underperformed since 2011, with some fearing it could put the social gains at risk................

http://news.yahoo.com/brazil-votes-next-leader-bitter-campaign-040235793.html

`Brazil's President and Workers Party presidential candidate Dilma Rousseff, shows her electronic voting receipt that confirms she voted in the presidential runoff election as she drinks mate, an herbal tea, in Porto Alegre, Brazil, Sunday, Oct. 26, 2014.`
http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/szCgdoCxZRSpNb_VFBde9Q--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTYzOTtweW9mZj0wO3E9Nz U7dz05NjA-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/c4500f1d1f66a62a630f6a706700e747.jpg

Ah yes, sounds familiar, doesn't it? "No one represents me". And the young and the perpetually stupid actually 'think' the commies represent them and their future? Yeah. They do. They represent a future where the commies all control all the people all the time (not just the stupid).

[red state]

Funny isn't it (not so much) how the leftist adopt and abuse words for their gain. WORKER's Party?! Really!!!! I have a client in the UK who is sold, hook, line and sinker that the WORKER's Party is for the "workers" when it truly isn't. Perhaps Drummond could tell us a great deal more but we see it here in the USA as well........under the name "progressive" or "DIM".

Another similarity we may have with their terrorist and "OURS" is that ours was pretty much taught to hate the USA and had an excellent group of teachers.....some now "preaching" and some "teaching". No need for bombs or guns, however, the LEFT (under the plan of the communist) have taken over this Nation without firing a single shot.......EXACTLY how the USSR said they would and it seems that they (with the USSR's lil' puppy Castro) have done exactly that in Brazil.

[DLT]

Funny isn't it (not so much) how the leftist adopt and abuse words for their gain. WORKER's Party?! Really!!!! I have a client in the UK who is sold, hook, line and sinker that the WORKER's Party is for the "workers" when it truly isn't. Perhaps Drummond could tell us a great deal more but we see it here in the USA as well........under the name "progressive" or "DIM".

Another similarity we may have with their terrorist and "OURS" is that ours was pretty much taught to hate the USA and had an excellent group of teachers.....some now "preaching" and some "teaching". No need for bombs or guns, however, the LEFT (under the plan of the communist) have taken over this Nation without firing a single shot.......EXACTLY how the USSR said they would and it seems that they (with the USSR's lil' puppy Castro) have done exactly that in Brazil.

Just like that young, stupid, head-full-of-mush female...wailing that nobody (but the commies) represents her.....we have a virtual plethora of similar-minded morons in America that will vote for the commies every time over any solid conservative candidate. Of course, that is assuming that we could even get a 'solid conservative candidate' nominated since the GOP has been taken over by these same aholes.

Just like in Brazil and in other nations around the world, these kids in America have been brainwashed and indoctrinated and deliberately dumbed down to the point that turning this "transformation" around now, at this point, would require a Vatican-sanctioned and immediate miracle. I just don't see that happening.

I think we, as a free nation, are pretty much toast. And even IF we take both houses, we still have to consider what mushy, wussie, RINOs will have that control. It probably won't change a damned thing other than ensuring that the left wins big again in 2016.

[gabosaurus]

Corrupt countries elect corrupt leaders. Brazil is a nation of very poor people. Dilma caters to the poor, even though she doesn't really care about them.
I know people who are amazed that Dilma got reelected. Just a few months ago, Dilma was so unpopular that she couldn't show up at the World Cup. Yet she won 51 percent of the vote in Sunday's election.
Not that her opponent was any less corrupt and dishonest.

[Drummond]

Funny isn't it (not so much) how the leftist adopt and abuse words for their gain. WORKER's Party?! Really!!!! I have a client in the UK who is sold, hook, line and sinker that the WORKER's Party is for the "workers" when it truly isn't. Perhaps Drummond could tell us a great deal more but we see it here in the USA as well........under the name "progressive" or "DIM".

Another similarity we may have with their terrorist and "OURS" is that ours was pretty much taught to hate the USA and had an excellent group of teachers.....some now "preaching" and some "teaching". No need for bombs or guns, however, the LEFT (under the plan of the communist) have taken over this Nation without firing a single shot.......EXACTLY how the USSR said they would and it seems that they (with the USSR's lil' puppy Castro) have done exactly that in Brazil.

I'm finding it difficult to prove with absolute certainty. But ... there are various manifestations of 'Workers' Party' cropping up in various countries. Since they seem to share Globalist aims ... I believe they're different wings of just the one outfit.

