Salafists Form 'Sharia Police' In Order To Enforce Sharia Law in Germany

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

http://en.ria.ru/analysis/20140906/192692316/Salafists-Form-Sharia-Police-In-Order-To-Enforce-Sharia-Law-in.html

Salafists Form 'Sharia Police' In Order To Enforce Sharia Law in Germany

MOSCOW, September 6 (RIA Novosti), Ekaterina Blinova - Eleven members of the self-proclaimed "Sharia Police," which were allegedly trying to "influence and recruit" German youths, were stopped by local police on Wednesday, September 3, in Wuppertal, a city of 350,000.

"These people's intention is to provoke and intimidate and force their ideology (upon others)," claimed Peter Jung, Wuppertal's mayor, adding that Wuppertal has always been an "open and tolerant city, which is proud of the fact that people of different religions and convictions live together in peace," as cited by Deutsche Welle.

The followers of Salafism, a fundamentalist form of Islam were seen on Wednesday, September 3, dressed in orange traffic safety vests with the words 'Sharia Police' on their backs, 'patrolling' the streets of Wuppertal. The Salafi volunteers have declared the nightlife areas of Wuppertal to be a 'Sharia Controlled Zone,' and persuaded young people "to refrain from alcohol, drugs, gambling, attending concerts, watching pornography or visiting prostitutes," the media source notes.

"What have all the grumblers now coming out of the woodwork done for wayward youth? Do you realize how many are buying and consuming drugs? If you are so honest and good, where is your shrieking and outrage?" read the statement on the 'Sharia Police Germany' Facebook page, as cited by United Press International.

A propaganda video, posted on YouTube by German Salafists, shows Muslim volunteers urging young people to visit Salafists' mosques and offers them 'a path to paradise.'

The initiative of the Muslim fundamentalists has immediately provoked serious concerns among the city-dwellers and the state authorities, who suspect the 'Sharia Police' members areencouraging German youths to join ISIS or other Islamist radical groups. It is worth mentioning that Northrhein-Westphalia's Salafist community consists of 1,800 members, ten of whom are considered to be radical extremists.

Deutsche Welle has cited Birgitta Rademacher, the Wuppertal Police Chief, as saying: "Intimidation or provocation won't be tolerated." She also added that the so-called 'Sharia Police' had no legitimate right to act as police in Germany.

"The video is a new provocation and part of the Salafist propaganda, which shows that the scene does not acknowledge Germany's rule of law," stressed Joerg Rademacher, the German Interior Minister spokesperson, as quoted by the NBC News.

It is not the first time Muslim fundamentalists are trying to enforce Sharia law in European cities. In 2013, the Guardian reported of self-styled "Muslim Patrol" vigilantes jailed for harassing London civilians. The gang had assaulted Britons for drinking alcohol, claiming, reportedly: "Why are you poisoning your body? It is against Islam. This is Muslim Patrol. Kill the non-believers."

In the wake of the increased domestic threat, posed by the Islamic State's followers, experts call the European governments to keep an eye on local sectarian Islamic groups.

What other religion--arms its members and goes out into the streets to enforce its religious laws(Sharia law)???
They should have shot down those vermin for such tyranny and treason..
What, you say no way???
Ok tell me where you live so I can bring my religious law to force upon you.
Do you think those armed fanatics were playing patty-cake or what.
They were armed--they should have been shot down like the scum they are IMHO.
Let 'em come into my neighborhood at night doing that and I'll reply with my own means of force.. They will not survive attempting to take my freedom away.. Fact
Armed men unlawfully confront me I'll shoot first and ask questions later.
At the very least those men should get life in prison IMHO.
Folks , this is exactly what Islam is... It is a barbaric , murdering enslaving cult founded by a child molesting piece of mad raving scum...-Tyr

[Gaffer]

I have a suggestion. All western countries need to outlaw sharia law. They can worship any way they want, they just can't use sharia law in any way.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I have a suggestion. All western countries need to outlaw sharia law. They can worship any way they want, they just can't use sharia law in any way.

NOT PC AND---

Dat iz racist!!!! ;)--Tyr

[fj1200]

I have a suggestion. All western countries need to outlaw sharia law. They can worship any way they want, they just can't use sharia law in any way.

They should be forced to eat pork?


Dat iz racist!!!! ;)--Tyr

It's dawning on me that you don't know what the word means.

[jimnyc]

They should be forced to eat pork?

