nevadamedic
06-19-2007, 01:08 AM
Story Highlights
• Final arguments ended Wednesday in a $54 million lawsuit over pants
• Judge chided plaintiff for rambling, repetitive, inaccurate presentation
• Plaintiff took superior service promise literally, cited consumer law
• Judge plans to issue a written ruling next week
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/06/13/trouser.trial/index.html
This is the dumbest thing I have ever herd. Suing for $54 Million because you wern't happy with the service. Then paying $15,000 dollars to rent a car so they could goto a different dry cleaners? This is a complete abuse of the system.
• Final arguments ended Wednesday in a $54 million lawsuit over pants
• Judge chided plaintiff for rambling, repetitive, inaccurate presentation
• Plaintiff took superior service promise literally, cited consumer law
• Judge plans to issue a written ruling next week
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/06/13/trouser.trial/index.html
This is the dumbest thing I have ever herd. Suing for $54 Million because you wern't happy with the service. Then paying $15,000 dollars to rent a car so they could goto a different dry cleaners? This is a complete abuse of the system.