I can tell you this much. The British version is called 'Socialist Workers Party', and what they are is a group of disgusting Marxist rabble-rousers. Want to show solidarity with every Left-wing strike imaginable ? Want to take joy in the destruction resulting ? Want to protest about any and all Conservative causes, or to protest against anti-terrorism efforts ? The Socialist Workers mob are your catch-all ticket to ALL of that.

The recent NATO summit saw them setting up stalls - unopposed by the local authorities - in Newport city centre, spending a Saturday afternoon trying to recruit the townsfolk for all they were worth (few actually listened to them) . Marches were organised against NATO's so-called 'warmongering' (... according to them !).

If the SWP had their way, terrorists would flourish unopposed. Right-wing organisations would cease to exist -- as would Nation States. The world, in SWP land, would be one great 'happy commune', individualism snuffed out, the Glorious State dictating to everyone else. Death to anyone and everything not seeing things their way.

I'm assuming that yours is the American version of all that ...

As for your UK client .... that individual must surely have Socialist leanings, to have come to such a conclusion. Sure - the SWP do go all-out to say they're pro-the 'Working Class', but any attempt to look at what they stand for in any detail reveals the truth.

[I'm assuming your client isn't an idiot, of course .. ?]

[red state]

I'm finding it difficult to prove with absolute certainty. But ... there are various manifestations of 'Workers' Party' cropping up in various countries. Since they seem to share Globalist aims ... I believe they're different wings of just the one outfit.

I can tell you this much. The British version is called 'Socialist Workers Party', and what they are is a group of disgusting Marxist rabble-rousers. Want to show solidarity with every Left-wing strike imaginable ? Want to take joy in the destruction resulting ? Want to protest about any and all Conservative causes, or to protest against anti-terrorism efforts ? The Socialist Workers mob are your catch-all ticket to ALL of that.

The recent NATO summit saw them setting up stalls - unopposed by the local authorities - in Newport city centre, spending a Saturday afternoon trying to recruit the townsfolk for all they were worth (few actually listened to them) . Marches were organised against NATO's so-called 'warmongering' (... according to them !).

If the SWP had their way, terrorists would flourish unopposed. Right-wing organisations would cease to exist -- as would Nation States. The world, in SWP land, would be one great 'happy commune', individualism snuffed out, the Glorious State dictating to everyone else. Death to anyone and everything not seeing things their way.

I'm assuming that yours is the American version of all that ...

As for your UK client .... that individual must surely have Socialist leanings, to have come to such a conclusion. Sure - the SWP do go all-out to say they're pro-the 'Working Class', but any attempt to look at what they stand for in any detail reveals the truth.

[I'm assuming your client isn't an idiot, of course .. ?]


No, he isn't an idiot BUT, like my Aussie client, seems to have been "programmed" into hating certain things without true understanding or consideration to FACTs. Take the UK client.......he HATES "rich people" yet, by his understanding/interpretation, I am that RICH that he hates. He hates bosses, industry and anything that would have someone receiving success for their hard work (IF) that isn't shared EQUALLY by others (who, by the way, took nowhere near the risk that this "RICH" business owner took). As for the Aussie.....she doesn't mind one having success (she, after all, is a successful business woman) BUT, she absolutely HATES guns and if she was granted some special, supernatural powers, would make ALL guns go.......'POOOFfff'. I've tried to reason with both of them but have gotten NOWHERE. They are both really good people but we share virtually NOTHING politically. Religiously, the Aussie and I are close to agreement but the UK guy is an atheist.....although respectful to my religion and seems to have an interest in hunting and other aspects that liberals often shun or ridicule. Yep, they are both OK kind of people but I"m glad to have so many conservative clients......in California of all places. I had one GREAT client in Australia (international lawyer/producer) but he died a few years ago. We were actually good friends (despite his being more my grandfather's age) and I wish I hadn't have been so reluctant to talk about things such as hunting. I knew he was quite excited when Bush came to his area but I had no idea that he was a hunter..........RABBIT HUNTER. His children are all VERY successful artists, lawyers and architects and told me of how Carnie would stock up on rabbits when they killed a good many of them. Go figure. I may lose many clients due to my political views and PROUDLY posting such but it is better to lose the losers rather than NEVER find out that another human being that you like or care for has so much in common. Sorry for the long reply but I figure my good friend, Drummond, would appreciate it.