Snowden movie indicts obama

[Pernicious]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6510&stc=1

Citizen Four is the shocking doc about Edward Snowden made by Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras. Just screened tonight was the two hour film will be released by the Weinstein Company this month. It doesn’t paint the Obama administration in a very good light as Snowden explains how the government has violated privacy rights on a massive scale.
Also the filmmakers clearly inducate that all roads lead to POTUS, a fairly serious accusation. There may be serious repercussions.
http://www.showbiz411.com/2014/10/10/edward-snowden-doc-premieres-shocking-inside-look-at-how-he-did-it

[PixieStix]

Does anything paint the Obama administration in a good light.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Does anything paint the Obama administration in a good light.
Not anything that is true!-Tyr

[Pernicious]

Does anything paint the Obama administration in a good light.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh NOPE!
http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6513&stc=1

[revelarts]

sooo Snowden is a good guy now ...becaaause he's exposing Obama. (theBatistMuslimCommunistGayShapshifter)
and when I and others were saying Snowden's exposures are good and he should NOT be branded a traitor or hunted down and shot we we're correct.

While calling him a hero might be a stretch he was/is doing a service for his fellow countrymen, in the Spirit of the law and the in service to the Highest law of the land which TRUMPS agency oaths and contracts.

[jimnyc]

sooo Snowden is a good guy now ...becaaause he's exposing Obama. (theBatistMuslimCommunistGayShapshifter)
and when I and others were saying Snowden's exposures are good and he should NOT be branded a traitor or hunted down and shot we we're correct.

While calling him a hero might be a stretch he was/is doing a service for his fellow countrymen, in the Spirit of the law and the in service to the Highest law of the land which TRUMPS agency oaths and contracts.

3 members posted in this thread, 2 of which I can almost guarantee have not discussed the Snowden case with you. That leaves one member. That member stated nothing about Snowden in this thread. I don't think the hypocrisy that you think exists actually exists. I don't see anyone that has posted here before, stating they now support Snowden, who had not prior. Just sayin! No back patting this time.

And for the record, he's still a scumbag. And if I were in charge, and could somehow get my paws on him, he would likely have done to him what you despise so much. Gotta know what else the man knows for sure. That's right, electrical cables to his balls. Waterboarding would be on the table, but it might not get that far.

[Pernicious]

3 members posted in this thread, 2 of which I can almost guarantee have not discussed the Snowden case with you. That leaves one member. That member stated nothing about Snowden in this thread. I don't think the hypocrisy that you think exists actually exists. I don't see anyone that has posted here before, stating they now support Snowden, who had not prior. Just sayin! No back patting this time.

And for the record, he's still a scumbag. And if I were in charge, and could somehow get my paws on him, he would likely have done to him what you despise so much. Gotta know what else the man knows for sure. That's right, electrical cables to his balls. Waterboarding would be on the table, but it might not get that far.
http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6538&stc=1