The radicalized version of Sharia is likely what he refers to - where people are killed for apostasy, adultery and other petty crimes. TONS of discrimination towards women as well, and it varies. But the radical side of Islam is larger than most will admit, millions at the bare minimum, up to hundreds of millions if you believe the research.

At any rate, to be more specific, maybe outlaw everything within except for things like you pointed out that are technically harmless to anyone. Ban any and all instances that would in any remote way go against our laws. It's not against the law to be an apostate, or cheat on your wife. It's not against the law to say muhammed sucks ass. But many out there would have you killed for that, and much less.

[fj1200]

The radicalized version of Sharia is likely what he refers to - where people are killed for apostasy, adultery and other petty crimes. TONS of discrimination towards women as well, and it varies. But the radical side of Islam is larger than most will admit, millions at the bare minimum, up to hundreds of millions if you believe the research.

At any rate, to be more specific, maybe outlaw everything within except for things like you pointed out that are technically harmless to anyone. Ban any and all instances that would in any remote way go against our laws. It's not against the law to be an apostate, or cheat on your wife. It's not against the law to say muhammed sucks ass. But many out there would have you killed for that, and much less.

Unlikely but I would venture a guess that anything Sharia that is not technically harmless is already illegal. The point is just that any form of "Sharia police" should have no force of law or coercion.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

It's dawning on me that you don't know what the word means.
It is dawning on me that you are either a totally clueless fool , a damn propagandist or about as smart as a damn brick..:laugh:-Tyr

[fj1200]

It is dawning on me that you are either a totally clueless fool , a damn propagandist or about as smart as a damn brick..:laugh:-Tyr

I suppose that you'll be able to point out the races involved here then.

[jimnyc]

Unlikely but I would venture a guess that anything Sharia that is not technically harmless is already illegal. The point is just that any form of "Sharia police" should have no force of law or coercion.

So long as not a single place in the land allows for a separate 'court' of sorts for them to rule their own shariah. They MUST use solely our own courts and laws.

[fj1200]

So long as not a single place in the land allows for a separate 'court' of sorts for them to rule their own shariah. They MUST use solely our own courts and laws.

Secular Court Called on To Enforce Beth Din Ruling

The filing sheds light on an unusual area of the law, in which American courts can enforce the result of a Jewish legal ruling. American courts have historically maintained a strict separation between religious and secular law and have rejected attempts to enlist secular courts in religious disputes. But in civil disputes, the courts can and do enforce binding arbitrations of all stripes, including those carried out by a beth din.

“In general, the United States believes in freedom of contract. If you and I agree to conduct ourselves by Jewish law, the courts will require that, not because they believe in Jewish law but because they believe in contracts law,” said Rabbi Michael Broyde, a law professor at Emory University School of Law and a member of the Beth Din of America. (He is not involved, or familiar, with this case.)
http://forward.com/articles/13431/secular-court-called-on-to-enforce-beth-din-ruling-/#ixzz3Ck2FRDSa

[jimnyc]

Secular Court Called on To Enforce Beth Din Ruling

http://forward.com/articles/13431/secular-court-called-on-to-enforce-beth-din-ruling-/#ixzz3Ck2FRDSa

I wouldn't have an issue with that if the muslims throughout the world haven't used Sharia a zillion times over in order to kill and subjugate women. The subjugation could easily exist with little muslim kangaroo courts deciding their fates. Time and time and time again it's been shown that sharia has been used to enforce a dominating way of life. To enforce a contract is one thing, to have a separate court that oversees almost every aspect of your life though?

Remember what Abso and Jafar taught us - Muslim and Sharia are one, and it's a way of integrated life. Their entire lives are to be molded around sharia. They want no part of our courts, and I say tough shit. If you live here, you live under the rules here.

[Gaffer]

Secular Court Called on To Enforce Beth Din Ruling

http://forward.com/articles/13431/secular-court-called-on-to-enforce-beth-din-ruling-/#ixzz3Ck2FRDSa

Contract law doesn't call for beheadings and stoning. A ruling was upheld by the secular court. It had nothing to do with religion other than where the ruling came from.

[fj1200]

I wouldn't have an issue with that if the muslims throughout the world haven't used Sharia a zillion times over in order to kill and subjugate women. The subjugation could easily exist with little muslim kangaroo courts deciding their fates. Time and time and time again it's been shown that sharia has been used to enforce a dominating way of life. To enforce a contract is one thing, to have a separate court that oversees almost every aspect of your life though?

