Mutiverse a desperate dodge from the Designer

[revelarts]

it seems the main Reason Scientist even pursued the unobservable hypothesis of an infinite # of universes or multiverses is because OUR observable Universe is so fine tuned for life and existence that it's MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE unless it was done on purpose.... by a DESIGNER. it's admitted.


New Scientist's mag
Marcus Chown explains:

Should the fine-tuning turn out to be real, what are we to make of it? There are two widely-discussed possibilities: either God fine-tuned the universe for us to be here, or there are (as string theory implies) a large number of universes, each with different laws of physics, and we happen to find ourselves in a universe where the laws happen to be just right for us to live. After all, how could we not?
CultureLab: A physicist finds God in cosmic harmonies (http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/05/looking-for-god-in-the-cosmic-details.html)
A physicist finds God in cosmic harmonies
12:24 19 May 2010
...

Another New Scientist writer has explained:
"But the main reason for believing in an ensemble of universes is that it could explain why the laws governing our Universe appear to be so finely turned for our existence ... This fine-tuning has two possible explanations. Either the Universe was designed specifically for us by a creator or there is a multitude of universes -- a multiverse."

Evolution - June 1998: Re: Anything goes? (http://www2.asa3.org/archive/evolution/199806/0130.html)
....

Discover Magazine offers the multiverse as "Science's Alternative to an Intelligent Creator" (2008).
... Quote:

<tbody>
Science's Alternative to an Intelligent Creator: the Multiverse Theory | DiscoverMagazine.com (http://discovermagazine.com/2008/dec/10-sciences-alternative-to-an-intelligent-creator)
Science's Alternative to an Intelligent Creator: the Multiverse TheoryOur universe is perfectly tailored for life. That may be the work of God or the result of our universe being one of many.
By Tim Folger|Monday, November 10, 2008

</tbody>



and the thing is the multiverse is near pure speculation, groping for support.
That some physicist don't even accept as real science.

[revelarts]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpIiIaC4kRA

[pete311]

To believe in God is reasonable. To believe in a man made God is not.

[revelarts]

Physicist admitting the universe is too fined tuned to be random and the multiverse is a bad solution and not even a decent theory.
the only other option a fine tuner.
All the wind taken out of Richard Dawkins as he's left with nothing to lean on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=z4E_bT4ecgk


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4E_bT4ecgk

[pete311]

Physicist admitting the universe is too fined tuned to be random and the multiverse is a bad solution and not even a decent theory.
the only other option a fine tuner.
All the wind taken out of Richard Dawkins as he's left with nothing to lean on.


yup, that's it, you did it, nobel prize to you... for internet message board logic...

[SassyLady]

yup, that's it, you did it, nobel prize to you... for internet message board logic...

As someone recently said "the argument may be too nuanced for some". Perhaps you are missing the point.