Little-Acorn
06-30-2014, 01:57 PM
Will the Courts next rule that private individuals also cannot be forced to pay their Obamacare premiums if it's for a policy that has contraceptions methods they object to on religious grounds?
They can't rule until a case is brought, of course. But if/when one is, will this be the next step?
The Supremes just ruled that certain employers cannot be forced by government, to pay for an "insurance"policy for their employees, if it has contraception methods that violates the employer's religious beliefs.
When will that decision be extended to the obvious place: Not forcing Obamacare on private individuals to pay for it themselves, if it contains those contraceptive methods that violate the private individual's religious beliefs?
Employers aren't the only ones paying for this white elephant of an "insurance" scheme. The people getting the insurance, have to pay, too.
And while the Supremes have ruled that the penalty written into Obamacare that fines you for not signing up, isn't a penalty but a tax, that desn't mean it's not coercive anyway. It's just another method the Fed govt is using to force you to do things against your bgetter judgment.
If some employers can't be forced to do that, then private individuals with religious objections shouldn't be forced to, either. The ban on such govt cercion, should be even stronger for private individuals than for employers.
They can't rule until a case is brought, of course. But if/when one is, will this be the next step?
The Supremes just ruled that certain employers cannot be forced by government, to pay for an "insurance"policy for their employees, if it has contraception methods that violates the employer's religious beliefs.
When will that decision be extended to the obvious place: Not forcing Obamacare on private individuals to pay for it themselves, if it contains those contraceptive methods that violate the private individual's religious beliefs?
Employers aren't the only ones paying for this white elephant of an "insurance" scheme. The people getting the insurance, have to pay, too.
And while the Supremes have ruled that the penalty written into Obamacare that fines you for not signing up, isn't a penalty but a tax, that desn't mean it's not coercive anyway. It's just another method the Fed govt is using to force you to do things against your bgetter judgment.
If some employers can't be forced to do that, then private individuals with religious objections shouldn't be forced to, either. The ban on such govt cercion, should be even stronger for private individuals than for employers.