Remember what Abso and Jafar taught us - Muslim and Sharia are one, and it's a way of integrated life. Their entire lives are to be molded around sharia. They want no part of our courts, and I say tough shit. If you live here, you live under the rules here.

And we are not a theocracy so that isn't the source of our laws. If my religion says do not commit adultery and I do they are free to kick me out of the church. The question isn't just answered by, "aack Sharia."


Contract law doesn't call for beheadings and stoning. A ruling was upheld by the secular court. It had nothing to do with religion other than where the ruling came from.

That's the point. And not all Sharia ends in beheadings and stonings.

[jimnyc]

That's the point. And not all Sharia ends in beheadings and stonings.

But MANY do, and MANY, if not MOST, end up with women discriminated against in a major way and/or subjugated. It's not fair to compare with other religions - as I know of no other modern religion, that has a set of laws, where people are killed as a result, imprisoned for petty crimes, body defaced for petty crimes... These are not remote instances, but rather daily instances.

[fj1200]

But MANY do, and MANY, if not MOST, end up with women discriminated against in a major way and/or subjugated. It's not fair to compare with other religions - as I know of no other modern religion, that has a set of laws, where people are killed as a result, imprisoned for petty crimes, body defaced for petty crimes... These are not remote instances, but rather daily instances.

I don't disagree that they have major problems but if there is one instance of a religious court arbitrating then what's the difference between another religious court arbitrating? There are plenty of instances of arbitration and mediation that go on in this country. Besides any instance of discrimination or subjugation is still against other laws in this country.

[jimnyc]

I don't disagree that they have major problems but if there is one instance of a religious court arbitrating then what's the difference between another religious court arbitrating? There are plenty of instances of arbitration and mediation that go on in this country. Besides any instance of discrimination or subjugation is still against other laws in this country.

I don't take issue with arbitration, but that's not really a separate court as I meant it. Many companies demand 'binding arbitration' and such. It's using Sharia law as a total. Arbitration would touch upon about .02% of Sharia. And if that's the case, I have no issue with that.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I suppose that you'll be able to point out the races involved here then.




NOT PC AND---

Dat iz racist!!!!- ;) --Tyr

It is not about race, reason why there was this added--;)
I just like to toss it back because I've been called a racist so many times for my criticisms of Islam.
Even here years ago. :laugh:
I am sure Gaffer caught it...Tyr

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I don't disagree that they have major problems but if there is one instance of a religious court arbitrating then what's the difference between another religious court arbitrating? There are plenty of instances of arbitration and mediation that go on in this country. Besides any instance of discrimination or subjugation is still against other laws in this country.

They do not arbitrate -death to apostates, stonings for adultery, cutting off hands for stealing, death for blasphemy, execution for being Jew or Christian etc..
Arbitration is for civil matters Hoss. Figures you'd run away from the serious stuff to try to defend the bastards!!
GOOGLE SHARIA LAW and COME BACK TO DEFEND THE SERIOUS STUFF...
Mr. Spinmaster...... :laugh:

Sharia law is what they force on all--when they have control.
And its not arbitration then junior! --Tyr

Here just for you, thank me later ok?



Sharia law is the law of Islam. The Sharia (also spelled Shariah or Shari'a) law is cast from the actions and words of Muhammad, which are called "Sunnah," and the Quran, which he authored.

The Sharia law itself cannot be altered, but the interpretation of the Sharia law, called "figh," by imams is given some leeway.

As a legal system, the Sharia law covers a very wide range of topics. While other legal codes deal primarily with public behavior, Sharia law covers public behavior, private behavior and private beliefs. Of all legal systems in the world today, Islam's Sharia law is the most intrusive and strict, especially against women.

According to the Sharia law:

• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.

Where in the world is the Sharia law actually in use?

Muslims' aspired Sharia-ruled state is Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Muhammad. It has no legal code other than the Sharia, which is enforced without mercy (see Sharia law in Saudi Arabia). But the Sharia law is also used in full or in part, nationally or regionally in:

• Afghanistan (89%)**
• Algeria
• Austria*
• Bahrain
• Bangladesh (82%)**
• Brunei
• Canada*
• Comoros
• Djibouti (82%)**
• Egypt (74%)**
• Eritrea
• Ethiopia
• France*
• Gambia
• Germany*
• Ghana
• India
• Indonesia (72%)**
• Iran
• Iraq (91%)**
• Jordan (71%)**
• Kenya
• Kuwait
• Libya
• Lebanon
• Malaysia (86%)**
• Maldives
• Mauritania
• Morocco (83%)**
• The Netherlands*
• Nigeria
• Oman
• Pakistan (84%)**
• Palestinian territories (Gaza strip & the West Bank - 89%)**
• Qatar
• Saudi Arabia
• Somalia
• Spain*
• Sudan
• Sri Lanka
• Syria
• Tanzania
• Thailand (77%)**
• Uganda
• United Arab Emirates (UAE)
• United Kingdom*
• United States of America*
• Yemen

* In the United States of America, Canada, United Kingdom, and other European countries that resist the penetration of Sharia law, it has proven adept at infiltrating elements of the society that are left vulnerable (see Sharia law in America and the Islamization of America).

** Percent of Muslims who favor making Sharia the official law in their country (source: Pew Forum Research, 2013). In many countries where an official secular legal system exists alongside Sharia, the vast majority of their Muslim citizens favor making Sharia the official law. For example, while the Egyptian military may have blocked the Muslim Brotherhood's efforts in this direction, 74% of Egypt's Muslims still favor it. Even in Jordan, Indonesia and Malaysia - Muslim countries with progressive images - the relatively secular ruling elite sit atop Muslim masses, 71%, 72% and 86% respectively of whom want their countries to be ruled by Sharia. And in Iraq, where the United States shed blood and money for over a decade to try to plant democracy, 91% of its Muslims want to live under Sharia.

[fj1200]

I don't take issue with arbitration, but that's not really a separate court as I meant it. Many companies demand 'binding arbitration' and such. It's using Sharia law as a total. Arbitration would touch upon about .02% of Sharia. And if that's the case, I have no issue with that.

That will never happen, we don't live in a theocracy.

[fj1200]

It is not about race, reason why there was this added--;)
I just like to toss it back because I've been called a racist so many times for my criticisms of Islam.
Even here years ago. :laugh:
I am sure Gaffer caught it...Tyr

Of course it's not about race. You just enjoy trolling.

[fj1200]

They do not arbitrate -death to apostates, stonings for adultery, cutting off hands for stealing, death for blasphemy, execution for being Jew or Christian etc..
Arbitration is for civil matters Hoss. Figures you'd run away from the serious stuff to try to defend the bastards!!
GOOGLE SHARIA LAW and COME BACK TO DEFEND THE SERIOUS STUFF...
Mr. Spinmaster...... :laugh:

Sharia law is what they force on all--when they have control.
And its not arbitration then junior! --Tyr

Here just for you, thank me later ok?

I'm sorry, was there something in your post that I didn't know? You could also point out where I defended the "serious stuff." Besides, I summed up your position way back here.


"Aack Sharia."

:slap:

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Of course it's not about race. You just enjoy trolling.

So my reply to my friend Gaffer was trolling????
Exactly how the hell was my reply trolling?
I am serious, this I got to know...
Enlighten me please if you can..
I mean you have recently called me a racist and now a troll.

Please ask admin here to ban me for my trolling.
If they do I'll abide by it.
If they do not then your ridiculous charge proves something about you rather than about me.
Logic baby, I use it often when not ranting. :laugh: --Tyr

[fj1200]

So my reply to my friend Gaffer was trolling????
Exactly how the hell was my reply trolling?
I am serious, this I got to know...
Enlighten me please if you can..
I mean you have recently called me a racist and now a troll.

Please ask admin here to ban me for my trolling.
If they do I'll abide by it.
If they do not then your ridiculous charge proves something about you rather than about me.
Logic baby, I use it often when not ranting. :laugh: --Tyr

That must be the key; when are you not ranting? :dunno: But I guess I get to prove something else:


In Internet slang (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_slang), a troll (/ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English)ˈ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)t (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)r (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)oʊ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)l (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)/ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English), / (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English)ˈ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)t (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)r (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)ɒ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)l (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)/ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English)) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-Campbell-Trolls-1) by posting inflammatory,[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-2) extraneous (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/extraneous#Adjective), or off-topic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-topic) messages in an online community

Sweet! Are you going to create three more threads whining about this too? Nevertheless I don't really care if you troll, it just makes it easier to identify who the hypocrites are. ;)

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

That must be the key; when are you not ranting? :dunno: But I guess I get to prove something else:

When are you going to prove your previous dumbass accusations?:laugh:




Sweet! Are you going to create three more threads whining about this too? Nevertheless I don't really care if you troll, it just makes it easier to identify who the hypocrites are. ;)

^^^^ Just like a liberal, make multiple false accusations , then criticize that person for daring to defend against character attacks.
You make multiple false accusations and then you complain because I dare to answer back.. That is typical lib/dem tactics 101 at every political forum I've been at for over a decade now.
Logic says my high post count , high thank you count and high rep point to a great many here agreeing with my posts yet YOU are actually saying either they are all duped , or else stupid or applauding my trollish, hypocritical and racist ways..
Thus far in recent weeks you called me a racist, a troll and a hypocrite.
When all that insulting leaps forth one knows the accuser has failed to win any damn thing previously.

Since I get such high marks from so many members(including admin here) it is quite apparent your accusations are not only false but part of a personal agenda with you. That is just sad!

Please do continue for its only your lack of honor, integrity and emotional control showing for all to see.
For if your accusations were founded I'd been ran off ages ago!
And at the very least not been applauded so often by honorable, respected members here.


Can you add some more to these false three accusations?
1. Racist
2. Troll
3. Hypocrite

Remember , accuracy counts. :laugh:--Tyr

[fj1200]

Can you add some more to these false three accusations?
1. Racist
2. Troll
3. Hypocrite

Remember , accuracy counts. :laugh:--Tyr

Quoting would count but you're not very good at that. Besides, 1. I've proven a couple of times now, 2. I don't care that you troll, and 3. I wasn't calling you a hypocrite. As far as #1 goes I can't really control what you believe but I thought you'd be man enough to admit to it. :dunno:

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Quoting would count but you're not very good at that. Besides, 1. I've proven a couple of times now, 2. I don't care that you troll, and 3. I wasn't calling you a hypocrite. As far as #1 goes I can't really control what you believe but I thought you'd be man enough to admit to it. :dunno:

Gooooooooooooood enough to get you to run from this shown again below ..:laugh:
When I pointed out your spin into arbitration on civil matters concerning Sharia law away from the serious actions like murder, rape, cutting off body parts and absolute and total degradation of women! -Tyr


Sharia law is the law of Islam. The Sharia (also spelled Shariah or Shari'a) law is cast from the actions and words of Muhammad, which are called "Sunnah," and the Quran, which he authored.

The Sharia law itself cannot be altered, but the interpretation of the Sharia law, called "figh," by imams is given some leeway.

As a legal system, the Sharia law covers a very wide range of topics. While other legal codes deal primarily with public behavior, Sharia law covers public behavior, private behavior and private beliefs. Of all legal systems in the world today, Islam's Sharia law is the most intrusive and strict, especially against women.

According to the Sharia law:

• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.

Where in the world is the Sharia law actually in use?

Muslims' aspired Sharia-ruled state is Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Muhammad. It has no legal code other than the Sharia, which is enforced without mercy (see Sharia law in Saudi Arabia). But the Sharia law is also used in full or in part, nationally or regionally in:

• Afghanistan (89%)**
• Algeria
• Austria*
• Bahrain
• Bangladesh (82%)**
• Brunei
• Canada*
• Comoros
• Djibouti (82%)**
• Egypt (74%)**
• Eritrea
• Ethiopia
• France*
• Gambia
• Germany*
• Ghana
• India
• Indonesia (72%)**
• Iran
• Iraq (91%)**
• Jordan (71%)**
• Kenya
• Kuwait
• Libya
• Lebanon
• Malaysia (86%)**
• Maldives
• Mauritania
• Morocco (83%)**
• The Netherlands*
• Nigeria
• Oman
• Pakistan (84%)**
• Palestinian territories (Gaza strip & the West Bank - 89%)**
• Qatar
• Saudi Arabia
• Somalia
• Spain*
• Sudan
• Sri Lanka
• Syria
• Tanzania
• Thailand (77%)**
• Uganda
• United Arab Emirates (UAE)
• United Kingdom*
• United States of America*
• Yemen

* In the United States of America, Canada, United Kingdom, and other European countries that resist the penetration of Sharia law, it has proven adept at infiltrating elements of the society that are left vulnerable (see Sharia law in America and the Islamization of America).

** Percent of Muslims who favor making Sharia the official law in their country (source: Pew Forum Research, 2013). In many countries where an official secular legal system exists alongside Sharia, the vast majority of their Muslim citizens favor making Sharia the official law. For example, while the Egyptian military may have blocked the Muslim Brotherhood's efforts in this direction, 74% of Egypt's Muslims still favor it. Even in Jordan, Indonesia and Malaysia - Muslim countries with progressive images - the relatively secular ruling elite sit atop Muslim masses, 71%, 72% and 86% respectively of whom want their countries to be ruled by Sharia. And in Iraq, where the United States shed blood and money for over a decade to try to plant democracy, 91% of its Muslims want to live under Sharia.

And both of these.--Tyr



http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?37131-Most-recent-muslim-terrorist-attacks/page51



http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?36912-I-take-my-stand-you/page84


I take my stand, you?
Started by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot, 09-12-2012 07:32 PM
1
2
3... 84 pages


13 Attachment(s)
Replies: 1,259
Views: 22,029
--------------------------------------------------------

Most recent muslim terrorist attacks..


Started by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot, 09-30-2012 09:44 AM
1
2
3... 51 pages


22 Attachment(s)
Replies: 757
Views: 16,984


^^^^ Not bad for troll work, eh? TOTALS of --135 PAGES , 2,016 REPLIES AND OVER 39,000 VIEWS...

Methinks that is quite some kind of trolling to be ignored ,huh? :lol:

[fj1200]

Gooooooooooooood enough to get you to run from this shown again below ..:laugh:
When I pointed out your spin into arbitration on civil matters concerning Sharia law away from the serious actions like murder, rape, cutting off body parts and absolute and total degradation of women! -Tyr

And both of these.--Tyr

^^^^ Not bad for troll work, eh? TOTALS of --135 PAGES , 2,016 REPLIES AND OVER 39,000 VIEWS...
Methinks that is quite some kind of trolling to be ignored ,huh? :lol:

What are you on about now? Trying to create what I think in your imagination? Your buddy isn't good at it and apparently neither are you. I already said my piece on non-civil Sharia:


Unlikely but I would venture a guess that anything Sharia that is not technically harmless is already illegal. The point is just that any form of "Sharia police" should have no force of law or coercion.

I just don't feel the need to look like a raving lunatic while doing so. You though...

[Drummond]

What are you on about now? Trying to create what I think in your imagination? Your buddy isn't good at it and apparently neither are you. I already said my piece on non-civil Sharia:



I just don't feel the need to look like a raving lunatic while doing so. You though...

Well, now. I see you've moved on from trolling me, to trolling Tyr.

When you're finished with Tyr, who will you move on to next ?

Only one response (.. keeping it decent !) really fits, doesn't it, FJ ? Namely ....

:trolls::trolls::trolls::trolls::trolls:

[Drummond]

Oh, by the way, FJ ....


In Internet slang (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_slang), a troll (/ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English)ˈ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)t (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)r (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)oʊ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)l (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)/ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English), / (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English)ˈ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)t (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)r (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)ɒ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)l (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English#Key)/ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_English)) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-Campbell-Trolls-1) by posting inflammatory,[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)#cite_note-2) extraneous (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/extraneous#Adjective), or off-topic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-topic) messages in an online community

Anyone reviewing our many past exchanges cannot help but observe the above to be an excellent summary of tactics YOU have employed !!

Ever heard the saying 'People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' .. ??

[fj1200]

Well, now. I see you've moved on from trolling me, to trolling Tyr.

Aah, yes. There you are.


... it just makes it easier to identify who the hypocrites are. ;)

:)


When you're finished with Tyr, who will you move on to next ?

If you could point out the doddering fool with paranoid delusions and an active imagination paired with an utter inability to have a rational debate... ;) I'll surely set my leftie* sights on them! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

*obvious sarcasm


Oh, by the way, FJ ....

:blah:

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

What are you on about now? Trying to create what I think in your imagination? Your buddy isn't good at it and apparently neither are you. I already said my piece on non-civil Sharia:



I just don't feel the need to look like a raving lunatic while doing so. You though...

I should think that your accusation of my not being very good at it is answered right here!-Tyr






http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?46646-Another-great-site-for-information-on-the-muslim-threat-that-faces-us-and-the-world!
Another great site for information on the muslim threat that faces us and the world!

I noticed that you took the third option I gave there. :laugh:--Tyr

[fj1200]

I should think that your accusation of my not being very good at it is answered right here!-Tyr

I noticed that you took the third option I gave there. :laugh:--Tyr

Ten days to respond and that's what you come up with? At least make it intelligible next time.